диссертация (1169444), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
(ed.). Corpora in cognitive linguistics:corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. – Walter de Gruyter, 2007.125.Harrison W. Description of Elizabethan England. 1557 // Holinshed‘sChronicles.[Электронныйресурс].Режимдоступа:www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1577harrison-england.asp126.Hewson J. Article and noun in English. – Mouton, 1972. – Р. 104.127.Hodgins D. Male and female differences [Электронный ресурс].
Режимдоступа: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/llog/Hodgins1.pdf211128.Hunston S. Corpora in applied linguistics. – Ernst Klett Sprachen, 2002.129.Janowski M. Inheritance of Features in Metaphoric Mappings in English.Peter Lang, 2009.130.Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin, 1924.– 359 p.131.Jones K. W. Accent on privilege: English identities and Anglophilia in theUS.
– Temple University Press, 2001.132.Kanzaki K., Yamamoto E., Isahara H. Construction of an objectivehierarchy of abstract concepts via directional similarity. 2004. p. 1147.133.Keynes J.N. Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic. London: Macmillan.1906.134.Kintsch W. Abstract nouns: Imagery versus lexical complexity . Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1972, vol. 11.
1, p. 59 - 65.135.Kohn S.E. Conclusions: Toward a working definition of conductionaphasia // Conduction aphasia. Ed. by S.E. Kohn. Hillside, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, 1992. P. 151-156.136.Kolhatkar V., Hirst G. Resolving shell nouns. [Электронный ресурс].Режим доступа: http://emnlp2014.org/papers/pdf/EMNLP2014056.pdf137.withKolhatkar V., Zinsmeister H., Hirst G.
Annotating anaphoric shell nounstheirantecedents.[Электронный212ресурс].Режимдоступа:http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~varada/VaradaHomePage/Research_files/law2013.pdf138.Kormos J. Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.139.Kormos J. Speech production and the cognition hypothesis // Secondlanguage task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of languagelearning and performance. Ed. by P. Robinson.
John Benjamins PublishingCompany, 2011. P. 39-60.140.Krummel V. The old upper class-Britain's aristocracy. – BoD–Books onDemand, 2008.141.Lawton D. Class, culture and the curriculum. – Routledge, 2011.142.Leech, G. A Communicative Grammar of English /G. Leech, J. Svartvic. -Moscow: Prosveshcheniye, 1983. – 304 p.143.Marshall G. et al. Social class in modern Britain. – Routledge, 2005.144.Martensson F., Horne M., Roll M.
Implications of aphasia on abstract andconcrete noun processing. 2008145.Martensson F., Roll M., Apt P., Horne M. Modeling the meaning of words:neural correlates of abstract and concrete noun processing. Acta neurobiologiaeexperimentalis. 2011, vol. 71. 4, p. 455–478.146.Matlin M. The psychology of women. Wadsworth, 2012.213147.McEnery T., Xiao R., Tono Y. Corpus-based language studies.
– London :Routledge, 2006.148.McEnery T., Wilson A. Teaching and language corpora (TALC) //ReCALL. – 1997. – Т. 9. – №. 01. – p. 5-14.149.Menn L., Obler L. Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic narrativesourcebook. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1989. – 1985 p.150.Milroy L., Milroy J. Social network and social class: Toward an integratedsociolinguistic model. Language in Society. 1992, vol. 21, p. 1–26.151.Mukherjee J.
Bridging the gap between applied Corpus Linguistics and thereality of English teaching in Germany // Applied Corpus Linguistics: AMultidimensional Perspective Rodopi, 2004. P. 239-250.152.Nelson G.C., Greenbaum D., Greenbaum S. An Introduction to EnglishGrammar. Taylor & Francis, 2013.153.Newmeyer F.J.
Language: The Socio-Cultural Context // Linguistics: TheCambridge Survey: Vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 1989.154.Nguyenth Y.Uy.N. A study of Abstract Nouns in English and Vietnamese.MA Thesis in the English Language. 2011.155.Olohan M. Introducing corpora in translation studies. – Routledge, 2004.156.Paivio A. Dual coding theory and education.
