Диссертация (Социокультурные факторы воспроизводства мобильной трудовой занятости в российском регионе (на примере северо-востока Республики Башкортостан)), страница 37
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Социокультурные факторы воспроизводства мобильной трудовой занятости в российском регионе (на примере северо-востока Республики Башкортостан)". PDF-файл из архива "Социокультурные факторы воспроизводства мобильной трудовой занятости в российском регионе (на примере северо-востока Республики Башкортостан)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "социология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата социологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 37 страницы из PDF
Тюменский государственный нефтегазовыйуниверситет. — Тюмень, 2013. — 192 с.69. Штомпка П. Социальное изменение как травма // Социологические исследования. —2001. — № 1. — С. 6–16.70. Штомпка П. Социология социальных изменений / Пер. с англ. под ред. В. А. Ядова.— М.: Аспект Пресс, 1996. — 416 с.71. Adams M.
Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: towards an understanding of contemporaryidentity? Sociology. — 2006. — Vol. 40. — № 3. — Pp. 511–528.72. Ahmed N., Jones I. R. ‘Habitus and bureaucratic routines’, cultural and structural factors inthe experience of informal care. A qualitative study of Bangladeshi women living in London.
CurrentSociology. — 2008. — Vol. 56. — № 1. — Pp. 57–76.73. Aldridge A. Habitus and cultural capital in the field of personal finance. SociologicalReview. — 1998. — Vol. 46. — № 1. — Pp. 1–23.74. Aner L. G. Dwelling habitus and urban outmigration in Denmark. European Urban andRegional Studies. — 2014. — Pp. 1–15.75. Archer M. S. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach.
— Cambridge, NewYork, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1995. — 368 p.76. Barley S. R., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links betweenaction and institution. Organization studies. — 1997. — Vol. 18. — № 1. — Pp. 93–117.77. Belland B. R.
Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers totechnology integration. Computers & Education. — 2009. — Vol. 52. — № 2. — Pp. 353–364.78. Benson M. Trajectories of middle-class belonging: The dynamics of place attachment andclassed identities. Urban Studies. — 2014. — Vol. 51. — № 14. — Pp. 3097–3112.15079. Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. — Cambridge,Massachusetts: Harvard university press, 1984. — 613 p.80. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. J. D.
An invitation to reflexive sociology. — Cambridge: PolityPress, 1992. — 332 p.81. Calhoun C. Habitus, field, and capital: the question of historical specificity. In: C.Calhoun, E. LiPuma, M. Postone (ed.). Bourdieu: critical perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.— Pp. 61–88.82. Carfagna L. B., Dubois E. A., Fitzmaurice C., Ouimette M. Y., Schor J. B., Willis M. Anemerging eco-habitus: the reconfiguration of high cultural capital practices among ethical consumers.Journal of Consumer Culture. — 2014. — Vol. 0. — № 0. — Pp.
1–21.83. Clausen J. A. Life reviews and life stories. In: J. Z. Giele and G. H. Elder, Jr. (ed.) Methodsof life course research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. — Thousand Oaks, London, NewDelhi: SAGE Publications, 1998. — Pp. 189–212.84. Clercq D. De, Voronov M. Sustainability in entrepreneurship: a tale of two logics.International Small Business Journal. — 2011. — Vol. 29. — № 4. — Pp. 322–344.85.
Crossley N. From reproduction to transformation: social movement fields and the radicalhabitus. Theory, Culture & Society. — 2003. — Vol. 20. — № 6. — Pp. 43–68.86. Edgerton J. D., Roberts L. W. Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in theexplanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education. — 2014. — Vol.12. — № 2. — Pp. 193–220.87. Elder-Vass D. The causal power of social structures: emergence, structure and agency. —Cambridge, New York: Cambridge university press, 2011. — 221 p.88.
Erel U. Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology. — 2010. —Vol. 44. — № 4. — Pp. 642–660.89. Gaddis S. M. The influence of habitus in the relationship between cultural capital andacademic achievement. Social Science Research. — 2013. — Vol. 42. — № 1. — Pp. 1–13.90. Giddens A. A contemporary critique of historical materialism.
