Диссертация (Социокультурные паттерны родственных отношений в условиях большого города (на примере Санкт-Петербурга)), страница 50
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Социокультурные паттерны родственных отношений в условиях большого города (на примере Санкт-Петербурга)". PDF-файл из архива "Социокультурные паттерны родственных отношений в условиях большого города (на примере Санкт-Петербурга)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "социология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата социологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 50 страницы из PDF
Ebtehaj F. Regulating relationship / F. Ebtehaj // Kinship matters / eds F. Ebtehaj, B. Lindley,M. Richards. – Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. – Pp. 1-16.76. Edwards J. Born and bred: idioms of kinship and new reproductive technologies in England / J.Edwards. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – 264 p.77.
Edwards R. Who is a Sister and Brother? / R. Edwards, L. Hadfield, H. Lucey, M. Mauthner //Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group Working Paper No. 13. – London: LondonSouth Bank University, 2005. – 22 p.78. Elder G. Time, human agency and social change: perspectives of the life course /G. Elder //Social psychology quarterly. – 1994. – Vol. 57. – No. 1. – Pp.
4-15.79. European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology / eds J.Edwards, C.Salazar. – New York:Berghahn Books, 2009. – 224 p.80. Eisikovits Z. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis / Z. Eisikovits, C.Koren // Qualitative Health Research. – 2010. – No. 20. – Pp. 1642–1655.81. Faubion J. Introduction: toward an anthropology of the ethics of kinship / J.
Faubion // TheEthics of Kinship: Ethnographic Inquiries / eds. by J. Faubion. – Lanham: Rowman andLittlefield Publishers, 2001. – Pp. 1-28.82. Feinberg R. Schneider's Cultural Analysis of Kinship and Its Implications for AnthropologicalRelativism / R. Feinberg // Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David M. Schneider /eds R.Feinberg, M.Ottenheimer. – Univ. of Illinois Press, 2002. – Pp.1-32.83.
Firth R. Introduction / R. Firth // Two studies of kinship in London / ed. by R. Firth. – London:The Athlone Press University of London, 1956. – Pp. 11-2984. Firth R. Families and their relatives / R. Firth, J. Hubert, A. Forge. – London: Routledge andKegan Paul. 1969. – 492 p.85. Franklin S. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies / S. Franklin, S. McKinnon //Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies / eds S.Franklin, S.McKinnon.
– Durham andLondon: Duke University Press, 2001. – Pp. 1-25.86. Freeman J. On the Concept of the Kindred / J. Freeman // The Journal of the RoyalAnthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. – 1961. – Vol. 91. – № 2. – Pp. 192–220.87.
Gellner E. The Concept of Kinship: With Special Reference to Mr. Needham's "DescentSystems and Ideal Language" / E. Gellner // Philosophy of Science. – Vol. 27. – No. 2 (Apr.,1960). – Pp. 187-204.17988. Gellner E. Nature and Society in Social Anthropology / E. Gellner // Philosophy of Science. –1963. – Vol. 30. – Pp. 236-251.89. Godelier M. The Metamorphoses of kinship / M. Godelier. – London: Verso, 2011.
– 654 p.90. Goetting A. The Developmental Tasks of Siblingship over the Life Cycle / A. Goetting //Journal of Marriage and Family. – 1986. – Vol. 48. – № 4. – Pp. 703–714.91. Gold D. Sibling Relationships in Old Age: A Typology / D. Gold // The International Journalof Aging and Human Development. – 1989. – Vol.: 28(1). – Pp. 37-51.92. Gordon D.
Societal Complexity and Kinship: Family Organization or Rules of Residence? / D.Gordon // The Pacific Sociological Review. – Vol. 13. – No. 4 (Autumn, 1970). – Pp. 252-262.93. Gouveia R. Personal networks in Portuguese society: a configurational and lifecourse approach[Электронный ресурс] / R. Gouveia. – Lisbon: Tese de doutoramento em Sociologia, InstitutodeCienciasSociaisdaUniversidadedeLisboa,2014.–Режимдоступа:http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/15607/1/ulsd069540_tese.pdf94.
Greif G. Patterns in adult sibling relationships after the death of one or both parents / G. Greif,M. Woolley // Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative Care. – 2015. – Vol. 11:1. –Pp. 74-89.95. Hareven T. The Family as Process: The Historical Study of the Family Cycle / T. Hareven //Journal of Social History. – Vol. 7. – No. 3 (Spring, 1974). – Pp.
322-329.96. Harris C. Introduction / C. Harris // Readings in Kinship in Urban Society / ed. by C.Harris. –Pergamon Press, 1970. – Pp. 1-35.97. Heady P. Thinking scientifically about kinship: towards an axiomatic formulation ofethnographic insights / P. Heady // Working Papers. Max Planck Institute for SocialAnthropology.
