Диссертация (1174377), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
Gastroenterol. — 2009. — Vol.104, № 6. — P. 1563–1574.177. Muzii, L. Histologic analysis of endometriomas: what the surgeon needs to know. /L.Muzii, A.Bianchi, F.Bellati [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2007. — Vol. 87. — P. 362–366.178. Muzii, L. Histologic analysis of specimens from laparoscopic endometrioma excisionperformed by different surgeons: does the surgeon matter? / L.Muzii, R.Marana,R.Angioli [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2011. — Vol.
95, № 6. — P. 2116–2119.179. Muzii, L. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the stripping technique a tissuesparing procedure? / L.Muzii, A.Bianchi, C.Croce' [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2002. —Vol. 77. — P. 609–614.180. Navot, D. Prognostic assessment of female fecundity. / D.Navot, Z.Rosenwaks,E.J.Margalioth // Lancet. — 1987. — Vol.
19, № 2 (8560). — P. 645–647.181. Nduka, C.C. Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable air-borne cancercells. / C.C.Nduka, N.Poland, M.Kennedy [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. — 1998. — Vol. 12,№ 8. — P. 1031–1034.182. Nesbitt, C. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapyversus conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varices. / C.Nesbitt, R.K.Eifell,P.Coyne [et al.] // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2001. - № 10. —CD005624.183. Ng, E.H.
Effects of age on hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve inChinese women with proven fertility. / E.H.Ng, W.S.Yeung, D.Y.Fong [et al.] // Hum.Reprod. — 2003. — Vol. 18. — P. 2169–2174.184. Ng, W.T. Comparison of experimental nerve injure caused by ultrasonically activatedscalpel and electrosurgery.
/ W.T. Ng // Br. J. Surg. — 2005. — Vol. 92, № 9. — P.1180.185. Ogg, M. Comparative healing of human cutaneous surgical incitions createdby thePEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a standart scalpel. / M.Ogg //AORN J. — 2009. — Vol. 90, № 5. — P. 751–752.186. Opøien, H. K.
Do endometriomas induce an inflammatory reaction in nearby follicles?184/ H. K.Opøien, P.Fedorcsak, A.Polec [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. – 2013. – Vol. 28, №7. –P. 1837–1845.187. Ouchi, K. Palliative operation for cancer of the head of the pancreas: significance ofthe pancreaticoduodenectomy and intraoperative radiation therapy for survival andquality of live. / K.Ouchi, T.Sugavara, H.Ono [et al.] // Dig. Surg. — 2000 — Vol. 17,№ 2.
— P.38–42.188. Palanker, D.V. Electrosurgery with cellular precision. / D.V. Palanker, A.Vankov,P.Huie [et al.] // IEEE Transact. Biomed. Engineer. — 2008. — Vol. 55, № 2. — P.838–841.189. Pandian, Z. Intervention for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation(COH) in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). / Z.Pandian, A.R.McTavish, L. Aucott [et al.] //Cochrane Detabase Syst. Rev. – 2010.
- №1. - CD004379.190. Patrick, F.V. Postoperative Adhesion Formation in a Rabbit Model: MonopolarElectrosurgery Versus Ultrasonic Scalpel. / F.V.Patrick, L.George, A.Radu [et al.] //SCIENTIFIC PAPER. — 2015. – Vol.19, № 2. - P. 1–5.191. Pellegrino, A. Harmonic scalpel versus conventional electrosurgery in the treatment ofvulvar cancer. / A.Pellegrino, R.Fruscio, A.Maneo [et al.] // Int.
J. Gynaecol. Obstet.— 2008. — Vol. 103, № 2. — P. 185–188.192. Pergialiotis, V. The effect of bipolar electrocoagulation during ovarian cystectomy onovarian reserve: a systematic review. / V. Pergialiotis [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. —2015. — Vol. 213, № 5. — P. 620–628.193. Perrin, L. Fertility and ovarian function after concervative surgery for germ cell tumorsof the ovary. / L.Perrin, J.Low, J.Nicklin [et al.] // Obstet. Gynaecol. — 1999.
— Vol.39, № 2. — P. 243–245.194. Piipo, S. Surgery for ovarian masses during childhood and adolescence: a report of 79cases. / S.Piipo, L.Mustaniemi, H.Lenko // Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. - 1999. – Vol.12, №4. - P. 223-227.195. Raffi, F. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: asystematic review and meta-analysis. / F.Raffi, M.Metwally, S.Amer // J. Clin.Endocrinol. Metab. — 2012. — Vol. 97.
- P. 3146–3154.185196. Rioux, J.E. Bipolar electrosurgery: a short history. / J.E. Rioux // J. Minim. Invasiv.Gynecol. — 2007. — Vol. 14, № 5. — P. 538–541.197. Rogers, A. Laser hair removal following reconstructive surgery. / A.Rogers,D.Sainsbury, A.Tahir, S.Pape // J.
Plastic Reconstr. Aesth. Surg. — 2010. — Vol. 63,№ 11. — P. 796-797.198. Roman, H. Direct proportional relationship between endometrioma size and ovarianparenchyma inadvertently removed during cystectomy and its implication on themanagement of enlarged endometriomas. / H.Roman, I.Pura, O.Tarta [et al.] // Hum.Reprod.
