Диссертация (1154446), страница 97
Текст из файла (страница 97)
Документ ООН А/CONF. 183/09.478. Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme: Brussels, 20.04.2010; COM (2010)171 final.479. Action plan of the Council and the Commission on how best to implement the provisions ofthe Treaty of Amsterdam on an area of freedom, security and justice (Vienna Action plan), adopted bythe JHA Council on 3 Dec.
1998 // Official Journal of European Union. – Brussels, 1999. – P. 1-15.480. Action Plan 2014-2017: Priorities for future cooperation in the area of Migration andMobility in the framework of the Africa-EU Strategic Partnership [Электронный ресурс] – Режим352доступа::http://www.africa-eu-partnership.org/en/documents/action-plan-2014-2017-prioritiesfuture-cooperation-area-migration-and-mobility-framework481. Administrative arrangement between the European police office (EUROPOL) and theEuropean Anti-fraud Office (OLAF); Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation betweenEurojust and OLAF (24.09.2008).
[Электронный ресурс]–Режимдоступа:http://mobile.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/administrative_arrangement_between_europol_and_olaf_signed_version.pdf.482. Agreement on mutual legal assistance between the European Union and the United States ofAmerica // Official Journal of the European Union. – 2003. – Vol. L 181/34.483.
Agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminalmatters // Official Journal of the European Union. – 2010. – Vol. L 39. – P. 20–35.484. Agreement of 6 November 1990 between the member states of the European Communitieson the transfer of proceedings in criminal matters. // Official Journal of the European Communities. –2000. – C 379/7.485.
Agreement between Eurojust and Europol (The Hague, 01 October 2009) [Электронныйресурс]. – Режим доступа: https:www.europol.europa.eu.486. Alec Stone Sweet and Helen Keller. Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National LegalSystem // Faculty Scholarship Series. – 2008.487. Amended Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerninginvestigations conducted by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation(EURATOM) No 1074/1999 – Brussels, 17.03.2011 – COM (2011) –135 final.488. Almirall, J.
R., Furton, K. G. The Importance of Standards in Forensic Science / J. R.Almirall,K.G.Furton[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:www.scafo.org/library/140502.html.489. Answers to the questionnaire related to the types of procedure to be covered by theapplication of the EIO initiative 13050/10; 31 August 2010.490. Arai-Takahashi Y. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle ofProportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR Intersentia, 2002.491. Balkan Academy of Forensic Sciences [Электронный ресурс].
– Режим доступа:www.balkanforensic.org.492. Balzer, A.J. International Police Cooperation: Opportunities and Obstacles / Policing inCentral and Eastern Europe: Comparing Firsthand Knowledge with Experience from the West. Editedby Milan Pagon. College of Police and Security Studies. – Slovenia, 1996.493. BBC News 20 September 2001. // Kaunert C. Without the Power of Pursue or Sword.
–P. 399.494. Beck U., Grande E. Cosmopolitan Europe // Policy Press, 2008.495. Benvenisti E. Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards // InternationalLaw and Politics. – 1999. – Vol. 31.496. Berger, M. A. Evolving Trends in Forensic Science / M. A. Berger // Tennessee Journal ofLaw & Policy. – 2014. – Vol. 6(2). – P. 147-160.497.
Berger V. Le Cours constitutionnelles e la Cour Européenne des droits de l’homme // LesNouveaux Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel. – Paris, 2011 – № 3.498. Blakemore B., Blake Ch. Can the National DNA Database be effective and comply withhuman rights legislation? / Police Journal, Great Britain, 2010. – Vol. 85 – № 3.499. Brauch J. A. The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court ofHuman Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law // Columbian Journal of European Law. 2004. – Vol. 11.500. Blakemore B., Blake Ch.
