Диссертация (1136269), страница 91
Текст из файла (страница 91)
Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras, Judgment, 29 July 1988 [Электронный ресурс].URL: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_04_ing.pdf.5.9. Межамериканская комиссия по правам человека1. Armando Alejandre Jr., Carlos Costa, Mario de la Peña, and Pablo Morales v.Cuba, Report № 86/99, 29 September 1999 [Электронный ресурс]. URL:https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/Cuba11.589.htm2. ArturoRibónAvilanv.Colombia,Case11.142,ReportNо.26/97,OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev.
at 444 (1997), 30 September 1997 [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/97eng/Colombia11142.htm.3. Chile, Cases 11.228, 11.229, 11.231 and 11.182, Report № 34/96, 15 October 1996[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.cidh.org/annualrep/96eng/chile11228.htm.4. Chumbivilcas v. Perú, Case 10.559, Report № 1/96, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.91 Doc. 7 at136(1996),1March1996[Электронныйhttp://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/1996/peru1-96.htm.ресурс].URL:4275. Coard et al. v. the USA, Case 10.951, Report № 109/99, 29 September 1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/UnitedStates10.951.htm.6. Detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; Request for Precautionary Measures,Communication to the Applicants, 13 March 2002 [Электронный ресурс].
URL:http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/guantanamo-2003.html.7. Disabled Peoples International and Others v. USA, Case 9213, IACHR Report №3/96,1March1996[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.cidh.org/annualrep/95eng/usa9213.htm.8. Hugo Bustios Saavedra v. Perú, Case 10.548, Report № 38/97, 16 October 1997[Электронныйресурс].URL:https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/97eng/Peru10548.htm.9. Jose Alexis Fuentes Guerrero et al. v. Colombia, Case 11.519, Report № 61/99, 13April1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://cidh.org/annualrep/98eng/Merits/Colombia%2011519.htm#27.10.
Juan Carlos Abella v. Argentina, Case 11.137, Report № 55/97, 18 November 1997[Электронныйресурс].URL:https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/97eng/Argentina11137.htm.11. Lucio Parada Cea, Hector Joaqíin Miranda Marroqín, Fausto García Funes,Andres Hernández Carpio, Jose Catalino Meléndez and Carlos Antonio Martínez v.El Salvador, Case 10.480, Report № 1/99, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7, 27 January1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://cidh.org/annualrep/98eng/Merits/ElSalvador%2010480.htm.12. Manuel Garcia Franco v. Ecuador, Case 10.258, Report № 1/97, 12 March 1997[Электронныйресурс].URL:https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/97eng/Ecuador10258.htm.13.
Report on Terrorism and Human Rights, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.116 Doc. 5 rev. 1 corr., 22October2002[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.cidh.org/terrorism/eng/part.b.htm#C.%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20International%20Humanitarian%20Law.42814. Resolution 2/06, Guantanamo Bay Precautionary Measures, 28 July 2006[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.cidh.org/annualrep/2006eng/annexes/annex%205eng.htm.15. Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.102 Doc.9rev.1,26February1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.cidh.org/countryrep/colom99en/table%20of%20contents.htm.5.10.
Африканская комиссия по правам человека и народов1. Amnesty International, Comité Loosli Bachelard, Lawyers’ Committee for HumanRights, Association of Members of the Episcopal Conference of East Africa v. Sudan,Decision,1–15November1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/26th/comunications/48.90-50.91-52.9189.93/achpr26_48.90_50.91_52.91_89.93_eng.pdf.2. Commission Nationale des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés v. Chad, 11 October1995[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/18th/comunications/74.92/achpr18_74_92_eng.pdf.3. D. R. Congo v.
Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda, Report, 20 May 2003.Communication227/99[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.achpr.org/english/Decison_Communication/Burundi/Comm.227-99.pdf.4. Resolution on the Right to Recourse and Fair Trial, 2–9 March 1992 [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://www.achpr.org/sessions/11th/resolutions/4/.5.11. Решения международных уголовных трибуналов5.11.1. Международный трибунал по бывшей Югославии1.
Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić, Appeals Chamber, Decision on the Defence Motion forInterlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 2 October 1995 [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm.2. Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić, Trail Chamber, Judgment, 7 May 1997 [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/tjug/en/tad-tsj70507JT2-e.pdf.4293. Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 15 July 1999[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acjug/en/tad-aj990715e.pdf.4.
Prosecutor v. Kupreškić et al., Trial Chamber, Judgment, 14 January 2000[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kupreskic/tjug/en/kuptj000114e.pdf.5. Prosecutor v. Martić, Decision, Review of the Indictment, 8 March 1996[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/martic/tdec/en/960308.pdf.6. Prosecutor v.