[Электронный ресурс].Режимдоступа:http://www.umich.edu/~rdytolrn/pathwaysconference/presentations/paivio.pdf214157.Rickford J. The need for new approaches to social class analysis insociolinguistics. Language & Communication. vol. 6, 1986. 3. p. 215 - 221.158.Ross A. S. C. U and non-U: an essay in sociological linguistics //NoblesseOblige. – 1956. – P. 9-32.159.Rubin J. "Planning for Language Code and Language Use: SomeConsiderations in Policy Formation and Implementation," with E. Annamalai.Language Planning Newsletter 6.3, 1980.160.Saxton M. Child language: Acquisition and development. SagePublications, 2010. – 344 p.161.Schmid, H.-J. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: from corpus tocognition.
Walter de Gruyter, 2000.162.Schmid, H.-J. Cognitive effects of shell nouns // Amsterdam studies in thetheory and history of linguistic science series 4. 1999, p. 111–132.163.Schneider B. Attributing Properties. The American PhilosophicalQuarterly. 2006, vol. 43, p. 315-328.164.Schmid H.-J.Constant and Ephemeral Hypostatization. THING,PROBLEM and other ―Shell Nouns‖. Proceedings of the 16th InternationalCongress of Linguists (Paris, July 20-25). 1997.165.Semino E., Short M. Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thoughtpresentation in a corpus of English writing. – Routledge, 2004.215166.SettiA., Camaelli N. Different domains in[Электронныйресурс].abstract concepts.Режимдоступа:http://www.psych.unito.it/csc/cogsci05/frame/poster/1/p453-setti.pdf167.Singer D., Avedon J., Hering R., McCann A., Sacks C. Sex differences inthe vocabulary of college students // The Journal of Sex Research.
Vol. 13, No. 4.p. 267-273.168.Shewan C. M., Bandur D. L. Treatment of aphasia: a language-orientedapproach. – London : Taylor & Francis, 1986.169.Shewan C. M., Bandur D. L. Language-oriented treatment: Apsycholinguistic approach to aphasia //Language intervention strategies in adultaphasia. – 1994. – С. 184-206.170.Schwanenflugel P., Akin C. Developmental trends in lexical decisions forabstractandconcretewords//ReadingResearchQuarterlyVol.
29, No. 3 (Jul. - Aug. - Sep., 1994), pp. 250-264.171.Schwanenflugel P. J. Contextual constraint and lexical processing//Advances in Psychology. – 1991. – p. 23-45.172.Stefanowitsch A., Gries S. T. (ed.). Corpus-based approaches to metaphorand metonymy. – Walter de Gruyter, 2007. – 171 p.173.Stubbs M. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics.
–Blackwell Publishers, 2001.216174.Svensson P. Number and countability in English nouns: An embodiedmodel. – Umeå University, 1998.175.Sweet, H. A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical: In two parts/H. Sweet. New ed. - Oxford, 1955.
- Pt.I. - XXIV+499p.; Pt.II. - IX+137p.176.Teubert W. My version of corpus linguistics //International Journal ofCorpus Linguistics. – 2005. – Т. 10. – №. 1. – P. 1-13.177.Tognini-Bonelli E. Corpus linguistics at work. – John BenjaminsPublishing, 2001. – Т. 6.178.Wiemer-Hastings K. Abstract noun classification: using a neural networkto match word context and word meaning. Behavior Research Methods,Instruments, & Computers.
1998, vol. 30. 2, p. 264–271.179.Wiemer-Hastings K., Xu J. Content differences for abstract and concreteconcepts. Cognitive Science. 2005, vol. 29. 5, p. 719–736.180.Wiemer-Hastings K., Graesser A. Contextually representing abstractconcepts with abstract structures. 2000.181.Wilson-Mendenhall C., Simmons W., Martin A., Barsalou L. Contextualprocessing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of nonlinguisticsemantic content. Journal of cognitive neuroscience.
2013, vol. 25. 6, p. 920–935.182.Wynn M. Arts and Humanities Data Service. Developing linguisticcorpora: a guide to good practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2005.217.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