Vol. 1. Power, property andthe state. — Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981. — 294 p.91. Giddens A., Pierson C. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: making sense of modernity.— Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. — 233 p.92. Giele J. Z. Innovation in the typical life course. In: J. Z. Giele and G. H. Elder, Jr. (ed.)Methods of life course research: qualitative and quantitative approaches.
— Thousand Oaks, London,New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 1998. — Pp. 231–263.15193. Glaesser J., Cooper B. Using rational action theory and Bourdieu’s habitus theory togetherto account for educational decision-making in England and Germany. Sociology. — 2013. — Vol. 0.— № 0. — Pp. 1–19.94. Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitativeresearch. — New Brunswick, London: Aldine transaction, 2006. — 271 p.95. Goss J., Lindquist B. Conceptualizing international labor migration: a structurationperspective. International migration review. — 1995.
— Vol. 29. — № 2. — Pp. 317–351.96. Gregson N. On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research. In: D. Heldand J. Thompson (ed.). Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. —Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1989. — Pp. 235–248.97. Grenfell M. Working with habitus and field: the logic of Bourdieu’s practice. In: E. Silvaand A. Warde (ed.). Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: settling accounts and developingalternatives. — London, New York: Routledge, 2010. — Pp.
14–27.98. Halfacree K. H. Household migration and the structuration of patriarchy: evidence from theUSA. Progress in Human Geography. — 1995. — Vol. 19. — № 2. — Pp. 159–182.99. Hurst A. L. Student types as reflection of class habitus: an application of Bourdieu'sscholastic fallacy. Theory and Research in Education. — 2013.
— Vol. 11. — № 1. — Pp. 43–61.100. Jack L., Kholeif A. Introducing strong structuration theory for informing qualitative casestudies in organization, management and accounting research. Qualitative Research in Organizationsand Management: An International Journal. — 2007. — Vol. 2.
— № 3. — Pp. 208–225.101. Jenkins R. Pierre Bourdieu and the reproduction of determinism. Sociology. — 1982. —Vol. 16. — № 2. — Pp. 270–281.102. Jetzkowitz J., Schneider J., Brunzel S. Suburbanisation, mobility and the ‘good life in thecountry’: a lifestyle approach to the sociology of urban sprawl in Germany. Sociologia Ruralis. —2007. — Vol. 47. — № 2. — Pp. 148–171.103. Jones С., Southcott C.
Mobile miners: work, home, and hazards in Yukon's miningindustry. The Northern Review. — 2015. — № 41. — Pp. 111–137.104. Kaufmann V., Bergman M. M., Joye D. Motility: mobility as capital. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research. — 2004.
— Vol. 28. — № 4. — Pp. 745–756.105. Kemp S. Interests and structure in dualist social theory: a critical appraisal of Archer'stheoretical and empirical arguments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. — 2012. — Vol. 42. — № 4.— Pp. 489–510.106. King A. Against structure: a critique of morphogenetic social theory. The SociologicalReview.
— 1999. — Vol. 47. — № 2. — Pp. 199–227.152107. Lareau A. Social class differences in family-school relationships: the importance ofcultural capital. Sociology of Education. — 1987. — Vol. 60. — № 2. — Pp. 73–85.108. Latcheva R., Herzog-Punzenberger B. Integration trajectories: a mixed method approach.In: M. Wingens, M. Windzio, H. de Valk, C. Aybek.
(ed.). A life-course perspective on migration andintegration. — Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, 2011. — Pp. 121–142.109. Lau R. W. K. Habitus and the practical logic of practice: an interpretation. Sociology. —2004. — Vol. 38. — № 2. — Pp. 369–387.110. Legido-Quigley H., McKee M. Health and social fields in the context of lifestylemigration. Health & Place. — 2012. — Vol. 18. — № 6. — Pp. 1209–1216.111. Lehmann W.
Habitus transformation and hidden injuries: successful working-classuniversity students. Sociology of Education. — 2013. — Vol. 87. — № 1. — Pp. 1–15.112. Leschziner V., Green A. I. Thinking about food and sex: deliberate cognition in theroutine practices of a field. Sociological Theory. — 2013. — Vol.
31. — № 2. — Pp. 116–144.113. Liversage A. Finding a path: investigating the labour market trajectories of high-skilledimmigrants in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. — 2009. — Vol. 35. — №. 2. —Pp. 203–226.114. Livesay J. Structuration theory and the unacknowledged conditions of action.