Диссертация (1172861), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
Fire dynamic of spill fires // Spill Fires. –2000. – P. 1-36.127. Delichatsios M.A., Gordon W.S., Lee Y.P. Mass pirolysis rates and excesspirolysate in fully developed enclosure fires // Fire Safety Journal. – 2004. –Vol. 39. – Pp. 1-21.128. Dong H.Q., Garo J.P., Magnognou B., Wang H.Y. A tractable solution forengineering calculations on buoyancy dominated turbulent non-premixedflames // Fire Science and Technology. – 2015. – Vol.
34, No. 1. – Pp. 1-21.129. Fan W., Wang X. A new numerical calculation method for zone modelling topredict smoke movement in building fires // Fire Safety Science, Proceedingsof the Fifth International Symposium, International Association of Fire SafetyScience, Melbourne, Australia. – 1997. – Pp. 487-498.130. Fusegi T., Farour B.
Numerical Study on interactions of turbulent convectionand Radiation in compartment fires // Fire Sci. Techn., 1988. – V. 8, N 1. – P.15-28.131. Hansell G. O., Morgan H. P. Design approaches for smoke control in atriumbuildings. Building Research Establishment Report BR258. Building ResearchEstablishment. Garston. UK.
– 1994. – 57 p.132. Hjertager B.H., Magnussen B.F. Computer simulation of flow, heat transfer andcombustion in three-dimensional furnaces // Arch. Combust., 1982. – 2, N1/2S. – P. 23-48.133. Hua J., Wang J., Kumar K. Development of a hybrid field and zone model forfire smoke propagation simulation in buildings // Fire Safety Journal. – 2005. –Vol. 40, No. 2. – Pp.
99-119.134. Hyde S.M., Moss J.B. Field modelling of carbon monoxide production in fires254135.136.137.138.139.140.141.142.143.144.145.146.147.// IN-TERFLAM’99, 1999. – P. 951-962.International Building Cod. / USA. – ICC, 2003. – 660 p.Jia F., Galea E.R., Patel M.K. The prediction of fire propagation in enclosurefires // Proc. of V Int. Symp. On Fire Safety Science, 1997.
– P. 439-450.Jones W. W. State of the art in zone modeling of fires. National Institute ofStandards and Technology (NIST) // 9th International Fire Protection Seminar.– 2001. May 25 and 26. – Munich. – P. 36.Kamenshchikov L.P., Bykov V.I., Amelchugov S.P. Numerical modelling ofdistribution of a smoke in increased-storeyed buildings // Proc. of the 2nd Int.Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazard of Substances and VentingDeflagrations, 11-15 August, Moscow, 1997.
– P. 650-659.Kumar S., Cox G. Mathematical modeling of fires in road tunnels // 5 the Int.Symp. On the aerodynamics and ventilation of venicle tunnels. – Lille(France), 1985. – P. 61-68.Lougheed G. D. Basic Principles of Smoke Management for Atriums //Construction Technology Update. – 2000. – N. 47. – P. 1-6.Lubin B. T., Springer G. S. The formation of a dip on the surface of a liquiddraining from a tank // Journal Fluid Mech.
– 1967. Vol 29, part 2. – Pp.385390.Luo M., Beck V. A study of non-flaschover and flaschover fires in a full-scalemulti-room building // Fire Safety Jornal. – 1996. – V. 26, N 3. – P. 191-219.Makhviladze G.M., Roberts J.R., Melikhov V.I. Numerical simulation ofsprinkler jet-fire interaction for compartment fires // Proc. of the 2nd Int.Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazard of Substances and VentingDeflagrations, 11-15 August, Moscow, 1997.
– P. 485-494.Matsuyama K., Mizuno M., Wakamatsu T. Systematic Experiments of Roomand Corridor Smoke Filling for Use in Calibration of Zone and CFD FireModels for Engineering Fire Safety Design of Buildings / K. Matsuyama, //Fire Science and Technology. – 2001. – V. 21, N 1. – Pp. 43-55.Mc Grattan, K. B. Klein, S. Hostikka, J. Floyd Fire Dynamics Simulator(Version 6) // National Institute of Standards and Technology. SpecialPublication. 1018. – 2013.
– 149 p.Milke J. A. Effectiveness of High-Capacity Smoke Exhaust in Large Spaces //Journal of Fire Protection Engineering. – 2003. – V. 13, May. – Pp. 111-128.Mowrer F. W., Williamson R. B. Room fire modeling within a computer-aided255148.149.150.151.152.153.154.155.156.design framework / International Association for Fire Safety Science. 2ndInternational Symposium.
