Диссертация (1174205), страница 64
Текст из файла (страница 64)
– 2015. – Vol. 82. – P. 203-214.234. Chaudhary, A. Complications after Frey’s procedure for chronic pancreatitis / A.Chaudhary, S.S. Negi, S. Masood, M. Thombare // Am J Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 188.– P. 277-281.235. Chebli, M. Internal pancreatic fistulas: proposal ol a management algorithm basedon a case series analysis. / M.
Chebl, P.D. Gaburri, A.F. de Souza [et al.] // J ClinGastroenterol. – 2004. – Vol. 38. – P. 795-800.236. Chen, R.Y.M. Diagnosing pancreas divisum in patients with abdominal pain andpancreatitis: is endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) accurate enough? / R.Y.M. Chen,R.H.Hawes, M.B. Wallace // Gastrointest. Endosc. – 2002. – Vol. 55. – P. 96.237. Chen, Y.I. An international multicenter study comparing EUS-guided pancreaticduct drainage with enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatographyafter Whipple surgery / Y.I. Chen, M.J.
Levy, T.G. Moreels [et al.] // GastrointestEndosc. – 2017. – Vol. 85. – P. 170-177.238. Chen, Y.K. Peroral pancreatoscopy (PP) for pancreatic stone therapy andinvestigation of susptected pancreatic lesions: first human experience using the394spyglass direct visualization system (SDVS) / Y.K. Chen, P.R. Tarnasky, I.Raijman [et al.] // Gastrointest Endosc. – 2008. – Vol. 67.
– P. AB108.239. Chen, Y-I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: technicalapproaches to a challenging procedure / Y-I. Chen, P. Saxena, S.Ngamruengphong [et al.] // Endoscopy. – 2016. – Vol. 48. – P. E192–E193.240. Cheruvu, C.V. Conservative treatment as an option in the management ofpancreatic pseudocyst / C.V. Cheruvu, M.G.
Clarke, M. Prentice [et al.] // Ann RColl Surg Engl. – 2003. – Vol. 85(5). – P. 313-316.241. Chinnakotla, S. Factors predicting outcomes aft er a total pancreatectomy andislet autotransplantation lessons learned from over 500 cases / S. Chinnakotla,G.J. Beilman, T.B. Dunn [et al.] // Ann Surg. – 2015. – Vol. 262. – P. 610-622.242. Choudhary, A. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: ameta-analysis and systematic review / A. Choudhary, M.L.
Bechtold, M. Arif //Gastrointest Endosc. – 2011. – Vol. 73. – P. 275-282.243. Ciocirlan, T. Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography / T.Ciocirlan, T. Ponchon // Endoscopy. – 2004. – Vol. 36. – P. 137-146.244. Clarke, B. Endoscopic therapy is effective for patients with chronic pancreatitis /B. Clarke, A. Slivka, Y.
Tomizawa [et al.] // Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. – 2012. –Vol. 10, № 7. – P. 795-802.245. Cohen, S. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science ConferenceStatement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002 / S. Cohen, B.R.Bacon, J.A. Berlin [et al.] // Gastrointest Endosc. – 2002. – Vol. 56. – P. 803-809.246. Comcz-Cerezo, J. Pancreatic ascites: study of therapeutic options by analysis ofcase reports and case series between the years 1975 and 2000 / J. Comcz-Cerezo,A. Barhado Cano, I. Suarez [et al.] // Am J Gastroenteral. – 2003.
– Vol. 98. – P.568-577.247. Conwell, D.L. American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in ChronicPancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines / D.L. Conwell, L.S.Lee, D. Yadav // Pancreas. – 2014. – Vol. 43. – P. 1143-1162.395248. Conwell, D.L. An endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcinesecretin for the evaluation of chronic abdominal pain and suspected chronicpancreatitis / D.L. Conwell, G.Jr. Zuccaro, J.J. Vargo [et al.] // GastrointestEndosc. – 2003. – Vol. 57.
– P. 37-40.249. Conwell, D.L. Validation of demographics, etiology, and risk factors for chronicpancreatitis in the USA: a report of the North American Pancreas Study (NAPS)Group / Conwell D.L., Banks P.A., Sandhu B.S. [et al.] // Dig Dis Sci. – 2017. –Vol. 62. – P. 2133-2140.250. Corazziari, L. Functional disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas / L.Corazziari, E.A. Shaffer, W.J. Hogan [et al.] // Gut.
