Диссертация (Государственная экономическая поддержка социально ориентированных некоммерческих организаций в Российской Федерации), страница 27

(1987). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.172.Powell W. (Ed.), The independent sector: A research handbook (pp.99–117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press173.Pressman, J.L., Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley:University of California Press.174.Pryor, F. L. (2012). Determinants of the size of the nonprofit sector.European Journal Of Comparative Economics, 9(3), 337-348.175.Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y.

(1993). Making DemocracyWork: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press,Princeton.176.Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining socialcapital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.177.Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants:Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1-32.178.Kramer, R.M., Lorentzen, H., Melief, W.B. Pasquinelli, S. (1993).Privatization in Four European Countries: Comparative Studies inGovernment-Third Sector Relationships.

Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 15179.Ralph M. Kramer. Voluntary agencies and the contract culture:«Dream or Nightmare?» Social Service Review (March 1994)180.Robert Wuthnow, ed., Between States and Markets: The VoluntarySector in Comparative Perspective (Princetonm N.J.: Princeton UniversityPress, 1991), p.299181.Ronelle B., & Trudy O. (2010). Promoting Transparency in the NGOSector: Examining the Availability and Reliability of Self-Reported Data.World Development, vol.

38, issue 9, pages 1263-1277.182.Saidel, Judith R. (1991). Resource interdependence: The relationshipbetween public agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public AdministrationReview 51:543-53.183.Saillant, Catherine, and Jai-Rui Chong. 2008. Private fire crewsgaining ground in the field. Los Angeles Times, November 23.184.Salamon L. M. (1987). Partners in public service: The scope andtheory of government-nonprofit relations.

In W. Powell (Ed.), Theindependent sector: A research handbook (pp. 99–117). New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.178185.Salamon L.M. (1987). Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, andThird-party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Non-profitRelations in the Modern Welfare State. Journal of Voluntary ActionResearch, 16, 29–49186.Salamon, L. M.

(1995). Partners in public service: Governmentnonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkins University Press.187.Salamon, L. M. (1997). Holding the center: America’s nonprofitsector at the crossroads. New York: Nathan Cummings Foundation.188.Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profitsector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3, 125–151.189.Salamon, L.

M., and Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the NonprofitSector: A Cross-national Analysis, Manchester University Press,Manchester.190.Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Anheier H. K. (2000). Socialorigins of civil society: An overview, Working Papers of the Johns HopkinsComparative Nonprofit Sector Project.191.Salamon, L.M. (2002). The resilient sector: the state of nonprofitAmerica. In Lester M. Salamon (ed.). The State of Nonprofit America,Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp.3-65192.Sanders J., O’Brian M., Tennant M., Sokolowski S.W., Salamon L.M.The New Zealand Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective. Wellington(New Zealand): Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, Office forthe Community and Voluntary Sector, Committee for the Study of the NewZealand Nonprofit Sector.

2008. P. 19, 41–42.193.Sandfort, Jodi R., Sally Coleman Seiden, and Jessica E. Sowa. 2008.Do govemment tools influence organizational performance? Examining theirimplementation in early childhood education. The American Review ofPublic Administration 38:412-38.194.Savas, E.S. (1987). Privatization: The Key to Better Government.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.195.Schneider A., Ingram H. (2001) Behavioral Assumptions of PolicyTools.196.Schuster, Mark D. (1989). “The Search for International Models:Results from Recent Comparative Research in Arts Policy.” In Who’s to Payfor the Arts? The International Search for Models of Arts Support, ed.Milton C.

Cummings, Jr., and Mark D. Schuster. New York: ACA Books,15–41197.Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectiveness of organizational effectivenessstudies. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings, & Associates (Eds.), New179perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 63-95). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.198.Simmons W., & Emanuele R. (2004). Does government spendingcrowd out donations of time and money? Public Finance Review, 32(5),498–511.199.Simon J.G. (1990). Modern welfare state policy toward the nonprofitsector.