Milomir Stakic, Trial Chamber, Judgment, 31 July 2003.[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/stakic/tjug/en/stak-tj030731e.pdf7. Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 17 July 2008[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/strugar/acjug/en/080717.pdf.8. Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, Trial Chamber, Judgment, 3 March 2000[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/tjug/en/bla-tj000303e.pdf.9. Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic also known as «PAVO», HazimdelicEsad Landzo also known as «ZENGA», Judgment, 16 November 1998[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icty.org/x/cases/mucic/tjug/en/981116_judg_en.pdf.5.11.2. Международный уголовный трибунал по РуандеProsecutor2 September 1998v.Jean-PaulAkayesu,[ЭлектронныйJudgment,Case№ICTR-96-4-T,ресурс].http://www.unictr.org/Portals/0/Case/English/Akayesu/judgement/akay001.pdf.URL:4305.12.
Решения органа по разрешению споров в ВТО1. Appelate Body Report, Guatemala – Anti-Dumping Investigation RegardingPortland Cement from Mexico, WTO Soc. WT/DS60/AB/R, 5 November 1998.2. WTO, Panel Report, Indonesia – Certain Measures Affecting the AutomobileIndustry, WT/DS54/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R, 23 July 1998.3. WTO, Panel Report, Turkey – Restriction on Imports of Textile and ClothingProducts, WT/DS34/R, 31 May 1999.5.13. Решения иных международных судебных и квазисудебных органов1. Committee against Torture, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United Statesof America, CAT/C/USA/CO/2, 25 July 2006 [Электронный ресурс].
URL:http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/CAT.C.USA.CO.2.En?Opendocument.2. Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission, Partial Award, Western Front, AerialBombardment and Related Claims, The State of Eritrea and The Federal DemocraticRepublic of Ethiopia, 19 December 2005 // International Legal Materials. – 2006. –Vol. 45 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=652.3. Special Court for Sierra Leone, Appeals Chamber, Prosecutor v. Sam HingaNorman, Case № SCSL-2004-14-AR72(E), Decision on Preliminary Motion Basedon Lack of Jurisdiction (Child Recruitment), 31 May 2004 [Электронный ресурс].URL: http://www.sierralii.org/sl/judgment/special-court/2004/18.6.
Национальные правовые акты1. Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, 24 April1863 / Schindler D., Toman J. The Laws of Armed Conflicts. – Leiden; Boston:Martinus Nijhoff, 1988. – P. 3–23.2. USA, Authorization for Use of Military Force, Joint Resolution, 18 September 2001.PublicLaw107-40(S.J.Res.23)[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ40/html/PLAW-107publ40.htm.3. USA, Military Commissions Act, 22 September 2006 [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:S.3930:.4317. Решения национальных судов7.1.
Израиль1. Supreme Court of Israel, A and B v. the State of Israel, Judgment, 11 June 2008[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/06/590/066/n04/06066590.n04.pdf2. Supreme Court of Israel, The Public Committee against Torture in Israel v. theGovernment of Israel et al., Judgment, 13 December 2006 [Электронный ресурс].URL: http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/02/690/007/a34/02007690.a34.htm7.2. Великобритания1. Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (U.K.), Public Prosecutor v. Oie Hee Koiand connected appeals, 4 December 1967 // A.C.
– 1968. – at 829 [Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl-nat.nsf/72ac608e14b9c5d241256486004ad09f/9060d45de85f16dcc1256a1d0030f720?openDocument.2. High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division, DivisionalCourt, the Queen – on the Application of – Mazin Jumaa Gatteh Al Skeini and othersClaimants – and – the Secretary of State for Defence, 14 December 2004 // EWHR.– 2004. – at 2911.3. Supreme Court Of Judicature Court Of Appeal (Civil Division), The Queen (on theapplication of Mazin Mumaa Galteh Al-Skeini and Others) – and – The Secretary ofState for Defence, 21 December 2005 // EWCA.
– 2005. – Civ. 1609.4. Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause Al-Skeini and Others(Respondents) v. Secretary of State for Defence (Appellant), Al-Skeini and Others(Appellants) v. Secretary of State for Defence (Respondent), 13 June 2007 // UKHL.–2007[Электронныйресурс].http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070613/skeini1.htm.URL:4325. High Court of Justice, Serdar Mohammed v. Ministry of Defence, Judgment, 2 May2014 // EWHC. – 2014.
– at 1369 (QB) [Электронный ресурс]. URL:https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/mohammed-v-mod.pdf7.3. США1. Supreme Court of the United States, Lakhdar Boumediene, et al., Petitioners v.George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al., Decision, 12 June 2008 // 553– U.S. – 723.2. Supreme Court of the United States, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H.Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense, et al., Decision, 29 June 2006 // 548 –U.S.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
