Диссертация (1145317), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
—Pp. 431–442.40. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Senkpeil R. R., Longcope D. W. et al. The minimum ofsolar cycle 23: as Deep as it could be? // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2015.— Vol. 804. — P. 68.41. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Senkpeil R. R., Windmueller J. C. et al. Small-scale andglobal dynamos and the area and flux distributions of active regions, sunspotgroups, and sunspots: a multi-database study // The Astrophysical Journal.— 2015.
— Vol. 800. — P. 48.42. Vaquero J. M., Nogales J. M., Sánchez-Bajo F. Sunspot latitudes during theMaunder minimum: a machine-readable catalogue from previous studies //Advances in Space Research. — 2015. — Vol. 55. — Pp. 1546–1552.43. Spörer G.F.W. Ueber die Periodicität der Sonnenflecken seit dem Jahre 1618,Vornehmlich in Bezug auf die Heliographische Breite Derselben, und Nachweis einer Erheblichen Störung Dieser Periodicität Während eines LangenZeitraumes, von Prof. Dr. G. Spoerer,...
— Druck von E. Blochmann undSohn, 1889.44. Ribes J. C., Nesme-Ribes E. The solar sunspot cycle in the Maunder minimumAD1645 to AD1715 // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 1993. — Vol. 276. —Pp. 549–563.45. Weiss N. O., Cattaneo F., Jones C. A. Periodic and aperiodic dynamo waves //Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics. — 1984. — Pp.
305–341.46. Sokoloff D., Nesme-Ribes E. The Maunder minimum: a mixed-parity dynamomode? // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 1994. — Vol. 288. — Pp. 293–298.25147. Schmitt D., Schuessler M., Ferriz-Mas A. Intermittent solar activity by an onoff dynamo. // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 1996. — Vol. 311. — Pp. L1–L4.48. Küker M., Arlt R., Rüdiger G. The Maunder minimum as due to magneticLambda -quenching // Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 1999.
— Vol. 343. —Pp. 977–982.49. Brandenburg A., Spiegel E. A. Modeling a Maunder minimum // Astronomische Nachrichten. — 2008. — Vol. 329. — Pp. 351–358.50. Olemskoy S. V., Kitchatinov L. L. Grand minima and north-south asymmetryof solar activity // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2013. — Vol. 777. — P. 71.51. Sokoloff D. The Maunder minimum and the solar dynamo // Solar Physics. —2004. — Vol.
224. — Pp. 145–152.52. Karak B. B. Importance of meridional circulation in flux transport dynamo: thepossibility of a Maunder-like Grand minimum // The Astrophysical Journal.— 2010. — Vol. 724. — Pp. 1021–1029.53. Cliver E. W., Clette F., Svalgaard L. Recalibrating the sunspot number (SSN):the SSN workshops // Central European Astrophysical Bulletin. — 2013. —Vol. 37.
— Pp. 401–416.54. Svalgaard L. Solar activity - past, present, future // Journal of Space Weatherand Space Climate. — 2013. — Vol. 3, no. 27. — P. A24.55. Zolotova N. V., Ponyavin D. I. The Maunder minimum is not as Grand as itseemed to be // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2015. — Vol. 800. — P. 42.56. Gómez J. M., Vaquero J. M. The sunspot observations by Rheita in 1642 //arXiv:1502.06772. — 2015.57. Vaquero J. M., Kovaltsov G. A., Usoskin I. G. et al. Level and length of cyclicsolar activity during the Maunder minimum as deduced from the active-daystatistics // Astronomy and Astrophysics.
— 2015. — Vol. 577. — P. A71.58. Usoskin I. G., Arlt R., Asvestari E. et al. The Maunder minimum (16451715) was indeed a grand minimum: a reassessment of multiple datasets //Astronomy and Astrophysics. — 2015. — Vol. 581. — P. A95.25259. Svalgaard L., Schatten K. H. Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: thebackbone method // arXiv:1506.00755. — 2015.60. Pesnell W. D. Predictions of solar cycle 24 // Solar Physics.
— 2008. — Vol.252. — Pp. 209–220.61. Wang Y.-M., Sheeley N. R. Understanding the geomagnetic precursor of thesolar cycle // The Astrophysical Journal Letters. — 2009. — Vol. 694. —Pp. L11–L15.62. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Balmaceda L. A., DeLuca E. E. Using the dipolar andquadrupolar moments to improve solar-cycle predictions based on the polarmagnetic fields // Physical Review Letters.
— 2013. — Vol. 111, no. 4. —P. 041106.63. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Dasi-Espuig M., Balmaceda L. A. et al. Solar cycle propagation, memory, and prediction: insights from a century of magnetic proxies //The Astrophysical Journal Letters. — 2013.
— Vol. 767. — P. L25.64. Priyal M., Banerjee D., Karak B. B. et al. Polar network index as a magneticproxy for the solar cycle studies // The Astrophysical Journal Letters. — 2014.— Vol. 793. — P. L4.65. Tlatov A. G., Dormidontov D. V., Kirpichev R. V. et al. Study of some characteristics of large-scale solar magnetic fields during the global field polarityreversal according to observations at the telescope-magnetograph KislovodskObservatory // Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. — 2015. — Vol. 55. — Pp. 969–975.66.
Scherrer P. H., Bogart R. S., Bush R. I. et al. The solar oscillations investigation - Michelson Doppler Imager // Solar Physics. — 1995. — Vol. 162. —Pp. 129–188.67. Keller C. U., Nso Staff. SOLIS — A modern facility for synoptic solar bservations // Cool stars, stellar systems, and the Sun / Ed. by R. A. Donahue,J. A. Bookbinder. — Vol. 154 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific ConferenceSeries. — 1998.
