Зверев_ Phd Summary (1136601), страница 2
Текст из файла (страница 2)
Nowadays in social psychology there is no image of optimum characteristics of processes of groupdynamics of the work groups of various types that doesn't allow to define efficiency of formation of the work groups of various types by means of a socio-psychological training for formation of the work group.Ideas of the best level of group development as from Russian social psychology (E.Kuzmin, B. Masterov, N. Obozov, A. Petrovsky, L. Umansky), and foreign (W.
Bennis, J. Lev4ine, R. Moreland, T.M. Newcomb, B. Tuckman, G. Shepard), irrespectively accounting of optimum characteristics of group dynamics of the work groups of various types doesn't allow tosolve this problem in the modern conditions which are characterized by the smaller term of existence and the updated range of tasks of the work groups of the organizations.The solution of this problem would promote the statement of system methodology of development of a socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types inthe organizations; creation of complex tools of assessment of socio-psychological efficiency of atraining for formation of the work groups; determination of effects which are minimum guaranteed result of a training for formation of the work groups that in general would make a contribution to a problem of assessment of efficiency of a socio-psychological training.The degree of scientific development of the problemThe problematics of formation of the work groups is very popular and has high demandin different branches of professional activity nowadays.
Among authors of publications on thissubject – businessmen, managers of different levels, athletes, engineers, physicists, biologistsand even mathematicians. In view of high popularity and widespread belief in efficiency of teammanagement the bigger part of publications have rather practical, than the academic character.Often in professional periodicals this subject is provided only by the description of the best practices (programs of a training) selected without application of proven research methods.While in the 1960th abroad there were already first ideas of the work groups in the organizations and now the history of reviewing of this phenomenon contains more than 50 years(R. Belbin, R.
Blake, J. Katzenbach, D. Smith, W. Dyer, J. Gulowsen, G. Parker), the Soviet social psychology (A. Dontsov, A. Petrovsky, L. Umansky, M. Yaroshevsky, etc.) considered andstudied collective (Filindash, 2009). With development of researches in this area the set of determination of such concepts as "team", "collective" and "work group", their typologies, approaches to a research of small groups of this sort appeared. At the same time the purpose of thevast majority of researches – search of tools for creation of the effective work group.
The principal method of achievement of this purpose is the socio-psychological training for formation ofthe work groups which can provide preliminary organizational diagnostics and specialized selection of participants (Ivanova, Zverev, Toropova, 2014). However, along with popularity ofgroup forms of operation and a large number of applied researches in this area absence of thereasonable standard methods of formation and assessment of the work groups is available. Process of formation of the work groups in most cases is not considered as systematic.Now the set of research attempts of a typologization of the work groups on the most different characteristics are made: from work compensation methods to levels in hierarchy of theorganizations (L. Gómez-Mehia, D. Macintosh-Fletcher, L.
Nogueira, G. Parker, T. Raz, P.Strozniak, T. Wellborn, N. Kalinina, etc.). Each of them makes the contribution to scientificjudgment of this perspective. The typology of the work groups created by Y. Zhukov, A.Zhuravlev and E. Pavlova in the organization is of special interest (Zhukov, Zhuravlev, Pavlova,2008). In this typology the work groups existing in the modern organization differ by two criteria characterizing features of activity which define formation of the work group: range of activity and interchangeability of members. Range of activity is understood as the volume ofknowledge, opportunities defining limits of functional duties of the employees united in one5group. The interchangeability of members is understood as ability of one members of the groupto carry out group tasks of other members of the group and vice versa.
Thus, authors allocatefour types of the work groups: "task team" (narrow range of activity and low interchangeabilityof members); "team of specialists" (narrow range of activity and high interchangeability ofmembers); "team of changes" (wide range of activity and low interchangeability of members)and "management team" (wide range of activity and high interchangeability of members).So, summing up, it is possible to speak about insufficient scientific development of theproblem of the research: at wide popularity of a subject, existence of various ways of formationof the work groups and sets of the training programs there is no all-divided system approach tothese phenomena and also methods of assessment of efficiency of a training for formation of thework groups aren't defined.
