диссертация (1169215), страница 90
Текст из файла (страница 90)
Glennon // Foreign Affairs. – 2003. –Vol. 82, No. 3. – Pp. 16-35.432. Groom A.J.R. The United States and the United Nations: Some Revolting European Thoughts /A.J.R. Groom // Journal of International Relations and Development. – 2003. – Vol. 6, No. 2. –Pp. 120-138.433. Harris P. Decolonising the special relationship: Diego Garcia, the Chagossians, and AngloAmerican relations / P. Harris // Review of International Studies. – 2013. – Vol. 93.
– No. 3. – Pp.707-727.434. Hill C. Powers of a kind: the anomalous position of France and the United Kingdom in worldpolitics // C. Hill // International Affairs. – 2016. – Vol. 92, No.2. – Pp. 393-414.435. Hodge C.C. An ocean apart: The legacy of the Bush years in transatlantic security / C.C. Hodge// Journal of Transatlantic Studies. – 2010. – Vol. 8, No.3.
– Pp. 279-289.436. Homan K. Building Up EU Military Capabilities: An Incremental Process [Electronic resource]/ K. Homan // Audit of European Strategy. Egmont Paper 3 / Ed. Sven Biscop. – Brussels : Royalinstitute for international relations (IRRI-KIIB), December 2004. – Pp. 33 – 36. – URL:http://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2013/09/ep3.pdf?type=pdf (accessed 13.08.2019).311437.
Hoveyda F. The United States and the United Nations: From Close Relationship toEstrangement / F. Hoveyda // American Foreign Policy Interests. – 2006. – Vol. 28, No. 4. –Pp. 333-336.438. Hufbauer G.C. How will TPP and TTIP Change the WTO System? / G.C. Hufbauer, C.Cimino-Isaacs // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2015. – Vol. 18, No. 3. – Pp. 679-696.439.
Ikenberry J. Institutions, strategic restraint, and the persistence of American postwar order / J.Ikenberry // International Security. – 1999. – Vol. 23, No 3. – Pp. 43 – 78.440. Johnson E. Keeping Cyprus off the Agenda: British and American Relations at the UnitedNations 1954-58 / E. Johnson // Diplomacy and Statecraft. – 2000. – Vol.11.
– No. 3. – Pp. 227255.441. Mahncke D. The United States, Germany and France: Balancing Transatlantic Relations / D.Mahncke // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. – 2009. – Vol. 11, Issue 1.– Pp. 79-93.442. Marsh S. ‘Global Security: US-UK relations’: lessons for the special relationship? / S. Marsh //Journal of Transatlantic Studies.
– 2012. – Vol. 10, No. 2. – Pp. 182-199.443. Marsh S. The Anglo-American ‘special relationship’: The Lazarus of international relations / S.Marsh, J. Baylis // Diplomacy and Statecraft. – 2006. – Vol. 17. – No. 1. – P. 173-211.444. Marshall P. Britain’s Place in the Contemporary World / P. Marshall // The Round Table. –2015. – Vol. 104, No. 1.
– Pp. 19-30.445. Mattelaer A. Revisiting the Principles of NATO Burden-Sharing / A. Mattelaer // Parameters. –2016. – Vol. 46, No.1 – Pp. 25-33.446. Mattelaer A. Revisiting the Principles of NATO Burden-Sharing Parameters. P. 29.447. Mingst K. Troubled Waters: The United States-United Nations Relationship / K. Mingst //International Peacekeeping. – 2003. – No. 4.
– Pp. 82-93.448. Morjé Howard L. Sources of Change in United States – United Nations Relations / L. MorjéHoward // Global Governance. – 2010. – Vol. 16, No. 4. – Pp. 485-503.449. Oliver T. Special relationships in flux: Brexit and the future of the US-EU and US-UKrelationships / T. Oliver, M.J. Williams // International Affairs. – 2016. – Vol. 92, No. 3. – P. 547567.450. Peters I.
