Диссертация (Experimental study of several core concepts of theoretical morphology (on the material of russian) - regularity, syncretism, markedness), страница 13
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Experimental study of several core concepts of theoretical morphology (on the material of russian) - regularity, syncretism, markedness". PDF-файл из архива "Experimental study of several core concepts of theoretical morphology (on the material of russian) - regularity, syncretism, markedness", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "филология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве НИУ ВШЭ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с НИУ ВШЭ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора филологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 13 страницы из PDF
S. (2013). A comparison of statistical methodsfor detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI. Neuroimage84, 1042–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.018Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 991–1060. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002228Davidson, D. E., Gor, K.
S., and Lekic, M. D. (1996). Russian: Stage One: Live fromMoscow! Dubuque, IO: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.de Diego-Balaguer, R., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Bahlmann, J., Heinze,H. J., and Münte, T. F. (2006). Neural circuits subserving the retrieval of stemsand grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27,874–888.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20228Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., and Binder, J. R. (2006). fMRI of past tenseprocessing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. J. Cogn.Neurosci. 18, 278–297. doi: 10.1162/089892906775783633Dhond, R. P., Marinkovic, K., Dale, A. M., Witzel, T., and Halgren, E. (2003).Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb inflection. Neuroimage 19, 91–100. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)000478Duncan, J. (2010). The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain:mental programs for intelligent behavior. Trends Cogn.
Sci. 14, 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts,K., et al. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25, 1325–1335. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034Fedorenko, E.
(2014). The role of domain-general cognitive control in languagecomprehension. Front. Psychol. 5:335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00335Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., and Kanwisher, N. (2013). Broad domain generality infocal regions of frontal and parietal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110,16616–16621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315235110Friston, K. J. (2011).
Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect.1, 13–36. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008Friston, K. J., Zarahn, E., Josephs, O., Henson, R. N. A., and Dale, A. M.(1999). Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 619, 607–619. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0498Gitelman, D. R., Penny, W. D., Ashburner, J., and Friston, K. J. (2003). Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance ofhemodynamic deconvolution. Neuroimage 19, 200–207. doi: 10.1016/S10538119(03)00058-2Gor, K. (2003).
The Rules and Probabilities Model of Native and Second LanguageMorphological Processing. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.Gor, K. (2010). Beyond the obvious: do second language learners process inflectionalmorphology? Lang. Learn. 60, 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00549.xGor, K., and Chernigovskaya, T. (2001). “Rules in the processing of Russian verbalmorphology,” in Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, eds G. Zybatow, U.Junghanns, G.
Mehlhorn, and L. Szucsich (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang),528–536Gor, K., and Chernigovskaya, T. (2003). Mental Lexicon Structure in L1 and L2Acquisition: Russian Evidence.Gor, K., and Chernigovskaya, T. (2005). “Formal instruction and the acquisition of verbal morphology,” in Investigation in Instructed Second LanguageFrontiers in Human NeuroscienceAcquisition, eds A.
Housen and M. Pierrard (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter),103–139.Gor, K., and Jackson, S. (2013). Morphological decomposition and lexical access in anative and second language: a nesting doll effect. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 28, 1065–1091.doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.776696Gor, K., Svistunova, T., Petrova, T., Khrakovskaya, M., and Chernigovskaya, T.(2009). Mental’nyj leksikon pri raspade jazykovoj sistemy u bol’nyx s afaziej:eksperimental’noe issledovanie glagol’noj morfologii (‘The decay of the mental lexicon in aphasia: an experimental study of verb morphology’). VoprosyJazykoznanija 5, 3–17.Indefrey, P.
(2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Front. Psychol. 1:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Sach, M., and Seitz, R. (1997). APET study of cerebral activation patterns induced by verb inflection. Neuroimage5, S548.Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Van Valin, R. D. Jr., Murphy, B.
W.,et al. (1996). A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verbmorphology in English. Language 72, 451–497. doi: 10.2307/416276Jakobson, R. O. (1948). Russian conjugation. Word 4, 155–167.Joanisse, M. F., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2005). Imaging the past: neural activation infrontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing.Cogn.
Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 282–296. doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.282Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V. A., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkola, T., and Laine, M. (2006).Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: an fMRI study. Brain Lang. 98, 182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.011Leminen, A., Leminen, M., Lehtonen, M., Nevalainen, P., Ylinen, S., Kimppa, L.,et al. (2011).
Spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of spoken inflected andderived words: a combined EEG and MEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 21:5–66.doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00066Longworth, C. E., Keenan, S. E., Barker, R. A., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Tyler, L. K.(2005). The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence from vascularand degenerative conditions. Brain 128, 584–596.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awh387Lyashevskaya, O. N., and Sharoff, S. A. (2009). Èastotnyj Slovar’ SovremennogoRusskogo Jazyka (‘The Frequency Dictionary of Modern Russian Language’).Moscow: Azbukovnik.Macoir, J., Fossard, M., Mérette, C., Langlois, M., Chantal, S., and Auclair-Ouellet,N. (2013). The role of basal ganglia in language production: evidence fromParkinson’s disease. J. Parkinson’s Dis.
3, 393–397. doi: 10.3233/JPD-130182MacWhinney, B., and Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40, 121–157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90048-9Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mentalcomputation. Nature 387, 592–594. doi: 10.1038/42456Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Tyler, L.
K. (1998). Rules, representations, andthe English past tense. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 428–435. doi: 10.1016/S13646613(98)01239-XMarslen-Wilson, W. D., and Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language, and thebrain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philos. Trans.R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362, 823–836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2091McClelland, J. L., and Patterson, K.
(2002). Rules or connections in past-tenseinflections: what does the evidence rule out? Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 465–472. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9McLaren, D., Ries, M., Xu, G., and Johnson, S. (2012). A generalized form of contextdependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standardapproaches. Neuroimage 61, 1277–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.068Münte, T.
F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., and Kutas, M. (1999). Decompositionof morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brainpotentials. Cogn. Brain Res. 7, 241–253. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7Newman, A. J., Izvorski, R., Davis, L., Neville, H. J., and Ullman, M. T. (1999).“Distinct electrophysiological patterns in the processing of regular and irregularverbs,” in Poster presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting,Washington, DC.Newman, A.
J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., and Neville, H. J. (2007).An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. Neuroimage34, 435–445. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.007Oh, T. M., Tan, K. L., Ng, P., Berne, Y. I., and Graham, S. (2011). The past tensedebate: is phonological complexity the key to the puzzle? Neuroimage 57, 271–280.doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.008www.frontiersin.org35February 2015 | Volume 9 | Article 36 | 9Kireev et al.A PPI study of Russian verb productionOldfield, R. C. (1971).
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburghinventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4Orsolini, M., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Universals in morphological representation: evidence from Italian. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 12, 1–47. doi:10.1080/016909697386899Pinker, S. (1991).
Rules of language. Science 253, 530–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1857983Pinker, S., and Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis ofa parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28,73–193. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7Pinker, S., and Ullman, M. T. (2002).
The past and future of the past tense. TrendsCogn. Sci. 6, 456–463. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3Plunkett, K., and Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building:acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48,21–69. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90057-3Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann. N. Y.
Acad. Sci. 1191, 62–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.xRagnasdóttir, H., Simonsen, H. G., and Plunkett, K. (1999). The acquisition of pasttense morphology in Icelandic and Norwegian children: an experimental study.J. Child Lang. 26, 577–618. doi: 10.1017/S0305000999003918Rumelhart, D., and McClelland, J. (1986).
