Диссертация (Арбитражные суды в системе властных отношений), страница 42

—№.6 — P. 1339-1391.209. Galanter, M. Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limitsof Legal Change / M. Galanter // Law & Society Review. — 1974. — №. 9.— P. 95–112.216210. Gandhi, J. S. Lawyers and touts: a study in the sociology of legal profession/ J.S.

Gandhi. — Hindustan Publishing Corporation, 1982. — 120 p.211. Garcia, A. Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactionalorganization of mediation hearings minimizes argument / A. Garcia //American Sociological Review. — 1991. — № 6. — P. 818-835.212. Genn, H.G.

Paths to justice: what people do and think about going to law /H.G. Genn, S. Beinart. — Hart Publishing, 1999. — 288 p.213. George, T.E. On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making / T.E.George, L. Epstein // Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. — 1992. — Vol. 86. — № 2. —P. 323–337.214. Gertz, M.G. Influence in court systems: the clerk as interface / M.G. Gertz //Just. Sys. J. — 1977. — Vol. 3. — P. 30 - 37.215. Gilson, R.J. Devolution of the Legal Profession: A Demand Side Perspective/ R.J.

Gilson // Md. L. Rev. — 1990. — Vol. 49. — P. 869 - 904.216. Glendon, M.A. A nation under lawyers: How the crisis in the legalprofession is transforming American society / M.A. Glendon. — HarvardUniversity Press, 1996. — 352 p.217. Goldman, S. Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of AppealsRevisited / S. Goldman // The American Political Science Review. — 1975.—Vol. 69. — №. 2. — P. 491-506.218. Green, B.

A. Must Government Lawyers Seek Justice in Civil Litigation /B.A. Green //Widener j. Pub. l. — 1999. — Vol. 9. — P. 235 - 803.219. Green, M. D. From Here to Attorney's Fees: Certainty Efficiency andFairness in the Journey to the Appellate Courts / M.D. Green //Cornell L.Rev. — 1983. — Vol. 69. — P. 207 - 219.220. Grossman, J. B.

Agenda Formation in the Policy Active U.S. Supreme Court/ J.B. Grossman, C.R. Epp // Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S.Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court edit by R.Rogowski, T. Gawron. — New York: Berghahn Books, 2002. — P. 103–124.217221. Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms / J.

Habermas // Translated by W.Rehg. — The MIT Press. —1996. — 675 p.222. Haire, S. Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: AHierarchical Perspective / S. Haire, D. Songer, S. Lindquist // Law &Society Review. — 2003. — Vol. 37. — № 1. — Р. 143–168.223. Hamlin, R.P. The Role of the Appellation in Wine Marketing—Does theNew Zealand Wine Industry Know What It's Getting? / R.P. Hamlin, V.Watson // International Journal of Wine Marketing. — 1997. — Vol. 9. —№.

2. — P. 52-69.224. Hans, V.P. Jurors' judgments of business liability in tort cases: Implicationsfor the litigation explosion debate / V.P. Hans, W.S. Lofquist // Law & Soc'yRev. — 1992. — Vol. 26. — P. 85-116.225. Hanssen, F. A. The effect of judicial institutions on uncertainty and the rateof litigation: the election versus appointment of state judges / F.A. Hanssen//The Journal of Legal Studies. — 1999.

— Vol. 28. — №. 1. — P. 205-232.226. Hendley, K. Business litigation in the transition: a portrait of debt collectionin Russia / K. Hendley // Law & society review. — 2004. — Vol. 38. — №.2. — P. 305-348.227. Hendley, K. Growing Pains: Balancing Justice & (and) Efficiency in theRussian Economic Courts / K. Hendley // Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ. — 1998.— Vol. 12. — P. 301-330.228.

Hendrix, G.P. Business litigation and arbitration in Russia / G.P. Hendrix //The International Lawyer. — 1997. — P. 1075-1103.229. Holmes, O.W. The common law / O.W. Holmes. — Harvard UniversityPress, 2009. — 464 p.230. Holmes, O.W. The path of the law / Jr O.W. Holmes. — The Floating Press,2009. — 30 p.231.

Holt, L.T. Whither Arbitration-What Can Be Done to Improve Arbitrationand Keep out Litigation's Ill Effects / L.T. Holt // DePaul Bus. & Comm. LJ.— 2008. — Vol. 7. — P. 455-655.218232. Jacob, H. Сourts as Organizations / H. Jacob // Empirical Theories aboutCourts edit by K.O. Boyum, L. Mather. — London: Longman, 1983.

— 284p.233. Jaffe, L.L. The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian orIdeological Plaintiff / L.L. Jaffe // University of Pennsylvania Law Review.— 1968. — № 116. — P. 1033-1047.234. Jappelli, T. Courts and banks: Effects of judicial enforcement on creditmarkets / T. Jappelli, M. Pagano, M. Bianco //Journal of Money, Credit andBanking. — 2005. — № 2.— P. 223-244.235. Jick, T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation inaction / T.D. Jick //Administrative science quarterly. — 1979.

— № 4. — P.602-611.236. Johnson, R.B. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose timehas come / R.V. Johnson, A.J. Onwuegbuzie // Educational researcher. —2004. — Vol. 33. — №. 7. — P. 14-26.237. Kastellec, J. Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courtsof Appeals / J. Kastellec // The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.— 2007. — Vol. 23.

