Диссертация (1136203), страница 81
Текст из файла (страница 81)
1. P. 73-99.Dobrushina N. R. Imperatives in conditional and concessive subordinate clauses.Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages. Vajda E. J. (ed.).Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. Pp. 123-141.Dum-Tragut, Jasmine. Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian. Vol. 14. John BenjaminsPublishing, 2009.Elliott, Jennifer R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation ofreality.
Linguistic typology, vol.4-1. P. 55-90.Evans, N. (2012). Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach.Canonical Morphology and Syntax, 66.Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its functions. In Irina Nikolaeva & Frans Plank(eds.). Finiteness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Farkas, Donka. (2003). Assertion, Belief and Mood Choice. Paper presented at ESSLLI,ConditionalandUnconditionalModalityWorkshop,Vienna.http://people.ucsc.edu/~farkas/papers/mood.pdf421Fleischman, Suzanne. (1995)/ Imperfective and irrealis. Modality in grammar and discourse:519-551.Fortuin, Egbert. 2000.
Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and dativeinfinitive construction in Russian. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute for Logic, Language andComputation, Amsterdam University. Amsterdam: ILLC Dissertation Series.Fortuin, Egbert. 2005. From necessity to possibility: the modal spectrum of the dativeinfinitive construction in Russian. In Bjorn Hansen & Peter Karlik (eds.).
Modality in Slavoniclanguages. Verlag Otto Sagner. Munchen. Pp. 40-60.Garde, Paul. 1963. L'emploi du conditionnel et de la particule by en russe. Aix-en-Provence:Ophrys.Giannakidou, Anastasia. (2009). The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporalsemantics and polarity." Lingua 119.12: 1883-1908.Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2013. (Non)veridicality, epistemic weakening, and eventactualization: evaluative subjunctive in relative clauses. In: Taboada, Maite, and Rada Trnavac,eds.
Nonveridicality and Evaluation: Theoretical, Computational and Corpus Approaches. Brill.Givón, Talmy. (1994). Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in language, 18(2), 265-337.Givón, Talmy. (1984). Syntax Vol. I. The Hague: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Goldberg A.A. (1995). Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago:Univ. of Chicago.Green G.M. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses // Language 52 (2), 1976.Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to theOrder of Meaningful Elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H.
(ed.), Universals of Human Language,73-113. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Greenberg, Joseph H. (1986). The realis-irrealis continuum in the classical Greekconditional. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. On conditionals. Cambridge University Press, 1986.247-264.Grønn, Atle. An amazing come-back: a counterfactual imperfective in Russian. ScandoSlavica 54.1 (2008): 5-31.Grosz P. On the grammar of optative constructions. PhD dissertation.
MIT, 2011.Hacking, Jane F. 1998. Coding the hypothetical: A comparative typology of Russian andMacedonian conditionals. Vol. 38. John Benjamins Publishing.Hacking, Jane F. "Grammaticalization Theory and the Particle bi/by in Bulgarian,Macedonian and Russian." Canadian Slavonic Papers 41.3-4 (1999): 415-430.Hansen, Björn. 2010. Mood in Russian. In: Rothstein, Björn & Rolf Thieroff. Mood in theLanguages of Europe (pp. 325-341). John Benjamins Publishing Company.422Hansen, Björn. 2005. How to measure areal convergence: a case study of contact-inducedgrammaticalization in the German-Hungarian-Slavonic contact area. In Bjorn Hansen & PeterKarlik (eds.). Modality in Slavonic languages.
Verlag Otto Sagner. Munchen. P. 219-237.Hansen, Björn, Letučij, Aleksandr, Błaszczyk, Izabela. Complementizers in Slavonic. In:Boye, Kasper / Kehayov, Petar (eds.) Semantic functions of complementizers in Europeanlanguages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (submitted).Haspelmath, Martin. (1989). From purposive to infinitive - a universal path ofgrammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10: 287-310.Hengeveld, Kies. Semantic type, factivity and the expression of adverbial clauses //Hengeveld K. (Ed.) The internal structure of adverbial clauses (EUROTYP Working Papers,V.5). 1995.
