Диссертация (Государственная экономическая поддержка социально ориентированных некоммерческих организаций в Российской Федерации), страница 26

M. (2005). Do charitabledonors know enough—and care enough—about government subsidies toaffect private giving to nonprofit organizations? Nonprofit and VoluntarySector Quarterly, 34(1), 136–149.114.Huberman, M., Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close. New York:Plenum115.Jakobson L., Sanovich S. The Changing Models of the Russian ThirdSector: Import Substitution Phase // Journal of Civil Society. 2010. Vol. 6.No.

3. P. 279–300.116.Jakobson L.I., Mersiyanova I.V., Efremov S.V. Challenges and newtrends for nonprofit accountability in Russia / Working papers by NRUHigher School of Economics. Series PA "Public Administration". 2012. No.03.173117.James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative prospective. InW.

W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 397–415). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.118.Javeline D., Lindemann-Komarova S. A balanced Assessment ofRussian Civil Society// Journal of International Affairs, Spring/Summer2010, Vol. 63, No.2. p.174-179119.Jennifer Wolch, The Shadow State: Government and the VoluntarySector in Transition (New York: Foundation Center, 1990)120.Jing, Y., Liu, X. (2009). Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in China:An Assessment, in EROPA Local Government Center ed., LocalGovernance under Stress: Fiscal Retrenchment and Expanding PublicDemands on Government. Tokyo: EROPA Local Government Center,pp.73-93121.Jing, Y., Savas, E.S.

(2009). Managing Collaborative ServiceDelivery: Comparing China and the United States. Public AdministrationReview (Special Issue): 101-107.122.Jing, Y., Chen, B. (2010?). Is Competitive Contracting ReallyCompetitive? A Case Study of Restructuring Government-NonprofitRelations in Shanghai. Working Papers Series, Baruch College, The CityUniversity of New York, Center for Nonprofit Strategy and Management123.Jing, Y., Liu, C. (2010).

“Understanding China‟s AdministrativeAdaptation: The Role of Weak Organizations”. Issues and Studies 46 (2): 132.124.Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies. The ComparativeNonprofitSectorProject,FindingsbyCountry.URL:http://www.ccss.jhu.edu/index.php?section=content&view=16&sub=91&tri=93125.Jung, K., M. Jae Moon (2007), The double-edged sword of publicresource dependence: the impact of public resources on autonomy andlegitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations, The Policy StudiesJournal, 35(2), 205-226126.Kamerman, Sheila B.; Kahn, Alfred J. Privatization and the WelfareState.

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989127.Kanter, R. M., & Summers, D. V. (1987). Doing well while doinggood: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizationsand the need for a multiple constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed),The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 154-166). New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.174128.Kearns, Kevin (1994).

"The Strategic Management of Accountabilityin Nonprofit Organizations: An Analytical Framework."PublicAdministration Review" (2), 185-192.129.Keating E., Fischer M., Gordon T., Greenlee J. (2005), AssessingFinancial Vulnerability in the Nonprofit Sector. KSG Working Paper No.RWP05-002, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University130.Kramer R.M.

(1981), Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State,Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.131.Kramer, F. D. (2010). The Role for Public Funding of Faith-BasedOrganizations Delivering Behavioral Health Services: Guideposts forMonitoring and Evaluation. American Journal Of Community Psychology,46(3/4), 342-360132.Krishman, R., Yetman, M.

H., & Yetman, R. J. (2006). ExpenseMisreporting in Nonprofit Organizations. Accounting Review, 81(2), 399420133.Kunemund H., & Rein M. (1999). There is more to receiving thanneeding: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding inand crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 93–121.134.Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M.

(2013). Nonprofit Sector Growth andDensity: Testing Theories of Government Support. Journal Of PublicAdministration Research & Theory, 23(1), 189-214.135.Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., & Grossman, A. (1999). High performancenonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York:John Wiley.136.Lewis, J. (1999). Reviewing the Relationship Between the VoluntarySector in Britain in the 1990s. Voluntas 10(3): 255-270137.Lipsky, M.

(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of theindividual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation138.Loevinsohn, B., Harding, A. (2005). Buying results? Contracting forhealth service delivery in developing countries. Lancet; 366: 676–81. p.67139.Loi du 1er juillet 1901 relative au contrat d’association, Versionconsolidée au 24 mars 2012, article 1140.Louis, K. (1989) The role of the school district in schoolimprovement. In M. Holmes, K. Leithwood, D. Musella (Eds.), Educationalpolicy for effective schools.

