Диссертация (1025060), страница 26

Просмтор этого файла доступен только зарегистрированным пользователям. Но у нас супер быстрая регистрация: достаточно только электронной почты!

Текст из файла (страница 26)

Р. 2370–2378.53.Computer-aided design of the human aortic root / E.A. Ovcharenko [et al.] //Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2014. No 54. P. 109–115.54.Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: Why are so manydenied surgery? / B. Iung [et al.] // European Heart Journal. 2005. Vol. 26. Р.2714–2720.55.Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of theaortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy / A.Hamdan [et al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

2012. Vol. 59,No. 2. Р. 119–127.56.Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants /P. Dagum [et al.] // Circulation. 1999. Vol. 100, No. 19. Р. 54–62.57.Degradation effect of diepoxide fixation on porcine endogenous retrovirus DNAin heart valves: molecular aspects / A. Cyganek-Niemiec [et al.] // TheInternational journal of Artificial Organs. 2012. Vol. 35, No. 1.

Р. 25–33.17258.Deployment of self-expandable stents in aneurysmatic cerebral vessels:comparison of different computational approaches for interventional planning /A. Bernardini [et al.] // Computer Methods in Biomechanics and BiomedicalEngineering. 2011. Vol. 15, No. 3. Р. 303–311.59.Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict the need forpermanent pacing after cardiac valve surgery / B.A.

Koplan [et al.] // Journal ofthe American College of Cardiology. 2003. Vol. 41. Р. 795–801.60.Dislocation of a transapically implanted aortic valve prosthesis with a functionallybicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic aneurysm / T. Schroeter [et al.] // TheJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011. Vol. 59, No. 8. Р. 503–506.61.Distensibility of the ascending aorta: Comparison of invasive and noninvasivetechniques in healthy men and in men with coronary artery disease / C. Stefanadis[et al.] // European Heart Journal. 1990. Vol. 11. Р. 990–996.62.Effect of transformation volume contraction on the toughness of superelasticshape memory alloys / W. Yan [et al.] // Smart Material and Structure. 2002.

Vol.11. Р. 947–955.63.Emergent cardiac surgery during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI):a weighted meta-analysis of 9,251 patients from 46 studies / H .Eggebrecht [et al.]// EuroIntervention. 2013. Vol. 8, No. 9. Р. 1072–1080.64.Evolving strategies for the treatment of valvular heart: preclinical and clinicalpathways for percutaneous aortic valve replacement / J. Fann [et al.] //Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

2008. Vol. 71, No. 3. Р. 434–440.65.Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: Method and in vitro evaluationfor intracranial aneurismal stenting / I. Larrabide [et al.] // Medical ImageAnalysis. 2012. Vol. 16, No. 3. Р. 721–730.66.Fatigue and durability of Nitinol stents / A.R. Pelton [et al.] // Journal of theMechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.

2008. Vol. 1, No. 2. Р. 153–164.17367.Finite element analysis of stent deployment: understanding stent fracture inpercutaneous pulmonary valve implantation / S. Schievano [et al.] // Journal ofInterventional Cardiology. 2007. Vol. 20, No. 6.

Р. 546–554.68.Finn M., Green P. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: who torefer? // Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2014. Vol. 57, No. 2. Р. 215–225.69.Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for themanagement of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the AmericanCollege of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on PracticeGuidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for theManagement of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Societyof Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiographyand Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons / R.O. Bonow [et al.] //Circulation. 2008.

Vol. 118, No. 15. P. 523–661.70.Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system withmultislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis/ C.J. Schultz [et al.] // Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009. Vol.54. Р. 911–918.71.Gizzi A., Vasta M., Pandolfi A. Modeling collagen recruitment in hyperelasticbiomaterial models with statistical distribution of the fiber orientation //International Journal of Engineering Science.

2014. Vol. 78. Р. 48–60.72.Gnyaneshwar R., Kumar R.K., Balakrishnan K.R. Dynamic analysis of the aorticvalve using a finite element model // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2002. Vol.73, No. 4. Р. 1122–1129.73.Hopkins R.A. Aortic valve leaflet sparing and salvage surgery: evolution oftechniques for aortic root reconstruction // European Journal of Cardio-ThoracicSurgery. 2003. Vol. 24.

Р. 886–897.74.Impact of treatment choice on the outcome of patients proposed for transcatheteraortic valve implantation / M. De Carlo [et al.] // EuroIntervention. 2010. Vol. 6.Р. 568–574.17475.Increased radial force improves stent deployment in tricuspid but not in bicuspidstenotic native aortic valves / R. Zegdi [et al.] // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2010.