P. 119–132.Hengeveld, Kies. 1998. Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. In: Adverbialconstructions in the languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter. 335-420.Holvoet, Axel. 2009. Modals in Baltic. In Bjorn Hansen & Peter Karlik (eds.). Modality inSlavonic languages. Verlag Otto Sagner. Munchen. P. 199-228.Holvoet, A. (2010). Mood in Latvian and Lithuanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe(Vol.
120). John Benjamins Publishing.Hooper J., Thompson S.A. On the applicability of root transformations // Linguistic inquiry.V. 4. 1973.Iatridou, Sabine. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. LinguisticInquiry 31.2: 231-270.Israeli, Alina. 2013. Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian. Current Studies in SlavicLinguistics, 146, 199.Kagan, Olga. (2007). On the Semantics of Structural Case: Hebrew University: Ph.Ddissertation.Kampers-Mahne B. 1991. L’opposition subjonctif/indicatif dans les relatives.
PhD thesis,University of Groningen.Kehayov, P., Niit, E., & Lindström, L. (2011). Imperative in Interrogatives in Estonian(Kihnu), Latvian and Livonian. Linguistica Uralica, (2), 81-93.Kempchinsky, P. (1987). The subjunctive disjoint reference effect. Studies in Romancelanguages, 25, 123.Khanina, Olesya. (2008). How universal is wanting. Studies in Language 32.4: 818-865.Lazard, Gilbert, 2001. L’expression de l’irre.el: Essai de typologie. In: Etudes de linguistiquege.ne.rale: Typologie grammaticale, Peeters, Leuven, pp. 413–424.Mauri, Caterina, and Andrea Sansò. (In press.) Irrealis and subjunctive.423Maurice, Florence.
1996. Der modale Infinitiv in der modernen russischen Standardsprache.Otto Sagner.Metslang, Helle, Maria-Maren Sepper. (2010) Mood in Estonian. In: Rothstein, Björn, andRolf Thieroff, eds. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Vol. 120. John Benjamins Publishing,2010.Mills M. H. Conventionalized politeness in Russian requests: A pragmatic view ofindirectness //Russian Linguistics. – 1992. – Т. 16. – №. 1. – С. 65-78.Mithun, M.
(1999). The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press.Nikolaeva, Irina. (2007). Constructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. In IrinaNikolaeva & Frans Plank (eds.). Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
138-80.Nikolaeva, Irina. (2014). Analyses of the Semantics of Mood. Jan Nuyts and Johan Van DerAuwera, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Modality and MoodNoonan, Michael. (2007). Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typologyand syntactic description (2nd ed.), vol. II, Complex constructions. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, pp.
52–150.Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Perlmutter, David. In what ways can finite and nonfinite clauses differ? Evidence fromRussian. In Irina Nikolaeva & Frans Plank (eds.). Finiteness: Theoretical and EmpiricalFoundations, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007): 250-305.Plungian, V. 2005. Irrealis and modality in Russian and in typological perspective. In BjornHansen & Peter Karlik (eds.). Modality in Slavonic languages. Verlag Otto Sagner.
Munchen. P.135-146.Podlesskaja, V.I. "Syntax and semantics of resumption: some evidence from Russianconditional conjuncts." Russian linguistics 21.2 (1997): 125-155.Quer, Josep. Twists of mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative andsubjunctive. Lingua 119.12 (2009): 1779-1787.Quer, Josep. (2010). Mood in Catalan.
Mood in the languages of Europe. Amsterdam/NewYork: John Benjamins, 221-236.Rothstein B., Thieroff R. (2010). Mood in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Say, S. (2013). On the nature of dative arguments in Russian constructions with“predicatives”. Current studies in Slavic linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 225246.424Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. (2009). A Typology of Purpose Clauses. John Benjamins,Amsterdam / Philadelphia.Siegel, Laura. (2009). Mood selection in Romance and Balkan. Lingua 119, 1859–1882.Spencer, Andrew, and Ana R. Luís. (2012) Clitics: an introduction. Cambridge UniversityPress.Thieroff, Rolf. 2010.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
