Диссертация (1137405), страница 19
Текст из файла (страница 19)
÷ÌÉÑÎÉÅ É ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÎÁÑ ÕÓÔÏÊÞÉ×ÏÓÔØ × ÒÏÓÓÉÊÓËÏÍ ÐÁÒÌÁÍÅÎÔÅ(1905|1917 É 1993|2005 ÇÇ.), í., æÉÚÍÁÔÌÉÔ, 2007. 310 c.[6] áÌÅÓËÅÒÏ× æ.ô., ëÁÌÑÇÉÎ ÷.á., ðÏÇÏÒÅÌØÓËÉÊ ë.â. áÎÁÌÉÚ ÒÁÓÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÉÑ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ × íÅÖÄÕÎÁÒÏÄÎÏÍ ÷ÁÌÀÔÎÏÍ æÏÎÄÅ // á×ÔÏÍÁÔÉËÁ É ÔÅÌÅÍÅÈÁÎÉËÁ. 2008. 11. C. 140|148.140[7] áÌÅÓËÅÒÏ× æ.ô., èÁÂÉÎÁ ü.ì., û×ÁÒà ä.á. âÉÎÁÒÎÙÅ ÏÔÎÏÛÅÎÉÑ, ÇÒÁÆÙ ÉËÏÌÌÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÑ. 2-Å ÉÚÄÁÎÉÅ. í.: æÉÚÍÁÔÌÉÔ, 2012. 342 c.[8] âÁÃÙÎ í.÷., ëÁÌÑÇÉÎ ÷.á. ï ÁËÓÉÏÍÁÔÉÞÅÓËÏÍ ÏÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÉÉ ÏÂÝÉÈ ÉÎÄÅËÓÏ× ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ × ÚÁÄÁÞÅ ÇÏÌÏÓÏ×ÁÎÉÑ Ó Ë×ÏÔÏÊ.
WP7/2009/04. í.: éÚÄ. ÄÏÍçõ-÷ûü, 2009.[9] ÷ÁÓÉÎ á.á., íÏÒÏÚÏ× ÷.÷. ôÅÏÒÉÑ ÉÇÒ É ÍÏÄÅÌÉ ÍÁÔÅÍÁÔÉÞÅÓËÏÊ ÜËÏÎÏÍÉËÉ.í.: íÁËÓ-ÐÒÅÓÓ, 2005. 278 Ó.[10] äÁÎÉÌÏ× ÷.é. ìÅËÃÉÉ ÐÏ ÔÅÏÒÉÉ ÉÇÒ. í.: òÏÓÓÉÊÓËÁÑ ÜËÏÎÏÍÉÞÅÓËÁÑ ÛËÏÌÁ,2002. 140 c.[11] ëÌÉÍÁ ò.ü., èÏÄÖ äÖ.ë. íÁÔÅÍÁÔÉËÁ ×ÙÂÏÒÏ×. í.: íãîíï, 2007. 224 c.[12] ëÕËÕÛËÉÎ î.ó., íÏÒÏÚÏ× ÷.÷. ôÅÏÒÉÑ ÎÅÁÎÔÁÇÏÎÉÓÔÉÞÅÓËÉÈ ÉÇÒ. í.: éÚÄÁÔÅÌØÓÔ×Ï ÍÏÓËÏ×ÓËÏÇÏ ÕÎÉ×ÅÒÓÉÔÅÔÁ, 1984. 104 Ó.[13] ìÁÎÄÏ ó.ë.
