Диссертация (1136788), страница 37
Текст из файла (страница 37)
1027.122. Morris R.T., Murphy R.J. The Situs Dimension in OccupationalStructure// American Sociological Review. - 1959. Vol.24. - P. 231-239.123. OECD Employment Outlook. Chapter 2. “Declaring Work or StayingUnderground: Informal Employment in Seven OECD Countries”, 2008.124. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being. - OECDPublishing, 2013219125. Ossowski S. Class Structure in the Social Consciousness. - London:Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.126.
Ostrove J.M. et al. Objective and subjective assessments ofsocioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in anethnically diverse sample of pregnant women// Health Psychology. - 2000.Vol. 19. No.6. - P. 613–618.127. Pages C., Madrigal L. Is informality a good measure of job quality?Evidence from job satisfaction data. Research Department by Inter-AmericanDevelopment Bank Working Paper Series. - 2008. WP # 654.128. Pahl R. E.
Employment, Work, and the Domestic Division of Labour///International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. - 1980. Vol. 4(March).- P.1-20.129. Parkin F. Strategies of social closure in class formation/ In: The socialanalysis of class structure. Ed. by Parkin. F. - London: Tavistock, 1974.130. Peattie, L.R. Anthropological perspectives on the concepts of dualism,the informal sector, and marginality in developing urban economies//International Regional Science. - 1980.
Vol.5. - P. 1–31.131. Perry et al. Informality: exit and exclusion. Latin America and theCaribbean studies report. - The World Bank, 2007.132. Pianto D.M., Tannuri-Pianto M. Informal Employment in Brazil: AChoice at the Top and Segmentation at the Bottom: A Quantile RegressionApproach. XXIV Meeting of the Brazilian Econometrics Society, 2002.133. Piore M.J. Birds of Passage. Migrant Labour and Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.134. Piore M. J. Labor Market Segmentation: To What Paradigm Does ItBelong?// The American Economic Review. - 1983. Vo.
73. - P. 249-253.135. Piore M., Doeringer P. Internal labor markets and manpower analysis.- Lexington: Heath Lexington Books, 1971.220136. Portes A. The Informal Economy and Its Paradoxes/ In: The Handbookof Economic sociology. Ed. by Smelser N. and Swedberg R. - Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1994. P. 426-446.137. Portes A.
Economic Sociology: A systematic inquiry. - PrincetonUniversity Press. 2010.138. Portes A., Haller W. The Informal Economy/ In: Handbook ofEconomic Sociology, 2nd edition. Ed. by Smelser N. and Swedberg R. - NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.139. Qu Xiao-bo. Wage Gap between Formal Employment and InformalEmployment: Based on income inequality decomposition of informalheterogeneity// South China Journal of Economics.
- 2012.Vol. 30. No.4. - P.32-42.140. Reich M., Gordon D.M., Edwards R.C. Dual Labor Markets: A Theoryof Labor Market Segmentation// Economics Department Faculty Publications,University of Nebraska – Lincoln. 1973.141. Reitzel et al. Subjective social status affects smoking abstinence duringacute withdrawal through affective mediators// Addiction. - 2010. Vol. 105.No. 5. - P. 928-936.142. Reza Arabsheibani G., Staneva A.
Is There an Informal EmploymentWage Premium? Evidence from Tajikistan. IZA Discussion Paper Series. 2012. IZA DP No. 6727.143. Rona-Tas A., Sagi M. Entrepreneurship and Self-Employment inTransition Economies// Entrepreneurship (Research in the Sociology ofWork).- 2005. Vol. 15. - PP.279-310.144. Saavedra J., Chong A. Structural reform, institutions and earnings:Evidence from the formal and informal sectors in urban Peru// Journal ofDevelopment Studies. - 1999. Vol.
35. No.4. - P.95-116.221145. Saavedra J., Tommasi M. Informality, the State and the social contractin Latin America: A preliminary exploration// International Labour Review.2007. Vol. 146. No. 3–4.- P.279-309.146. Sakurai et al. The impact of subjective and objective social status onpsychological distress among men and women in Japan// Social Science &Medicine. - 2010. Vol. 70.
No. 11. - P. 1832-1839.147. Sassen S. Cities Today: A New Frontier for Major Developments// TheAnnals of the American Academy. - 2009. AAPSS, No. 626. - P.53-71.148. Shepelak N.J. The Role of Self-Explanations and Self-Evaluations inLegitimating Inequality// American Sociological Review. - 1987. Vol.52.No.4.- P. 495-503.149. Shevchuk A., Strebkov D. Freelance Contracting in the Digital Age:Informality, Virtuality and Social Ties / Working papers by NRU HigherSchool of Economics.
