Диссертация (1101774), страница 49
Текст из файла (страница 49)
– Иркутск: Изд-во Иркутского университета,1984. – 336 с.101. ЧуковскийК.И. Собрание сочинений. В 15 т. Т. 7: Литературная критика. 1908-1915.– М.: Агентство ФТМ, 2013. – 734 с.102. ШефферЖ.-М. Что такое литературный жанр? – М.: УРСС, 2010. – 192 с.103. ШильниковаО.Г. Литературно-художественный журнал как «большая литературнаяформа»: теоретико-прагматическая концепция русских формалистов // Вестник ВолГУ.Журналистика.
Серия 8. – 2011. – Вып. 10. – С. 65-72.104. ШкловскийВ.Б. Литература и кинематограф. – Берлин: Рус. универс. изд-во, 1923. –59 с.105. ШкловскийВ.Б. О теории прозы. – М.: Советский писатель, 1983. – 383 с.106. ШкловскийВ.Б. Гамбургский счет: статьи – воспоминания – эссе (1914-33). – М.:Советский писатель, 1990. – 544 с.107. ШкловскийВ.Б. Воскрешение слова // Русский авангард. Манифесты, декларации,программные статьи (1908-1917) /под ред. И.С. Воробьева. – СПб., 2008. – С.
120-129.108. ШлегельФр. Эстетика. Философия. Критика. В 2 Т. Т. 2. – М.: Искусство, 1983. –448 с.109. ЭйхенбаумБ.М. Как сделана «Шинель» Гоголя // Поэтика. – Петроград, 1919. – С.151-167.110. ЭйхенбаумБ.М. Теория «формального метода» // О литературе. – М., 1987. – С. 375-408.111.
ЭсалнекА.Я. Основы литературоведения. – М.: Флинта, 2004. – 179 с.208112. Ямпольский113. ЯуссМ. О близком. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001. – 240 с.Г.Р. История литературы как вызов теории литературы // Современнаялитературная теория. Антология. – М., 2004. – С.
192-201.B. Billion Year Spree: the True History of Science Fiction. – Garden City, N.Y.:114. AldissDoubleday, 1973. – 339 p.115. AldissB. Trillion Year Spree: the History of Science Fiction. – N.Y.: Atheneum, 1986. – 511p.P.K. Science Fiction Before 1900: Imagination Discovers Technology. – N.Y.:116. AlkonRoutledge, 2002. – xix, 176 p.117. AltmanR. A Semantic/Syntactic Approach to Film Genre // Cinema Journal. – 1984. – Vol.23, №3 (Spring). – P. 6-18.118. AltmanR. The American Film Musical. – Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
– x,386 p.119. AmisK. New Maps of Hell: a Survey of Science Fiction. – N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace, and co.,1960. – 161 p.120. AshleyM. The Gernsback Days: A Study of the Evolution of Modern Science Fiction from1911 to 1936. – Rockville, MD: Wildside Press, 2004. – 499 p.121. AstleR.
Lem’s Misreading of Todorov // Science Fiction Studies. – 1975. – Vol. 2, № 2,July. – P. 167-170.122.AtteberyB. The Magazine Era: 1926-1960 // The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction/ ed. by E. James, F. Mandlesohn. – Cambridge, 2003. – P. 32-47.123. BanerjeeA. We Modern People: Science Fiction and the Making of Russian Modernity. –Middletown, CT: Wesleyan UP, 2012. – viii, 206 p.124. BarronN. Anatomy of Wonder. – N.Y.: Bowker, 1987. – xii, 874 p.125. BawarshiA.S., Reiff M. Jo. Genre: An Introduction in History, Theory, Research, andPedagogy.
