Диссертация (1154446), страница 99
Текст из файла (страница 99)
– 2004. – Vol. 349.562. Council Regulation (EC) № 1168/2011 of 25 October 2011.563. Crecelius M., Kӧmer D., Galgenmüller E., Kontrollierete Lieferungen. Wiesbaden,Frankfurt am Main: BKA, Zentralstelle für die Bekämpfung der Betäu-bungsmittelkriminalität bei derGeneralstaatsanwaltschaft – 2001 – S. 91564. Curtin D. “Post national Democracy, the European Union in Search of a PoliticalPhilosophy” – Inaugural Lecture, Utrecht – 1997.565.
Daily Telegraph, 2009 Sean Hodgson: Police re-examine cases using DNA profiling[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.telegraph.co/uk/news/uknews/law-andorder/5010003/Sean-Hodgson-Police-re-examine-cases-using-DNA-profiling.html.566. De Londras F. International Human Rights Law and Constitutional Rights: In Favour ofSynergy // International Review of Constitutionalism.
– 2009. – Vol. 9.567. De Salvia M. Controle européen et principe de subsidiarité: faut-il encore (et toujour)émarger á la marge d’appréciation ? // Protection de droits de l’homme: la perspective européenne.Mélanges á la mémoire de Rolv Ryssdal. 2000.568. Delmas-Marty M. A. A “Reasoned” Conception of the Reason of State // The EuropeanConvention for the Protection Human Rights. International Protection versus National Restrictions /Edited by Delmas-Marty M. Kluwer. – 1992.569.
Delzangles B. Activism et Autolimitation de la Cour Européenne des droits de l’homme.Paris. – 2009.357570. De Salvia M. Controle européen et principe de subsidiarité: faut-il encore (et toujour)émarger á la marge d’appréciation ? // Protection de droits de l’homme: la perspective européenne.Mélanges á la mémoire de Rolv Ryssdal. – 2000.571. Den Boer Monica. Taming the Third Pillar: Improving the management of Justice andHome Affairs cooperation in the EU.
– Maastricht, IEAP. – 1998.572. Directive 2014/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. // Official Journal of the EuropeanUnion. – 2014. – Vol. L 96/79.573. Discussion paper on the European Investigation Order 11842/10. – 8 July 2010.574. Directive 96/71/EC of 16.12.1996 of the European Parliament and the Council, Art. 6 //Official Journal. –1996. – Vol. L 18/97.575. Directive 97/7/EC of 20.05.1997 of the European Parliament and the Council on theprotection of consumers in respect of distance contacts, Art.
12 // Official Journal – L 144/97.576. Dok. Nr. 11367/12 Council of the European Union. – Brussels. – 20 June 2012.577. Dzehtsiarow K. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of EuropeanConvention on Human Rights // German Law Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 12.578. ENFSI has been granted liaison status with CEN/TC 419. 2013-3-12. [Электронныйресурс]. – Режим доступа: www.enfsi.eu/news/enfsi-has-been-granted-liaison-status-centc-419.579. EIO Initiative – Commission Comments. – 13446/10. – 10 September 2010.580.
EIO Initiative – Follow-up document of the meeting in 27-28 July 2010 12862/10. – 30August 2010.581. EIO Initiative – Detailed Statement 9288/10. – 23 June 2010.582. EIO Initiative – Explanatory Memorandum – Brussels. – 9288/10. – 3 June 2010.583. EIO Initiative – Financial Statement. – 9288/10. – 23 June 2010.584. Europe's Area of freedom, security and justice / Walker N. (ed). Academy of EuropeanLaw. European University Institute. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press.
– 2004. – 283 p.585. The European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the evaluation of the EuropeanArrest Warrant (2005/2175 (INI). Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant and JointInvestigation Teams at EU and National Level. European Parliament. Policy Department C. Citizens’Rights and Constitutional Affairs. January 2009. – P. 10.586. Européenne des droits de l’homme.
Suivi d’Intertaken. Principe de subsidiarité. Note dujurisconsulte. – Doc. 3158598. – 2010.587. The EU's PNR (Passenger Name Record) scheme agreed in April 2004 // Official Journal.–2004. – Vol. L 261.588. The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe. –22.11.2010. – COM (2010) 637 final.589. Eser, A. The importance of comparative legal research for the development of criminalsciences in Comparative Criminal Justice System, in M. Cherif Bassouni (ed), Comparative CriminalJustice systems: From Diversity to Rapprochement.
– Toulouse: Eres, 1998. – P. 77-108.590. European Cybercrime Centre. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:www.europol.europa.eu/ec3old.591. Europol Annual Report 2001. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp? page=publar2001.592. Eurojust Annual Report 2014.
