Summary (Структура и содержание обыденных педагогических представлений матерей (на примере г. Москвы)), страница 3

In his or her parental practice aparent has to consider both the child’s life situation at present and the child’s future lifeprospects.2.2.«Psyche» and «character» are inherent properties of a child. «Psyche» reflects the child’svulnerability and fragility, while «character» represents his or her resistance to mother’spedagogical influence. From parents’ point of view the resistance of the child is manifest as«lasiness», «stubborness» etc. The problem for parents here is how not to «traumatize» thepsyche and, at the same time, «break» the character on the way to ensuring high academicachievements of the child.2.3.«Norm». When describing a child, mothers evaluate him or her based on the child’scompliance with norms.

In this, attribute scales (for example, «an ability to sit still», «the qualityof memory») and scale values which are considered as «normal» (for example, «rememberseverything from the first time») are different for the mothers interviewed. Parents’ anxiety iscaused not only by worries about the child’s future («life path») or present («psyche» and8«character»), but also originates from concerns on how well their child fits the image a «normal»child, and what to do when a child does not comply with a norm.The scientific significance of the research lies in attempting to specify and articulate theconstruct of «everyday pedagogical theories» in relation to modern Russian parenting, as well asin the development of ideas of parental self-efficacy. Concerning the significance of the resultsfor educational sphere, as we can see, parents face many factors that can lower their parentalself-efficacy.

This, in turn, may negatively affect their current parental practices and satisfactionwith parenthood, as well as mastering new parental practices (including their involvement inchild’s education).Therefore, it is reasonable to take into account specifics of parental practices and beliefs, as wellas factors influencing on parental self-efficacy, when creating programs of psychological andpedagogical accompanying of modern parenting.The practical significance of findings lies in the fact that they can be used for further researchfocused on the national specifics of parenting and the problems of psychological and pedagogicalsupport of parenting in Russia. The said materials may be used: to create programs parental support; to increase the involvement of parents and contribute to practical work with parents,educators, psychologists and centers for working with parents and children; to design course syllabi in Pedagogical Anthropology.7) Literature used in the summary1) Arber S., Timonen V.

Contemporary Grandparenting: Changing Family Relationships inGlobal Contexts. UK: Policy Press, 2012. C. 270.2) Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory //American psychologist. – 1989. –Т. 44. – №. 9. – С. 1175.3) Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change // PsychologicalReview, 1977.

Т. 84. № 2. С. 191-215.4) Bluebond-Langner M. The private worlds of dying children. Princeton University Press,1980.5) Bornstein M. H., Putnick D. L., Suwalsky J. T. D. Parenting cognitions→ parentingpractices→ child adjustment? The standard model //Development and psychopathology.– 2017. – С. 1-18.6) Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature anddesign. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. 19797) Coleman P. K., Karraker K. H. Maternal self‐efficacy beliefs, competence in parenting,and toddlers' behavior and developmental status // Infant Mental Health Journal.

2003. Т.24. №2. C. 126-1488) Daly M. Parenting support: another gender-related policy illusion in Europe? // Women'sStudies International Forum. Pergamon, 2013. Т. 41. С. 223-230.9) Denzin N. Children and Their Caretakers. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1973.910) Domitrovich C. E., Bierman K. L. Parenting practices and child social adjustment:Multiple pathways of influence // Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2001. Т. 47. №2. С. 235-263.11) Fenstermacher G.

D. Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects // Handbook ofresearch on teaching. 1986. Т. 3. С. 37-49.12) Fenstermacher G. D., Richardson V. The elicitation and reconstruction of practicalarguments in teaching // Journal of curriculum studies. 1993. Т. 25. №2. С. 101-114.13) Füredi F. Paranoid Parenting: Abandon Your Anxieties and be a Good Parent. AllenLane, 2001.8) Galambos N. L., Barker E. T., Almeida D. M. Parents do matter: Trajectories of changein externalizing and internalizing problems in early adolescence // Child development.2003. Т. 74. №2.

