Диссертация (Феномен социальных сетей акторно-сетевой контекст, теоретико-методологический анализ), страница 47
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Феномен социальных сетей акторно-сетевой контекст, теоретико-методологический анализ". PDF-файл из архива "Феномен социальных сетей акторно-сетевой контекст, теоретико-методологический анализ", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "социология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата социологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 47 страницы из PDF
— P. 1377-1396.Adorno, T. Subject and object // The essential Frankfurt school reader / Ed. By A.Arato & E. Gebhardt. New York: Continuum publishing. — 1994. — P. 497-511.Amsterdamska, O. Surely, You Must be Joking, Monsieur Latour! // Science,Technology and Human Values. — 1990. — Vol. 15. P. 495-504.Arsenault, A., & Castells, M. The structure and dynamics of global mutli-mediabusiness networks. International Journal of Communication. — 2008. — № 2, —P. 707–748.232Ashby, W.
Ross Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System // Journal ofGeneral Psychology. —1947. — vol. 37, — P. 125—128.Baker, W. E. Floor Trading and Crowd Dynamics Adler P. A. The Social Dynamicsof Financial Markets. — Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984. — P. 107–128.Barnes, J. A. Social networks // Addison-Wesley Module. —1972. — No. 26. —P. 1-29.Barnes, J. A. Class and committees in a Norwegian Island parish. // HumanRelations. — 1954. — №7. — P. 39—58.Bloor, D. Anti-Latour. // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. —1999. —V. 30, № 1. — Р.
113—129.Bott, E. Urban families: conjugal roles and social networks // Human Relations. —1955. — №8. — Р. 345-385.Collins, R., Kemper T. Dimensions of Microinteraction // American Journal ofSociology. — 1990. — Vol. 96., No. 1. — Р. 32-68.Collins, R. Interaction ritual chains, power and property: The Micro- macroconnection as an empirically based theoretical problem // The Micro-Macro Link.University of California Press, 1987. — Vol.5.
— Pp. 47 - 69.Callon, M. Actor-Network Theory: the Market Test // J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds)Actor Network and After. — Oxford and Keele. —1999. — P.181-195.Callon, M., Latour B. Don’t throw the baby out with the Bath school! // Science aspractice and culture (Pickering A., ed). — Chicago, 1992. — P. 301-342.Callon, M., Law J.
Agency and the hybrid collectif // The South Atlantic quart. —N.-Y., 1995. — Vol. 94. — N 2. — P. 51-59.Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of thescallops and the fisherme of St Brieuc Bay / Power, action and belief: a new sociologyof knowledge? — London, Routledge, —1986.
– P. 196-223.Callon M. From Science as an Economic Activity to Socioeconomics of ScientificResearch. The Dynamics of Emergent and Consolidated Techno-Economic Networks.In P. Mirowski and E.M. Sent, eds. Science Bought and Sold. Essays in the Economics of233Science. — Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. — 2002. — P. 277-317.Callon, M. The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. InMichel Callon, John Law and A. Rip, eds. Mapping the Dynamics of Science andTechnology. — Houndmills: Macmillan. —1986. — P. 19-34.Collins H.,Yearley S. Epistemological chicken, in A. Pickering (ed.) // Science asPractice and Culture.
— Chicago: Chicago University Press. — 1992. — P. 301–326 &369–389.Cook, K., Whitmeyer J. Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory andnetwork analysis // Annual Review of Sociology. —1992. — Vol. 18. — P. 109-127.Callon, M., Law J. On the Construction of sociotechnical networks: content andcontext revisited. // Knowledge and Society. —1989.
— Vol. 9. — P. 57–83.Davern, M. Social Networks and Economic Sociology: A Proposed ResearchAgenda For a More Complete Social Science // American Journal of Economics andSociology. —1997. — Vol. 56, №3. — P. 288 – 291.Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple HelixUniversity-Industry-GovernmentRelations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development EASST Review— 1995. — № 14. — P.
14-19.Friedman, M. On the sociology of scientific knowledge and its philosophical agenda// Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. — 1998. — Vol. 29, No. 2. — P. 239271.Harre, R. Material objects in social world // Theory, Culture and Society. — 2002. —Vol. 19., No 5/6.Horkheimer, M. Art and Mass Culture / / Critical Theory: Selected Essays. —1941.— pp. 273–290.Killworth, P. D., Bernard H. R. Informant accuracy in social network data // HumanOrganization. — 1976.