– 1999. – Vol. 45(2). – P.4854.251. Coronel, E. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment ofgastroduodenal obstruction in severe chronic pancreatitis / E. Coronel, C.G.Chapman, J. Matthews [et al.] // Endoscopy. – Vol. 50(03). – P. 285-287.252. Corral, J.E. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in the biliary and pancreatic ducts:a feasibility study with histological correlation / J.E.
Corral, O.Y. Mousa, M.Krishna [et al.] // Endoscopy. – 2018. – Vol. 50, № 11. – P. 1089-1094.253. Corrao, G. Exploring the doseresponse relationship between alcohol consumptionand the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: A meta-analysis / G. Corrao, V.Bagnardi, A. Zambon, S. Arico // Addiction. – 1999. – Vol. 94. – P. 1551-1573.254. Costamagna, G. Endoscopic treatment of postsurgical external pancreatic fistulas/ G. Costamagna, M.
Mutignani, M. Ingrosso [et al.] // Endoscopy. – 2001. – Vol.33, № 3. – P. 317-322.255. Costamagna, G. Multiple stenting of refractory pancreatic duct strictures in severechronic pancreatitis: long-term results / G. Costamagna, M. Bulajic, A. Tringali[et al.] // Endoscopy. – 2006. – Vol. 38. – P.
254-259.256. Cote, G.A. Alcohol and smoking as risk factors in an epidemiology study ofpatients with chronic pancreatitis / G.A. Coté, A. Slivka [et al.] // ClinGastroenterol Hepatol. – 2011. – Vol. 9. – P. 266-273.396257. Coté, G.A. Effect of covered metallic stents compared with plastic stents onbenign biliary stricture resolution: a randomized clinical trial / G.A. Coté, A.Slivka, P. Tarnasky [et al.] // JAMA. – 2016. – Vol. 315. – P.
1250-1257.258. Coté, G.A. Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Signifcantly Reduces Quality of LifeEven in the Absence of Overt Chronic Pancreatitis / G.A. Coté [et al.] // TheAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology. – 2018. – Vol. 113, №. 6. – P. 906.259. Coté, G.A. Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic,sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis / G.A. Coté,T.F.
Imperiale, S.E. Schmidt [et al.] // Gastroenterology. – 2012. – Vol. 143. – P.1502-1509.260. Cremer, M. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronicpancreatitis: long-term follow-up after 7 years of experience / M. Cremer, J.Deviere, L. Engelholm // Gastrointestinal endoscopy. – 1989.
– Vol. 35, № 1 –P.1-9.261. Cremer, M. Stenting in severe chronic pancreatitis: results of medium-termfollow-up in seventy-six patients / M. Cremer, J. Deviere, M. Delhaye, M. Baize,A. Vandermeeren // Endoscopy. – 1991. – Vol. 23, № 3. – P. 171-176.262. Cumulative Official WHO Updates – 1996 – 2009 – volume 4 [Electronicresource] // World health organization. – Mode of access: https: //www.who.int/263. Cunha, A.S. A single-institution prospective study of laparoscopic pancreaticresection / A.S. Cunha, A.
Rault, C. Beau [et al.] // Arch Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 143.– P. 289-295.264. Das, R. Endotherapy is effective for pancreatic ductal disruption: A dual centerexperience / R. Das, G.I. Papachristou, A. Slivka [et al.] // Pancreatology. – 2016.– Vol. 16. – P.
278-283.265. De Oliveira, M.L. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novelgrading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy /M.L. DeOliveira, J.M. Winter, M. Schafer [et al.] // Ann Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 244,№ 6. – Р. 931-937.397266.
De Palma, G.D. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a longtermfollow-up study of 49 patients / G.D. De Palma, G. Galloro, A. Puzziello, S.Masone, G. Persico // Hepatogastroenterology. – 2002. – Vol. 49. – P.1113-1115.267. Delhaye, M. Endoscopic technique for the management of pancreatitis and itscomplications // M. Delhaye, C. Matos, J. Deviere // Best Pract Res ClinGastroenterol.
– 2004. – Vol. 18. – P. 155-181.268. Delhaye, M. Long-term clinical outcome after endoscopic pancreatic ductaldrainage for patients with painful chronic pancreatitis / M. Delhaye, M.Arvanitakis, G. Verset, M. Cremer, J. Deviere // Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. –2004. – Vol. 2. – P. 1096-1106.269. Delhaye, M. Pancreatic ductal system obstruction and acute recurrent pancreatitis/ M.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