÷×ÅÄÅÎÉÅ × ÄÉÓËÒÅÔÎÕÀ ÍÁÔÅÍÁÔÉËÕ. í.: éÚÄÁÔÅÌØÓÔ×Ïíãîíï, 2012. 266c.[14] îÅÊÍÁÎ äÖ. ÆÏÎ, íÏÒÇÅÎÛÔÅÒÎ ï. ôÅÏÒÉÑ ÉÇÒ É ÜËÏÎÏÍÉÞÅÓËÏÅ ÐÏ×ÅÄÅÎÉÅ.í.: îÁÕËÁ, 1970.[15] ðÅÞÅÒÓËÉÊ C.ì., ñÎÏ×ÓËÁÑ å.â. ëÏÏÐÅÒÁÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ÉÇÒÙ: ÒÅÛÅÎÉÑ É ÁËÓÉÏÍÙ.éÚÄ-×Ï åõóðÂ, 2004. 459 c.[16] ðÏÇÏÒÅÌØÓËÉÊ ë.â. íÅÔÏÄÙ ÏÃÅÎËÉ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× × ÚÁÄÁÞÅ ÐÒÉÎÑÔÉÑËÏÌÌÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÈ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÊ: ÏÂÚÏÒ ÏÓÎÏ×ÎÙÈ ÎÁÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÊ. ðÒÏÂÌÅÍÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ.
2011. 5. Ó. 2|13.[17] ðÒÁÓÏÌÏ× ÷.÷., ôÉÈÏÍÉÒÏ× ÷.í çÅÏÍÅÔÒÉÑ. 2|Å ÉÚÄ., ÐÅÒÅÒÁÂ.É ÄÏÐ. í.:íãîíï, 2007. 328 c.141[18] òÏÂÅÒÔÓ æ.ó. äÉÓËÒÅÔÎÙÅ ÍÁÔÅÍÁÔÉÞÅÓËÉÅ ÍÏÄÅÌÉ Ó ÐÒÉÌÏÖÅÎÉÑÍÉ Ë ÓÏÃÉÁÌØÎÙÍ, ÂÉÏÌÏÇÉÞÅÓËÉÍ É ÜËÏÌÏÇÉÞÅÓËÉÍ ÚÁÄÁÞÁÍ. í.: îÁÕËÁ, 1986. 486c.[19] óÏËÏÌÏ×Á á.÷. ëÏÌÉÞÅÓÔ×ÅÎÎÙÅ ÍÅÔÏÄÙ ÏÃÅÎËÉ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× ÐÒÉÐÒÉÎÑÔÉÉ ËÏÌÌÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÈ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÊ // ðÏÌÉÔÉÑ. 2008. 51(4). ó. 152|162.[20] óÏËÏÌÏ×Á á.÷.
íÏÄÉÆÉÃÉÒÏ×ÁÎÎÙÅ ÉÎÄÅËÓÙ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ, ÕÞÉÔÙ×ÁÀÝÉÅÐÒÅÄÐÏÞÔÅÎÉÑ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× ÐÏ ËÏÁÌÉÃÉÏÎÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÀ // íÏÄÅÌÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ×ÓÏÃÉÁÌØÎÏ-ÐÏÌÉÔÉÞÅÓËÏÊ ÓÆÅÒÅ. 2009. 3. C. 41|46.[21] û×ÁÒà ä.á. ï ×ÙÞÉÓÌÅÎÉÉ ÉÎÄÅËÓÏ× ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ, ÕÞÉÔÙ×ÁÀÝÉÈ ÐÒÅÄÐÏÞÔÅÎÉÑÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× // á×ÔÏÍÁÔÉËÁ É ôÅÌÅÍÅÈÁÎÉËÁ. 2009. 3. C. 152|159.[22] û×ÁÒà ä.á. éÎÄÅËÓÙ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ, ËÁË ÜÌÅÍÅÎÔÙ ÐÒÏÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÇÏ ÐÒÏÓÔÒÁÎÓÔ×Á// ôÒÕÄÙ VI-Ê íÏÓËÏ×ÓËÏÊ ÍÅÖÄÕÎÁÒÏÄÎÏÊ ËÏÎÆÅÒÅÎÃÉÉ ÐÏ ÉÓÓÌÅÄÏ×ÁÎÉÀÏÐÅÒÁÃÉÊ.