Series SOC "Sociology". - 2012. No. 12/SOC/2012.150. Singh-Manoux A. et al. Subjective social status: its determinants and itsassociation with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study// SocialScience & Medicine. - 2003. Vol.56. No. 6. - P. 1321–1333.151. Slonimczyk F. The Effect of Taxation on Informal Employment:Evidence from the Russian Flat Tax Reform.
Серия препринтов WP3"Проблемы рынка труда". - 2011. WP3/2011/05.152. Slonimczyk F. Informality as a Stepping Stone. Серия препринтовWP3 "Проблемы рынка труда". - 2013. WP3/2013/05.153. Sorokin P. A. Social and Cultural Mobility. - New York: Free Press,1959.154. Special focus: Inequality in Emerging Economies/ In: Divided WeStand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. OECD report, 2011.155. Tansel A. Wage Earners, Self-Employment and Gender in the InformalSector in Turkey. Policy Research Report on Gender and Development.No.24. - Washington: The World Bank, 2000.222156. Tansel A., Kan E. O.
The formal/informal employment earnings gap:evidence from Turkey. MPRA Paper Series. - 2012. No. 38498.157. Temkin B. Informal Self-Employment in Developing Countries:Entrepreneurship or Survivalist Strategy? Some Implications for PublicPolicy// Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. - 2009. Vol. 9.No. 1.158. Thornton P. H. The sociology of entrepreneurship// Annual Review ofSociology.
- 1999. Vol. 25. No. 19–46.159. Wachsberger et al. Job satisfaction and Informal Sector in Vietnam. In:International Conference about The Informal Sector &Informal Employment:Statistical Measurement, Economic Implications and Public Policies. Onlineconferencematerials.2010.URLhttp://www.colloques.tamdaoconf.com/en/ii-parallel-sessions/sectoralallocation-social-constraints/ Дата доступа: 12.04.2013.160. Weber M.
Class, status and party/ In: Class , status and power. Ed.by Bendix R. and Lipset S.M. - NY: Free Press, 1966.161. Weeden K. A. Why Do Some Occupations Pay More than Others?Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States// AmericanJournal of Sociology. - 2002. Vol. 108.
No. 1. - P. 55-101.162. Weeden K.A., Grusky D. Are there any big classes at all?/ In: TheShape of Social Inequality: Stratification and Ethnicity in ComparativePerspective. Ed. by Bills D. Vol 22, Research in Social Stratification andMobility. - Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2005. - P. 3–56.163. Weitzman M.L. A Theory of Wage Dispersion and Job MarketSegmentation// The Quarterly Journal of Economics. - 1989.
Vol. 104. - P.121-137.164. Williams C.C., Renooy P. Measures to Tackle Undeclared Work in theEuropean Union. - Eurofund, 2008.223165. Winkelmann R. Subjective Well-Being and the Family: Results from anOrdered Probit Model with Multiple Random Effects. IZA Discussion PaperSeries. 2004. DP No. 1016166. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and PanelData. - Cambridge, MA; London, UK: The MIT Press, 2002.224Приложение 1.Таблица 1.
Распределение респондентов по основным социально-демографическим характеристикам, РМЭЗ НИУВШЭ, 2000-2010, в %.Число наблюденийПолМужчиныЖенщиныТип поселенияобластной центргородПГТ+селоМосква и Санкт-ПетербургОбразованиенеполное среднее и ниженеполное среднее +ПТУполное среднееполное среднее +ПТУсреднее профессиональноевысшееВозраст15-2930-3940-4950-5960+Семейное положениев браке/есть партнернет партнера (включая разведенных,вдовых и проживающих