– 2014. – No 158. – 27 p.98. Holy L. Anthropological perspectives on kinship / L. Holy. – London: Pluto Press, 1996. – 198p.99. Howell S. Self-Conscious kinship: some contested values in Norwegian transnational adoption/ S. Howell // Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies / eds S.Franklin, S.McKinnon.
–Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2001. – Pp. 203-223.100. Howell S. Kinning: the creation of life trajectories in transnational adoptive families / S.Howell // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. – 2003. – No. 9(3). – Pp. 465-485.101. Howell S. Adoption of the Unrelated Child: Some Challenges to the Anthropological Study ofKinship / S.
Howell // Annual Review of Anthropology. – 2009. – Vol. 38. – Pp. 149-166.180102. Howell S. To Kin a Transnationally Adopted Child in Norway and Spain: The Achievementof Resemblances and Belonging / S. Howell, D. Marre // Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology. –2006. – Vol. 71. – Issue 3. – Pp. 293-316.103. Huntsman J. Complementary and similar kinsmen in Tokelau / J. Huntsman // Siblingship inOceania / ed. by M. Marshall. – Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1981. – Pp.79-103.104. Hutchinson S.
Identity and substance: the broadening bases of relatedness among Nuer ofsouthern Sudan / S. Hutchinson // Cultures of relatedness: new approaches to the study ofkinship / ed. by J.Carsten. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. – Pp. 55-72.105.
Johnson C. Sibling Solidarity: Its Origin and Functioning in Italian-American Families / C.Johnson // Journal of Marriage and Family. – Vol. 44. – No. 1 (Feb., 1982). – Pp. 155-167.106. Johnson C. Perspectives on American Kinship in the Later 1990s / C. Johnson // Journal ofMarriage and the Family. – 2000. – № 62. – Pp. 623-639.107. Joseph S. Brother/Sister Relationships: Connectivity, Love, and Power in the Reproduction ofPatriarchy in Lebanon / S.
Joseph // American Ethnologist. – Vol. 21. – No. 1 (Feb., 1994). –Pp. 50-73.108. Kim E. Adopted Territory: Transnational Korean Adoptees and the Politics of Belonging /E.Kim. – Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2010. – 320 p.109. Kim J. An "Orphan" with Two Mothers: Transnational and Transracial Adoption, the ColdWar, and Contemporary Asian American Cultural Politics / J.
Kim // American Quarterly. –2009. – Vol. 61. – No. 4. – Pp. 855-880.110. Kinship and family: anthropological reader / eds R.Parkin, L.Stone. – Oxford: Blackwellpublishing, 2007. – 496 p.111. Kirkpatrick J. Meanings of siblingship in Marquesan / J. Kirkpatrick // Siblingship in Oceania/ ed. by M. Marshall. – Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1981. – Pp.
17-51.112. Lambert H. Sentiment and substance in North Indian forms of relatedness / H. Lambert //Cultures of relatedness: new approaches to the study of kinship / ed. by J.Carsten. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. – Pp. 73-89.113.
Laslett P. Introduction: the history of the family / P. Laslett // Household and family in past /ed. by P. Laslett. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972. – Pp. 1-89.114. Leach E. Pul Eliya, a Village in Ceylon; A Study of Land Tenure and Kinship / E. Leach. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961. – 368 p.115. Leigh K. Kinship Interaction over the Family Life Span / K. Leigh // Journal of Marriage andFamily – Vol. 44. – No. 1 (Feb., 1982). – Pp. 197-208.181116. Leutloff-Grandits C. Kinship, Community, and Care: Rural-Urban Contrasts in Croatia / C.Leutloff-Grandits // Ethnologie francaise. – 2012. – No.1 (Vol.
42). – Pp. 65-78.117. Lewis O. Anthropological essays / O. Lewis. – New York: Random House, 1970. – 524 p.118. Litwak E. The Use of Extended Family Groups in the Achievement of Social Goals: SomePolicy Implications / E. Litwak // Social Problems. – Vol. 7. – No. 3 (Winter, 1959-1960). –Pp. 177-187.119. Manning J. Qualitative Approaches to Dyadic Data Analyses in Family CommunicationResearch: An Invited Essay / J.
Manning, A. Kunkel // Journal of Family Communication. –2015. – Vol. 15. – Pp. 185–192.120. Marshall M. The Nature of Nurture / M. Marshall // American Ethnologist. – Vol. 4. – No. 4(Nov., 1977). – Pp. 643-662.121. Mason J .Being Related: How children define and create kinship / J. Mason, B. Tipper //Childhood.
– 2008. – Vol. 15 (4). – Pp. 441-460.122. Mauthner M. Sistering: Power and Change in Female Relationships / M. Mauthner. – NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. – 228 p.123. McKinley R. Cain and Abel on the Malay Peninsula / R. McKinley // Siblingship in Oceania /ed. by M. Marshall. – Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1981. – Pp. 335-387.124.