— West Lafayette: Parlor Press. – 2010. – xiv, 263 p.126. BhatiaV.K. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. – L.; N.Y.: Longman,1993. – xvi, 246 p.127. BiberD., Conrad S. Register, Genre, and Style. – Cambridge, UK; NY: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2009. – ix, 344 p.209E.K. Science Fiction the Early Years. – Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press,128. Bleiler1990. – xxiii, 998 p.129. BroderickD. New Wave and backwash: 1960-80 // The Cambridge Companion to ScienceFiction / ed.
by E. James, F. Mendlesohn. – Cambridge, 2003. – P. 48-63.130. BrooksJ. When Russia Learned to Read: Literacy and Popular Literature, 1861-1917. –Princeton (N.J.): Princeton U.P., 1985. - xxii, 450 p.131. BrunetiereF. L’evolution des Genres dans l’Histoire de la Litterature: 2 Vols. (1890). –Paris: Hachette et Cie, 1914.132. BuckinghamD. Children Talking Television: the Making of Television Literacy.
- L.;Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press, 1993. - xiv, 321 p.R. History and Genre // New Literary History. – 1986. – Vol. 17, № 2 (Winter). – P.133. Cohen203-218.134. CohenR. Genre Theory, Literary History, and Historical Change // Theoretical Issues inLiterary History /ed. David Perkins.
– Cambridge, MA, 1991. – P. 85-113.135. Culler J.Structuralist Poetics. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975. – 301 p.136. DaviesA. New Weird 101 // SFRA Review. – 2010. – № 291, Winter. – P. 6-9.137. DevittA.J. Generalizing about Genre: New Conceptions of a New Concept // CollegeComposition and Communication. – 1993. – Vol. 44, № 4 (December). – P. 573-586.138. DelanyS.R. The Jewel-Hinged Jaw: Notes on the Language of Science Fiction. –Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 2009.
– xxx, 254 p.139. DijkT.A. van Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. – L.; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SagePublications, 1998. – x, 374 p.140. DroutM.D.C. From Here to Infinity [sound recording]: an Exploration of Science FictionLiterature. - Prince Frederick, Md.: Recorded Books, 2006. - 7 sound discs: digital; 4 3/4 in.+ 1 course guide (88 p.).141.
Dubrow142. FeuerH. Genre. – N.Y.: Methuen, 1982. - x, 133 p.J. Genre study and television // Channels of discourse, reassembled: television andcontemporary criticism / edited by Robert C. Allen. - Chapel Hill: University of NorthCarolina Press, 1992. – P. 138-159.143. FishS. Interpreting the “Variorum” // Critical Inquiry. – 1976. – Vol.
2, № 3, Spring. – P.465-485.210144. FishS. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. –Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1980. – viii, 394 p.A. Kinds of Literature. An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. –145. FowlerOxford: Oxford University Press, 1982. – vii, 357 p.146. FreedmanC.H. Critical Theory and Science Fiction.
– Middletown, Conn.: WesleyanUniversity Press, 2000. – xx, 206 p.147. Genresin the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genres / ed. by Janet Giltrow, Dieter Stein. –Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Pub. Co., 2009. – vi, 294 p.148. GomelE. Postmodern Science Fiction and Temporal Imagination. – N.Y.: Continuum, 2010.– 192 p.D. Age of Wonders: Exploring the World of Science Fiction. – N.Y.: Walker,149. Hartwell1984.
– 205 p.150. HollingerV. History of the Future: Notes for an Archive // Science Fiction Studies. – 2010.– № 1, Vol. 37, March. – P. 23-33.151. Holquist152. HymesM. Dialogism. Bakhtin and His World. – L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2002. – xiv, 228 p.D. On Communicative Competence // Sociolinguistics: selected readings / ed. byPride, J.B., Holmes, J. – Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1972.
– P. 269-293.153. Hyun-GyungI., Orlikowski W.J., Yates J.A. Temporal Coordination through Genre andGenre Systems // Information, Technology and People. – 2005. – Vol. 18, № 2. – P. 89-119.154. J.G.A New Fantastic Journey (review on Adam Roberts The History of Science Fiction) //Science Fiction Studies. – 2008. – № 2, Vol. 35, Jul. – P. 339-340.155. JamesonF. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. – Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1981. – 305 p.156. JamesonF.
