Диссертация (Внешние шоки как фактор развития интеграционных процессов в Пространстве свободы, безопасности и правосудия Европейского союза (на примере событий 11 сентября 2001 года и Арабской весны)), страница 50
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Внешние шоки как фактор развития интеграционных процессов в Пространстве свободы, безопасности и правосудия Европейского союза (на примере событий 11 сентября 2001 года и Арабской весны)". PDF-файл из архива "Внешние шоки как фактор развития интеграционных процессов в Пространстве свободы, безопасности и правосудия Европейского союза (на примере событий 11 сентября 2001 года и Арабской весны)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "политические науки" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата политических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 50 страницы из PDF
P.349–386.143.Nascimbene B., Di Pascale A. The «Arab Spring»and the Extraordinary Influx ofPeople Who Arrived in Italy from North Africa // European Journal of Migration andLaw. 2011. Vol. 13. N 4. P. 341–360.144.Niemann A., Mak J. (How) Do Norms Guide Presidency Behaviour in EUNegotiations? // Journal of European Public Policy. 2010. Vol. 17. N 5. P. 727–742.145.Nilsson H.
Decision-making in EU Justice and Home Affairs: CurrentShortcomings and Reform Possibilities // SEI Working Paper No 57. 2002. P. 1–14.146.Nilsson H. Developments in Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition at theInternational Level // Resource Material Series. 2005. N 65. P. 15–38.147.Nohrstedt D., Weible C. M. The Logic of Policy Change after Crisis: Proximityand Subsystem Interaction // Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy.
2010. Vol. 1. N 2.P. 1–32.148.Nordhaus W. D. The Political Business Cycle // The Review of EconomicStudies. 1975. Vol. 42. N 2. P. 169–190.149.Nugent N. The Leadership Capacity of the European Commission // Journal ofEuropean Public Policy. 1995. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 603–623.150.Nußberger A. Poland: The Constitutional Tribunal on the Implementation of theEuropean Arrest Warrant // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2008. Vol.
6. N1. P. 162–170.151.O’Mahony J. «Bringing Process Back in»: Investigating the Formulation,Negotiation and Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant from a Policy AnalysisPerspective // EUSA 10th Biennial Conference, Montreal. 2007. P. 1-36.152.O’Mahony J., Payne D. The European Arrest Warrant Negotiations: A CaseStudy at the National Level in Ireland // Negotiating European Issues: Occasional Paper1.2 – 11.03. 2005. P. 1–26.153.Padfield N.
The European Arrest Warrant: Between Trust, Democracy and theRule of Law: The Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant in England and180Wales // European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst). 2007. Vol. 3. N 2. P. 253–268.154.Paoletti E. The Arab Spring and the Italian Response to Migration in 2011 –Beyond the Emergency // Comparative Migration Studies. 2014.
Vol. 2. N 2. P. 127–150.155.Pascouau Y. Internal Border Controls in the Schengen Area: Much Ado aboutNothing? // EPC Commentary. 2011. P. 1–2.156.Pascouau Y. Schengen and Solidarity: the Fragile Balance between Mutual Trustand Mistrust // EPC Policy Paper. 2012. P. 1–19.157.Pascouau Y. Schengen Area under Pressure # 2: the Commission Recalls the EUNature of the Schengen System // EPC Commentary.
2011. P. 1–2.158.Pascouau Y. Schengen Area under Pressure: Controversial Responses andWorrying Signs // EPC Commentary. 2011. P. 1–2.159.Pascouau Y. The Schengen Evaluation Mechanism and the Legal Basis Problem:Breaking the Deadlock // EPC Policy Brief. 2012. P. 1–4.160.Pascouau Y. The Schengen Governance Package: The Subtle Balance betweenCommunity Method and Intergovernmental Approach // EPC Discussion Paper.
2013.P. 1–15.161.Pascouau Y., McLoughlin S. Migratory Flows from North Africa: Challenges forthe EU // EPC Commentary. 2011. P. 1–2.162.Payne D. et al. Political Collaboration under Pressure: Some Lessons from theEuropean Arrest Warrant // EUSA, Texas, 2005.
P. 1-19.163.Peers S. Legislative Update, EC Immigration and Asylum Law: The New VisaCode // European Journal of Migration and Law. 2010. Vol. 12. N 1. P. 105–131.164.Peers S. Mutual Recognition and Criminal Law in the European Union: Has theCouncil Got it Wrong? // Common Market Law Review. 2004.
Vol. 41. N 1. P. 5–36.165.Peers S. The Future of the Schengen System // SIEPS. 2013. N 6. P. 1–136.166.Peters B. G., Hogwood B. W. In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle // TheJournal of Politics. 1985. Vol. 47. N 1. P. 238–253.167.Pierson P. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change //Governance. 2000. Vol. 13. N 4. P.
