Большакова Е.И. и др. - Автоматическая обработка текстов на естественном языке и компьютерная лингвистика (1027379), страница 26
Текст из файла (страница 26)
Performance on cloze tests with fixed-ratio and rational deletions // TESOL Quarterly.1985, vol. 19.5. Barlow M., Kemmer S. (eds) Usage-based models of language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.2000.6. Biber D. Variation Across Speech and Writing – Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.7. Boguslavsky I., Iomdin L., Sizov V. Multilinguality in ETAP-3. Reuse of Linguistic Resources //Proceedings of the Workshop “Multilingual Linguistic Resources. 20th International Conference onComputational Linguistics» – Geneva, 20048.
Boguslavsky I., L. Iomdin, V. Sizov. Interactive enconversion by means of the ETAP-3 system //Proceedings of the International Conference on the Convergence of Knowledge, Culture, Language andInformation Technologies – Alexandria, 20039. Chafe W. Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience inspeaking and writing – Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 199410.
Church K., Hanks, P., ‘Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicogra-phy’, ComputationalLinguistics, 16(1), 22–29. 199011. Church, K., W. Gale, P. Hanks and D. Hindle 1991 Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik edLexical Acquisition. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Erlbaum. 115-64.12. Church, K., W. Gale, P. Hanks and D. Hindle Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik ed LexicalAcquisition. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Erlbaum. 115-64. 199113. Clark H. H. Arenas of Language Use – Chicago: Univ. ChicagoPress, 199314.
Cloze tests in English, Thai, and Vietnamese. Native and non-native performance 1972;15. Croft W. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press. 2001.16. Croft W., Cruse A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.17. Crowder R. G., Morton J.
Precategorical Acoustic Storage // Perception and Psychophysics. 1969, №518. Сиротко-Сибирский С. А. О проблеме понимания текста в лингвистике и психолингвистике // …Слово отзовется: памяти А. С. Штерн и Л. В. Сахарного – Пермь, 200619. Daudaravicius V. Automatic identification of lexical units. // Computational Linguistics and Intelligenttext processing CICling-2009, Meksikas, Meksika. 2010a.8320. Daudaravičius V. The Influence of Collocation Segmentation and Top 10 Items to Keyword AssignmentPerformance.
In proceedings of Computational Linguistics and Intelligent text processing CICling-2010,Iasi, Romania. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag.648–660. 2010б.21. Daudaravicius, V., Marcinkeviciene, R.: Gravity Counts for the Boundaries of Collocations.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(2), 321–348. 200422.
Fillenbaum S. et al. The predictability of words and their grammatical classes as a function of rate ofdeletion from a speech transcript // J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1963, vol. 223. Fillmore Ch. J. Inversion and constructional inheritance.// Webelhuth G., Koenig J., Kathol A. (eds.).Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation. Stanford, Ca: CSLI.
113-128. 1999.24. Fillmore Ch. J., Kay, P.. Construction Grammar Coursebook. Manuscript, University of California atBerkeley Department of linguistics. 1993.25. Fillmore Ch. J., Lee-Goldman R. R., and Rhodes R. The FrameNet Constructicon // Sign-BasedConstruction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications / H.C. Boas & I.A. Sag (eds.) 201126. Fillmore Ch., J., Kay P., O’Connor M. C.
Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: Thecase of Let alone. // Language 64, 3. 501-538. 1988.27. Firbas J. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis // Travaux linguistiques de Prague, vol.1. 196628. Firbas, J. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Studies in EnglishLanguage – Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 199229. Firth, J.R.: 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951.
London.30. Firth, J.R.: 1968.Selected Papers of J.R. Firth, 1952–1959. London.31. Fletcher C. R., Bloom C. P. Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts // J. Mem.Lang. 1988, 1932. Fodor J. A. The Modularity of Mind – Cambridge (Mass.), 198333. Fox B. Discourse structure and anaphora – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 198734. Fried M., Östman J. 2004. Construction Grammar: a thumbnail sketch.// Fried M., Östman J. (eds.).Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.35.
Gernsbacher, M. A. Handbook of Psycholinguistics / M. A. Gernsbacher. – New York : Academic Press,1994. – 1174 p36. Givón, Talmy. Topic continuity in discourse: An Introduction / Topic continuity in discourse: aquantitative cross-linguistic study (Typological studies in language, vol. 3) – Amsterdam: J. Benjamins,1983.37. Goldberg A.. Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure.
