Диссертация (Влияние политики федерального центра на трансформацию региональных политических режимов в России), страница 22

- N2. - С. 3-9.74.Чернявский А., Вартапетов К. Финансовая децентрализация и местноесамоуправление // Вопросы экономики. - 2003. - № 10. – C.126-141.75.Чирикова А.Е. Московские назначенцы в губернаторском корпусе:анализ Самарского случая // Полития. - 2011.

- №4. - С.61-73.76.Швецов А. Региональная политика в Российской унитарной федерации// Федерализм. - 2008. - № 2. – C.5-26.77.Шумпетер Й. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.78.Элейзер Дж. Сравнительный федерализм // Полис. - 1995. - № 5. - С.106—115.79.Acemoglu, D., Johnson S. and Robinson J. The Colonial Origins ofComparative Development:AnEmpiricalInvestigation".NationalBureau of Economic Research, Working paper # 7771, 2000. URL:http://www.nber.org/papers/w7771 (дата обращения: 15.02.2014).80.Arellano M., Bond S. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: MonteCarlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations // The Reviewof Economic Studies.

– 2001. – Vol.58, N2. – Pp.277–297.81.Barro, R. Democracy and Growth // Journal of Economic Growth. – 1996. –Vol.1., №1. - Pp.1-27.82.Bell D. The Coming Of Post-Industrial Society. NY, 1973.83.Boix C., Stokes S. Endogenous Democratization // World Politics. – 2003. –Vol.55, №4. - P.517-549.84.Bollen K., Jackman R. Economic and Noneconomic Determinants ofPolitical Democracy in the 1960s // Research in Political Sociology.

– 1985.– Vol. 1. – P.27-48.12985.Bonvecchi A., Lodola G. The Dual Logic of Intergovernmental Transfers:Presidents, Governors, and the Politics of Coalition-Buildingin Argentina //Publius: The Journal of Federalism. – 2011. – Vol.41, №2. – Р.179-206.86.Boulding C., Brown D. Political Competition and Local Social Spending:Evidence from Brazil // St Comp Int Dev. – 2014. – Vol.49. – P.197–216.87.Brooker P. Non-Democratic Regimes. New York, 2009.88.Bueno De Mesquita B, Morrow J, Siverson R.

Smith A Political institutions,policy choice and the survival of leaders // British Journal of PoliticalScience. – 2002. - №32. Р. 559–590.89.Calvo E., Murillo M. Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the ArgentineElectoral Market // American Journal of Political Science. - 2004. - Vol.48,No. 4. - P.

742–757.90.Chong A. and Calderon C. Institutional Quality and Income Distribution// Economic Development and Cultural Change. – 2000. - Vol. 48, # 4. Pp. 761-786.91.Dahl R.A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, 1989.92.Diamond L. Economic Development and democracy Reconsidered //Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset.Newbury Park, 1992. – P. 93-139.93.Diamond L. Thinking about hybrid regimes // Journal of democracy. – 2002.– Vol. 13, N 2.

– P. 21–35.94.Diamond L., Morlino L. The Quality of Democracy. Standford, 2004. P.4.95.Diaz-Cayeros A. Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in LatinAmerica. Cambridge, 2006.96.Diaz-Cayeros A., Estevez F., Magaloni B. From Clientelism to Entitlements:The politics of social transfers in Mexico, 1989-2006 / Chapter fordiscussion at the Comparative Politics Workshop UCLA, 2007.97.DiMaggio P.

Culture and Economy // The Handbook of EconomicSociology. Princeton, 1994. – P.27-57.13098.Fish S. Islam and Authoritarianism // World Politics. – 2002. – Vol.55. - P.4-37.99.Flanigan W.,Fogelman E. Patterns of political development anddemocratization: A quantitative analysis // Macro-Quantitative Analysis:Conflict, Development, and Democratization. Beverly Hills, 1971.100.Fox J. Latin America's Emerging Local Politics // Journal ofDemocracy. - 1994. – Vol.5, №2.

- Р. 105-116.101.Geddes B. What do we know about democratization after twentyyears? // Annual review in political science. – 1999. – N 2. – P. 115–144.;102.Gervasoni C. A Rentier Theory Of Subnational Regimes: FiscalFederalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces //World Politics. - 2010. – Vol.62, №2.

– P.302-340.103.Gervasoni C. Measuring Variance in Subnational Regimes: Resultsfrom an Expert-Based Operationalization of Democracy in the ArgentineProvinces // Journal of Politics in Latin America. – 2010. - № 2. – P.13-52.104.Ghandi J., Przeworski A. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival ofAutocrats // Comparative Political Studies. – 2007. - Vol.40, N11. - P.12791301.105.Gibson E. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism inDemocratic Countries // World Politics. – 2005. – Vol.58. – P.101-132.106.Giraudy A. Varieties of Subnational Undemocratic Regimes:Evidence from Argentina and Mexico // Studies in ComparativeInternational Development. - 2013. – Vol.48.

- №2. – P. 51-80.107.Giraudy A. Varieties of Subnational Undemocratic Regimes:Evidence from Argentina and Mexico // Studies in ComparativeInternational Development. - 2013. – Vol.48, №2. – P. 51-80.108.Golosov G. Growing Old Without Grace: Electoral AuthoritarianismAnd The Age Composition Of Russia's Regional Legislative Assemblies //Representation. – 2014. –Vol.50, №4.

