Диссертация (1145317), страница 44
Текст из файла (страница 44)
Long-term solar cycle evolution: review of recentdevelopments // Solar Physics. — 2003. — Vol. 218. — Pp. 319–343.212. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Kovaltsov G. A. Was one sunspot cycle lost inlate XVIII century? // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2001. — Vol. 370. —Pp. L31–L34.213. Svalgaard L. Updating the historical sunspot record // SOHO-23: understanding a peculiar solar minimum / Ed. by S. R. Cranmer, J. T. Hoeksema,J. L.
Kohl. — Vol. 428 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific ConferenceSeries. — 2010. — Pp. 297–305.214. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Kovaltsov G. A. Lost sunspot cycle in the beginningof Dalton minimum: new evidence and consequences // Geophysical ResearchLetters. — 2002. — Vol. 29. — P. 2183.267215. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Kovaltsov G.
A. Cyclic behaviour of sunspot activity during the Maunder minimum // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2000.— Vol. 354. — Pp. L33–L36.216. Kovaltsov G. A., Usoskin I. G., Mursula K. An upper limit on sunspot activityduring the Maunder minimum // Solar Physics. — 2004. — Vol. 224. — Pp. 95–101.217. Наговицын Ю. A., Наговицына E. Ю., Макарова В. В. ПравилоГневышева-Оля для физических параметров солнечного магнитного поля:400-летний интервал // Письма в Астрономический журнал.
— 2009. —Vol. 35. — Pp. 625–633.218. Kremliovsky M. N. Can we understand time scales of solar activity? // SolarPhysics. — 1994. — Vol. 151.219. Krivova N. A., Solanki S. K., Beer J. Was one sunspot cycle in the 18thcentury really lost? // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2002. — Vol. 396. —Pp. 235–242.220. Usoskin I.
G., Mursula K., Kovaltsov G. A. The lost sunspot cycle: reanalysisof sunspot statistics // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2003. — Vol. 403. —Pp. 743–748.221. Waldmeier M. Ergebnisse und Probleme der Sonnenforschung. — Leipzig: Becker and Erler kom.-ges., 1941.222. Veselovsky I. S., Tarsina M. V. Intrinsic nonlinearity of the solar cycles //Advances in Space Research. — 2002. — Vol. 29. — Pp. 417–420.223.
Яковчук О. С., Веселовский И. С. Правило Вальдмайера и гипотезао “потерянном” солнечном цикле в минимуме Дальтона // Труды Xмеждународной конференции по солнечной физике “Квазипериодическиепроцессы на Солнце и их геоэффективные проявления”, Пулково, СанктПетербург. — 2006. — Pp. 155–162.224. Hathaway D. H., Wilson R. M., Reichmann E. J. The shape of the sunspotcycle // Solar Physics. — 1994. — Vol. 151. — Pp.
177–190.268225. Illarionov E., Sokoloff D., Arlt R. et al. Cluster analysis for pattern recognitionin solar butterfly diagrams // Astronomische Nachrichten. — 2011. — Vol. 332.— Pp. 590–596.226. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Arlt R. et al. A solar cycle lost in 1793-1800: earlysunspot observations resolve the old mystery // Tha Astrophysical JournalLetters. — 2009. — Vol. 700.
— Pp. L154–L157.227. Becker W. Bemerkung zum Farben-Helligkeits-Diagramm des Kugelhaufens M71 = NGC 6838. Mit 1 textabbildung // Zeitschrift für Astrophysik. — 1954.— Vol. 34. — Pp. 107–109.228. Mursula K., Ulich T. A new method to determine the solar cycle length //Geophysical Research Letters. — 1998. — Vol. 25. — Pp. 1837–1840.229. Fligge M., Solanki S. K., Beer J. Determination of solar cycle length variationsusing the continuous wavelet transform // Astronomy and Astrophysics. —1999.
