Диссертация (1025060), страница 27
Текст из файла (страница 27)
Kojodjojo [et al.] // QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2008.Vol. 101. Р. 567–573.99.Peacock J.A. An in vitro study of the onset of turbulence in the sinus of Valsalva// Circulation Research. 1990. Vol. 67, No. 2. Р. 448–460.100. Percutaneous mitral valve dilatation: single balloon versus double balloon. Afinite element study / S.
Schievano [et al.] // The Journal of Heart Valve Disease.2009. Vol. 18, No. 1. Р. 28–34.101. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcificaortic stenosis: first human case description / A. Cribier [et al.] // Circulation.2002. Vol. 106. Р. 3006–3008.102. Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement:incidence, indications, and predictors / S. Dawkins [et al.] // The Annals ofThoracic Surgery.
2008. Vol. 85. Р. 108–112.103. Permanent pacemaker insertion after CoreValve transcatheter aortic valveimplantation:Incidence and contributing factors (the UK CoreValveCollaborative) / M.Z. Khawaja [et al.] Circulation. 2011. Vol. 123, No. 9. Р. 951–960.177104.
Persistent annual permanent pacemaker implantation rate after surgical aorticvalve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis / N.M. Van Mieghem [etal.] // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2012. Vol. 94, No. 4. Р. 1143–1149.105. Pibarot P., Garcia D., Dumesnil J.G. Energy loss index in aortic stenosis: fromfluid mechanics concept to clinical application // Circulation. 2013.
Vol. 127, No.10. Р. 1101–1104.106. Potential mechanism of annulus rupture duringtranscatheter aortic valveimplantation / K. Hayashida [et al.] // Catheterization and CardiovascularInterventions. 2013. Vol. 82, No. 5. Р. 742–746.107. Predictors of moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation immediatelyafter CoreValve implantation and the impact of postdilatation / K.
Takagi [et al.]// Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011. Vol. 78, No. 3. Р. 432–443.108. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis / R. Rosenhek [etal.] // The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000. Vol. 343. Р. 611–617.109. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valveimplantationusing the third generation (18 Fr) corevalverevalving system:results from themulticentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval /N. Piazza [et al.] // EuroIntervention.
2008. Vol. 4. Р. 242–249.110. Procedural, 30 day and one year outcome following CoreValve or Edwardstranscatheter aortic valve implantation: results of the Belgian national registry /J.M. Bosmans [et al.] // Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2011.Vol. 12. P.
762–767.111. Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results ofthree device generations of the CoreValve Revalving system / E. Grube [et al.] //Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2008. Vol. 1. Р. 167–175.112. Progressive aortic valve calcification: three-dimensional visualization andbiomechanical analysis / R. Halevi [et al.] // Journal of Biomechanics.
2015. Vol.48, No. 3. Р. 489–497.178113. Prospective study of asymptomaticvalvularaorticstenosis: clinical,echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome / C.M. Otto [et al.] //Circulation. 1997. Vol. 95. Р. 2262–2270.114. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography anddoppler ultrasound / W.A. Zoghbi [et al.] // Journal of The American Society ofEchocardiography. 2009. Vol.
22, No. 9. Р. 975–1014.115. Recommendations on the management of the asymptomatic patient with valvularheart disease / B. Iung [et al.] // European Heart Journal. 2002. Vol. 23. Р. 1253–1266.116. REDO aortic valve replacement: the sutureless approach / G. Santarpino [et al.] //The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2013. Vol. 22, No.
5. Р. 615–620.117. Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enableaortic bioprosthesis. / G. Concistre [et al.] // Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2015.Vol. 42, No. 2. Р. 117–123.118. Relationship of aortic annular eccentricity and paravalvular regurgitation posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve / D.T. Wong [et al.] //Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2013. Vol. 25, No.
4. Р. 190–195.119. Right anterior mini-thoracotomy direct aortic self-expanding trans-catheter aorticvalve implantation: A single center experience / G. Bruschi [et al.] // InternationalJournal of Cardiology. 2015. Vol. 181. P. 437–442.120. Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and futureapproaches // Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2011. Vol. 9, No.
1. Р. 15–29.121. Rodriguez-Caulo E.A., Araji O.A., Barquero J.M. Transapical aortic valveimplantation in bicuspid aortic valves: must be an absolute contraindication? //Research in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2012. Vol. 1, No. 1. Р. 37–39.122. Role of aortic root motion in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection / C.J. Beller [etal.] // Circulation. 2004. Vol. 109, No. 6. Р. 763–769.123.
Ross J., Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis // Circulation. 1968. Vol. 38, No. 1. Р. 61–67.179124. Sacks M.S., Merryman W.D., Schmidt D.E. On the biomechanics of heart valvefunction // Journal of Biomechanics. 2009. Vol. 42, No. 12. Р. 1804–1824.125.
Schoen F.J., Levy R.J. Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progresstoward understanding and prevention // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005.Vol. 79. Р. 1072–1080.126. Severe aortic stenosis in a veteran population: treatment considerations andsurvival / F.G. Bakaeen [et al.] // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2010. Vol. 89,No. 2. Р. 453–458.127. Short-term follow up with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis: clinical andechocardiographic results / G. Concistre [et al.] // The Journal of Heart ValveDisease.
2013. Vol. 22, No. 6. Р. 817–823.128. Simulation and experimental observation of contact conditions between stents andartery models / K. Takashima [et al.] // Medical Engineering & Physics. 2007.Vol. 29, No. 3. Р. 326–335.129. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation through patient-specificfinite element analysis: two clinical cases / S. Morganti [et al.] // Journal ofBiomechanics. 2014. Vol. 47, No. 11. Р. 2547–2555.130. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation under consideration ofleaflet calcification / C.
Russ [et al.] // Conference Proceedings Engineering inMedicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Annual International Conference of theIEEE. 2013. Vol. 2013. Р. 711–714.131. Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a patient-specific finiteelement approach / F. Auricchio [et al.] // Computer Methods in Biomechanicsand Biomedical Engineering.
2014. Vol. 17, No. 12. Р. 1347–1357.132. Sun W., Li K., Sirois E. Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation:implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment // Journal ofBiomechanics. 2010. Vol. 43, No. 16. Р. 3085–3090.180133.
Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers /T.A. Folliguet [et al.] // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2012. Vol. 93, No. 5. Р.1483–1488.134. Sutureless stented aortic valve implantation under direct vision: lessons from anegative experience in sheep / T.M. Joudinaud [et al.] // Journal of CardiacSurgery. 2007.
Vol. 22, No. 1. Р. 13–17.135. T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparativedescriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves / L. Wallby [et al.]// Heart. 2002. Vol. 88. Р. 348–351.136. Tamas E., Nylander E. Echocardiographic description of the anatomic relationswithin the normal aortic root // The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2007. Vol.16, No.
3. Р. 240–246.137. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses foraortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age / A. Weber [etal.] // The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012. Vol. 144, No.5. Р. 1075–1083.138. The cyclical changes and the structure of the base of the aortic valve / M.J.Thubrikar [et al.] // American Heart Journal. 1980. Vol.
99. Р. 217–224.139. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) isnot appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis:a retrospective cohort study / D. Kalavrouziotis [et al.] // Journal of CardiothoracicSurgery. 2009. Vol. 4, No. 32. Р. 1–8.140. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation onfluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricularhypertrophy / M. Thubrikar [et al.] // The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 1998.Vol.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