— № 2. — Р. 421–441.238. Katvan, E. "Overcrowding the Profession"–An Artificial Argument? / E.Katvan // Oñati Socio-legal Series. — 2013. — Vol.3 — №. 3 — P. 409429.239. Katz, J. Legality and Equality: Plea Bargaining in the Prosecution of WhiteCollar and Common Crimes / J. Katz // Law & Society Review. SpecialIssue on Plea Bargaining. — 1979. — Vol. 13. — № 2. — P. 431–459.240. Kelle, U.

Sociological Explanations between Micro and Macro and theIntegration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods / U. Kelle // Forum:Qualitative Social Research. — 2001. — Vol. 2. — №. 1. — P. 95 – 117.241. Kenworthy, L. “The More Things Change…”: Business Litigation andGovernance in the American Automobile Industry / L. Kenworthy, S.219Macaulay, J. Rogers // Law & Social Inquiry. — 1996. — Vol. 21. — №.

3.— P. 631-678.242. Kittelsen, S.A.C. Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts / S.A.C.Kittelsen, F.R Førsund // Journal of Productivity Analysis. — 1992. — Vol.3. — №. 3. — P. 277-306.243. Kluger, R. Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education andBlack America's struggle for equality / R. Kluger. — Random House LLC,2011. — 880 p.244. Kornhauser, L.A. Legal education and entry into the legal profession: Therole of race, gender, and educational debt / L.A.

Kornhauser, R.L. Revesz //NYUL Rev. — 1995. — Vol. 70. — P. 829- 882.245. Kritzer, H. Law Schools and the Continuing Growth of the Legal Profession/ H. Kritzer. — Oñati Socio-legal Series, 2013. — Vol.3 — №. 3 — P. 450473.246. Latour, B. Scientific objects and legal objectivity / B. Latour // Law,anthropology, and the constitution of the social: making persons and things.— CUP, 2004. — P.

73-114.247. Laumann, E.O. Specialization and Prestige in the Legal Profession: TheStructure of Deference /E.O. Laumann, J.P. Heinz // Law & Social Inquiry.— 1977. — Vol. 2. — P. 155–216.248. Lawyers in Society: Comparative Theories / edit by R.L. Abel, P. Lewis P.— Beard Books, 1989. — Vol. 3. — 576 p.249. Levin, A. Barriers to the Profession: Inaction in Ontario, Canada and ItsConsequences / A. Levin, A. Alkoby // Oñati Socio-Legal Series.

— 2013.— Vol. 3. — №3 — P. 580-594.250. Luhmann, N. Law as a social system / N. Luhmann. — Oxford UniversityPress, 2004. — 512 p.251. Luhmann, N. The self-reproduction of law and its limits / N. Luhman //Dilemmas of law in the welfare tate // edit by Teubner G. — Berlin, N .Y.:De Cruyter,1986. — P.

111–127.220252. Mann, C.J. The Function of Judicial Decision in European EconomicIntegration / C.J. Mann. — BRILL, 1972. — 567 p.253. Marshall, Т.Н. Class, citizenship and social development / T.H. Marshall. —Garden Citv, NY: Anchor, 1965. — 334 p.254. McCurdy, C.W. Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government-BusinessRelations: Some Parameters of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism, 1863-1897 /C.W. McCurdy // The Journal of American History. — 1975. — № 4. — .

P.970-1005.255. McEwen, C.A. Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliancethrough consent / C.A. McEwen, R.J. Maiman // Law & Soc'y Rev. — 1984.— Vol. 18. — P. 11 - 49.256. McFarland, E. Access to justice / E. McFarland D. Rhode — OxfordUniversity Press, 2004. — 272 p.257. Menkel-Meadow, C. The Comparative Sociology of Women Lawyers: The"Feminization" of the Legal Profession / C. Menkel-Meadow // OsgoodeHall Law Journal. – 1986. – Vol. 24.

– №. 4. – P. 897-918.258. Merton, R.K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empiricalinvestigations / R.K. Merton. — University of Chicago press, 1973. — 605p.259. Mertz, E. The language of law school: learning to" think like a lawyer" / E.Mertz. — Oxford University Press, 2007.

— 336 p.260. Miller, A.S. On Politics, Democracy, and the First Amendment: ACommentary on First National Bank v. Bellotti / A.S. Miller // Wash. & LeeL. Rev. — 1981. — Vol. 38. — P. 21 - 41.261. Milovanovich, D. An introduction to the Sociology of Law / D.Milovanovich. — NY. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press, 2003. — 316 p.262. Nascimbene, B. The Legal Profession in the European Union / B.Nascimbene. — Kluwer Law International, 2009. — Vol. 6.

— 251 p.263. Newman, I. Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring theinteractive continuum / I. Newman. — SIU Press, 1998. — 240 p.221264. Osborne, E. Courts as Casinos? An empirical investigation of randomnessand efficiency in civil litigation / E. Osborne // The Journal of Legal Studies.— 1999. — Vol.

28. — №. 1. — P. 187-203.265. Parsons, T. A sociologist looks at the legal profession / T. Parsons // Essaysin Sociological Theory. — NY: Free Press, 1950. — P. 370 – 385.266. Parsons, T. Societies Evolutionary and comparative perspectives / T.Parsons. — Englewood Chffs (N J): Prentice-Hall, 1966. — 120 p.267. Parsons, T. Some reflections on the place of force in social process/ T/Parsons //Sociological theory and modern society.