2010. C. 435|436.[23] û×ÁÒà ä.á. áËÓÉÏÍÁÔÉËÁ ÄÌÑ ÉÎÄÅËÓÏ× ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ, ÕÞÉÔÙ×ÁÀÝÉÈ ÐÒÅÄÐÏÞÔÅÎÉÑ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× // á×ÔÏÍÁÔÉËÁ É ôÅÌÅÍÅÈÁÎÉËÁ, íÏÓË×Á. 2010. 1. C.144|158.[24] û×ÁÒà ä.á. éÎÄÅËÓÙ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ, ËÁË ÜÌÅÍÅÎÔÙ ÐÒÏÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÇÏ ÐÒÏÓÔÒÁÎÓÔ×Á// äÏËÌÁÄÙ áËÁÄÅÍÉÉ îÁÕË, 2011. 441 (4). C. 456|459.[25] û×ÁÒà ä.á.
áËÓÉÏÍÁÔÉËÉ ÄÌÑ ÉÎÄÅËÓÏ× ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ × ÚÁÄÁÞÅ ÇÏÌÏÓÏ×ÁÎÉÑ ÓË×ÏÔÏÊ // ðÒÏÂÌÅÍÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ, 2012. 1. C. 33|41.[26] ñËÕÂÁ ÷.é. áÎÁÌÉÚ ÒÁÓÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÉÑ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× ÐÒÉ ÒÁÚÌÉÞÎÙÈ ÐÒÁ×ÉÌÁÈÐÒÉÎÑÔÉÑ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÊ × óÏ×ÅÔÅ íÉÎÉÓÔÒÏ× ÒÁÓÛÉÒÅÎÎÏÇÏ å×ÒÏÐÅÊÓËÏÇÏ ÓÏÀÚÁ. WP7/2003/03. í.: çõ ÷ûü, 2003.142[27] ñËÕÂÁ ÷.é. íÏÄÅÌÉ É ÍÅÔÏÄÙ ÁÎÁÌÉÚÁ ÒÁÓÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÉÑ ×ÌÉÑÎÉÑ × ×ÙÂÏÒÎÙÈÏÒÇÁÎÁÈ Ó ÏÇÒÁÎÉÞÅÎÉÑÍÉ ÎÁ ÆÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ËÏÁÌÉÃÉÊ. á×ÔÏÒÅÆÅÒÁÔ ÄÉÓÓ.ËÁÎÄ. ÔÅÈÎ. ÎÁÕË. í.: éðõ òáî, 2005.[28] Aleskerov F. Power indices taking into account agents' preferences. Mathematicsand Democracy.
Berlin, Springer, 2006. P. 1|18.[29] Aleskerov F.T., Belianin A.V., Pogorelskiy K.B. Power and preferences: an experimental approach. WP7/2010/01. M. çõ ÷ûü,, 2010.[30] Aleskerov F.T., Kalyagin V.A., òÏgÏrÅlskiÕ K. Actual voting power of the IMFmembers based on their political-economic intergration // Mathematical andComputer Modelling. 2008. 48. P. 1554|1559.[31] Aleskerov F.T., Kalyagin V.A., òÏgÏrÅlskiÕ K. Distribution of power within theIMF: when does preference mean voice? Social Science Research Network, 2010.P. 1|15.[32] Banzhaf J.
F. Weighted Voting Doesn't Work: A Mathematical Analysis //Rutgers Law Review. 1965. 19. P. 317|343.[33] Barr J., Passarelli F., Who has the power in the EU? Working Papers RutgersUniversity, Newark, 2004-005, Department of Economics, Rutgers University,Newark, 2004.[34] Bilbao J.M., Fernandez J.
R., Jimenes A., Lopez J.J. Generating functions forcomputing power indices eciently // Top. 2000. 8(2). P. 191|213.[35] Bilbao J.M., Fernandez J. R., Jimenes A., Lopez J.J. Voting power in the European Union enlargement // European Journal of Operational Research. 2002. 143. P.
181|196.143[36] Braham M., Holler M. The impossibility of a preference-based power index //Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2005. 17(1). P. 137|157.[37] Braham M., Holler M. Power and preferences again: a reply to Napel and Widgren // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2005. 17(3). P. 389|395.[38] Brams S.J. Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press, 1975.