ESDP as a Transatlantic Issue: Problems of Mutual Ambiguity / I. Peters //International Studies Review. – 2004. – No. 6. – Pp. 381-401. Pp. 391-392.451. Peterson J. Transatlantic Institutions: Can Partnerships be Engineered? / J. Peterson, R.Steffenson // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. – 2009. – Vol.
11, No. 1.– Pp. 25-45.312452. Petersson M. The United States as the Reluctant Ally / M. Petersson // Parameters. – 2016. –Vol. 46, No.1. – Pp. 43-50.453. Porter P. Last charge of the knights? Iraq, Afghanistan and the Special Relationship / P. Porter// International Affairs. – 2010. – Vol. 86, No. 2 – Pp.
355-375.454. Reynolds D. A ‘special relationship’? America, Britain and the international order since theSecond World War / D. Reynolds // International Affairs. – 1986. – No. 1. – Pp. 1-20.455. Reynolds D. From the Transatlantic to the Transnational: Reflections on the Changing Shape ofInternational History / D. Reynolds // Diplomacy and Statecraft. – 2013.
– Vol. 24, No. 1. – Pp.134-148.456. Reynolds D. Rethinking Anglo-American relations / D. Reynolds // International Affairs. –1989. – No. 1. – Pp. 89-111.457. Richter A. Sharing the burden? U.S. Allies, defense spending, and the future of NATO / A.Richter // Comparative Strategy. – 2016. – Vol. 35, No. 4. – Pp. 298-314.458. Rivlin B. The UN Reform Conundrum / B. Rivlin // American Foreign Policy Interests. – 2005.Vol. 27, Issue 5. – Pp.
365-384.459. Rynhold J. British Policy in the Arab-Israeli Arena 1973–2004 / J. Rynhold, J. Spyer // BritishJournal of Middle Eastern Studies. – 2007. – Vol. 34, No. 2. – Pp. 137-155.460. Samuilov S. The United Nations, the United States, and the War on Terrorism / S. Samuilov //Russian Politics and Law. – 2002. – Vol. 40, No. 6. – Pp. 28–46.461. Samuylov S. The United Nations, the United States and the War on Terrorism / S. Samuylov //Russian Politics and Law. – 2002. – Vol. 40, No. 6, – Pp.
28-46.462. Simpson J. The United Kingdom and the Nuclear Future / J. Simpson // The NonproliferationReview. – 2007. – Vol.14, No.2. – Pp. 227-249.463. Stokes D. Transatlantic triage? European and UK ‘grand strategy’ after the US rebalance toAsia / D. Stokes, R.G. Whitman // International Affairs. – 2013. – Vol. 89, No. 5. – Pp. 10871107.464. Stokes D. Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order / D.Stokes // International Affairs.
– 2018. – Vol. 94, No. 1. – Pp. 133-150.465. Sutterlin J.S. United Nations Relations with the Untied States: A Nettlesome ContinuumBetween Multifaceted Partners / J.S. Sutterlin // American Foreign Policy Interests. – 2007. –Vol. 29, No. 4. – Pp. 257-265.466. Svendsen A.D.M.
Buffeted not Busted: The UKUSA “Five Eyes” after Snowden [Electronicresource] / A.D.M. Svendsen // E-International Relations. – 2014. – 8 January. – URL:313http://www.e-ir.info/2014/01/08/buffeted-not-busted-the-ukusa-five-eyes-after-snowden/(accessed 10.08.2019).467. Svendsen A.D.M. Exemplary ‘friends and allies’? Unpacking UK-US relations in the earlytwenty-first century / A.D.M. Svendsen // Journal of Transatlantic Studies. – 2012. – Vol. 9, No.4. – Pp. 342 – 361.468. Thompson H. Inevitability and contingency: The political economy of Brexit / H. Thompson //The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
– 2017. – Vol. 19, No 3. – Pp. 434-449.469. Toje A. The 2003 European Union Security Strategy: A Critical Appraisal / A. Toje //EuropeanForeign Affairs Review. – 2005. – Vol.10, No. 1. – Pp. 117-133.470. Voeten E. Resisting the Lonely Superpower: Responses of States in the United Nations to U.S.Dominance / E. Voeten // The Journal of Politics.
