Диссертация (1155650), страница 54
Текст из файла (страница 54)
– 2010.145. ICJ, case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo), Compensation, Judgment : the official text // ICJ Reports. –2012.146. Case concerning the Difference between New Zealand and France concerning the Interpretation or Application of two Agreements, concluded on 9 July1986 between the two States and which related to the Problems arising from theRainbow Warrior Affair, award of 30 April 1990 : the official text // Recueil de sentences arbitrales.
– 1990. – Vol. XX.147. ECHR, case A. v the United Kingdom. Judgment of 23 September 1998 :the official text // ECHR, Reports of Judgments and Decisions. – 1998-VI.148. ECHR, case Akdivar and others v Turkey (Article 50), Application№ 99/1995/605/693, Judgment, 1 April 1998. Para. 18 : the official text [Электронный ресурс].
– Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58152 (дата обращения: 11.02.2018).149. ECHR, case Aksoy v Turkey. Judgment of 18 December 1996 : the officialtext // Reports. – 1996-VI.238150. ECHR, case Aktaş v Turkey. Judgment of 24 April 2004 : the official text[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001102720 (дата обращения: 15.02.2018).151. ECHR, case Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom, Application № 27021/08.Judgment of 7 July 2011, 27021/08, [2011] ECHR 1092, 30 BHRC 637, (2011) 53EHRR 23 : the official text // Reports. – 2011.152.
ECHR, case Amuur v France, Application № 1977/92, Judgment 17/1995/523/609 : the official text // Reports. – 1995.153. ECHR, case Assanidze v Georgia. Judgment of 8 April 2004. Paras 202–203 : the official text [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61875 (дата обращения: 15.02.2018)154. ECHR, case Aslakhanova v. Russia (Appl.
№ 2944/06 and 8300/07,50184/07, 332/08, 42509/10) : the official text. Judgment, 18 December 2012 // Reports. – 2012.155. ECHR, case Assenov v Bulgaria. Judgment of 28 October 1998 : the official text // Reports. – 1998-VIII.156. ECHR, case Aydin v Turkey. Judgment of 25 September 1997 : the officialtext // Reports. – 1997-VI.157. ECHR, case Bilgin v Turkey. Judgment of 16 November 2000. Paras 138–152.
[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=00159592 (дата обращения: 12.02.2018).158. ECHR, case Broniowski v Poland, Application № 31443/96. Judgment of26 September 2005. Para. 194 : the official text [Электронный ресурс]. – Режимдоступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i =001-70326 (дата обращения: 14.02.2018).159.
ECHR, case Brumarescu v. Romania : the official text. – App. №28342/95, 33 Eur. H.R. Rep. 36 (2001).160. ECHR, case Cakici v Turkey : the official text. Judgment of 8 July 1999 //Reports. – 1999-IV.239161. ECHR, case Goodwin v. United Kingdom : the official text. – App.№ 17488/90, 22 Eur. H.R. Rep. 123, 1996.162. ECHR, case Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom : the official text. Applications № 60041/08 and 60054/08). Judgment of 23 November 2011 (final 11April 2011) // Reports of judgments and decisions. – 2010-IV.163. ECHR, case Elci and others v Turkey : the official text.
– Applications№ 23145/93 and 25091/94, Judgment 13 November 2003.164. ECHR, case Hirst v. the United Kingdom (№ 2) [GC], application№ 74025/01 : the official text. Judgment of 6 October 2005 // Reports of judgmentsand decisions. – 2005-IX.165. ECHR, case Ilascu and others v Moldova and Russia : the official text.Judgment of 8 July 2004. Para. 490.
[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа:http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886 (дата обращения: 15.02.2018).166. ECHR, case Ipek v Turkey : the official text Application № 25760/94.Judgment of 17 February 2004 (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Para. 227.[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=00161636 (дата обращения: 12.02.2018).167. ECHR, case Isayeva v Russia : the official text Application № 57950/00,Judgment 6 July 2005. [Электронный ресурс].
– Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68379 (дата обращения: 11.02.2018).168. ECHR, case Kilic v Turkey : the official text. Judgment of 28 Mars 2000 //Reports. – 2000-III.169. ECHR, case Kingsley v. United Kingdom : the official text. – App.№ 35605/97, 35 Eur. H.R. Rep. 10, 49 (2002).170. ECHR, case Klass a.o. v. Germany : the official text. 6 September 1978. –Appl.