312 p.[39] Brams S.J., Auso P.J. Power and size: a new paradox // Theory and Decision.1976. 7. P. 29|56.[40] Brams S.J., Auso P.J. New Paradoxes of Voting Power on the EC Council ofMinisters // Electoral Studies. 1985. 4. P. 135|139.[41] Brams S.J., Auso P.J. Addendum to: New Paradoxes of Voting Power on theEC Council of Ministers // Electoral Studies. 1985.
4. P. 135|139.[42] Carreras F. Restriction of Simple Games // Mathematical Social Sciences. 1991.V. 21. 3. P. 245|260.[43] Coleman J.S. Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act.1971. In B. Lieberman (ed.) Social choice, Gordon and Breach. London.[44] Coleman J.S. Loss of Power // American Sociological Review.
1973. 38. P.1|17.[45] Deegan J., Packel E.W. A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games //International Journal of Game Theory. 1978. 7(2). P. 113|123.[46] Deegan J., Packel E.W. An Axiomatic Family of Power Indices for Simple nPerson Games // Public Choice. 1980. 35. Pp. 229|239.[47] Deegan J., Packel E.W. To the (Minimal Winning) Victors Go the (Equally Divided) Spoils: A New Power Index for Simple n-Person Games // In:144S.J.
Brams, W.F. Lucas and P.D. Stran (eds), Political and Related Models.Berlin, Springer, 1983, p. 239|255.[48] Dubey P. On the Uniqueness of the Shapley Value // International Journal ofGame Theory, 1975. 4. P. 131|139.[49] Dubey P., Neyman A., Weber R.J. Value theory without eciency // Mathematics of Operations Research. 1981.
6. P. 122|128.[50] Dubey P., Shapley L.S. Mathemaical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index //Math. Oper. Res., 1979. 4. P. 99|131.[51] Edgeworth F.I. Mathematical psychics; an essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London. 1881. 162 p (× ÉÚÄÁÎÉÉ 2011 Ç.)[52] Feltkamp V. Alternative axiomatic characterizations of the Shapley andBanzhaf values // International Journal of Game Theory. 1995. 24. P. 179|186.[53] Felsenthal.
D.S., Machover M. Postulates and paradoxes of relative voting power| A critical reappraisal // Theory and Decision. 1995. 38. P. 195|229.[54] Felsenthal. D.S., Machover M. The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory andPractice, Problems and Paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998. 322 p.[55] Felsenthal. D.S., Machover M.
Voting power measurement: a story of misreinvention. 2005 // Social Choice and Welfare. V 25. P. 485|506.[56] Friedman J., McGrath L., Parker C. Achievable hierarchies in voting games //Theory and Decision. 2006. 61. P. 305|318.[57] Gillies D.B. Solutions to General Non-zero-sum Games // Annals of Mathematical Studies. 1959. 40. P. 47|85.145[58] Haller H.
Collusion properties of values // International Journal of Game Theory. 1994. 23. P. 261|281.[59] Holler M.J., Packel E.W. Power, Luck and the Right Index // Journal of Economics. 1983. 43, P. 21|29.[60] Johnston R.J. On the Measurement of Power: Some Reactions to Laver //Environment and Planning. 1978.
10. P. 907|914.[61] Katsev I,, Yanovskaya E. The Prenucleolus for Games with Restricted Cooperation// Mathematical Social Sciences. 2013. 66. P. 56|65.[62] Kilgour D.M. A formal analysis of the amending formula of Canada's Constitution Act // Canadian Journal of political science. 1983. 16.
P. 771|777.[63] Kunh H.W. Report on an Informal Conference on the Theory of n-Person GamesHeld in the Princeton University. 1951.[64] Lambert J.P. Voting games, power indices and presidential elections // UMAPJournal. 1988. 9. P. 216|277.[65] Laruelle A., Valenciano F. Shapley|Shubik and Banzhat Indices Revisited //Mathematics of operation research.
2000. 26. 1. P. 89|104.[66] Laruelle A., Valenciano F. A critical reappraisal of some voting power paradoxes// Public Choice. 2005. 125. P. 17|41.[67] Laruelle A., Valenciano F. Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations // Social Choice and Welfare. 2005. 24. P. 171|197.[68] Leech D. Computation of power indices. // Warwick economic research papers.2002.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