— Vol. 346. — Pp. 313–321.230. Benestad R. E. A review of the solar cycle length estimates // GeophysicalResearch Letters. — 2005. — Vol. 32. — P. 15714.231. Vaquero J. M., Garcı́a J. A., Gallego M. C. A note on solar cycle lengthestimates // Solar Physics. — 2006. — Vol. 235. — Pp. 433–437.232. Karoff C., Inceoglu F., Knudsen M. F. et al. The lost sunspot cycle: newsupport from 10Be measurements // Astronomy and Astrophysics,.
— 2015. —Vol. 575. — P. A77.233. Owens M. J., McCracken K. G., Lockwood M. et al. The heliospheric Halecycle over the last 300 years and its implications for a “lost” late 18th centurysolar cycle // Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. — 2015. — Vol. 5,no. 27. — P. A30.234. Silverman S. M. The visual aurora as a predictor of solar activity // Journalof Geophysical Research.
— 1983. — Vol. 88. — Pp. 8123–8128.235. Eddy J. A. The Maunder minimum // Science. — 1976. — Vol. 192. —Pp. 1189–1202.269236. Feynman J., Ruzmaikin A. The centennial Gleissberg cycle in space weather //Space weather: the Space radiation environment: 11th annual internationalastrophysics conference / Ed. by Q.
Hu, G. Li, G. P. Zank et al. — Vol. 1500of American Institute of Physics Conference Series. — 2012. — Pp. 44–49.237. Feynman J., Ruzmaikin A. The centennial Gleissberg cycle and its associationwith extended minima // Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics). —2014. — Vol. 119. — Pp. 6027–6041.238. Ruzmaikin A., Feynman J. The Earth’s climate at minima of centennial Gleissberg cycles // Advances in Space Research. — 2015. — Vol.
56. — Pp. 1590–1599.239. Frick P., Galyagin D., Hoyt D. V. et al. Wavelet analysis of solar activityrecorded by sunspot groups // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 1997. — Vol.328. — Pp. 670–681.240. Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A., Schüssler M. et al. Search for a relationshipbetween solar cycle amplitude and length // Astronomy and Astrophysics. —2002. — Vol. 396. — Pp. 1029–1035.241. Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A. Analyzing solar cycles // Science. — 2011. —Vol.
334. — Pp. 916–917.242. Vaquero J. M., Trigo R. M. Can the solar cycle amplitude be predicted usingthe preceding solar cycle length? // Solar Physics. — 2008. — Vol. 250. —Pp. 199–206.243. Sheeley Jr. N. R. Surface evolution of the Sun’s magnetic field: a historicalreview of the flux-transport mechanism // Living Reviews in Solar Physics. —2005. — Vol. 2. — P. 5.244. Jiang J., Cameron R. H., Schüssler M. The cause of the weak solar cycle 24 //The Astrophysical Journal Letters. — 2015. — Vol. 808.
— P. L28.245. van Ballegooijen A. A., Cartledge N. P., Priest E. R. Magnetic flux transport and the formation of filament channels on the Sun // The AstrophysicalJournal. — 1998. — Vol. 501. — Pp. 866–881.270246. Yeates A. R., Mackay D. H. Chirality of high-latitude filaments over solar cycle23 // The Astrophysical Journal Letters. — 2012. — Vol. 753. — P. L34.247. Schrijver C. J., Title A. M. On the formation of polar spots in Sun-like stars //The Astrophysical Journal. — 2001. — Vol. 551.
— Pp. 1099–1106.248. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Nandy D., Martens P. C. H. et al. A double-ring algorithm for modeling solar active regions: unifying kinematic dynamo modelsand surface flux-transport simulations // The Astrophysical Journal Letters.— 2010. — Vol. 720. — Pp. L20–L25.249. Baumann I., Schmitt D., Schüssler M. et al. Evolution of the large-scale magnetic field on the solar surface: a parameter study // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2004. — Vol.
426. — Pp. 1075–1091.250. Sheeley Jr. N. R. What’s so peculiar about the cycle 23/24 solar minimum? //SOHO-23: understanding a peculiar solar minimum / Ed. by S. R. Cranmer,J. T. Hoeksema, J. L. Kohl. — Vol. 428 of Astronomical Society of the PacificConference Series. — 2010. — Pp.