In this study we hope to fill these gaps.Object of a research (theoretical): group dynamics as set of the socio-psychologicalprocesses proceeding in small group during a certain period of time.Object of a research (empirical): the small work group included in structure of thecommercial organization.Object of research: characteristics of group dynamics in the socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups.Research objective: to reveal and describe characteristics of group dynamics in a sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups of various types.
The research objectivecan be achieved at the solution of the following tasks.Theoretical tasks:1. To carry out the system theoretical analysis of category "work group" as special typeof small social group to the organizations with the purpose to allocate and describe characteristics of the processes of group dynamics which are actualised in various types of the work groupsduring its spontaneous development.2.
To carry out the system theoretical analysis of group dynamics in a sociopsychological training with the purpose to allocate and describe characteristics of the processesof group dynamics which are actualised in various types of the work groups during the sociopsychological training for formation of the work groups.3. To carry out the system theoretical analysis of types of the work groups and types of atraining for formation of the work groups with the purpose to allocate and describe characteristics of the processes of group dynamics which are actualised in various types of the work groupsduring the socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups.4. To define and prove parameters of socio-psychological efficiency of the work groupsfor a possibility of estimation of efficiency of training influence.5.
To analyse modern methods of assessment of efficiency of a socio-psychologicaltraining for formation of the work groups.66. To define and prove parameters of efficiency of a socio-psychological training forformation of the work groups.Methodical tasks:To develop the program of a socio-psychological training for formation of the workgroups taking into account features of each type of the work group and processes of group dynamics.Empirical tasks:1. To carry out examination of the program of the developed socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types.2.
To reveal and describe features of demand for services in formation of the workgroups which can be the basis for systematization of requirements of the organizations.3. To compare types of a training for formation of the work groups with types of thework groups, characteristics of processes of group dynamics and also features of demand forservices of formation of the work groups.4. To estimate socio-psychological efficiency of each module of the training program foreach type of the work groups on the revealed parameters of socio-psychological efficiency.5. To carry out examination of the developed model of characteristics of group dynamicsof a socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types.Research hypothesisThus, the general hypothesis of the research is formulated as follows: there are differences in characteristics of processes of group dynamics (group identification, group standardsetting, group cohesion process, role differentiation, group leadership and group decisionmaking) at the work groups of various types ("task team", "team of specialists", "team of changes", "management team").The hypothesis testing is carried out by means of the forming experiment (holding thedeveloped socio-psychological training for formation of the work groups of various types).Theoretical and methodological background base of the researchTheoretical socio-psychological models of a research of joint activity (A.
Grachev, A.Dontsov, E. Dubovskaya, Y. Zhukov, A. Zhuravlev, R. Nemov, A. Petrovsky, V. Petrovsky, L.Petrovskaya, L. Umansky, V. Shadrikov, V. Shpalinsky, L. Gaertner, H. Giles, J. Moreno, J.Schopler, J. Turner, etc.).Theory and methodology of a research of processes of group dynamics (V. Bolshakov, I.Vachkov, V.
Stroh, V. Cartwright, C. Cooper, L. Festinger, H. Giles, M.A. Jensen, K. Lewin, H.Tajfel, G. Trandafirescu, B.W. Tuckman, J. Turner, A. Zander, etc.).7Theory and methodology of a socio-psychological training (T. Bazarov, V. Bolshakov, I.Vachkov, Y. Zhukov, H. Mikkin, V. Nikandrov, B. Parygin, L. Petrovskaya, S.
Petrushin, E.Sidorenko, N. Hryashcheva, V. Stroh, K. Rudestam, K. Thorne, D. Mackey, S. Tannenbaum,D. Wood, G. Yukl, etc.).Theory and methodology of formation of the work groups (V. Avdeev, T. Bazarov, I.Volkov, Y. Zhukov, A. Zhuravlev, E. Pavlova, A. Chanko, R.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