Can the National DNA Database be effective and comply withhuman rights legislation? // Police Journal, Great Britain, 2010. –Vol. 85. – № 3.501. Bennetto, J. (2009) Police and Racism: What has been achieved 10 years after the StephenLawrence Inquiry Report? London: Equality and Human Rights Commission [Электронный ресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/raceinbritain/policeandracism.pdf.353502. Bulletin quotidien Europe. – Brussels, 2013. – 18 July.503.
Carrera S., Hernanz N., Parkin J. The «Lisbonisation» of the European Parliament:Assessing progress, shortcomings and challenges for democratic accountability in the area of freedom,security and justice. – Brussels: CEPS, 2013. – 44 p.504. Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretaryof State intervening) [2009] – EWCA Civ 1079.505. Collett E. Future EU Policy Development on Immigration and Asylum: Understanding theChallenge.
Policy Brief. – June 2014. – P.8506. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, theEuropean economic and social Committee and the Committee of the regions. On the protection of thefinancial interests of the European Union by criminal law and by administrative investigations. Anintegrated policy to safeguard taxpayers' money. – Brussels, 2011. – 26 June. – 12 p.507. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, theEconomic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on The Global Approach toMigration and Mobility (COM (2011) 743 final). –18.11.2011.508.
Commission Staff working document, Accompanying document to the third Report fromthe Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of theCouncil Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrenderprocedures between Member States (COM(2011) 175 final) SEC (2011) 430 final; 11.04.2011).509. Commission Communication, «An Open and Secure Europe: Making it Happen» COM(2014) 154, 11 March 2014;510. Commission Communication, «The EU Justice Agenda for 2020 – Strengthening Trust,Mobility and Growth within the Union» COM (2014) 144, 11 March 2014;511.
Commission Communication, «A New EU Framework to Strengthen Rule of Law» COM(2014) 158, 19 March 2014.512. Commission Staff working document, Accompanying document to the third Report fromthe Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of theCouncil Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrenderprocedures between Member States COM(2011) 175 final) SEC (2011) 430 final; 11 April 2011.513.
Commission proposal for a Regulation on the establishment of an evaluation andmonitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis. COM (2011) 559. – Brussels,2011. – 16 September. – 17 p.514. Commission proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No. 562/2006 in order toprovide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders inexceptional circumstances, COM (2011) 560. – Brussels, 2011.
– 16 September. – 13 p.515. Commission Decision 1999/352 of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Anti-fraudOffice (OLAF) (Article 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) // OfficialJournal of the European Union. – 1999. – Vol. L 136.516.
Communication from the Сommission to the European Parliament, the Council, theEuropean Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the protection of thefinancial interests of the European Union by criminal law and by administrative investigations – Anintegrated policy to safeguard taxpayers’ money, COM (2011) 293.517. Community food law. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.eds-aes.ru.518.
Consolidated version of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; The EuropeanPublic Prosecutor’s Office in the European judicial area (Brussels, 15 April. 2010; 8614/10)[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Consolidated_version_of_the_Treaty_on_the_Functioning_of_the_European_Union519. Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member states of theEuropean Union // Official Journal – 2000 – C 197/3.354520.
Explanatory Report on the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in CriminalMatters between the Member states of the European Union // Official Journal of the European Union.– 2000. – Vol. C 379/7.521. Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Establishment ofa European Police Office (EUROPOL Convention). [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/-organisedcrime/projects/carpo/output_3_special_investigative_means/Europol_Convention.pdf.522. Convention on the international validity of criminal judgment (The Hague, 28.5.1970).
–[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_the_International_Validity_of_Criminal_Judgments523. Convention between the Member states of the European Communities on the enforcementof foreign criminal sentences of 13.11.1991. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/524.
Council of Europe’s Convention on the transfer of sentenced persons of 21.3.1983.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Transfer_of_Sentenced_Persons.525. EC Agreement on the application of the convention of transfer of sentenced persons of25.05.1987[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Transfer_of_Sentenced_Persons.526. Additional Protocol to the Convention on the transfer of sentenced persons of 18 December1997.[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Transfer_of_Sentenced_Persons527.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