— Pp. 636–649.25368. Ulrich R. K. Very long lived wave patterns detected in the solar surface velocitysignal // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2001. — Vol. 560. — Pp. 466–475.69. Ulrich R. K., Boyden J. E. The solar surface toroidal magnetic field // TheAstrophysical Journal Letters. — 2005. — Vol. 620. — Pp. L123–L127.70. Svalgaard L., Duvall Jr. T. L., Scherrer P. H. The strength of the sun’s polarfields // Solar Physics.
— 1978. — Vol. 58. — Pp. 225–239.71. Hoeksema J. T. The large-scale structure of the heliospheric current sheetduring the ULYSSES epoch // Space Science Reviews. — 1995. — Vol. 72. —Pp. 137–148.72. Wülser J.-P., Lemen J. R., Tarbell T. D. et al. EUVI: the STEREO-SECCHIextreme ultraviolet imager // Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics / Ed. by S. Fineschi, M. A. Gummin.
— Vol. 5171 of Society ofPhoto-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. — 2004.— Pp. 111–122.73. Наговицын Ю. A. “Синтетический” ряд среднегодовых чисел полярныхфакелов в 1947-1979 гг. // Солнечные данные. — 1988. — Vol. 8. — Pp. 88–95.74. Nagovitsyn Y. A., Ivanov V. G., Miletsky E. V. et al. ESAI database and someproperties of solar activity in the past // Solar Physics. — 2004. — Vol. 224.— Pp.
103–112.75. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Sheeley N. R., Zhang J. et al. Calibrating 100 Years ofpolar faculae measurements: implications for the evolution of the heliosphericmagnetic field // The Astrophysical Journal. — 2012. — Vol. 753. — P. 146.76. Casas R., Vaquero J. M., Vazquez M. Solar rotation in the 17th century //Solar Physics. — 2006. — Vol. 234. — Pp. 379–392.77. Carrington R.
C. Observations of the spots on the Sun from November 9,1853 to March 24, 1861 made at Redhill. — London, Edinburgh: Williams andNorgate, 1863.25478. Spörer G.F.W., Prussia (Kingdom). Ministerium der Geistlichen Unterrichtsund Medizinal-Angelegenheiten. Beobachtungen der Sonnenflecken: Forsetzung der Publication XIII der Astronomischen Gesellschaft, Gedruckt auf desKonigl. Preussischen Ministeriums der Geistlichen, Unterichts- und Medicinalangelegenheiten. II. — Wilhelm Engelmann, 1876.79. Spörer G.F.W. Publicationen des Astrophysikalischen Observatoriums zu Potsdam Nr. 1, Vol. 1, part 1.
— Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1878.80. Spörer G.F.W. ibid No. 5, Vol. 2, part 1. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann,1880.81. Spörer G.F.W. ibid No. 17, Vol. 4, part 4. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann,1886.82. Spörer G.F.W. ibid No. 32, Vol. 10, part 1. — Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann,1894.83. Arlt R. Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749-1796 // SolarPhysics. — 2008. — Vol. 247. — Pp. 399–410.84. Arlt R.
The butterfly diagram in the eighteenth century // Solar Physics. —2009. — Vol. 255. — Pp. 143–153.85. Arlt R. The solar observations at Armagh observatory in 1795-1797 // Astronomische Nachrichten. — 2009. — Vol. 330. — Pp. 311–316.86. Vaquero J. M., Gallego M.
C., Usoskin I. G. et al. Revisited sunspot data:a new scenario for the onset of the Maunder minimum // The AstrophysicalJournal. — 2011. — Vol. 731. — P. L24.87. Livingston W., Penn M. J., Svalgaard L. Decreasing sunspot magnetic fieldsexplain unique 10.7 cm radio flux // The Astrophysical Journal Letters. —2012. — Vol. 757. — P. L8.88. Feynman J., Ruzmaikin A. The Sun’s strange behavior: Maunder minimum orGleissberg cycle? // Solar Physics. — 2011. — Vol. 272. — Pp. 351–363.25589.
Nagovitsyn Y. A., Pevtsov A. A., Livingston W. C. On a possible explanationof the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength // The Astrophysical JournalLetters. — 2012. — Vol. 758. — P. L20.90. Золотова Н. В., Понявин Д. И. Метод обнаружения скрытойсинхронизации // Письма в ЖТФ. — 2006. — Vol. 32. — Pp. 84–94.91. Золотова Н. В., Понявин Д. И. Эпизодическая и лаг синхронизацияактивности солнечных пятен северного и южного полушарий Солнца //Труды X Международной Пулковской конференции “Квазипериодическиепроцессы на Солнце и их геоэффективные проявления”. — 2006. — Pp. 171–174.92.
Ponyavin D. I., Zolotova N. V. Cross recurrence plots analysis of the North–South sunspot activities // Multi-wavelength investigations of solar activity /Ed. by A. V. Stepanov, E. E. Benevolenskaya, A. G. Kosovichev. — Vol. 223of IAU Symposium. — 2004. — Pp. 141–142.93. Ponyavin D. I., Barliaeva T. V., Zolotova N. V. Hypersensitivity of climateresponse to solar activity output during the last 60 years.
// Memorie dellaSocietà Astronomica Italiana. — 2005. — Vol. 76. — Pp. 1026–1029.94. Золотова Н. В., Понявин Д. И. Нелинейный анализ климатическихвременных рядов и солнечной активности посредством рекуррентных икросс-рекуррентных графиков // Вопросы Геофизики. — 2005. — Vol. 38.— Pp. 203–231.95. Zolotova N. V., Ponyavin D. I. Recognition of unstable synchronization //Proceedings of the 6th International conference “Problems of Geocosmos”.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
