Диссертация (1145958), страница 20
Текст из файла (страница 20)
Psychophysiol. – 2003. – V.48. – P. 179 –188.129139.Näätänen, R. Processing negativity. An evoked-potential reflection ofselective attention. / R. Näätänen // Psychol. Bull. – 1982. – V. 92. – P. 605 –640.140.Näätänen, R. The role of attention in auditory information processing asrevealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitivefunction. / R. Näätänen // Behav. Brain Sci. – 1990. – V.13.
– P. 201–288.141.Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W., Mantysalo, S. Early selective attention effecton evoked potential reinterpreted. / R. Näätänen, A.W. Gaillard, S. Mantysalo //Acta. Psychol. – 1978. – V.42. – P. 313–329.142.Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., Winkler, I. Memory based or afferent processesin mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. / R. Näätänen, T.Jacobsen, I. Winkler // Psychophysiology. – 2005. – V. 42. – P.25–32.143.Näätänen, R., Kahkonen, S. Central auditory dysfunction in schizophreniaas revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalentMMNm: a review. / R.
Näätänen, S. Kahkonen // Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol.–2009. – V.12 (1). – P. 125–135.144.Näätänen, R., Michie, P.T. Early selective attention effects on the evokedpotential. A critical review and reinterpretation. / R. Näätänen, P.T. Michie //Biol. Psychol. – 1979. – V. 8. – P. 81–136.145.Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. Doevent-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory inthe human brain? / R. Näätänen, P. Paavilainen, K.
Alho, K. Reinikainen, M.Sams // Neurosci. Lett. – 1989. – V. 98. – P. 217–221.146.Näätänen, R., Sams, M., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., et al.Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. / R. Näätänen,130M. Sams, K. Alho, P. Paavilainen, K. Reinikainen, et al. // Electroencephalogr.Clin.
Neurophysiol. – 1988. – V.69. – P.523–531.147.Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., Winkler I.“Primitive intelligence” in the auditory cortex. / R. Näätänen, M. Tervaniemi, E.Sussman, P. Paavilainen, I. Winkler // Trends. Neurosci. – 2001. – V.24. – P.283–288.148.Nagamoto, H.T., Adler, L.E., Hea, R.A., Griffith, J.M., McRae, K.A.,Freedman, R. Gating of auditory P50 in schizophrenics: unique effects ofclozapine. / H.T. Nagamoto, L.E. Adler, R.A. Hea, J.M. Griffith, K.A. McRae, R.Freedman // Biol. Psychiatry.
– 1996. – V. 40. – P. 181–188.149.Nagamoto, H.T., Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C., Freedman, R. Sensory gatingin schizophrenics and normal controls: effects of changing stimulation interval. /H.T. Nagamoto, L.E. Adler, M.C. Waldo, R. Freedman // Biol. Psychiatry. –1989. – V.25. – P.
549–561.150.Nagamoto, H.T., Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C., Griffith, J. Freedman, R.Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls: effectsof recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave. / H.T. Nagamoto,L.E. Adler, M.C. Waldo, J. Griffith, R. Freedman // Schizophr. Res. – 1991. –V.4. – P. 31–40.151.Nelson, D.A., Lassman, F.M. Combined effects of recovery period andstimulus intensity on the human auditory-evoked vertex response. / D.A.
Nelson,F.M. Lassman // J. Speech Hear. Res. –1973. – V.16. – P. 297–308.152.Nelson, D.A., Lassman, F.M. Effects of intersignal interval on the humanauditory evoked response. / D.A. Nelson, F.M. Lassman // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. –1968. – V.44. – P. 1529 – 1532.131153.Nelson, D.A., Lassman, F.M. Re-examination of the effects of periodic andaperiodic stimulation on the auditory-evoked vertex response. / D.A.
Nelson,F.M. Lassman // Audiol. – 1977. – V. 16. – P. 409–418.154.Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Knight, R.T., Woods, D.L., Woodward, K.Differential auditory processing continues during sleep. / L. Nielsen-Bohlman,R.T. Knight, D.L. Woods, K. Woodward // Electroencephalogr. Clin.Neurophysiol. – 1991. – V.79. – P. 281–290.155.Ninomiya, H., Chen, C.-H., Onitsuka, T., Ichimiya, A. Negative correlationof P50 peak latencies and reaction times in a simple reaction task.
/ H. Ninomiya,C.-H. Chen, T. Onitsuka, A. Ichimiya // Еlectroencephalography and clinicalNeurophysiology. – 1996. – V. 100. – P. 74–77.156.Olney,J.W.,Farber,N.B.Glutamatereceptordysfunctionandschizophrenia. / J.W. Olney, N.B. Farber //Archives of General Psychiatry. –1995. – V. 52. – P. 998-1007.157.Onitsuka, T., Ninomiya, H., Sato, E., Yamamoto, T., Tashiro, N.Differential characteristics of the middle latency auditory evoked magneticresponses to interstimulus intervals.
/ T. Onitsuka, H. Ninomiya, E. Sato, T.Yamamoto, N. Tashiro // Clin. Neurophysiol. –2003. – V.114. – P. 1513–1520.158.Onitsuka, T., Ninomiya, H., Sato, E., Yamamoto, T., Tashiro, N. The effectof interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evokedpotential and magnetic field: is the auditory P50 in humans an overlappingpotential? / T. Onitsuka, H. Ninomiya, E. Sato, T. Yamamoto, N. Tashiro //Clinical Neurophysiology. – 2000.