The Hague, 2015. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режимдоступа:www.eurojust.europa.eu/doclibrary/corporate/eurojust%20-Annual%20Reports/Annual%20Report%202014/Annual-Report-2014-EN.pdf.593. Eurojust and the Lisbon Treaty: Towards more effective action Conclusions of the strategicseminar organized by Eurojust and the Belgian Presidency. – Bruges, 20-22 September (17625/10;08.12.2010)[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/doclibrary/Eurojustframework/strategicmeetingsonfutureofeurojust/Eurojust%20and%20the%20Lisbon%20Treaty%20%20Towards%20more%20effective%20action,%20September%202010/17625-2010-12-09-EN.pdf358594.
European Council. 26-27 June 2014 «Strategic Agenda for the Union in times of change»[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:http://www.euintheus.org/press-media/europeancouncil-26-27-june/595. European criminal justice under Lisbon Treaty. Conference Proceeding. Trier, 13 February2008.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.era.int/web/en/html/nodes_main/4_1649_459/4_2153_462/5_1625_6358.htm596. Europol Information Management.
Products and Services. [Электронный ресурс]. –Режим доступа: http://62.162.77.57/Uploads/Europol%-20Products%-20and%20Services-Booklet.pdf.597. Framework Decision 2008/947/JA on the application of the principle of mutual recognitionto judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures andalternative sanctions // Official Journal of the European Union.
– 2008. – Vol. L 337/102.598. Ferllini, R. Forensic Archaeology and Human Rights Violations / R. Ferllini. – Illinois,2007. – 320 p.599. Final Report on the first evaluation exercise – mutual legal assistance in criminal matter(Doc. 2001/c 216/02) // Official Journal of European Communities. –2001. – C 216/14.600. FRONTEX Annual Report, 2009.601. FRONTEX: the EU external borders agency. House of Lords. European Union Committee.9th Reports of Session 2007-08.
– PP. 74-81.602. Frontex. Annual Risk Analysis 2014. – Warsaw, May 2014.603. Fennely N. The European Arrest Warrant: Recent Developments. – ERA Forum. – vol. 8604. Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Juridical Lawmaking // Virginia Journal ofInternational Law. 2005. Vol. 45 – P. 656-673605. Green Paper on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one Member States to anotherandsecurityitsadmissibility.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.statewatch.org/.../eu-com-cross-border-evidence.pdf606.
Green Paper on conflicts of jurisdiction and the principle of ne bis in idem in criminalproceedings. – COM (2005) 696.607. Green Paper on criminal-law protection of the financial interests of the Community and theestablishment of a European Prosecutor. – COM (2001) 715 final. – 11.12.2001.608. Follow-up Report on the Green Paper on the criminal-law protection of the financialinterests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. – COM (2003). – 128final.609. The Hague Program: strengthening freedom, security and Justice in the EU / OfficialJournal of European Communities, 2005.
– Vol. 48.610. Some remarks on Schengen III // Statewatch Bulletin, 2005, 17 July. [Электронныйресурс]. – Режим доступа: http:www.statewatch.org/news/2005/jul/17Schengen-III.htm.611. Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An inquiry into the desirability of and opportunitiesfor international standards. – Thela Thesis. – The Hague, 2000.612. Helfer L., Slaughter A.-M. Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response toProfessors Posner and Yoo. 93 // California Law Review. 2005.
– Vol. 93. – № 3 – Р. 899.613. Helfer L. Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights // CornellInternational Law Journal. 1993. – Vol. 23.614.HistoryofEAAF.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://eaaf.typepad.com/founding_of_eaaf/.615. History of IFSA. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:www.enfsi.eu/ifsa/letterunderstanding.616.HistoryofMAFS.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:www.mafs.biz/cennistorici.php.617. Home Affairs Committee (2007) Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System.Second Report of Session 2006-07. Volume I [Online] // (23 November 2010).
[Электронный359ресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmhaff/181/181i.pdf.618. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee. – 2007: 15.619. Howlett, M. 2009, ‘Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi‐levelnested model of policy instrument choice and policy design’, Policy Sciences, vol. 42, no. 1,September, pp. 73‐89.620.
Human Genetics Commission (2009) Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear? BalancingIndividual Rights and the Public Interest in the Governance and Use the National DNA Database: aReport by the Human Genetics Commission London: Human Genetics Commission.621. The Implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States, Delmas-Marty/Vervaele(edit.), 4 volumes, Intersentia. – ISBN 90-5095-097-3.622. Innocence Project (nd) [Online]. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:http://www.innocenceproject.org/know/(29 October 2010)623. International Forensic Strategic Alliance.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
