Диссертация (1173805), страница 64
Текст из файла (страница 64)
p. 112.52.Kuźniacki, B. Constitutional Issues Arising from the Principal Purpose Test: TheLesson from Poland // Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, [S.l.], June 2018, Vol. 27, № 2, p. 99.53.Lampreave, P. Anti-Tax Avoidance Measures in China and India: An Evaluationof Specific Court Decisions // Bulletin for International Taxation, 2013 (Volume 67), № 1,pp. 49-60.54.Lang, M. Cadburry Schweppes’ Line of Case Law from the Member States’Perspective // Prohibition of Abuse of Law: a New General Principle of EU Law? / R.
de laFeria, S. Vogenauer (eds.). Hart Publishing, 2011., p. 451.26655.Leung, S.C.M., Richardson, G., Taylor, G. The effect of the general anti-avoidancerule on corporate tax avoidance in China // Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics.2019 (Volume 15), Issue 1, p. 115.56.Li, Jinyan. Tax Transplants and Local Culture: A Comparative Study of theChinese and Canadian GAAR (July 19, 2010).
Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 11(2) // OsgoodeLegal Studies Research Paper № 04/ 2015. P. 83 [Электронный ресурс] URL:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1645336 (дата обращения 23.01.2020).57.Li, J. Fundamental enterprise income tax reform in China: motivations and majorchanges // Bulletin for International Taxation, 2007 (Volume 61), № 12, pp. 519-528.58.Livingston, M. Law, Culture, and Anthropology: On the Hopes and Limites ofComparative Tax // Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 2005, Vol. XVIII, № 1,pp. 129-131.59.Lynette, O., Honiball, M. International tax, a South African perspective 2008, 4thed.
Cape Town: Siber Ink CC. - p. 383.60.Marais, A. South Africa. Anti-avoidance measures of general nature and scope -GAAR and other rules // Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2018, Seoul. Vol. 103a. p. 687.61.Meyerowitz, D. Meyerowitz on Income Tax // Cape Town: The Taxpayer. 2008.Para. 29-12.62.Miller, A., Oats, L. Principles of international taxation, 2nd ed. West Sussex, Tottelpublishing, 2009, p. 11.63.Mo, P.L. Tax avoidance and anti-avoidance measures in major developingeconomies. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2003. - 224 p.64.Moreira, A.M. Elisão e Evasão Fiscal – limites ao planejanemto tributário. Revistada Associação Basileira de Direito Tributário, Belo Horizonte, Vol.
21, 2003, pp. 11-17.65.Mukundan, A., Ajinkya, B. The Vodafone Decision: All is not Lost // Tax notesinternational. September 27, 2010, pp. 1025-1029.66.Nelson, S. China, in Tax Risk Management: From Risk to Opportunity (A. Bakker,S. Kloosterhof eds. IBFD: Amsterdam, 2010, pp. 189-226.67.Olivier, L. Tax avoidance: options available to the Commissioner for InlandRevenue // Journal of South African Law, 1997, № 114(4), p. 744.68.Olivier, L., Davis, D., et al.
Juta Income Tax. South Africa: Juta. 2009. Para. 80C2.26769.Palao Taboada, С. La aplicación de las normas tributarias y la elusión fiscal, LexNova, 2009. - 302 p.70.Piantavigna, P. Tax Abuse and Aggressive Tax Planning in the BEPS Era: HowEU Law and the OECD Are Establishing a Unifying Conceptual Framework in InternationalTax Law, Despite Linguistic Discrepancies // World Tax Journal, 2017, Volume 9, p. 76.71.Pickup, D. In Relation to General Anti-Avoidance Provisions: A ComparativeStudy of the Legal Frameworks Used by Different Countries to Protect Their Tax Revenues. In:Freedman, J. (ed.) Beyond Boundaries: Developing Approaches to Tax Avoidance and Tax RiskManagement. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. 2008.
p. 14.72.Pidduck, T. The South African General Anti-Tax Avoidance Rule and Lessonsfrom the First World: a Case Law Approach. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Rhodes University. p. 78.73.Prebble, J. Criminal Law, Tax Evasion, Shams, and Tax Avoidance: Part I – TaxEvasion and General Doctrines of Criminal Law // New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law andPolicy, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 3-16.74.Prebble, R., Prebble, J. Does the Use of General Anti-Avoidance Rules to CombatTax Avoidance Breach Principles of the Rule of Law? // The Saint Louis University LawJournal.
2010. Vol. 55(1). p. 29.75.Pustovalov, E., Zakharov, E., Savitsky, A. Chapter 23: Russia, Tax AvoidanceRevisited in the EU BEPS Context: 2016 EATLP Congress Munich, 2-4 June 2016. Amsterdam:IBFD, 2017. pp. 599-602.76.Riccardi, L. Chinese Tax Law and International Treaties. Springer InternationalPublishing, Switzerland, 2013. p. 103.77.Rohatgi, R. Basic International Taxation, London. The Hague.