С. 578-594.14) Gillies V. Marginalised mothers: Exploring working class experiences of parenting.Routledge, 2006.15) Hardyment C. Dream Babies: Childcare Advice from John Locke to Gina Ford. London:Frances Lincoln, 2007. C. 382.16) James A., Jenks C., Prout A. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.17) James A., Prout A. Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues inthe sociological study of childhood. Routledge, 2015.18) Jenks C. Childhood.

London: Routledge, 1996.19) Kagan D. M. Ways of Evaluating Teacher Cognition: Inferences Concerning theGoldilocks Principle // Review of Educational Research. 1990. T. 60. №3. С. 419-469.20) Kolb D. A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.FT press, 2014.9) Lareau A. My wife can tell me who I know: Methodological and conceptual problems instudying fathers // Qualitative sociology. 2000. Т. 23. №4. С.

407-433.10) Lareau A. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of CaliforniaPress, 2011.21) Lee E., Bristow J., Faircloth C., Macvarish, J. Parenting Culture Studies. PalgraveMacmillan, 2014. C. 263.22) Lee E., Macvarish J., Bristow J. Risk, health and parenting culture // Health, Risk andSociety. 2010. T.12. №4. P.

293-300.23) Luhmann N. Das kind als medium der erziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag, 2006.24) Malle B.F. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and SocialInteraction. USA: MIT Press, 2004. C. 344.25) McGillicuddy-DeLisi A.V., Sigel I.E. Parental beliefs // Handbook of parenting. T.3:Status and social conditions of parenting. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates, 1995. C. 333358.26) Qvortrup J. Childhood and modern society // Childhood: Critical Concepts in Sociology.2005. Т. 1. С. 110.27) Reid C., Roberts L., Roberts C., Piek J. Towards a Model of Contemporary Parenting:The Parenting Behaviours and Dimensions Questionnaire.

// Plos One. 2015. T. 10. № 6.С. 1-23.1028) Roksa J., Potter D. Parenting and academic achievement intergenerational transmissionof educational advantage // Sociology of Education. 2011. Т. 84. №4. С. 299-321.29) Sanders M. R. Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: Towards an empirically validatedmultilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior andemotional problems in children // Clinical child and family psychology review. 1999. Т.2. №2. С. 71-90.30) Sigel I.E., McGillicuddy-DeLisi A.V., Goodnow J.J. Parental Belief Systems: ThePsychological Consequences for Children.

UK: Psychology Press, 2014. C. 262.31) Sigel I.E., McGillicuddy-DeLisi A.V., Goodnow J.J. Parental Belief Systems: ThePsychological Consequences for Children. UK: Psychology Press, 2014. C. 26232) Smith C., Perou R., Lesesne C. Parent education // Handbook of Parenting. SocialConditions and Applied Parenting. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2002.Т.4.

C. 389-409.33) Tudge J. R. H., Winterhoff P. A. Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on therelations between the social world and cognitive development // Human Development.1993. Т. 36. №2. С. 61-81.34) Valsiner J. Culture and human development. Sage publication. 2000. C. 240.35) Wilder S.

Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis//Educational Review. – 2014. – Т. 66. – №. 3. – С. 377-397.36) Аvdeeva А.V. "Vovlechennoe ottsovstvo" v sovremennoj Rossii: strategii uchastiya vukhode za det'mi // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. №11. S. 95-104.37) Аr'es F. Rebenok i semejnaya zhizn' pri starom poryadke. Izd-Vo Ural'sk. Universiteta,1999.38) Bezrukova O.

N. Modeli roditel'stva i roditel'skij potentsial: mezhpokolennyj analiz //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. T. 9. №9. S. 85-97.39) Bezrukova O.N. TSennosti roditel'stva: struktura, tipy, resursy // Sotsiologicheskieissledovaniya. 2016. № 3. S. 118-12740) Venger L.А. Gotov li vash rebyonok k shkole. M.