Toronto, Canada: OISE Press141.Lynn, L.E., Jr (2002), Social Services and the State: the PublicAppropriation of Private Charity, Social Service Review, 76 (1), 58-82175142.Majone, G., Wildavsky, A. (1978). Implementation as evolution. In H.Freeman (Ed.), Policy studies annual review (Vol.2, pp.103-117). BeverlyHills, CA: Sage143.Malani А., Choi A. (2004). Are Non-Profit Firms Simply For-Profitsin Disguise? Evidence from Executive Compensation in the Nursing HomeIndustry. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=617362 orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617362144.Manna, P. (2010). Collision course: Federal education policy meetsstate and local realities.

Washington, DC: CQ Press.145.Markowich, M. M. (1995). HR’s leadership in the third wave era.HRMagazine, 40, 92.146.Martin Knapp, «Intersectoral Differences in Cost-Effectiveness:Residential Child Care in England and Wales», in the Nonprofit Sector inInternational Perspective, ed. Estelle James (New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 1988), pp.193-216147.Martinez, M. N. (1996).

3 strategies for successful business partners.HRMagazine, 41, S1.148.Matsunaga, Y., Yamauchi, N., & Okuyama, N. (2010). WhatDetermines the Size of the Nonprofit Sector? A Cross-Country Analysis ofthe Government Failure Theory. Voluntas: International Journal OfVoluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 180-201149.McGuinn P. (2011) Stimulating Reform: Race to the Top,Competitive Grants and the Obama Education Agenda, Educational Policy.136-159150.McLaughlin, M.W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons frompolicy implementation.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171178151.McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). The RAND Change Agent StudyRevisited: Macros perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher,19 (9), 11-16152.Michael B. Fabricant, Steven Burghardt, The Welfare State Crisis andthe Transformation of Social Service Work (Armonk, N.Y.: M.E.

Sharpe,1992)153.Montias, John M. (1986). “Public Support for the Performing Arts inEurope and the United States.” In Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studiesin Mission and Constraint, ed. Paul J. DiMaggio. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 287–319154.Morris, S. (2000). Defining the Nonprofit Sector: Some Lessons fromHistory.

Voluntas: International Journal Of Voluntary & NonprofitOrganizations, 11(1), 28.176155.Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Roemer, C., & Von Kondratowitz, H. J.(2005). Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence fro mixedresponsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing and Society, 25, 863–882156.NCCS 2010, 02/2013157.Netzer, Dick. (1978).

The Subsidized Muse: Public Support for theArts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.158.O’Regan, K., Oster, S. Does government funding alter nonprofitgovernance? Evidence from New York City Nonprofit Contractors. Journalof Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Summer, 2002),pp.359-379159.O'Connell, A., Martin, F., & Chia, J. (2013). Law, policy and politicsin Australia's recent not-for-profit sector reforms. Australian Tax Forum,28(2), 289-315.160.Oliver, E. (2001). Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.161.Olson, M. (1965).

The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.162.O’Regan, K., Oster, S.M. (2002). Does government funding alternonprofit governance? Evidence from New York City NonprofitContractors, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(3), 359-379163.Ostrander, S. A., & Schervish, P. G.

(1990). Giving and getting:Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. VanTil (Ed.), Critical issues inAmerican philanthropy (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.164.Ostrom, E. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational ChoiceTheory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review, 92, 1–22;165.Ostrom, E. Governing the commons: The Evolution of Institutions forCollective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990;166.Ostrom, V.; Ostrom, E.

(1971). A different approach to the study ofpublic administration. Public Administration Review, 31 (2), 203–216167.Payne, A. Abigail (1998). Does the Government Crowd-Out PrivateDonations? New Evidence from a Sample of Non-Profit Firms. Journal ofPublic Economics 69: 323-345.168.Peters, B Guy. (1994).

Managing the hollow state. InternationalJournal of Public Administration 17 (3-4): 739-756.169.Pevcin, P. (2011). Demand and supply side view on the factorsaffecting size of the non-profit economy. Proceedings Of The InternationalScientific Conference, Juraj Dobrila University Of Pula, Department OfEconomics & Tourism 'Dr. Mijo Mirkovic', 631-653.177170.Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R. (1978), The external control oforganizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper &Row171.Powell, W. (Ed.).