Диссертация (Слухи как особый вид прагмакоммуникативной деятельности (на материале пьес У. Шекспира)), страница 27
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Слухи как особый вид прагмакоммуникативной деятельности (на материале пьес У. Шекспира)". PDF-файл из архива "Слухи как особый вид прагмакоммуникативной деятельности (на материале пьес У. Шекспира)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "филология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата филологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 27 страницы из PDF
131-164223.Chafe W. Cognitive constraints on information flow.// Coherence andGrounding in Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.,1987224.Chomsky N. Rules and representation. – New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press. - 1980225.Clark H. H., Carlson T. B. Context for Comprehension.//Attention andPerformance. Vol. IX.
P. 1-28., Hillsdale, N. Y.: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates. – 1981226.Degh L., Vazsonyi A. Does the word “dog” bite? Ostensive action: Ameans of legend telling// Journal of Folklore Research. 1983. Vol.20. # 1. P.5-34227.Van Dijk T. A. Text and context Explorations in the Semantics andPragmatics of discourse. London: Longman, 1977171228.Van Dijk T. A. Textwissenschaft. – Munchen. – 1980 – 285 S.229.Edmondson W. Let’s talk and talk about it. A pedagogic-interactionalgrammar of English.,Munchen: Urban and Schwarzenberg. - 1981230.Fauconnier G. Mappings in thought and language.
Cambridge:University Press, 1997.231.Fauconnier G. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and theMind’s Hidden Complexities (with Mark Turner) – 3-d edition, 2003232.Fillmore C. J. Frame Semantics// LiM ed. Linguistics in the morningcalm: Selected papers from the SICOL – 1981.
– Seoul: Hanship, 1982. P.111-137.233.Finch G. Key concepts in language and linguistics. - 2005234.Fleming B. E. Structure and chaos in Modernist works. – N.Y. etc.:Lang., 1995235.GeissnerH.Sprechwissenschaft:TheoriedermundlichenKommunikation. – Koenigstein. – 1981.- 235 S.236.Gibbs R.
W. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought: Language andunderstanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.237.Gardner H The mind's new science: A history of the cognitiverevolution /HowardGardnerСтановлениенаукопознании.Междисциплинарное исследование.
— New York: Basic books, Cop.1985. — 423 p.238.Goffman E. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization ofexperience. — N.Y., 1974.239.Goffman E. Encounters. Two studies in the Sociology of interaction.1972.172240.Goody E. Towards a theory of questions.// Questions and politeness.Strategies in social interaction., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. –1978. P. 17-43241.Gordon D., Lakoff G.Conversational postulates // CLS, 1971, v.7: 63-85.242.Grice P. Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.,Cambridge (Mass.) London, England, 1989243.Hakemulder J.
The moral laboratory: Experiments examining theeffects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. –Amsterdam: Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2000.244.Harman G. H. Some philosophical issues in cognitive science: Qualia,intentionality, and the mind – body problem// Foundations of cognitivescience.
– Cambr. (Mass.); L.; MIT, 1989. P. 831 – 848.245.Hart B. The psychology of rumour// Proceedings if the royal societyof medicine. 1916. Vol. 9. (Section Psychiatry). P. 1-26246.Herrmann T. AllgemeineSprachpsychologie. – Weinheim, 1994.247.How language helps us think// Pragmatics and Cognition. - 1996.
-Vol.4. - No.1.248.Hudson R. A. The Meaning of Questions.// Language 51. – 1975. P. 1-31249.Iser W. How to do Theory. London: Blackwell. - 2006250.Jackendoff R. S. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar,evolution. — Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2002. — 477 p.251.Jackendorff R.
Semantics and Cognition. — MIT, Cambridge(Mass.).-1993 — 283.173252.Keller E. Gambits: Conversational strategy signals.//Journal ofPragmatics 3. – 1979. P. 219-238253.Knapp R. H. A psychology of rumour// The Public Opinion Quarterly.1944. Vol. 8. #1. P. 22-37254.Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mindand Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books., 1999255.Lakoff R. Questionable answers and answerable questions.//Issues inlinguistics. Papers in honour of Henry and Renee Kahane., - 1973.
P. 453467256.Langacker R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: TheoreticalPrerequisits. — Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987 — 516 p.257.Langacker R.W. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar// CognitiveLinguistics.- 2001.- Vol.12.- No.2258.Lazarus R. S., Kanner A.
D., Folkmaft S. Emotions. A cognitive-phenomenologival analysis./ In: Plutchik R., Kellerman H. Emotion: theory,Research, and Experience. Vol. 1: Theories of emotion. New York:Academic Press, 1980. P. 124-129.259.Leech G. N. Principles of pragmatics. – L.; N.Y.: Longman, 1983260.Lycan W. G. Philosophy of mind// The Blackwell Companion tophilosophy. – O.: Blackwell, 1996. P. 167-198.261.Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge.// D. Metzinged. Frame conceptions and text understanding. – B.; N. Y. Gruyter, 1980. P.1-25.262.Mishra J.