– 1988. June 13-17. – Tokyo, Japan. – Pp. 453-462.Nam S. Development of a computational model simulating the interactionbetween a fire plume and a sprinkler spray // Fire Safety Jornal. – 1996. – V.26,N 3. – P. 157-163.NFPA 72. National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. National Fire ProtectionAssociation, 2002.NFPA 92B. 1990 NFPA Technical Committee Reports – Technical Guide forSmoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria and Large Areas. – National FireProtection Association, Quincy, MA, 1990.Novozhilov V., Moghtaden B., Fletcher D.F., Kent J.H. Computational FluidDynamics Modelling of Wood Combustion // Fire Safety Jornal.
– 1996. –V. 27, N 1. – P. 69-84.Park S. K., Miller K. W. Random Number Generators: Good ones are hard tofind // Comm. ACM, 1988. – N 10. Vol. 32. – P. 1192-1201.Puzach S. V., Nguen Tkhan’ Xai. Features of calculating the descent velocity ofthe lower boundary of the near-ceiling layer in a fire in an atrium // Journal ofEngineering Physics and Thermophysics. – 2010. – No.
5, Vol. 83. – Pp. 942949. DOI: 10.1007/s10891-010-0418-z.Ruegg H., Arvidsson T. Fire safety engineering concerning evacuation frombuildings. CFPA-E Guidelines. – Stockholm, 2009. – No. 19. – P. 45.Saxon R. Atrium buildings: development and design. – London: TheArchitectural Press, 1983.Shaodong G., Yang R., Zhang H., Attala M.J. Development of a fire zonemodel considering mixing behavior // Journal of Thermophysics and HeatTransfer. – 2009. – Vol.
23, No. 2. – Pp. 327-338.157. Smagorinsky, J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations /J. Smagorinsky // Month.Weath. Rev. – 1963. – V. 91. – P. 99-164.158. Snegirev A.Yu., Tanklevski L.T. Numerical Models of in Compartments //Proc. of the 2nd Int. Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazard of Substances andVenting Deflagrations, 11-15 August, Moscow, 1997. – P. 257-270.159.
Spalding, D. B. Older and newer approaches to the numerical modelling ofturbulent combustion // 3-rd International Conference on Computers inReciprocating Engines and Gas Turbines. – London: IMochE, 1996. – Рp. 2537.256160. Spalding D.B. Mixing and chemical reaction in steady-state confined turbulentflames // 13 the Symp. (Int.) Combust. The Combust. Institute, Pittsburg, PA. –P. 649-657.161. Tanaka T., Yamada S. Two layer zone smoke transport model // Fire Scienceand Technology.
– 2004. – V. 23, N 1. – Pp. 21-29.162. Welch, S., Rubini P. SOFIE: Simulation of Fires in Enclosures / User Guide.United Kingdom: Cranfield University. – 1996. – 340 p.163. Woodburn P.J., Britter R.E. CFD Simulation of a Tunnel Fire. Part 1, Part 2 //Fire Safety Jornal. – 1996. – V. 26, N 1. – P. 35-90.164. Yaman T., Tanaka T. Smoke control in a large scale spaces / Fire Science andTechnology, 1985. v.
S. № 1. – P. 41-54.165. Yang K.T. Role of fire field models as a design for performance-based firecode implamentation // International Journal on Engineering PerformanceBased Fire Codes. Editor-ln-Chief Professor Chow W.K. The Hong KongPolitechnic University. Hong-Kong, China, 1999, v. 1, N 1. – P. 11-17.166. Yao J., Fan W., Kohyu S., Daisuke K.
Verification and application of fieldzone-network model in building fire // Fire Safety Journal. – 1999. – Vol. 33,No. 1. – Pp. 35-44.167. Yeoh G.H., Yuen R.K., Lo S.M., Chen D.N. On numerical comparison ofenclosure fire in multi-compartment building // Fire Safety Journal. – 2003. –Vol. 38. – Pp. 85-94.168. Zhenghua Yan and Goran Holmstedt. CFD simulation of upward flame spreadover fuel surface // Fire Safety Science Proceedingof the Fifth InternationalSymposium, 1997.
– P. 345-356.169. Zhuman F., Hadjisophocleous G. A two-zone fire growth and smokemovement model for multi-compartment buildings // Fire Safety Journal. –2000. – Vol. 34, Issue 3. – Pp. 257–285.257Приложение IСвидетельство о поверке лабораторных весов DL – 3000258Приложение IIСвидетельство о поверке анализатора дымовых газов Kane-425259Приложение IIIАкты внедрения результатов диссертационной работы260261262263264265266267268269.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
