Диссертация (1136614), страница 19
Текст из файла (страница 19)
Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2011; 21(1):166–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x PMID: 2373012233.Simons-Morton B, Chen R. Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & society. 2009: 41(1):3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X0933486134.Berndt TJ, Keefe K. Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child development.
1995;66(5):1312–1329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131649 PMID: 755521835.Burke MA, Sass TR. Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics.2013; 31(1):51–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/66665336.Akers JF, Jones RM, Coyl DD. Adolescent friendship pairs: Similarities in identity status development,behaviors, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research. 1998: 13(2):178–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489813200537.Erikson E.
Identity, Youth, and Crisis. New York: Norton; 196838.Steinberg L, Silverberg SB. The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child development.1986; 57(4):841–851. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130361 PMID: 375760439.Sroufe LA, Cooper RG, DeHart GB, Marshall ME, Bronfenbrenner UE. Child development: Its natureand course. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company; 199240.Kossinets G, Watts DJ. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science. 2006; 311(5757):88–90. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116869 PMID: 1640014941.Szell M, Thurner S. Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game.
Social networks.2010; 32(4):313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.06.00142.Vaquero LM, Cebrian M. The rich club phenomenon in the classroom. Scientific reports. 2013; 3:1174.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01174 PMID: 2337890843.Wuchty S. What is a social tie? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(36):15099–15100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090790510644.Almaatouq A, Radaelli L, Pentland A, Shmueli E. Are you your friends’ friend? Poor perception of friendship ties limits the ability to promote behavioral change.
PloS One. 2016; 11(3):e0151588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151588 PMID: 2700253045.Eagle N, Pentland AS, Lazer D. Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(36): 15274–15278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090028210646.Mastrandrea R, Fournet J, Barrat A. Contact patterns in a high school: a comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveys. PloS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136497.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136497 PMID: 2632528947.Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In Cultural theory: An anthology; 2011. p. 81–93.48.Gamage KJ. Like it? Ritual Symbolic Exchange Using Facebook’s Like Tool. 201249.Jones JJ, Settle JE, Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Marlow C, Fowler JH. Inferring tie strength from onlinedirected behavior. PloS One.
2013; 8(1):e52168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052168 PMID:2330096450.Mayer A, Puller SL. The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses.Journal of public economics. 2008; 92(1):329–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.00151.Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J. Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012; 109(1):68–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109739109PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183473 August 30, 201715 / 16Formation of homophily in academic performance52.Dokuka S, Valeeva D, Yudkevich M.
Formation and Evolution Mechanisms in Online Network of Students: The Vkontakte Case. In: International Conference on Analysis of Images, Social Networks andTexts. Springer; 2015. p. 263–274.53.Scissors L, Burke M, Wengrovitz S. What’s in a Like?: Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likeson Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work& Social Computing. ACM; 2016. p. 1501–1510.54.Newman M. Networks: an introduction. Oxford university press; 2010.55.Duncan GJ, Dowsett CJ, Claessens A, Magnuson K, Huston AC, Klebanov P, et al. School readinessand later achievement. Developmental psychology.
2007; 43(6):1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 PMID: 1802082256.Krapohl E, Rimfeld K, Shakeshaft NG, Trzaskowski M, McMillan A, Pingault JB, et al. The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(42):15273–15278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.140877711157.Berndt TJ. The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence.
Child development; 1982. p.1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.2307/113007158.Brakefield TA, Mednick SC, Wilson HW, De Neve JE, Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Same-sex sexualattraction does not spread in adolescent social networks. Archives of sexual behavior. 2014; 43(2):335–344.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0142-9 PMID: 2384278459.Shakya HB, Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Parental influence on substance use in adolescent social networks. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2012; 166(12):1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.137260.Snijders TA, Van de Bunt GG, Steglich CE. Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for networkdynamics. Social networks. 2010; 32(1):44–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.00461.Karweit N. Extracurricular activities and friendship selection. In: Friends in school: Patterns of selectionand influence in secondary schools. Elsevier; 1983. p. 131–139.62.Granovetter MS. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press; 1995.63.Podolny JM, Baron JN. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace.American sociological review. 1997; 62(5):673–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657354PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183473 August 30, 201716 / 16Приложение Г Predicting PISA scores from students’ digital traces Smirnov, I. In International Conference on Web and Social Media 2018. AAAI. The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an influential worldwide study that tests the skills and knowledge in mathematics, reading, and science of 15-year-old students. In this paper, we show that PISA scores of individual students can be predicted from their digital traces. We use data from the nationwide Russian panel study that tracks 4,400 participants of PISA and includes information about their activity on a popular social networking site. We build a simple model that predicts PISA scores based on students’ subscriptions to various public pages on the social network. The resulting model can successfully discriminate between low- and high-performing students (AUC = 0.9). We find that top-performing students are interested in pages related to science and art, while pages preferred by low-performing students typically concern humor and horoscopes. The difference in academic performance between subscribers to such public pages could be equivalent to several years of formal schooling, indicating the presence of a strong digital divide. The ability to predict academic outcomes of students from their digital traces might unlock the potential of social media data for large-scale education research. Predicting PISA Scores from Students’ Digital TracesIvan SmirnovInstitute of Education, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMyasnitskaya ul., 20, Moscow 101000, Russiaibsmirnov@hse.ruAbstractThe Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)is an influential worldwide study that tests the skills andknowledge in mathematics, reading, and science of 15-yearold students.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