In “The third sector: comparative studies of nonprofit organizations”/ed. Helmut K. Anheier abd Wolfgang Seibel. – Berlin; New York: deGruyter200.Smith, S.R. (2002). Social Services, In Lester M. Salamon (ed.). TheState of Nonprofit America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press,pp.149-186201.Smith, S.R. (2004). Managing the challenges of governmentcontracts, in Robert Herman (Ed.), Jossey-Bass Handbook of NonprofitLeadership and Management, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp.371-390202.Smith, S.R.

(2006). Government financing of nonprofit activity, inElizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits andGovernment: Collaboration and Conflict, Washington, DC: Urban InstitutePress, pp. 219-256203.Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfarestate in the age of contracting.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.204.Sokolowski S. W. (2012). Effects of Government Support ofNonprofit Institutions on Aggregate Private Philanthropy: Evidence from 40Countries. Voluntas (2013) 24:359–381205.Sokolowski, W. (2000). The discreet charm of the nonprofit form:Service professionals and the nonprofit organizations in Poland 1989–1993.International Journal of Voluntary and Non-Profit Organizations, 11(2),141–159206.Spillane J.P. (1998). A Cognitive Perspective on the Role of the LocalEducational Agency in Implementing Instructional Policy: Accounting forLocal Variability. Educational Administration Quarterly 1998 34: 31207.Steinberg R.

(1985). Empirical relations between governmentspending and charitable donations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research,14, 54–64.208.Steinberg R. (1987). Voluntary Donations and Public Expenditures ina Federalist System. American Economic Review 77: 591-617.209.Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations.The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Second Edition, Ed. by WalterW. Powell and Richard Steinberg.

Yale University Press. New Haven andLondon: 117-140180210.Stid, Daniel, and Vishal Shah. (2012). The view from the Cliff:Government-funded nonprofits are looking out on steep cuts and anuncertain nature. San Francisco, CA: The Bridgespan Group.211.Stone, M.M., Hager, M.A., Griffin, J.J. (2001). Organizationalcharacteristics and funding environments: a study of a population of Unitedway-affiliated nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 276-289212.Suárez D. F.

(2011). Collaboration and Professionalization: TheContours of Public Sector Funding for Nonprofit Organizations. Journal OfPublic Administration Research & Theory, 21(2), 307-326.213.Sundeen, R. A. (1992). Differences in personal goals and attitudesamong volunteers.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 271-291.214.Szper, R., Prakash A. Charity Watchdogs and the Limits ofInformation-Based Regulation // Voluntas; Mar2011, Vol. 22. Issue 1, p.112–141.215.Toepler S. Government Funding Policies// Handbook of Research onNonprofit Economics and Management. Eds. Bruce A. Seaman, Dennis R.Young. Edward Elgar.

Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA, 2010216.TheBostonConsultingGroup(BSG)http://strategy2020.rian.ru/news/201170907/366139659.html217.The Guiding Opinions of the General Office of the State Council onGovernment Purchasing Services from Social Actors (September 26, 2013),国务院办公厅关于政府向社会力量购买服务的指导意见218.The Tools of Government.

Ed. Lester M. Salamon, Oxford UniversityPress. 2002219.The Nonprofit Almanac, 2012220.Timothy Hilderbrandt (2013)221.Tullock, Gordon (1965). The Politics of Bureaucracy.; Public AffairsPress: Washington, D.C.222.Ulrich, D. (1997). Measuring human resources: An overview ofpractice and a prescription for results. Human Resource Management, 36,303-320.223.US Internal Revenue Code, section 501 (c) (3)224.Van Slyke D.M. (2007). Agents and Stewards: Using Theory toUnderstand the Government-Nonprofit Contracting Relationship. Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–188.225.Vartapetov, K.

(2010). Russia's federal fiscal grants: regionalequalisation and growth. Post-Communist Economies, 22(4), 471-481181226.Vaughan, Shannon K. (2010). The importance of performanceassessment in local government decisions to fund health and human servicesnonprofit organizations. JHHSA. pp.486-512227.Von Glahn D., Whistler C. Pay for Success Programs: AnIntroduction.