Chicago:University of Chicago Press. 199538. Goldberg A.. Constructions at Work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press200639. Graesser A. C. et al. Discourse comprehension // Ann. Rev. Psychol. 1997, 4840. Gundel J. K., Hedberg N., Zacharsky R. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions indiscourse // Language. 1993, 69.41.
Hajičová E. Surface and underlying word order // Prague Linguistic Circle Papers, V.1 – Amsterdam: J.Benjamins, 1995.42. Hajičová E., Korbayová I. On the notion of topic // Prague Linguistic Circle Papers –Amsterdam: J.Benjamins, in print.43. Hajičová Е., Sgall P. Towards an automatic identification of topic and focus/ // Proceedings of thesecond conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Geneva, 1985.44.
Hajičová Е., Sgall P., Skoumalová H. Identifying Topic and Focus by an Automatic Procedure // HessDJ, Foss DJ, Carroll P. Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during languagecomprehension // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1995, 124.45. Halliday M. Lexis as a Linguistic Level.
// Bazell, C., Catford, J., Halliday, M., and Robins, R. (eds.). InMemory of J. R. Firth. Longman, London 1966.46. Ресурс и библиография по Грамматике конструкций/ http://constructiongrammar.org/47. Iordanskaja, L., Paperno, S. A Russian-English Collocational Dictionary of the Human Body,Columbus/Ohio. 1996.48. Johnson-Laird P. Mentёal models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference andconsciousness – Cambrige, 19838449. Just M.
A., Carpenter P. A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in workingmemory // Psychological Review. 1992, 9850. Kibrik A. A. Anaphora in Russian narrative discourse: A cognitive calculative account // Studies inAnaphora / B. Fox (Ed.) – Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 199651. Kintsch W. K. The Representation of Meaning in Memory – Hillsdale (NJ), 197452. Kintsch W. Text comprehension, memory, and learning // Am. Psychol. 1994, 4953. Kintsch W. K.
The Representation of Meaning in Memory – Hillsdale (NJ), 1974.54. Kintsch, W. K. Toward a model of text comprehension and production / / W. K. Kintsch, T. A.van Dijk // Psychological Review, 1978, 85. – P. 363-394.55. Lagus K., Kohonenand O., Virpioja S. Towards unsupervised learning of constructions from text //Proceedings of the Workshop on extracting and using constructions in NLP / Sahlgren M. and Knutsson O.NODALIDA 200956. Lagus K., Kohonenand O., Virpioja S. Towards unsupervised learning of constructions from text //Proceedings of the Workshop on extracting and using constructions in NLP / Sahlgren M.
and Knutsson O.NODALIDA 200957. Levelt W. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation – Cambridge: MIT Press, 198958. Liang S.F., Devlin S., Tait J. Can automatic abstracting improve on current extracting techniques inaiding users to judge the relevance of pages in search engine results? // 7th Annual CLUK ResearchColloquium – Birmingham, 200459.
MacDonald M. C., Pearlmutter N. J., Seidenberg M. S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguityresolution // Psychol. Rev. 1994, 10160. McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. Are good text always better? Textcoherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition andInstruction, 1996 14, 1-43.61. Mannes S.
Strategic processing of text // J. Educ. Psychol. 1994, 8662. Manning C., Schutze H. Collocations // Manning C., Schutze H. Foundations of Statictical NaturalLanguage Processing, 2002, pp.151-18963. Manning C., Schutze H. Collocations // Manning C., Schutze H. Foundations of Statictical NaturalLanguage Processing, 2002, pp.151-18964. Manning Ch. and Schutze H. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing . MIT Press,Cambridge, MA, 199965.
Masini F. Multi-word Expressions between Syntax and the Lexicon: the case of Italian Verb-particleConstructions. SKY // Journal of Linguistics 2005. 18. 145-17366. McClelland J. L., Rumelhart D. E. et al. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in theMicrostructure of Cognition – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1986.67. Mel’chuk I.A. 1995 Phrasemes in Language and Phraseology in Linguistics // Idioms: Structural andPsychological perspectives. Hillsdale, New Jersy 1995, 167-232.68. Morris R.
K. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading // J. Exp.Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1994, 2069. Muischnek K., Sahkai H. Using collocation-finding methods to extract constructions and to estimate theirproductivity // Proceedings of the Workshop on extracting and using constructions in NLP / Sahlgren M. andKnutsson O. NODALIDA 200970. Nenkova A., Gravano A., Hirschberg J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
