Диссертация (Энергетический баланс импульсного пересоединения), страница 18

Phys. Plasmas, 8, P. 4800-4809,2001.14345.Erkaev N.V., Semenov V.S., and Biernat H. K. Two-dimensional MHD modelof the reconnection diusion region. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, V.9, P.131-138, 2002.46.Farrudgia C.J. et. al.

A reconnection layer associated with a magnetic cloud. Adv. Space Res., V. 28(5), P. 759-764, 2001.47.Furth H.P., Killeen J.Finite-resistivity instabilities of a sheet pinch. Phys.uids, vol. 6, N2, P. 459, 1963.48.Furth H.P., Rutherford P. M., Selberg H.Tearing mode in the cylindricaltokamak.

Phys. Fluids, V. 16, P. 1054-1063, 1973.49.Godunv S.K.A dierence method for numerical calculation of discontinuoussolution of the equations of hydrodynamics. Mat. Sb. 47, P. 271-306, 1959.50.Hau L.N., Sonnenrup B. U. OTwo-dimensional coherent structures in themagnetopause: Recovery of statuc equilibria from single-spacecraft data. J.Geophys. Res., v. 104, P. 6899-6918, 1999.51.Heyn M.F., Semenov V.S. Rapid reconnection in incompressible plasma.

Phys.Plasmas., vol. 3, N 7, P. 2725-2741, 1996.52.Heyn M.F., Semenov V.S.Compressible reconnection, in "MagnetopauseReconnection and Aurora Dynamics edited by V.S. Semenov , H.K.Biernat,R.P.Rijnbeek , and H.O.Rucker , Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften,Wien, P. 51-69, 1996a.53.Heyn M.F., Biernat H.K., Rijnbeek R.P., and Semenov V.S.reconnection layer. J. Plasma. Phys., 40, P. 235-252, 1988.144The structure of54.Hones E.W. Magnetic reconnection in space and laboratory plasmas.

AGU,Washington, 386 P., 1984.55.Hu Q., Sonnerup B.U.OReconstruction of two-dimensional structures in themagnetopause: Method improvements. J. Geophys. Res., v. 108, N A1, 2011,2003.56. Reconstruction of magnetic clouds in the solar wind:Hu Q., Sonnenrup B. U. OOrentstions and cogurations. J. Geophys. Res., v. 107, P. 1142, 2002.57.Ivanova V.V., Semenov V.S., Penz T., Ivanov I.V., Sergeev V.A., Heyn M.F.,Farrugia C.J.,Biernat H. K., Nakamura R., Baumjohann W.Reconstructionof the reconnection rate from Cluster measurements: Method improvements.

J.Geophys. Res., v. 112A, P. 10226, 2007.58.Kivelson, M.G., Hughes, W.J. On the treshold for the triggering substorms. Planet. Space Sci., V. 38, N. 2, P. 211-220, 1990.59.Kivelson M.G. and Russel C.T.Introduction to space physics.

, CambridgeUniversity Press, 528 P., 1995.60.Kiehas S.A., Semenov V.S., Kubyshkin I.V., Kubyshkina M.V., Penz T., BiernatH.K., and Nakamura R. Determination of reconnected ux via remote sensing.Adv. Spase Res., 14, P. 1292-1297, 2008.61.Kiehas S.A., Semenov V.S., Kubyshkina M.V., Angelopoulos V., Nakamura R.,Keika K., Ivanova V.V., Biernat H.K., Baumjohann W., Mende S., Magnes W.,Auster U., Fornacon D., Larson D., Carlson C.W.,Bonnell J., and McFaddenJ.

First Application of a Petchek-Type Reconnection Model with Time-VaryingReconntction Rate to THEMIS Observations. J. Geophys. Res., v. 114, 2009a.14562.Kiehas S.A., Semenov V.S., and Biernat H.K.,Energy budget of reconnectionprocess. J. Geophys. Res., v. 114, 2009b.63.D.B. MelroseInstabilities in space and laboratory plasmas. CambridgeUniversity Press, 280 P., 1989.64.Parker E.N. The solar are phenomenon and the theory of reconnection andannihilation of magnetic elds. Astrophys.

J. Suppl. Ser., 1963, vol. 8, N 1, P.177-212.65.Parker E.N.66.Petschek H.E. Magnetic eld annihilation. AAS/NASA Symp. on the physicsCosmical magnetic elds. Vol 1. Oxford: Clarendon press, 1979.of solar ares: NASA Spec. Publ. SP-50.

P. 425-439, 1964.67.Powell K.G. An approximate Riemann solver for magnetohydrodynamics. Sci.and Eng., Technical Report 92-94, ed.: NASA Langley Space Flight Center, Inst.for Comput. Appl., Hampton, 1994.68.Priest E.R., Forbes T.Magnetic reconnection. Cambridge University press,2000.69.Rijnbeek R.P., Semenov V.S.Features of a Petschek-type reconnection model.