– 2004. – Vol. 66, No 3. – Pp. 729-754.471. Vucetic S. British national identity and the Anglo-American special relationship / S. Vucetic //Journal of Transatlantic Studies. – 2016. – Vol. 14, No. 3. – Pp. 272-292.472. Wallace W. American Hegemony: European Dilemmas / W. Wallace // The Political Quarterly.– Vol. 73, Issue s1.
– Pp. 105-118.473. Wallace W. Reassessing the special relationship / W. Wallace, C. Phillips // InternationalAffairs. – 2009. – Vol. 85, No. 2. – Pp. 263-284.474. William I. Britain’s New Foreign Secretary Only “Reluctant” to See Israeli Transgressions / I.William // Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. – 2006. – Vol.
25, Issue 6. – Pp.13-14.475. Xu R. Institutionalization, path dependence and the persistence of the Anglo-American specialrelationship / R. Xu // International Affairs. – 2016. – № 5. – Pp. 1208 – 1228.Сообщения в СМИ на русском языке476. Григорьев Е. «Обработка Москвы» не удалась [Электронный ресурс] / ЕвгенийГригорьев // Независимая газета. – 2002. – 30 сентября. – URL: http://www.ng.ru/world/200209-30/1_iraq.html (дата обращения 15.08.2019).Сообщения в СМИ на английском языке477. ‘We need negotiations, not declarations’: Russia stays away from Trump’s UN reform plan[Electronic resource] // RT. – 2017. – 18 September.
– URL: https://www.rt.com/news/403734trump-un-reform-russia/ (accessed 15.08.2019).478. A timeline of U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan since 2001 [Electronic resource] / The AssociatedPress // Military Times. – 2016. – 6 July. – URL: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-314military/2016/07/06/a-timeline-of-u-s-troop-levels-in-afghanistan-since-2001/ (accessed16.08.2019).479. Ackerman S. Obama claims US drones strikes have killed up to 116 civilians [Electronicresource] / Spencer Ackerman // The Guardian. – 2016.
– 1 July. – URL:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/01/obama-drones-strikes-civilian-deaths (accessed16.08.2019).480. Aleppo battle: Russia and China veto UN truce resolution [Electronic resource] // The BBC. –2016. – 5 December. – URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38216969 (accessed15.08.2019).481. Ap Dafydd I. UN diplomat ‘offended’ by diaries [Electronic resource] / Iolo ap Dafydd // BBCNews.
– 2007. – 14 July. – URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/6897899.stm(accessed 15.08.2019).482. Asthana A. Barack Obama: Brexit would put UK ‘back of the queue’ for trade talks [Electronicresource] / Anushka Asthana, R.Mason // The Guardian. – 2016. – 22 April. – URL:https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/22/barack-obama-brexit-uk-back-of-queue-fortrade-talks (accessed 18.08.2019).483. Asthana A. Cameron accepts TTIP amendment to mollify rebel Tory MPs [Electronicresource] / Anushka Asthana, Heather Steward // The Guardian.
– 2016. – 19 May. – URL:http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/19/cameron-accepts-ttip-amendment-to-mollifyrebel-tory-mps (accessed 13.08.2019).484. Baczynska G. EU to set up joint command center for military missions [Electronic resource] /Gabriela Baczynska // Reuters. – 2017. – 3 March. – URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eudefence/eu-to-set-up-joint-command-center-for-military-missions-idUSKBN16A1E6 (accessed14.08.2019).485. Baker L. EU has leverage with Israel on talks – Ashton [Electronic resource] / Luke Baker //Reuters. – 2010. – 13 March. – URL:https://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE62C0UN20100313 (accessed 17.08.2019).486.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