– Р.509-526.131109.Grier K. and Tullock G. An Empirical Analysis of Cross-NationalEconomic Growth, 1951-1980 // Journal of Monetary Economics. – 1989. –Vol.24, №2. – Pp. 259-276.110.Hadenius A., Teorell J. Cultural and Economic Prerequisites ofDemocracy: Reassessing Recent Evidence // Studies in ComparativeInternational Development. – 2005.

- Vol. 39, No.4.111.Hadenius A., Teorell J. Pathways from authoritarianism// Journal ofDemocracy. – Vol.18, № 1. - 2007. - P. 143 – 156.112.Hagopian F., Mainwaring S. The Third Wave of Democratization inLatin America. Cambridge, 2005.113.Hale H.E. Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions:Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy // Post-Soviet Affairs. – 2003. - Vol. 19, N3. - P. 228–263.114.Hale H.E.

Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, andthe State. Cambridge, 2006.115.Hartlyn J., McCoy J, Mustillo T. Electoral Governance Matters //Comparative Political Studies. - 2008. – Vol.41, N1. – Pp.73-98116.Herrmann J. Neo-Patrimonialism and Subnational Authoritarianism inMexico. The Case of Oaxaca // Journal of Politics in Latin America. – 2010.- №2. – Р. 85-112.;117.Ilyin M. What is behind the term: ideal type, category, concept or justa buzzword? // Rediscriptions. – 2015.

- Vol.18.1. – P.26-51.118.Inglehart R., Baker W. Modernization, Cultural Change, And ThePersistence Of Traditional Values // American Sociological Review. – 2000.- Vol. 65. - P. 19-51.119.Inkeles A. Measuring Democracy through Election Outcomes: ACritique with African Data // Comparative Political Studies.

– 2007. –Vol.40. – P. 1211-1237.132120.Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide GovernanceIndicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues / World Bank PolicyResearch Working Paper No. 5430.121.Knack S. and Keefer P. Institutions and Economic Performance:Cross-CountryTests Using AlternativeInstitutional Measures//Economics and Politics.

- 1995. - Vol. 7, #3. - Pp. 207-227.;122.Laakso M.; Taagepera R. Effective Number of Parties: A Measurewith Application to West Europe // Comparative Political Studies. – 1979. –vol.12. - P.3-27.123.Lankina T. Regional democracy variations and the forgotten legaciesof western engagement // Gel'man V. (ed.) The Politics of SubnationalAuthoritarianism in Russia. Ashgate, 2010.124.Leach R. Local Government Reorganization RIP? // PoliticalQuarterly. - 1998. - Vol.

69. - №1.125.Levitsky S, Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism //Journal of Democracy. – 2002. - Volume 13, Issue 2. - P. 51-65.126.Linz J. Democracy Today: an agenda for studies of Democracy //Scandinavian Political Studies. - 1997. – Vol.20. - P.115-134.127.Linz J., Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition andConsolidation. Baltimore, 1996.128.Linz J.J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. New York, 1975.129.Lipset S. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics.

N.Y., 1960.130.Lipset S. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: EconomicDevelopment and Political Legitimacy // The American Political ScienceReview. – 1959. - Vol. 53, No. 1 - P. 69-105.131.Marsh R. Does Democracy Hinder Economic Development in theLatecomer Developing Nations // Comparative Social Research. – 1979. –Vol.2, № 2. – Pp. 215-248.133132.Mazzuca S. Reconceptualizing Democratization: Access to PowerVersus Exercise of Power // Regimes and Democracy in Latin America / Ed.G.Munck.

Oxford, 2007. – P. 39-50.133.McMann K. Economic autonomy and democracy: hybrid regimes inRussia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge, 2006.134.McMann K., Petrov N. Survey of Democracy in Russia’s Regions //Post-Soviet Geography and Economics. - 2000. – Vol.41. - №3. - Р. 155182.135.Melville A, Stukal D., Mironyuk M. Trajectories of RegimeTransformation and Types of Stateness in Postcommunist Countries//Perspectives on European Politics and Society.

- 2013. - Vol. 14., No.4. - P.15.136.Melville A. Y., Mironyuk M. G. “Bad enough governance”: statecapacity and quality of institutions in post-Soviet autocracies // Post-SovietAffairs. - 2015. - No. 21 - . P. 1-20.137.Milton-Edwards N. Façade Democracy and Jordan // British Journalof Middle Eastern Studies. – 1993. - Vol. 20., Issue 2. - P. 191-203.138.Molinar J. Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index //American Political Science Review. – 1991. – Vol.85.

- P.1383–91.139.Montero A. “Uneven Democracy? Subnational Authoritarianism inDemocratic Brazil.” Paper presented at the 2007 Latin American StudiesAssociation meeting, Montréal, Canada, September 5-7.140.Montero A. Trading Spaces: The Endogenous Dynamics ofSubnational Authoritarianism in Brazil. Prepared for delivery at the 2010Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Toronto, CanadaOctober 6-9, 2010.141.Moore B. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord andPeasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, 1966.134142.Munck G.L., Leff C.S. Modes of transition and democratization:South America and Eastern Europe in comparative perspective //Comparative politics. - 1997.

– Vol.29, №3. – P.343-362.143.Negrier E. The Chenging Role of Franch Local Government // WestEuropean Politics. – 1999. - vol. 22. - № 4.144.O’Donnell G. Counterpoints. Selected essays on authoritarianism anddemocratization. Notre Dame, 1999.145.O'Donnell G., Schmitter Ph. Transitions from authoritarian rule:tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. – Baltimore, 1986.146.Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development // AmericanPolitical Science Review.