Science Fiction as a Spatial Genre: Generic Discontinuities and the Problem ofFiguration in Vonda McIntyre’s The Exile Waiting // Science Fiction Studies. – 1987. – № 1,Vol. 14, Mar. – P. 44-59.157. JamesonF. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other ScienceFictions. – N.Y.: Verso, 2005.
– xvi, 431 p.158.Jauss H.R. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. – Minneapolis, MN: University ofMinneapolis Press, 1982. – xxix, 231 p.211159. JohnsA.M. Discourse Communities and Communities of Practice: Membership, Conflict,and Diversity // Johns A.M. Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. –Cambridge, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1997. – P. 51-70.P. What Is It We Do When We Read Science Fiction? – Harold Wood: Beccon160. KincaidPublications, 2008.
– v, 365 p.161. KnightD. In Search of Wonder: Essays on Modern Science Fiction. – Gateway, 2013. – 326p.162. KrementsovN. Revolutionary Experiments: The Quest for Immortality in BolshevikScience and Fiction. – Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. – xiii, 268 p.163.Landon B. Science Fiction After 1900: From the Steam Man to the Stars. – N.Y.: PrenticeHall International, 1997. – xxxii, 251 p.164. LemS. On the Structural Analysis of Science Fiction // Science Fiction Studies. – 1973. –№1, Vol.
1, Spring. – P. 26-33.165. LemS. Todorov’s Fantastic Theory of Literature // Science Fiction Studies. – 2010. – № 37,Vol. 1, March. – P. 227-237.166. LeonardA.M. Political Poetry as Discourse: Rereading John Greenleaf Whittier, EbenezerElliot, Hip-hop-ology – Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010. – xvi, 357 p.167. LockhurstR. Science Fiction and Cultural History // Science Fiction Studies. – 2010.
–№110, Vol. 37, March. – P. 3-15.168. MalzbergB. Some Notes toward the True and the Terrible // Speculations on Speculation:Theories of Science Fiction. – Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2005. – P. 239-242.169. McCaffreyL., Williamson J. An Interview with Jack Williamson // Science Fiction Studies.– 1991. – Vol. 18, № 54. – P. 230-252.170.Milburn C. Nanotechnology // The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science.
–N.Y.: Routledge, 2011. – P. 181-192.171.Miller C.R. Genre as Social Action // Quarterly Journal of Speech. – 1984. – №70. – P.151167.172. MullenR.D. Two Early Works by Ray Cummings: “The Fire People” and “Around theUniverse” // Science Fiction Studies. – 1999. – Vol. 26, № 78, Jul.
– P. 295-302.173. Nate R.Discoveries of the Future: Herbert G. Wells and the Eugenic Utopia // Futurescapes /Ed. By R. Pordzik. – N.Y.: Rodopi, 2009. – P. 79-110.212174. NelsonC. Repression and Recovery: Modern American Poetry and the Politics of CulturalMemory, 1910-1945. – Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989. – xiii, 336 p.175. OrlikowskiW., Yates J.A. Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through CommunicativeNorms // Journal of Business Communication.
-2002. – Vol. 39, № 1. – P. 13-35.J. Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction. – Middletown, Conn.:176. RiederWesleyan University Press, 2008. – xii, 183 p.J. Fiction, 1895-1926 // The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. – L., N.Y.:177. RiederRoutledge, 2009. – P. 23-32.178. RiederJ. On Defining SF, or Not: Genre, SF, and History // Science Fiction Studies. – 2010.– Vol. 37, № 2, July. – P.
191-209.179. RobertsA. The History of Science Fiction. – N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. – xvii, 368 p.180. RobertsE.M. Something Fishy is Going On: The Misapplication of InterpretiveCommunities in Literary Theory // The Delta. – 2006. – Vol. 1, № 1, Article 6. – P. 32-42.181. ScholesR. Lem’s Fantastic Attack on Todorov // Science Fiction Studies. – 1975. – Vol. 2,№ 2, July.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