Managing the grapevine// Public Personnel management.1990. Vol. 19. #2. P. 213-228174263.Nkpa N. K. U. Rumours of mass poisoning in Biafra// The PublicOpinion Quarterly. 1977. Vol. 41. # 3. P. 332-346264.Palmer F. R. The English Verb. – London: Longman, 1988265.Pope K. S., Singer J. L. Regulation of the stream of consciousness:Toward a theory of ongoing thought. - In: G.
Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.).Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research. – New York,Plenum Press, 1976. Vol. II. P. 101-138.266.Prasad J. The psychology of rumour: a study relating to the greatIndian earthquake of 1934// British Journal of Psychology. 1935. Vol. 26. P.1-15267.Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartik J. A Grammar ofContemporary English., London: Longman. – 1972268.Renard J.-B. Denying rumours// Diogenes.
2007. Vol. 213. P. 43-58269.Riley J. A. Mental representations: reference and definiteness//Journal of Pragmatics. - 2007. - Vol. 39.270.Rosch E. Cognitive representation of semantic categories// J. Exp.Psychol.: General. 1975. V. 104. P. 192-233.271.Rosch E. Principles of Categorization// Cognition and Categorization.Ed.
By E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd. Hilisdale (N.J.): Eribaum, 1978.272.Rosnow R. L., Esposito J. L., Gibney L. Factors influencing rumourspreading: replication and extension// Language and Communication. 1988.Vol. 8. # 1. P. 29-42273.Rosnow R.
L, Yost J. H., Esposito J. L. Belief in rumour andlikelihood of rumour transmission// Language and Communication. 1986.Vol. 6. # 3 p. 189-194.175274.Sacks H., Schegloff E. A. & Jefferson G. A. A simplest systematicsfor the organization of turn-taking for conversation.//language 50. – 1974. P.275.Schank R. C., Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.276.SchegloffE.A.Onsomequestionsandambiguitiesinconversation.//Current trends in textlinguistics. – Berlin & New York: deGruyter.
– 1978. P. 81-102277.Searle J. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.,1969.278.Searle J. R. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speechacts. Cambridge University Press, 1985279.Shibutani T. Improvised news: a sociological study of rumour. –Indianopolis, N. Y. - 1966280.Speier M. Some conversational problems for interactional analysis.//Studies in social interaction.
New York: Free Press. – 1972. P. 397-427281.Spurgeon C. Shakespeare’s Imagery. — Cambridge: 1935. — 408 p.282.StarkeG.BildenAusrufesatzeeineeigenstandigeSatzart?//Sprachpflege. – Leipzig, 1989. – Jg. 38, H. 8. P. 109-112.283.StenstromAnna-Brita.QuestionsandresponsesinEnglishconversation. CWK Gleerup, 1984284.Talmy L. 1978 Rubber-sheet cognition in language// CLS 1977, v. 13.P. 612-628.285.Thagard P. Mind. Introduction to Cognitive Science., Cambridge(Mass).
- 1996176286.Trier J. Der Deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. DieGeschichte einessprachlichen Feldes. Heidelberg, 1931.287.Wegner I. Frame-Theorie in der Lexikographie. Untersuchungen zurtheoretischenFundierungundcomputer-gestuetztenAnwendungkontextueller Rahmenstrukturen fur die lexikographische Reprasentationvon Substantiven.
— Tuebingen: Max Niemenyer Verlag, 1985.288.WeigandE.SprachealsDialog:Sprechakttaxonomieundkommunikative Grammatik. – T.: Niemeyer, 1989.289.Weiser A. How not to answer a question: purposive devices inconversationalstrategy.//Papersfromthe11thregionalmeeting.,ChicagoLinguistic Society. – 1975. P. 649-660Список использованных словарей:1. A new Shakespearean Dictionary (by Richard John Cunliffe). London,1910.2. Cambridge International Dictionary of English.
Cambridge UniversityPress, 19983. Collins Cobuild Learner’s Dictionary. HarperCollinsPublishers, 19964. Collins Concise Thesaurus. HarperCollins Publishers, 20005. Dictionary of Shakespeare. Oxford University Press, 19986. Longman Idioms Dictionary. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, 20007. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Oxford, 20038. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press, 19951779. Shakespeare – Lexicon. A complete Dictionary of all the English Words,Phrases and Constructions in the works of the Poet (by Alexander Schmidt, LL.D.).3rd edition.Berlin, 1902.10.