475–499.168.Plachta M. European Arrest Warrant: Revolution in Extradition? // EuropeanJournal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 11. N 2. P. 178–194.169.Pollack M. A. Control Mechanism Or Deliberative Democracy? Two Images ofComitology // Comparative Political Studies. 2003. Vol. 36. N 1-2. P. 125–155.181170.Pollack M. Does the European Union Represent an n of 1? // EuropeanCommunity Studies Assosiation Review. 1997.
Vol. 10. N 3. P. 4–5.171.Pop V. Tunisia’s «Biblical Exodus» Pits Rome against Brussels [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://euobserver.com/article/31802 (дата обращения: 28.08.2014).172.Price D. E. Professionals and “Entrepreneurs”: Staff Orientations and PolicyMaking on Three Senate Committees // The Journal of Politics. 1971.
Vol. 33. N 2. P.316–336.173.Princen S. Agenda-Setting Strategies in EU Policy Processes // Journal ofEuropean Public Policy. 2011. Vol. 18. N 7. P. 927–943.174.Putnam R. D. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games// International Organization. 1988. Vol. 42. N 3. P. 427–460.175.Radu M. Who is Abdullah Ocalan? [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://www.fpri.org/articles/1998/11/who-abdullah-ocalan(датаобращения:01.09.2014).176.Raspotnik A., Jacob M., Ventura L.
The Issue of Solidarity in the EuropeanUnion // TEPSA: Discussion Papers. 2012. P. 1–13.177.Richardson J. Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change // PoliticalStudies. 2000. Vol. 48. N 5. P. 1006–1025.178.Richey M. The North African Revolutions: A Chance to Rethink EuropeanExternalization of the Handling of Non-EU Migrant Inflows // Foreign Policy Analysis.2013.
Vol. 9. N 4. P. 409–431.179.Rittberger B., Schimmelfennig F. Explaining the Constitutionalization of theEuropean Union // Journal of European Public Policy. 2006. Vol. 13. N 8. P. 1148–1167.180.Rossi L. S. New Trends in Italy’s European Policy // The International Spectator.2002. Vol. 37. N 1. P. 97–106.181.Sabatier P. A. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance forEurope // Journal of European Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 5. N 1.
P. 98–130.182.Sarkozy Aide Brings Election Campaign to EU Meeting [Электронный ресурс].URL:http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/sarkozy-ally-brings-election-campaign-eumeeting-news-512386 (дата обращения: 30.08.2014).183.Sarkozy, Berlusconi to Propose Schengen ‘Upgrade’ [Электронный ресурс].URL:http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/sarkozy-berlusconi-propose-schengenupgrade-news504292?utm_source=EurActiv%20Newsletter&utm_campaign=778e55908amy_google_analytics_key&utm_medium=email (дата обращения: 01.09.2014).182184.Sarmiento D.
European Union: The European Arrest Warrant and the Quest forConstitutional Coherence // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2008. Vol. 6. N1. P. 171–183.185.Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics // The AmericanPolitical Science Review. 1970. Vol. 64. N 4. P. 1033–1053.186.Satzger H., Pohl T. The German Constitutional Court and the European ArrestWarrant: ‘Cryptic Signals’ from Karlsruhe // Journal of International Criminal Justice.2006. Vol. 4. N 4.
P. 686–701.187.Scharpf F. W. The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited // JCMS: Journal of CommonMarket Studies. 2006. Vol. 44. N 4. P. 845–864.188.Scharpf F. W. The Joint-decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism andEuropean Integration // Public Administration. 1988. Vol. 66. N 3.
P. 239–278.189.Schedler A. The Menu of Manipulation // Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13.N 2. P. 36–50.190.Schimmelfennig F. Strategic Calculation and International Socialization:Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central andEastern Europe // International Organization. 2005. Vol. 59. N 4. P.
827-860.191.Schlamp H.-J. Chaos auf Lampedusa: Italien schiebt Flüchtlinge an EU-Partnerab // Spiegel Online. 2011.192.Schmidt V. A. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas andDiscourse // Annual Review of Political Science. 2008. Vol. 11. N 1. P. 303–326.193.Schmidt V. A. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Changethrough Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’ // EuropeanPolitical Science Review. 2010. Vol. 2. N 1. P. 1–25.194.Schmidt V.
A., Radaelli C. M. Policy Change and Discourse in Europe:Conceptual and Methodological Issues // West European Politics. 2004. Vol. 27. N 2. P.183–210.195.Scuzzarello S., Kinnvall C. Rebordering France and Denmark Narratives andPractices of Border-Construction in Two European Countries // Mobilities. 2013. Vol.8.
