Университет «Синергия» Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденции (Темы 1-8 Итоговый и Компетентностный тесты)

Университет «Синергия» Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденции (Темы 1-8 Итоговый и Компетентностный тесты) МТИ МосТех МосАП МФПУ Синергия Тест оценка ОТЛИЧНО 2024 год Ответы на 51 вопрос Результат – 100 баллов С вопросами вы можете ознакомиться до покупки ВОПРОСЫ: Подробная информация Учебные материалы Текущие Введение в курс Тема 1. What is Law? (Что такое Закон?) Тема 2. Law Systems. (Правовые системы.) Тема 3. Areas of Law. (Области права.) Тема 4. Legal Profession. (Профессия юриста.) Тема 5. English Court. (Английский суд.) Тема 6. Starting Action in Court. (Подача иска в суд.) Тема 7. Law of Tort. (Деликтное право.) Тема 8. Heads of Tort.

(Руководители деликтных компаний.) Заключение Итоговая аттестация Итоговый тест Компетентностный тест 1. … is a pivotal document from 1215 that limited the monarch s power and set the stage for individual rights and freedoms. 2. According to legal theorist Salmond, law is defined as... 3. An example of a statutory tort is... 4. Find a pair to make collocations: 5. In a tort case, the usual remedies available to the claimant are... 6. In criminal cases, if the police have enough evidence, they can make a formal … against a suspect. 7. International law regulates relations between … and between private citizens of different countries. 8. Laws are deemed crucial for society because...

9. Many countries distinguish between … law and public law. 10. Many people believe that … should be fair and equal for everyone involved. 11. Match each legal profession with its description: 12. Match each legal profession with the correct description 13. Match the halves to make up correct sentences: 14. Match the halves to make up correct sentences: 15. Match the terms with their correct descriptions: 16. Match the terms with their correct descriptions: 17. Match the words with their definitions 18. Match the words with their definitions: 19. Most civil cases are usually considered in... 20. Order the steps in the process of filing a tort claim: 21.

Put the following events in chronological order: 22. Put the following legal professionals in order from highest to lowest position in the hierarchy: 23. Put the following steps in the correct order for a civil lawsuit: Тип ответа: 24. Put the stages of criminal proceedings in the correct order: 25. Put the steps of the judicial process in the correct order 26. Read the dialogue and answer the question. There s only one correct answer. Carly: So you filed a claim against them after all? Max: Yes, I had to. It was the only way to get what they owed me. And I couldn t just let it go and not do anything about it. Carly: Right, but isn t going to court going to be expensive? Max: It s worth it for what they did to me.

Plus, there are legal aid services available if I need help with expenses. Carly: That s true. But don t you have to prove your claims in order to win the case? Max: Of course. They have to have merit and be based on solid evidence or proof. Luckily, I have ev erything organized and ready to present. Carly: Good for you. Do you think their defense will hold up in court? Max: Honestly, I m not too worried about that. Their argument is pretty weak and easily disproven. My lawyer has already pointed out some holes in their defense. Carly: You hired a lawyer? How much does that cost? Max: Not nearly as much as I thought it would be. There are different options depending on your financial circumstances.

Plus, my lawyer is confident we ll win this case. Carly: Wow, okay. So how does the jury pick process work? Max: Well, the judge oversees it and makes sure both sides agree on the jurors selected. The people chosen must listen to all the facts presented before deciding whether the defendant is guilty or not. Carly: Interesting. What happens after the court proceedings? Max: Once the trial concludes, the judge gives instructions to the jury and they deliberate the case. Then, when the verdict is announced by the foreperson, the official record of the trial is recorded by the court reporter. Carly: Got it. So who else is involved besides the judge, lawyers, and jury? Max: Well, there can also be interpreters for non English speaking witnesses or defendants.

And of course, the parties directly involved in the case - the plaintiff and defendant. Carly: Hmm, okay. It seems like a complicated process, but hopefully justice will prevail in your case. Max: Thank you, I m really hoping so. I just hope the judge and jury see the truth and the wrong that has been done. Question: Who oversees the jury selection process? 27. Read the dialogue and answer the question. There s only one correct answer.John: So, Sarah... When did you decide to become a lawyer? Sarah: I ve always been interested in the legal profession since I was young. My parents were lawyers too.John: Wow, really? Did they work together or something?Sarah: No, but they both inspired me to choose this career path.John: That s cool.