— № 35. — pp. 269-286.Latour, B. Drawing things together / M. Lynch & S.Woolgar. Representation inscientific practice. — Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1988. — pp. 19–68.Latour B. Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World. In Karin D. Knorr-234Cetina and Michael Mulkay, eds. Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study ofScience. — London: Sage. — 1983. — P. 141-170.LatourB.Trains of thoughts —Piaget, Formalism and the Fifth Dimension.//Common Knowledge — 1997, — Vol.6., № 3, — pp.
170-191.Latour B. On actor-network-theory: A Few Clarifications plus more than a fewComplications, Soziale Welt 47(4): 1997, Pp. 1-14.Latour B. The trouble with Actor Network Theory // Soziale Welt. —1999. — № 47.— pp. 369-381.Latour B. Promises of constructivism // Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality /Ed. by D. Ihde & E. Selinger.
Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2003. — P. 27-46.Latour B. On recalling ANT // Actor Network Theory and after (Hassard J., ed)Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review. — Oxford, 1999.Latour B. Technology is society made durable // in J. Law (ed) A Sociology ofMonsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. — London: Routledge. —1991. — P.
103–131.Law J. (1999). After ANT: Topology, Naming and Complexity. In J. Law and J.Hassard (Eds.) Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford and Keele, Blackwell and theSociological Review: 1-14.Lin, N. Social resources and instrumental action // Social Structure and NetworkAnalysis / Ed. By P. Mardsen. – Beverly Hills: Sage, — 1982.Lynch, M. The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson “DreamTeam” and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine // Social Studies of Science. — 1998.— № 28. — P.
829-868.MacLean, C., Hassard, J. Symmetrical Absence / Symmetrical Absurdity: Criticalnotes on the production of actor-network accounts // Journal of Management Studies. —2004. — № 41(3). — pp. 493-519.Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of theLiving // Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. / Robert S. Cohen, and Marx W.Wartofsky (eds.).
— Dordecht (Holland): D. Reidel Publishing Co., — 1980. —Vol. 42.235Merton, R. K. Social and cultural contexts of science // R.K. Merton. The sociologyof science: theoretical and empirical investigations. — Chicago; London: TheUniversity of Chicago Press. — 1973. — P. 173-190.Мizruchi, M. Social network analysis: Recent Achievements and CurrentControversies // Acta Sociologica. —1994. — Volume 37. — P. 329-343.Mol, Annemarie & Law, J. Regions, networks and fluids: anaemia and socialtopology // Social Studies of Science.
—1994. — №24. — pp. 641-671.Mol, A. Ontological Politics: a Word and Some Questions // J. Law and J. Hassard(Eds) Actor Network and After. — Oxford and Keele, Blackwell and the SociologicalReview. — 1999. — P. 74-89.Nowotny, H. Actor-networks vs. science as self-organizing system: A comparativeview of two constructivist approaches // Sociology of the Sciences. — 1990. — № 14. —P. 223-239.Parsons, Т., Shils, E. A., Allport, G. W. Some Fundamental Categories in the Theoryof Action. Chapter in: Toward a general Theory of Action, ed. by Talcott Parsons andEdward A.
Shils. — Cambridge ( Mass.), Harvard University Press. — 1956.— Vol. 1,No. 1, Nov. — P. 3-29.Pickering, A. Don’t throw the baby out with the Bath school! // Science as practiceand culture. — Chicago, — 1992. — P. 301-326.Pinch, T., Bijker, W. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How theSociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other //Social Studies of Science. 1984.
— № 14. — P. 399-441.Pinch, T. Bijker W. Science, Relativism and the New Sociology of Technology:Reply to Russell // Social Studies of Science. — 1986. — № 16. — P. 347-360.Russell, S. The Social Construction of Artefacts: Response to Pinch and Bijker //Social Studies of Science. — 1986. — №16. — P. 331-346.Schaffer, S. The eighteenth brumaire of Bruno Latour // Studies in the History andPhilosophy of Science. — 1991. — № 22. — P. 174–192.Trevillion, S.
Networking and community partnership. 2nd ed., Ashgate Publishing236Limited. — 1999. — UK. — P. 15-18.Wellman, B. Network analysis: some basic principles // Sociological Theory. —1983. — №1. — P. 155-200.Wiseman, J. P, Friendship: bonds and binds in a voluntary relationship // Journal ofSocial Personal Relations. — 1986. — Vol. 3. — P. 191-211.White, H. Where Do Markets Come From? // American Journal of Sociology. —1981. — Volume 87. — P.
517 – 547.Vespignani, A. Predicting the Behavior of Techno-Social Systems // SCIENCE. —July, 2009. — Vol. 325., № 24. — P. 425 – 428..
