Диссертация (Внешние шоки как фактор развития интеграционных процессов в Пространстве свободы, безопасности и правосудия Европейского союза (на примере событий 11 сентября 2001 года и Арабской весны)), страница 49

Vol. 44. N 5. P. 936–957.83. Hamchi M. For the Sake of the Mediterranean… De-Securitize the Arab Spring! //NEPAS Conference: Thinking out of the Box: Devising New European Policies to Facethe Arab Spring, 2013. P. 1-17.84. Hegemann H. Great Transformation or Politics as Usual? The Many Faces of SecurityGovernance in Post-9/11 EU Counterterrorism // SGIR 7th Pan-European Conference,Stockholm. 2010. P. 1-25.17585. Hibbs D.

A. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy // American Political ScienceReview. 1977. Vol. 71. N 4. P. 1467–1487.86. Hinarejos A. Recent Human Rights Developments in the EU Courts: The Charter ofFundamental Rights, the European Arrest Warrant and Terror Lists // Human RightsLaw Review. 2007.

Vol. 7. N 4. P. 793–811.87. Hobbing P. A Farewell to Open Borders? The Danish Approach // CEPS: Liberty andSecurity in Europe Series. 2011. P. 1–11.88. Hoffmann S. Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case ofWestern Europe // Daedalus. 1966. Vol. 95. N 3. P. 862–915.89. Isaac S. K. Europe and the Arab Revolutions: From a Weak to a Proactive Response toa Changing Neighborhood // KFG Working Paper Series. 2011. N 39.

P. 1–28.90. Italy, France Tussle over «Boat People» [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://www.euractiv.com/east-mediterranean/italy-france-tussle-boat-people-news503746 (дата обращения: 29.08.2014).91. Jimeno-Bulnes M. After September 11th: the Fight Against Terrorism in National andEuropean Law.

Substantive and Procedural Rules: Some Examples // European LawJournal. 2004. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 235–253.92. Jimeno-Bulnes M. The Enforcement of the European Arrest Warrant: A Comparisonbetween Spain and the UK // Social Science Research Network, 2007.93. Jones E. The JCMS Annual Review Lecture: European Crisis, European Solidarity //JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2012.

Vol. 50. N s2. P. 53–67.94. Jupille J., Caporaso J. A., Checkel J. T. Integrating Institutions : Rationalism,Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union // Comparative Political Studies.2003. Vol. 36. N 1-2. P. 7–40.95. Kaunert C. «Without the Power of Purse or Sword»: The European Arrest Warrant andthe Role of the Commission // Journal of European Integration. 2007. Vol.

29. N 4. P.387–404.96. Kaunert C. The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Lisbon Treaty:Commission Policy Entrepreneurship? // European Security. 2010. Vol. 19. N 2. P.169–189.97. Kaunert C. The External Dimension of EU Counter-Terrorism Relations: Competences,Interests, and Institutions // Terrorism and Political Violence. 2009. Vol. 22. N 1.

P. 41–61.98. Kaunert C. Towards Supranational Governance in EU Counter-Terrorism? - The Roleof the Commission and the Council Secretariat // Central European Journal ofInternational & Security Studies. 2010. Vol. 4. N 1. P. 8–31.17699. Kaunert C., Giovanna M. D.

Post-9/11 EU Counter-Terrorist Financing Cooperation:Differentiating Supranational Policy Entrepreneurship by the Commission and theCouncil Secretariat // European Security. 2010. Vol. 19. N 2. P. 275–295.100.Kaunert C., Léonard S. Introduction: Supranational Governance and EuropeanUnion Security after the Lisbon Treaty - Exogenous Shocks, Policy Entrepreneurs and11 September 2001 // Cooperation and Conflict. 2012. Vol. 47. N 4. P. 417–432.101.Kelley J. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: MembershipConditionality and Socialization by International Institutions // InternationalOrganization.

2004. Vol. 58. N 3. P. 425–457.102.Kinnunen J. The European Arrest Warrant Negotiations: Domestic Preparationsof the Finnish Position // Negotiating European Issues: Occasional Paper 3.2 – 11.03.2005. P. i–xxi.103.Koenig N. The EU and the Libyan Crisis – In Quest of Coherence? // TheInternational Spectator. 2011. Vol. 46. N 4. P. 11–30.104.Komarek J. European Constitutionalism and the European Arrest Warrant: InSearch of the Limits of Contrapunctual Principles // Common Market Law Review.2007. Vol. 44.

N 1. P. 9–40.105.Koper A. The Subsidiarity Mechanism and its Functioning within the EuropeanUnion: What Can Be Learned from the Schengen Borders Code Case? // University ofAmsterdam, 2013. P. 1–56.106.Kühn Z. The European Arrest Warrant, Third Pillar Law and NationalConstitutional Resistance / Acceptance: The EAW Saga as Narrated by theConstitutional Judiciary in Poland, Germany, and the Czech Republic // CroatianYearbook of European Law and Policy. 2007.

Vol. 3. N 3. P. 99–133.107.Kurds Protest at Arrest of PKK Leader // BBC. 1998.108.Laffan B. From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: the Challenge Facing theEuropean Commission // Journal of European Public Policy. 1997. Vol. 4. N 3. P. 422–438.109.Lasswell H. D. The Political Science of Science: An Inquiry into the PossibleReconciliation of Mastery and Freedom // The American Political Science Review.1956. Vol. 50. N 4. P. 961–979.110.Lavenex S.