– V.111. – P. 237–245.159.Park, H.R.P., Lim, V.K., Kirk, I.J., Waldie, K.E. P50 sensory gatingdeficits in schizotypy. / H.R.P. Park, V.K. Lim, I.J. Kirk, K.E.Waldie //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2015. – V.82. – P. 142–147.132160.Parker, N.K. Influence of induced muscular tension on a time-estimationmotor task. / N.K. Parker // J. Mot. Behav. 1973. – V.5. – P. 111–120.161.Perry, W., Minassian, A., Feifel, D., Braff, D.L.
Sensorimotor gatingdeficits in bipolar disorder patients with acute psychotic mania. / W. Perry, A.Minassian, D. Feifel, D.L. Braff // Biological Psychiatry. – 2001. – V. 50. – P.418–424.162.Perry, W., Minassian, A., Lopez, B., Maron, L., Lincoln, A. Sensorimotorgating deficits in adults with autism. / W. Perry, A. Minassian, B. Lopez, L.Maron, A. Lincoln // Biological Psychiatry. – 2007. – V. 61. – P. 482–486.163.Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L., Proulx, G.B. Human auditory sustainedpotentials.
II. Stimulus relationships. / T.W. Picton, D.L. Woods, G.B. Proulx //Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. – 1978. – V.45. – P. 198-210.164.Pineda, J.A., Herrera, C., Kang, C., Sandler, A. Effects of cigarettesmoking and 12-h abstention on working memory duringrecognition task./ J.A. Pineda, C.Herrera, C.a serial-probeKang, A. Sandler //Psychopharmacology. – 1998.
–V.139 (4). – P.311-321.165.Pinneo, L.R. The effects of induced muscle tension during tracking on levelof activation and on performance. / L.R. Pinneo // J. Exp. Psychol. – 2003. – V.62. – P. 523–531.166.Reite, M., Teale, P., Zimmerman, J., Davis, K., Whalen, J. Source locationof a 50 msec latency auditory evoked field component.
/ M. Reite, P. Teale, J.Zimmerman, K. Davis, J. Whalen // Electroencephalography and ClinicalNeurophysiology. – 1988. –V. 70 – P.490–498.167.Rentzsch Johannes, Maria C. Jockers-Scherubl, Nash N. Boutros, JurgenGallinat. Test-retest reliability of P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in133healthy subjects. //International Journal of Psychophysiology. – 2008. – V. 67 –P. 81-90.168.Retaux, S., Besson, M.J., Penit-Soria, J.
Opposing effects of dopamine D2receptor stimulation on the spontaneous and the electrically evoked release of[3H]GABA on rat prefrontal cortex slices. / S. Retaux, M.J. Besson, J. PenitSoria // Neuroscience. – 1991. – V. 42 – P.61 –71.169.Rinne, T., Alho, K., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Virtanen, J., Näätänen, R. Separatetime behaviors of the temporal and frontal MMN sources.
/ T. Rinne, K. Alho,R.J. Ilmoniemi, J. Virtanen, R. Näätänen // Neuroimage. – 2000. – V. 12. – P. 14–19.170.Roth, W.T., Pfefferbaum, A., Kelly, A.F., Berger, P.A., Kopell, B.S.Auditory event-related potentials in schizophrenia and depression. / W.T. Roth,A. Pfefferbaum, A.F. Kelly, P.A. Berger, B.S. Kopell // Psychiatry Res. – 1981.– V. 4 (2). – 199–212.171.Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Näätänen, R. Auditory frequencydiscrimination and event-related potentials. / M. Sams, P.
Paavilainen, K. Alho,R. Näätänen // Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. – 1985. –V.62. – P. 437–448.172.Schridde, U., Van Luijtelaar, G. The role of hippocampal theta activity insensory gating in the rat. / U. Schridde, G. Van Luijtelaar // Physiol. Behav. –2001. – V.
74 – P.257–266.173.Schubert, M., Johannes, S., Kock, M., Wieringa, B.M., Dengler, R., Munte,T.F. Differential effects of two motor tasks on ERPs in auditory classificationtask: Evidence of shared cognitive resources. / M. Schubert, S. Johannes, M.Kock, B.M. Wieringa, R. Dengler, T.F. Munte // Neuroscience Research. – 1998.– V. 30. – P. 125–134.134174.Seamans, J.K., Gorelova, N., Durstewitz, D., Yang, C.R.
Bidirectionaldopamine modulation of GABAergic inhibition in prefrontal cortical pyramidalneurons. / J.K. Seamans, N. Gorelova, D. Durstewitz, C.R. Yang //J.Neuroscience. –2001. – V. 21(10). – P. 3628 –3638.175.Simpson, G.V., Knight, R.T. Multiple brain systems generating the ratauditory evoked potential. II. Dissociation of auditory cortex and non-lemniscalgenerator systems. / G.V. Simpson, R.T. Knight //Brain Res. – 1993.
– V.60. – P.251–263.176.Smith, D., Boutros, N., Schwarzkopf, S. Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. / D. Smith, N. Boutros, S.Schwarzkopf // Psychophysiology. – 1994. – V. 31. – P. 495–502.177.Smith, J.W., Fetsko, L.A., Xu, R., Wang, Y. Dopamine D2L receptorknockout mice display deficits in positive and negative reinforcing properties ofmorphine and in avoidance learning. / J.W. Smith, L.A.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