№ 5029/71.171. ECHR, case Kurić and Others v. Slovenia : the official text. Application№ 26828/06, Judgment (Just satisfaction) [GC] of 12 March 2014 // Reports of240Judgments and Decisions. – 2014-I.172. ECHR, case Kurt v Turkey : the official text. Judgment of 25 May 1998 //Report.
– 1998-III.173. ECHR, case Mahmut Kaya v Turkey : the official text. Judgment of 28March 2000 // Reports. – 2000-III.174. ECHR, case McCann and Others v the United Kingdom : the official text.Judgment of 27 September 1995. – Series A. – № 324.175. ECHR, case Miloslavsky v. United Kingdom : the official text. – App.№ 18139/91, 20 Eur. H.R.
Rep. 442.176. ECHR, case Neumeister v. Austria (Article 50) : the official text. – App.№ 1936/63, 1 Eur. H.R. Rep. 136.177. ECHR, case Orhan v Turkey : the official text. Application № 25656/94.Judgment of 18 June 2002 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60509 (дата обращения: 11.02.2018).178. ECHR, case Osman v the United Kingdom : the official text. Judgment of28 October 1998 // Reports. – 1998-V III.179.
ECHR, case Papamichalopoulos and Others v Greece (Article 50) : the official text. – Judgment of 31 October 1995. – Series A. – № 330-B.180. ECHR, case Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy : the official text. – App.№ 39221/98 and 41963/98, 35 Eur. H.R. Rep. 12 (2000).181. ECHR, case Selcuk and Asker v. Turkey : the official text. App. №23184/94 and 23185/94, 26 Eur. H.R. Rep. 477, 125 // Reports 1998-II.182.
ECHR, case Silver v the United Kingdom : the official text. – Judgment of25 March 1983. Appl. № 5947/72 a.o. – Series A. – № 61.183. ECHR, case Varnava and others v Turkey : the official text. Applications№ 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90,16072/90 and 16073/90, Judgment, 18 September 2009. [Электронный ресурс].
–Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94162 (дата обращения:12.02.2018).241184. ECHR, case X and Y v the Netherlands : the official text. – Judgment of26 March 1985. – Series A 91.185. ECHR, case Z and others v. United Kingdom : the official text. – App.№ 29392/95, 34 Eur. H.R. Rep.
3.186. ECHR, cases De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp («Vagrancy») v. Belgium (Article 50) : the official text. – App. № 2832/ 66, 2835/66 and 2899/66, 1 Eur. H.R. Rep.438 (1972).187. ECHR, case Ouardiri v. Switzerland [SS], № 65840/09 : the official text.Judgment of June 28, 2011 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105618 (дата обращения: 16.02.2018).188.
ECHR, case Ligue des musulmans de Suisse v. Switzerland [SS], № 66274/09 : the official text. Judgment of June 28, 2011 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режимдоступа: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105618 (дата обращения: 17.02.2018).189. IACtHR, case Garridoy Baigorria v Argentina (Reparations) : the officialtext. – Judgment of 27 August 1998. – Series C. – № 39.190. IACtHR, case Velásquez-Rodríguez v Honduras : the official text. – Judgment of 29 July 1988. – Series C.
– № 4.191. IACtHR, case Aloeboetoe et al v Suriname (Reparations) : the official text. –Judgment of 10 September, 1993. – Series C. – № 15.192. IACtHR, case Bámaca Velásquez v Guatemala (Reparations) : the officialtext. – Judgment of 22 February, 2002. – Series C. – № 91.193. IACtHR, case Barrios Altos v Peru, Interpretation of the Judgment on theMerits. – Judgment of 3 September 2001. – Series C. – № 83.194. IACtHR, case Blake v.
Guatemala : the official text. – Judgment of January24, 1998 (Merits). [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www. univie.ac.at/bimtor/dateien/iacthr_1998_blake_vs_ guatemala.pdf (дата обращения:15.02.2018).195. IACtHR, case Blake v. Guatemala. Reparations : the official text242[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/ articulos/seriec_36_ing.pdf (дата обращения: 15.02.2018).196. IACtHR, case Caloto Massacre v Colombia : the official text.
– Report№ 36/00, Case 11.101, 13 April 2000.197. IACtHR, case Cantoral Benavides v Peru (Reparations) : the official text. –Judgment of 3 December 2001. – Series C. – № 88.198. IACtHR, case Caracazo v Venezuela (Reparation) : the official text. –Judgment of 29 August 2002. – Series C. – № 95.199. IACtHR, case Castillo Páez v Peru : the official text.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
