Зверев_ Phd Summary (1136601), страница 3
Текст из файла (страница 3)
Belbin, M. Campion, D. Denton,M. Finley, M. Gellert, J. Katzenbach, K. Novak, J. Newstrom, H. Robbins, A. Sinclair, D.Smith, M. Steven, P. Strozniak, L. Tompson, etc.).Theory and methodology of assessment of efficiency of a socio-psychological training(V. Bolshakov, I. Vachkov, Y. Zhukov, V. Konovalchik, V. Nikandrov, W. Arthur, S. Bell, W.Benett, C.
Campbell, R. Dawson, P. Edens, A. Gibb, D. Kirkpatrick, S. Mann, J. Phillips, I.Robertson, etc.).Empirical base of the research1. Data of the expert poll directed to detection of requirements of the organizations forservices in formation of the work groups of the commercial organizations. In total 200 experts –heads of departments of training and development of personnel and also directors of human resource management of the Russian commercial organizations participated in poll.2.
Data of the expert poll directed to assessment of the developed conceptual scheme of aresearch including characteristics of group dynamics of a socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types. Ten highly qualified specialists in the sphere of social psychology have participated in the poll.3. Data of the expert poll directed to assessment of applicability of the developed sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups of various types for a research.
Theprogram has been approved by seven social psychologists, which are considered as highly qualified specialists.4. Materials of assessment of efficiency of a series of trainings for formation of the workgroups of various types. Selection of a research was made by representatives of the commercialorganizations of Russia aged from 18 up to 48 years, men and women. 161 persons in total,from them 124 men and 37 women.
In total 20 training groups of people have participated, 6-13people in each group.Research methodsIn this dissertation theoretical and empirical methods have been used. Theoretical methods: analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, logical conclusion. Empirical methods:methods of socio-psychological influence; methods of collecting primary empirical data andmethods of its processing. Methods of collecting empirical data: expert poll, psychological diagnostics, quasiexperiment. In processing and the analysis of data methods were used qualitative(the analysis of contents of answers to open questions) and quantitative (including mathematicalstatistics).8During a training for formation of the work groups methods of socio-psychological influence and training were used: mini-lectures, group discussions, role-playing games, psychogymnastic and communicative exercises.Scientific novelty of the research1.
Characteristics of group dynamics are for the first time revealed and analysed during the socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types.2. It is revealed that besides "highest" there is an optimum level of development of characteristics of group dynamics of the work groups of various types (there is certain "threshold" afterwhich development of group entitativity, group cohesion and personality’s opulence of groupmembers is slowed down). It promotes an increment of knowledge in the field of group dynamics and features of group interaction.3. For the first time as a socio-psychological predictor of group efficiency use of parameter of amutual contribution of participants to personality’s opulence of each other is proved.4.
The socio-psychological model of a ratio of types of the work groups, the leading processesof group dynamics in them and relevant by it types of a training for formation of the workgroups is constructed for the first time.5. Original approach to assessment of efficiency of a socio-psychological training for formationof the work groups by means of diagnostics of development of socio-psychological parameters(group entitativity, group cohesion, personality’s opulence of the group members) is developed.Arguments of the dissertation to be defended1.
Characteristics of group dynamics in a socio-psychological training for formation ofthe work groups are optimum combinations of the following processes of group dynamics forthe work groups of various types: group identification, group standard setting, group cohesionprocess, group leadership, role differentiation, group decision-making. In programs of a sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups it is recomended to consider updatingoptimum for this purpose like the work group of processes of group dynamics.2. Optimum processes of group dynamics for the work groups of various types in thecommercial organizations are defined. Namely: for the work group "task team" – group identification and group standard setting; for the work group "team of specialists" – group identification, group standard setting and group cohesion process; for the work group "team of changes" –group identification, group standard setting, group cohesion process, role differentiation andgroup leadership; for the work group "management team" – group identification, group standardsetting, group cohesion process, role differentiation, group leadership and group decisionmaking.3.
As parameters of socio-psychological efficiency of the work group in the commercialorganization can be considered: level of group entitativity, level of group cohesion and also level of personality’s opulence of participants. Diagnostics of manifestation of these parameters9prior to the beginning and following the results of a socio-psychological training for formationof the work groups allows to estimate its socio-psychological efficiency.4. In the analysis of socio-psychological content of purposeful formation of the workgroups in the commercial organizations it is possible to allocate types of a socio-psychologicaltraining for formation of the work groups of various types: "Inspiration" (for the work group"task team"), "Challenge" (for the work group "team of specialists"), "Adjusting" (for the workgroup "team of changes") and "Joint decision" (for the work group "management team").The theoretical implications of a research is caused by addition of scientific representations of social psychology about regularities of development of small groups and also theirformations in the work groups by means of a socio-psychological training.
Results of a researchreveal features of updating of optimum characteristics of processes of group dynamics of thespecific program of a socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups for thework groups of various types.Practical implicationsThe main results of the research allow to develop evidence-based programs of a sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups for certain types of the work groups.Thereby the significant contribution to a technique of preparation of programs of a sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups in the commercial organizations ismade. Thus, "gap" between inquiry of administrative practice and the existing business offeringsof experts trainers is reduced.The offered model of a ratio of types of the work groups, types of a training for formation of the work groups and their leading processes of group dynamics can be used for effective formation of the work groups in various areas of practical activities for management of human resources in the sphere of training and development of personnel.Results of a research can be included in educational programs for training of organizational psychologists and managers of various levels, in particular, – in the maintenance of subject matters on social psychology, organizational psychology and psychology of management,management and also workshops on formation of the work groups.Reliability of results of a research is provided with carefully carried out theoreticalanalysis, quality of collected empirical data, use of reliable methodical tools and correct selection of mathematical methods of data processing and interpretation of the received results.Approbation and introduction of resultsBasic arguments of dissertation work have been presented and repeatedly discussed atpostgraduate seminars of department of organizational psychology and department of psychology of faculty of social sciences of the National research university "Higher School of Economics" during 2012-2016.Materials of a dissertation research have been presented at the XII Scientific and practical conference "Young scientists for the education of the capital (on April 18, 2013, Moscow),10on the International scientific conference "BUSINESS.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