3–13.251. Wang Y.-M., Robbrecht E., Sheeley Jr. N. R. On the weakening of the polarmagnetic fields during solar cycle 23 // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2009. —Vol. 707. — Pp. 1372–1386.252. Makarov V. I., Fatianov M. P., Sivaraman K. R. Poleward migration of themagnetic neutral line and the reversal of the polar fields on the sun. I - period1945-1981 // Solar Physics. — 1983. — Vol. 85. — Pp.
215–226.253. Makarov V. I., Sivaraman K. R. Poleward migration of the magnetic neutralline and the reversal of the polar fields on the sun. II - period 1904-1940 //Solar Physics. — 1983. — Vol. 85. — Pp. 227–233.254. DeVore C. R., Boris J. P., Sheeley Jr. N. R. The concentration of the largescale solar magnetic field by a meridional surface flow // Solar Physics. —1984. — Vol. 92. — Pp. 1–14.255. Sheeley Jr. N. R., DeVore C. R., Boris J. P.
Simulations of the mean solarmagnetic field during sunspot cycle 21 // Solar Physics. — 1985. — Vol. 98.— Pp. 219–239.271256. Hale G. E., Ellerman F., Nicholson S. B. et al. The magnetic polarity ofsun-spots // The Astrophysical Journal.
— 1919. — Vol. 49. — Pp. 153–183.257. Brunner W. Gesetzmäßigkeiten in der Anordnung der Sonnenflecken zu Gruppen // Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidgenössischen Sternwarte Zurich. —1930. — Vol. 13. — Pp. 67–74.258. Schmidt H. U. Magnetohydrodynamics of an active region // Structure anddevelopment of solar active regions / Ed. by K. O. Kiepenheuer. — Vol.
35 ofIAU Symposium. — 1968. — Pp. 95–107.259. D’Silva S., Howard R. F. Limits on the magnetic field strength at the base ofthe solar convection zone // Solar Physics. — 1993. — Vol. 148. — Pp. 1–9.260. Stenflo J. O., Kosovichev A. G. Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: globalanalysis of the SOHO/MDI data set // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2012. —Vol. 745. — P. 129.261. Wang Y.-M., Sheeley Jr. N. R. Average properties of bipolar magnetic regionsduring sunspot cycle 21 // Solar Physics.
— 1989. — Vol. 124. — Pp. 81–100.262. Howard R. F. Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups // Solar Physics. — 1991. —Vol. 136. — Pp. 251–262.263. Wang Y.-M., Sheeley Jr. N. R. Magnetic flux transport and the sun’s dipolemoment - new twists to the Babcock-Leighton model // The AstrophysicalJournal. — 1991. — Vol. 375. — Pp. 761–770.264.
Sivaraman K. R., Gupta S. S., Howard R. F. Measurement of Kodaikanalwhite-light images - IV. Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups // Solar Physics.— 1999. — Vol. 189. — Pp. 69–83.265. Schüssler M., Baumann I. Modeling the Sun’s open magnetic flux // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2006. — Vol. 459. — Pp. 945–953.266. Dasi-Espuig M., Solanki S.
K., Krivova N. A. et al. Sunspot group tilt anglesand the strength of the solar cycle // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2010.— Vol. 518. — P. A7.272267. Tang F., Howard R., Adkins J. M. A statistical study of active regions 19671981 // Solar Physics. — 1984. — Vol. 91. — Pp. 75–86.268. Li J., Ulrich R. K. Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles //The Astrophysical Journal. — 2012.
— Vol. 758. — P. 115.269. Mackay D. H., Priest E. R., Lockwood M. The evolution of the Sun’s openmagnetic flux - I. A single bipole // Solar Physics. — 2002. — Vol. 207. —Pp. 291–308.270. Jiang J., Cameron R. H., Schmitt D. et al. Can surface flux transport accountfor the weak polar field in cycle 23? // Space Science Reviews. — 2013. — Vol.176. — Pp. 289–298.271. Schrijver C.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
