Диссертация (Формирование системы государственного управления в России (политико-аксиологический подход)), страница 79
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Формирование системы государственного управления в России (политико-аксиологический подход)". PDF-файл из архива "Формирование системы государственного управления в России (политико-аксиологический подход)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "политические науки" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора политических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 79 страницы из PDF
N 3. P. 182–189.Kernaghan K. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization and Public Service Values //International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2000. Vol. 66. № 1. P. 91-104.Kickert W. Distinctiveness of Administrative Reforms in Greece, Italy, Portugal andSpain. Common Characteristics of Context, Administrations and Reforms // PublicAdministration. Vol. 89. N 3.
2011. P. 801–818.Kim Y. C. The Concept of Political Culture in Comparative Politics // The Journal ofPolitics. 1964. Vol. 26. N 2. P. 313–336.Kuhlmann S. New Public Management for the «Classical Continental EuropeanAdministrations»: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy // PublicAdministration. Vol. 88.
N 4. 2010. P. 1116–1130.Lagerspetz M., Rikmann E. Ethics and Public Good in a Transforming State: A Study ofEstonian Civil Servants // Scandinavian Political Studies. Vol. 32. N 4. 2009. P. 402–421.Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of governance exchangerelationships // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1992. N 37.
P. 76-104.Lockhart C. Parsing Disparate Implications of Moral Equality: Drawing on John StuartMill’s Contrasting Views // Journal of Contemporary Thought 2000. N 10. Р. 97–155.Lockhart Specifying the Cultural Foundations of Consensual Democratic Institutions //PS: Political Science & Politics. 2011.
Vol. 44. Р. 731-735.338Maesschalck J. Research Note: A Method for Applying Cultural Theory in the Study ofOrganisations // Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 2004. N 17 (4).Р. 377–86.March J. Administrative Practice, Organization Theory, and Political Philosophy:Ruminations on the Reflections of John M. Gaus // PS. Political Science and Politics.
1997.Vol. 30. N 4. P. 4–21.Michaud K. E. H., Carlisle J. E., Smith E. R. A. N. The Relationship between CulturalValues and Political Ideology, and the Role of Political Knowledge // Political Psychology.2009. Vol. 30(1). P. 27-42.Moe H. Governing Public Service Broadcasting: «Public Value Tests» in DifferentNational Contexts // Communication, Culture & Critique.
Vol. 3. 2010. P. 207–223.Morell K. Governance and the Public Good // Public Administration. Vol. 87. N 3.2009. P. 538–556.Nabatch T. Putting the «Public» Back in Public Values Research: DesigningParticipation to Identify and Respond to Values // Public Administration Review. 2012. Vol.72. Iss. 5. P. 699–708.Nowacki M., Verweij M., Shenghua L. .How to Test Cultural Theory: Suggestions forFuture Research // PS.
Political Science and Politics. 2011. October. Vol. 44. p. 745-748.Osterweil M. A cultural-political approach to reinventing the political // InternationalSocial Science Journal. 2004. Vol. 56 (182). Р. 495–506.Packenham R. A. Approaches to the Study of Political Development // World Politics.1964. Vol. 17. N 1. P. 108–120.Patrick D., Margetts H. New Public Management Is Dead — Long Live Digital-EraGovernance // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
2006. Vol. 16. N 3. P.467-494.Rhodes R., Wanna J. The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible from thePlatonic Guardians // Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2007. Vol. 66. N 4. P. 406–421.Ripberger J., Jenkins-Smith H. C., Herron K. G. How Cultural Orientations Createshifting National Security Coalition on Nuclear Weapons and Terrorist Threats in theAmerican Public // PS. Political Science and Politics. 2011. October. Vol.
44. P. 715-719.339Schultz D. Professional Ethics in a Postmodern Society // Public Integrity. 2004. Vol. 6(4). 279 – 297 .Simonet D. The New Public Management: Theory and European Health-CareReforms // Canadian Public Administration. Vol. 51. N 4. 2008. P. 617–635.Smith R. Focusing on public value: Something new and something old // AustralianJournal of Public Administration. 2004. Vol. 63.
Iss. 4. Р. 68-79.Smith R., Anderson E., Teicher J. Toward public value?// Australian Journal of PublicAdministration. 2004. Vol. 63. Iss. 4. Р.14–15.Somers M. R. What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the PublicSphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation // Sociological Theory. 1995.Vol. 13. № 2. P. 113–144.Stoker G. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance //American Review of Public Administration.
2006. Vol. 36. N 2. P. 41–57.Suwaj P. J. Transparency as Value and Principal of the Public Affair Management in aState under the Rule of Law Versus Public Officials’ Duty to Present Financial Declarations //Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 2009. N 19(32).
P. 111-124.Swedlow B. Cultural Theory of Politics // PS. Political Science and Politics. 2011.October. Vol. 44. P. 703-710.Van der Wal Z. What’s valued most? Similarities and Differences between theorganizational values of the public and Private Sector// Public Administration. 2008. Vol. 86(2).
Р. 465–482.Verweij M. Cultural Theory and the Study of International Relations // Millennium:Journal of International Studies 1995. Vol. 24 (1). Р. 87–111.Verweij M., Shenghua L., Mark N. How to Test Cultural Theory: Suggestions forFuture Research // PS: Political Science &Politics 2011. October. Vol.
44. Р.745-748.Whitt Kilburn H. Personal Values and Public Opinion // Social Science Quarterly. Vol.90. N 4. December 2009. P. 868–885.Widalsky A. Choosing Preferences by Constructing Instructions: A Cultural Theory ofPreference Formation // American Political Science Review. Vol.
81(1). 1987. P. 3–22..