отдельно)20009073200110098200210497200310635200495382005927420061249120071109720081186420091181620101711843,0156,9942,6357,3742,9157,0943,0256,9842,2857,7242,2657,7442,7657,2442,2357,7742,0957,9142,1957,8142,2457,7632,8626,9034,935,3128,9924,8432,4313,7528,4424,3532,1815,0327,9525,2633,2513,5428,4925,9331,3614,2328,3726,0932,5113,0329,4226,3832,2411,9630,3326,5631,2211,9029,9226,1332,4811,4629,6625,8033,0111,5330,9326,2232,6310,2227,564,1821,5912,2519,4314,9825,693,8121,9613,2718,8216,4425,233,8522,0512,7919,2116,8724,744,2022,0412,8219,1617,0419,984,4220,5414,3521,6319,0818,483,8720,9613,5323,6619,4922,353,9420,0612,9921,7118,9517,504,2519,214,1623,7821,120,353,7319,7812,8323,5119,820,213,6218,4113,5723,4720,7215,493,4821,4214,0222,4423,1428,5416,0718,5511,2525,5928,9616,118,3811,1725,3929,215,5818,5411,7724,9129,5716,221812,6623,5523,1318,4419,6515,1723,6123,2518,8918,8915,823,1728,8817,3816,7815,0421,9222,8119,1217,8917,2222,9627,6617,9515,916,0322,4727,4818,3815,3316,0322,7825,2819,4415,8317,4821,9761,6760,7259,7159,8565,0364,3958,1663,8158,5860,2463,6638,3339,2840,2940,1534,9735,6141,8436,1941,4239,7636,34225Продолжение Таблицы 1Статус на рынке трудаСамозанятыеНеформальные работники по наймуФормальные работникиБезработныеНерегулярные работникиЭкономически неактивныеСамооценка здоровьяплохоехорошееСтатус получателя пенсииданет200020012002200320042005200620072008200920101,423,3944,574,375,5740,691,271,7447,44,185,6139,811,663,5145,33,95,2940,341,634,1145,683,595,4539,531,995,9150,213,475,1433,281,75,5950,863,224,3634,271,365,9646,652,965,2337,851,836,2253,272,513,8732,291,815,4649,342,654,0336,711,626,6547,953,154,4736,161,86,4850,953,63,6633,5141,9458,0643,656,442,1957,8141,3358,6742,6157,3939,1360,8739,1660,8440,4859,5235,9864,0235,3564,6535,0164,9932,467,631,4968,5131,568,531,3668,6433,8466,1633,6566,3531,2368,7734,1565,8531,8268,1832,267,832,8467,16226Таблица 2.
Распределение респондентов по основным социально-демографическим характеристикам, ОНПЗ,2000-2010, в %.Число наблюденийПолМужчиныЖенщиныТип поселениягородселоОбразованиевысшее профессиональноенеполное высшее профессиональноесреднее профессиональноеначальное профессиональноесреднее (полное) общееосновное общееначальное общее или без образованияпослевузовскоеВозраст15-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960+Семейное положениев браке/есть партнернет партнера (включая разведенных,вдовых и проживающих отдельно)Статус на рынке трудаНеформальный Наем у физических лицСамозанятые2000260343200129134020022722642003272525200427512520052767742006277291200727901220082779802009485896201083102046,3253,6846,4053,6046,4453,5646,4953,5146,5753,4346,4053,6046,4153,5946,4453,5646,0553,9546,3253,6846,4353,5763,9536,0564,0635,9463,7436,2663,7936,2163,9336,0763,6636,3463,7136,2963,3336,6763,8936,1163,9236,0864,1235,8814,363,4024,288,4924,1216,388,96-15,233,0324,319,2025,0617,275,90-15,482,9624,729,8425,1916,415,41-15,602,5321,7612,7925,6716,455,20-15,942,5920,8813,7326,8415,884,14-16,632,4820,7014,5126,8015,133,74-17,212,3921,1614,8926,4714,533,35-18,062,2521,3014,8427,3113,163,08-18,442,2622,0716,0625,4812,413,28-19,3722,7216,6926,4212,462,210,1419,9022,8617,4426,0911,292,300,1410,7117,8017,7021,6913,6018,5011,2217,9117,0021,9913,7018,1711,2918,3116,5821,9714,4117,4511,2418,7016,4121,6915,5616,4011,2018,8316,2821,4116,8915,3910,8219,2616,1620,8218,0214,9210,3319,5516,3220,2318,8214,759,5619,6716,5519,7819,1815,259,5019,1516,8119,8318,8615,868,9619,8916,7719,0819,7215,568,7119,8817,0218,6920,1315,5760,2659,5358,8558,5758,3057,8257,5458,4559,7357,8858,4839,7440,4741,1541,4341,7042,1842,4641,5540,2742,1241,522,072,022,161,932,362,013,812,094,392,175,072,1650,375,395,612,186,352,365,413,403,094,00227Продолжение Таблицы 2Статус на рынке трудаЗанятые в домашних хозяйствахФормальная занятостьБезработныеЭкономически неактивные20003,5549,936,9035,5320012,3850,575,7837,1820022,5751,615,2136,2420032,0750,445,4436,1422820042,1550,475,2135,6320052,5450,095,0235,1320062,112,554,7034,8820072,4951,234,1934,3020082,0350,174,5134,5820091,8949,485,7334,1020102,0551,435,2234,21Таблица 3.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