I can barely remember when I decided what I wanted to do with my life.Sarah: It definitely wasn t an overnight decision for me either. It took years of hard work and studying to get where I am now. John: Yeah, that s why I never pursued law. Too much reading and memorization.Sarah: It s not just about memorizing laws and statutes. You have to be able to think critically and analyze information from different perspectives.John: True, true. And how long have you been a practicing attorney?Sarah: For about five years now. I started as a paralegal before taking the bar exam.John: That must have been tough. The bar exam is known to be quite challenging.Sarah: Oh, it definitely was.

But it was worth it in the end. What about you? How long have you been working at your law firm?John: Just a year, but I already feel like I m learning so much from everyone here. Sarah: That s great to hear. Law is an ever-changing field, so we never stop learning.John: Yeah, I love that aspect of it. Always something new to discover. Sarah: Absolutely. And speaking of learning, I have a case tomorrow morning that I need to prepare for. I should probably head out soon.John: Of course. Good luck with your case!Sarah: Thanks. Have a good evening, John!Question: How long has Sarah been a practicing attorney? 28. Read the dialogue and answer the question. There s only one correct answer.Judge Smith: The defendant, Mark Jones, is accused of robbery with violence and possession of a dangerous weapon.

How does he plead? Mark s Lawyer: Not guilty, your honor. My client had no part in the crime that occurred on the night of May 17th. We have evidence to prove his innocence. Prosecution Lawyer: Your honor, we have witnesses who saw Mr. Jones at the scene of the crime and DNA evidence linking him to the weapon used.Judge Smith: Interesting. Let us hear from the witnesses then. Witness 1: Yes, I saw the defendant wearing a black hoodie and holding a knife as he threatened the victim for her purse. Witness 2: And I remember seeing him run away from the scene with another person. They both had masks on. Judge Smith: Thank you for your testimonies. Are there any other pieces of evidence? Prosecution Lawyer: As mentioned earlier, DNA evidence has been found on the weapon that matches the defendant s.

Mark s Lawyer: Your honor, our client works as a chef and it s possible that his DNA was transferred onto the weapon innocently while working in the kitchen. He had no motive or reason to commit this crime. Judge Smith: I see. Bailiff, please bring in the forensic report. It appears that the DNA evidence could have been innocently transferred. Therefore, I m declaring the defendant, Mark Jones, not guilty. This court is adjourned.Question: What crimes is Mark Jones accused of? 29. Read the dialogue and answer the question. There s only one correct answer.Kelly: Wow, that s a lot of information on tort law. Did you understand all of it? Mark: Honestly, most of it went over my head.

I m still trying to wrap my head around the concept of negligence.Kelly: I remember studying this in college. Negligence is when someone breaches their duty of care and causes harm to another person, right?Mark: Yeah, that sounds about right. But there are also certain defenses available in cases of negligence. Like for psychiatric injury or economic loss.Kelly: Wait, so can anyone sue for those things under the premise of negligence?Mark: Not necessarily. The courts use a three-step test to determine if there is a duty of care owed by the defendant to the victim.Kelly: Ah, I see. So basically, the first step is proving that the harm was reasonably foreseeable?Mark: Exactly.

And then the second step looks at the relationship between the two parties - whether it s one of proximity or not.Kelly: And finally, the third step considers if it would be fair and just to hold the defendant liable for their actions.Mark: Right. It seems like the case of Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman was a turning point in establishing this threefold test.Kelly: Yeah, it definitely set a precedent. But I can imagine it must have been challenging determining liability in a complex situation like that.Mark: Definitely. And with the ever-changing laws and legal systems, it s important to constantly stay informed and educated.Question: What are some defenses available in cases of negligence? 30.

Read the dialogue and answer the question. There s only one correct answer.Lila: Have you read the new law passed by Congress last week? It s about regulating environmental pollution.Mark: No, I haven t. How is it different from the current regulations? Lila: Well, it gives more power to federal agencies in enforcing and monitoring compliance with environmental laws. And it also imposes stricter penalties for violations.Mark: That sounds like a good step towards protecting our environment. But what about local laws? Do they have any impact on this issue?Lila: Yes, definitely. Each state has its own set of environmenta....