Vol. 89, No. 3. Р. 768–772.76.Investigation of the tubular leaflet geometry of an aortic heart valve prosthesis byfinite-element analysis / E.A. Ovcharenko [et al.] // Biophysics. 2015. Vol. 60,No. 5. P. 827–834.77.Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent?Results from a human anatomic study in adults / R. Zegdi [et al.] // Journal of theAmerican College of Cardiology. 2008. Vol.

51, No. 5. Р. 579–584.78.Iung B. Management of the elderly patient with aortic stenosis // Heart, 2008.2008. Vol. 1, No. 1. Р. 519–524.79.Iung B., Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult // NatureReviews Cardiology.

2011. Vol. 8, No. 3. Р. 162–172.80.Johnson M.A. Strategies to improve diet in older adults // The Proceedings of theNutrition Society. 2013. Vol. 72, No. 1. Р. 166–172.81.Kalath S., Tsipouras P., Silver F.H. Non-invasive assessment of aortic mechanicalproperties // Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 1986. Vol. 14, No. 6.

Р. 513–524.82.Kalejs M., von Segesser L.K. Rapid prototyping of compliant human aortic rootsfor assessment of valved stents // Interactive CardioVascular and ThoracicSurgery. 2009. Vol. 8, No. 2. Р. 182–186.83.Kumar G.P., Mathew L. Self-expanding aortic valve stent-material optimization// Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2012. Vol. 42, No. 11. Р. 1060–1063.84.Kumar R.K., Tandon R. Rheumatic fever & rheumatic heart disease: the last 50years // Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2013.

Vol. 137, No. 4. Р. 643–658.85.Large-displacement 3D structural analysis of an aortic valve model with nonlinearmaterial properties / A. Ranga [et al.] // Journal of Medical Engineering &Technology. 2004. Vol. 28, No. 3. Р. 95–103.17586.Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement / G.T.Christakis [et al.] // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1996. Vol.

62. Р. 1084–1089.87.Li K., Sun W. Simulated thin pericardial bioprosthetic valve leaflet deformationunder static pressure-only loading conditions: implications for percutaneousvalves // Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2010. Vol. 38, No. 8. Р. 2690–2701.88.Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valveprostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons AdultCardiac Surgery National Database / J.M. Brennan [et al.] // Circulation. 2013.Vol. 127, No.

16. P. 1647–1655.89.Manufacturing and hydrodynamic assessment of a novel aortic valve made of anew nanocomposite polymer / B. Rahmani [et al.] // Journal of Biomechanics.2012. Vol. 45, No. 7. Р. 1205–1211.90.Mechanisms of the in vivo inhibition of calcification of bioprosthetic porcineaortic valve cusps and aortic wall with triglycidylamine/mercapto bisphosphonate/ H.S. Rapoport [et al.] // Biomaterials. 2007. Vol. 28, No. 4.

Р. 690–699.91.Modeling of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Patient specific vs generalapproaches based on finite element analysis/ E.A. Ovcharenko [et al.] //Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2016. No. 69. P. 29–36.92.Mummert J., Sirois E., Sun W. Quantification of biomechanical interaction oftranscatheter aortic valve stent deployed in porcine and ovine hearts // Annals ofBiomedical Engineering. 2013. Vol. 41, No. 3. Р. 577–586.93.Nitinol stent design -understanding axial buckling / D.J.

McGrath [et al.] // Journalof the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2014. Vol. 40. Р. 252–263.94.Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomographyimplications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement / L.F. Tops [et al.] //JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging.

2008. Vol. 1, No. 3. Р. 321–330.95.Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve andEdwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) / S.176Tzamtzis [et al.] // Medical Engineering & Physics. 2013. Vol. 35, No. 1. Р. 125–130.96.Numerical simulation of the dynamics of a bileaflet prosthetic heart valve using afluid-structure interaction approach / M.

Nobili [et al.] // Journal of Biomechanics.2008. Vol. 41, No. 11. Р. 2539–2550.97.One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heartvalve study / T. Lefevre [et al.] // European Heart Journal. 2011. Vol. 32. Р. 148–157.98.Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aorticstenosis: Impact of patient’s choice of refusing aortic valve replacement onsurvival / P.

Характеристики

Список файлов диссертации