— 2010. — Vol. 25, № 6. — P. 1428–1432.199. Roman, H. Postoperative recurrence and fertility after endometrioma ablation usingplasma energy: retrospective assessment of a 3-year experience. / H.Roman, M.Auber,N.Bourdel [et al.] // J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. - 2013. – Vol. 20, №5. – P. 573–582.200. Roman, H. Vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using plasma energy: histologicfindings of a pilot study. / H.Roman, I.Pura, O.Tarta [et al.] // Fertil.
Steril. — 2011. —Vol. 95. — P. 1853–1856.201. Romualdi, D. Follicular loss in endoscopic surgery for ovarian endometriosis:quantitative and qualitative observations. / D.Romualdi, F.Zannoni, A.Lanzone [et al.]// Fertil. Steril. — 2011. — Vol. 96, № 2. — P. 374–378.202.
Roudebush, W.E. Biomarkers of Ovarian Reservе. / W.E.Roudebush, W.J.Kivens,J.M.Mattke // Biomark. Insights. — 2008. Vol. 3. — P. 259–268203. Ruidiaz, M.E. Quantitative comparison of surgical margin histology following excisionwithtraditional electrosurgery and a low-thermal-injury dissection device. /M.E.Ruidiaz, M.J.Cortes-Mateos, S.Sandoval [et al] // J. Surg. Oncol. — 2011. —Vol.104, № 7. — P. 746–754.204.
Rustamov, O. Anti-Mulleran hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort ofsubjects suggests sample instability. / O.Rustamov, A.Smith, S.A.Roberta [et al.] //Hum. Reprod. – 2012. - №27, №10. – P. 3085–3091.205. Saito, A. Involvement of mesosalpinx in endometrioma is a possible risk factor fordecrease of ovarian reserve after cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
/ A.Saito,A.Iwase, T.Nakamura [et al.] // Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. – 2016. – Vol.14, №1. – P.18672.206. Scheffer, G.J. Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to agein women with proven natural fertility. / G.J. Scheffer, F.J. Broekmans, M.Dorland [etal.] // Fertil. Steril. — 1999.
— Vol. 72. — P. 845–851.207. Schmidt, K.L. Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortexfrom 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. /K.L.Schmidt, A G.Byskov, A.A.Nyboe [et al.] // Hum. Reprod. — 2003. — Vol. 18, №6. - P. 1158–1164.208. Seifer, D.B. Women with declining ovarian reserve may demonstrate a. decrease in day3 serum inhibin B before a rise in day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone. / D.B. Seifer,R.T. Scott, P.A. Bergh // Fertile. Steril. — 1999. — Vol. 72, № l. — P. 63–65.209. Shaban, M.M. Role of ultrasonographic markers of ovarian reserve in prediction ofIVF and ICSI outcome.
/ M.M.Shaban, G.A.Abdel Moety // Gynecol. Endocrinol. —2014. — Vol. 30, № 4. — Р. 290–293.210. Showers, M.R. Relating smoking, obesity, insulin resistance, and ovarian biomarkerchanges to the final menstrual perion. / M.R. Showers, D.McConnell, M.Ann. Yosef[et al.] // N. Y.
Acad. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 1204. – P. 95–103.211. Somigliana, E. Does laparoscopic removal of nonendometriotic benign ovarian cystsaffect ovarian reserve? / E.Somigliana, G.Ragni, M.Infantino [et al.] // Acta. Obstei.Gynecol. Scand. — 2006. — Vol. 85. — P. 74–77.212. Storec, D. Endoscopic argon gas coagulation-initial clinical experiences / D.Storec,K.Grand, G.Gronbach [et al.] // Z.Gastroenterol. 1993. - V.31, №11.
– P. 675-679.213. Streuli, I. In women with endometriosis anti-Mullerian hormone levels are decreasedonly in those with previous endometrioma surgery. / I.Streuli, D.de Ziegler, V.Gayet[et al.] // Human Reproduction. — 2012 — Vol. 27, № 11. — P. 3294–3303.214. Sugita, S. One-year follow-up of serum antimullerian hormone levels in patients withcystectomy: are different sequential changes due to different mechanisms causingdamage to the ovarian reserve? / S.Sugita, A.Iwase, M.Goto [et al.] / Fertility andSterility – 2013.
– Vol. 2, № 100. – P. 516–522.215. Syrop, C.H. Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction and187in early menopause. / C.H.Syrop, A.Willhoite, B.J.Voorhiis // Fertil. Steril. — 1995.— Vol. 64. — P. 1167–1171.216. Tang, Y. Ovarian damage after laparoscopic endometrioma excision might be relatedto the size of cyst. / Y.Tang, S.L.Chen, X.Chen [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2013. — Vol.100. — P. 464–469.217. Targarona, E.M. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomizedcomparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgeryand ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. / E.M.Targarona,C.Balague, J.Marin [et al.] // Surg.
Innovat. — 2005. — Vol. 12, № 4. — P. 339–344.218. Tsolakidis, D. The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomyversus three-stage management in patients with endometriomas: a prospectiverandomized study. / D.Tsolakidis, G.Pados, D.Vavilis [et al.] // Fertil. Steril. — 2010.— Vol. 94. — P.
71–77.219. Tunc Yaman, S. Protective effects of honokiol on ischemia/reperfusion injury of ratovary: an experimental study. / S. Yaman Tunc [et al.] // Drug Des. Devel. Ther. —2016. — Vol. 10. — P. 1077–1083.220. Tyler, L.N. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgeryexcision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionin predicting persistent disease.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