Trends Geophys. Res. 91, p. 247, 1993.70.Scholer M. Undriven magnetic reconnection in an isolated current sheet. J.Geophys. Res., 94, P. 8805, 1989a.71.Scholer M. Asymmetric Time-dependent and stationary magnetic reconnectionat the dayside magnetopause.

J. Geophys. Res., 94, P. 15099-15111, 1989.14672.Semenov V.S. , Kubyshkin I.V., Lebedeva V.V., Sidneva M.V., BiernatH.K., Heyn M.F., Besser B.P., and Rijnbeek R.P. Time-dependent localizedreconnection of skewed magnetic elds. J. Geophys. Res., 97, P. 4251-4263,1992.73.Semenov V.S., Drobysh O.A., Heyn M.F.Analysis of time-dependentreconnection in compressible plasmas. J.

Geophys. Res., 103, P. 11863-11874,1998a.74.Semenov V.S., Volkonskaya N.N., Biernat H.K. Eect of a snow plow in burstymagnetic reconnection. Phys. of Plasmas, vol 5, N 9, P. 3242-3248, 1998b.75.Semenov V.S., Heyn M.F., Ivanov I.B.Magnetic reconnection with space andtime varying reconnection rates in a compressible plasma. Phys.

Plasmas, 11,62,2004a.76.Semenov V.S., Kubyshkin I.V., Rijnbeek R.P., and Biernat H.K. Analyticaltheory of unsteady Petschec-type reconnection. Physics of MagneticReconnection in High-Temperature Plasmas, ed. by M.Ugai, 35-68, ResearchSignpost, Trivandrum, India, 2004b77.Semenov V.S., Penz T., Ivanova V.V., Sergeev V.A., Biernat H.K., NakamuraR., Heyn M.F., Kubyshkin I.V., and Ivanon I.V.Reconstruction of thereconnection rate from Cluster measuremtnts: First results, J. Geophys. Res.,110, 11217, 2005.78.Sergeev, V.A., V.

Angelopoulos, and R. NakamuraRecent advances inunderstanding substorm dynamics Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.39,L05101, 2012.14779.Sharma, A. S., Nakamura, R., Runov, A., Grigorenko, E. E., Hasegawa,H., Hoshino, M., Louarn, P., Owen, C. J., Petrukovich, A., Sauvaud, J.-A., Zelenyi, L.Semenov, V. S., Sergeev, V. A., Slavin, J. A., Sonnerup, B. U. O.,M., Fruit, G., Haaland, S., Malova, H., and Snekvik, K. Transient and localizedprocesses in the magnetotail: a review Ann. Geophys., 26, P. 955-1006, 2008.80.Slavin J.A., Smith E.J., Tsurutani B.T., Sibeck D.G., Singer H. J., BakerD.N., Gosling J. T., Hones E.W., and Scarf F.L.

Substorm associated travelingcompression region in the distant tail - ISEE-3 geotail observations. - Geophys.Res., Lett. 11, P. 657-660, 198481. Paschmann G. , Paramastorakis I., Sckopke N., Haerendel G.,Sonnerup B.U.O,Bame S.J., Asbridge J.R., Gosling J.T. and Russell C.T. Evidence for magneticeld reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause. J. Geophys.

Res., 86, P. 1004910067, 1981.82.Sweet P.A.In: Electromagnetic phenomena in cosmic physics. (ed. by B.Lambert), Cambridge University Press, P. 123, 1958.83.Toth G. IThe div B=0 constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamicscodes. J.Comp. Phys. 161, P. 605-652, 2000.84.Ugai M.Computer studies on the fast reconnection mechanism under anexternally driven boundary condition.

Phys. Plasmas, 1, P. 2853-2863, 1994.85.Ugai M.Computer studies on powerful magnetic energy conversion by thesponteneous fast reconnection mechanism. Phys. Plasmas, 2, P. 388-397, 1995.14886.Ugai M., Zheng L. Modeling of traveling compression regions in the Earth'smagetotail by the spontaneous fast reconnection model. Phys. Plasmas, 13,2006a.87.Ugai M., Zheng L. Parametric studies on traveling compression region observedin the Earth's magetotail. Phys.

Plasmas, 13, 2006b.88.Vasyliunas V.M. Theoretical models of magnetic eld line merdind. Rev.Geophys. Space Phys., 13, P. 303, 1975.89.Weitzner H.Linear wave propagation in ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Basic Plasma Physycs I, edited by A.A.Galeev and R.N.Sudan, North-HollandPublishing Compani, Amsterdam pp. 201-242, 1983.90.Wentzel D.G. Hydromagnetic surface waves. Astrophys. J., 227, 1979, P. 319322, 1983.91.Yamada M. Progress in understanding magnetic reconnection in laboratory andspase astrophysical plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 4(5), 200792.Zelenyi L.M., Artemyev A.V.

Mechanisms of Spontaneous Reconnection: FromMagnetospheric to Fusion Plasma. Space Sci. Rev., 178:441457, 2013.149.