Mutual Recognition and the Monopoly of Force: Limits of the SingleMarket Analogy // Journal of European Public Policy. 2007. Vol. 14. N 5. P. 762–779.111.Lavenex S., Wagner W. Which European Public Order? Sources of Imbalance inthe European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice1 // European Security. 2007. Vol.16. N 3-4. P. 225–243.177112.Lazowski A. Poland: Constitutional Tribunal on the Surrender of Polish Citizensunder the European Arrest Warrant. Decision of 27 April 2005.

// EuropeanConstitutional Law Review (EuConst). 2005. Vol. 1. N 3. P. 569–581.113.Libyan Crisis: Italy Warns of a New Wave of Immigrants to Europe // SpiegelOnline. 2011.114.Lijphart A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method // The AmericanPolitical Science Eeview. 1971. Vol. 65. N 3. P. 682–693.115.Llamazares I. The Popular Party and European Integration: Re-elaborating theEuropean Programme of Spanish Conservatism // South European Society and Politics.2005. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 315–332.116.Lombardi B. The Berlusconi Government and Intervention in Libya // TheInternational Spectator.

2011. Vol. 46. N 4. P. 31–44.117.Lorig S. German Interior Minister: «Italy Must Live up to its Responsibilities»[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.dw.de/german-interior-minister-italy-mustlive-up-to-its-responsibilities/a-14981244 (дата обращения: 30.08.2014).118.Lowi T. How the Farmers Get What They Want // The Reporter. 1964. P. 34–37.119.Mackarel M. ‘Surrendering’ the Fugitive— The European Arrest Warrant and theUnited Kingdom // The Journal of Criminal Law. 2007. Vol. 71. N 4. P. 362–381.120.Mackarel M. The European Arrest Warrant - The Early Years: Implementing andUsing the Warrant // European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice.2007.

Vol. 15. P. 37–65.121.Majone G. The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe // West European Politics.1994. Vol. 17. N 3. P. 77–101.122.Manners I. The 2012 Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union:Bridging Exclusion // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2013. Vol. 51. N s1.P.

70–79.123.March J. G., Olsen J. P. The Institutional Dynamics of International PoliticalOrders // International Organization. 1998. Vol. 52. N 4. P. 943–969.124.Marks G. Does the European Union Represent an n of 1? // EuropeanCommunity Studies Assosiation Review. 1997. Vol. 10.

N 3. P. 2–3.125.Maroni firma l’accordo con la Tunisia [Электронный ресурс]. URL:http://www.corriere.it/cronache/11_aprile_05/lampedusa-sbarchi_d4f3e236-5f50-11e0a9b0-e35a83b9ad3b.shtml (дата обращения: 29.08.2014).126.Mazarr M. J. The Iraq War and Agenda Setting // Foreign Policy Analysis.

2007.Vol. 3. N 1. P. 1–23.178127.McClure L. Suspending Schengen: Exceptions to the Schengen Agreement andthe Legality of France’s Decision to Close Its Borders with Italy // Loyola UniversityChicago International Law Review. 2011. Vol. 9. N 2. P. 327–346.128.McMahon S. North African Migration and Europe’s Contextual MediterraneanBorder in Light of the Lampedusa Migrant Crisis of 2011 // EUI Working Papers: SPS.2012. N 2012/37. P.

1–15.129.Mégie A. L’adoption du mandat d’arrêt européen: D’une instrumentalisation del’agenda politique à une expertise opérationnelle de l’entraide pénale // Les cahierseuropéens de Sciences Po. 2010. N 5. P. 1–37.130.Mégie A. The Origin of EU Authority in Criminal Matters: a Sociology of LegalExperts in European Policy-Making // Journal of European Public Policy. 2014. Vol.21.

N 2. P. 230–247.131.Meszaros E. L. The Dilemma of Securitisation of the EU’s Southern Borders:Shall We Let Them in or Shall We Keep Them out, or the European Way of Dealingwith the North African Immigrants // Eurolimes. 2013. N 15. P. 39–58.132.Migrants tunisiens: la France envisage de suspendre les accords de Schengen[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2011/04/22/afflux-de-migrants-la-franceenvisage-de-suspendre-les-accords-de-schengen_1511816_823448.html(датаобращения: 30.08.2014).133.Mille tunisini sbarcati a Lampedusa Maroni: «Emergenza umanitaria»[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.lastampa.it/2011/02/11/italia/cronache/mille-tunisini-sbarcati-alampedusamaroni-emergenza-umanitaria-3TijONCfkOkx59gaPbgHrO/pagina.html(дата обращения: 28.08.2014).134.Ministers Agree on Need for New EU Border Rules [Электронный ресурс].URL:http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/ministers-agree-need-new-eu-bord-news504810 (дата обращения: 30.08.2014).135.Monar J. Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union’sCounter-Terrorism Strategy and its Problems // Government and Opposition.

2007. Vol.42. N 3. P. 292–313.136.Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.2011. Vol. 49. N s1. P. 145–164.137.Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.2012. Vol. 50. N s2. P. 116–131.138.Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.2013. Vol.

51. N s1. P. 124–138.179139.Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.2014. Vol. 52. N s1. P. 141–156.140.Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs after the 2004 Enlargement // TheInternational Spectator. 2003. Vol. 1. P. 1–18.141.Moravcsik A. Does the European Union Represent an n of 1? // EuropeanCommunity Studies Assosiation Review. 1997. Vol. 10. N 3. P. 3–4.142.Moravcsik A. The European Constitutional Compromise and theNeofunctionalist Legacy // Journal of European Public Policy. 2005. Vol. 12. N 2.