New York: KluwerLaw International, 2002. - 720 p.78.Rohatgi, R. Basic International Taxation, Vol. 1: Principles, 2nd edition,Richmond, 2005. - 465 p.79.Rosenblatt, P. Tax Avoidance in Emerging Countries: Is a GAAR a SuitableMeasure? // Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, 2017, Vol. 1. p. 86.80.Rosenblatt, P., Tron, M. General report. Anti-avoidance measures of generalnature and scope - GAAR and other rules // Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2018, Seoul.Vol. 103a. p. 18.26881.Rubinstein, F., Vettori, G.G. Closing the Brazilian Tax Gap: Public Shaming,Transparency and Mandatory Disclosure as Means of Dealing with Tax Delinquencies, TaxEvasion and Tax Planning // Bulletin for International Taxation, 2017 (Volume 71), № 6.82.Sengupta, D.P. India.
In Y. Brauner and P. Pistone, eds., BRICS and theEmergence of International Tax Coordination. IBFD: Amsterdam, 2015. pp. 171-172.83.Schoueri, L.E., Galendi Júnior, R.A. Chapter 9: Brazil, Tax Avoidance Revisitedin the EU BEPS Context: 2016 EATLP Congress Munich, 2-4 June 2016. Amsterdam: IBFD,2017. pp. 200-203.84.Schoueri, L.E. Planejamento tributário: limites à norma antiabuso, in DireitoTributário Atual, vol.
24 (A.J. Alcides ed., Dialética 2010), p. 345.85.Schoueri, L.E., Galendi Júnior, R.A. Transparência Fiscal e Reciprocidade nasPerspectivas Interna e Internacional, in ROCHA, Valdir de Oliveira, Grandes Questões Atuaisdo Direito Tributário, vol. 19 (Dialética, 2015), pp. 252-253.86.Schoueri, L.E., Galendi Júnior, R.A. The BRICS and the BEPS project: anoverview from a Brazilian perspective // Russian Law: Theory and Practice. 2016. № 2. pp. 1732.87.Tanzi, V., Zee, H. Tax policy for emerging markets: Developing countries //National Tax Journal, 2000, Vol.
53, Issue 2, p. 319.88.Hu, T., Li, N. China. In Y. Brauner and P. Pistone, eds., BRICS and the Emergenceof International Tax Coordination. IBFD: Amsterdam, 2015. p. 222.89.Tiley, J. Revenue Law, 5th edition (London: Hart Publishing). 2005. pp. 101-102,90.Thuronyi, V.
Comparative Tax Law, Kluwer Law International, 2003. - 373 p.91.Tooma, R. Legislating Against Tax Avoidance / R. Tooma. – Amsterdam: IBFD,122.2008. pp. 33-34.92.Tôrres, H.T., Direito tributário e direito privado: Autonomia privada, simulação eelusão tributária (Revista dos Tribunais 2003), p. 355.93.Van Weeghel, S. General report.
Tax treaties and tax avoidance: application of anti-avoidance provisions // Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2010, Rome. Vol. 95a. p. 22.94.Vogel, K. Klaus Vogel on Double Taxation Conventions (3rd ed., Kluwer Law Intl.1997), p. 117, para. 78.26995.Xavier, A. Tipicidade da tributação, simulação e norma antielisiva. São Paulo:Dialética, 2001. - 175 p.96.Waerzeggers, C., Hillier, C. Introducing a General Anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) –Ensuring that a GAAR Achieves its Purpose, Tax Law IMF Technical Note 2016/1 viewed 14February2016,pp.2-4[Электронныйресурс]//URL:https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/tltn/2016/tltn1601.pdf (дата обращения 23.01.2020).97.West, C., Roeleveld, J. Chapter 24: South Africa, Tax Avoidance Revisited in theEU BEPS Context: 2016 EATLP Congress Munich, 2-4 June 2016.
Amsterdam: IBFD, 2017.pp. 621-623.98.Williams, R.C. The 1996 amendments to the general anti-avoidance section of theIncome Tax Act // The South African Law Journal, 1997, № 114(4), p. 682.99.Wilson, P.A. BRICS and International Tax Law (Series on international taxation,v. 61). Kluwer Law International, 2018. - 384 p.100.
Xiong, W., Evans, C. Towards an Improved Design of the Chinese General AntiAvoidance Rule: A Comparative Analysis // Bulletin for International Taxation. 2014 (Volume68), № 12, p. 694.101. Xu, W., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J. Tax enforcement as a corporate governancemechanism: empirical evidence from China // Corporate Governance an International Review.2011 (Volume 19), № 1, pp. 25-40.102. Yeung, K., Hui, D. Recent development in the general anti-tax avoidance rules inChina and future impacts on and challenges for offshore investment structuring // Asia-PacificJournal of Taxation, 2010 (Volume 14), № 1, pp. 55-61.103. Ni, Y.P.
Tax Treaty Disputes in China. In E. Baistrocchi (Ed.), A Global Analysisof Tax Treaty Disputes (Cambridge Tax Law Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2017. p. 790.104. Zimmer, F. General report. Form and Substance in Tax Law // Cahiers de DroitFiscal International. 2002, Oslo. Vol.87A. p. 48.105. Zhang, J., Wang, K. China: Taxing Offshore Transactions // Practical Law (1 Mar.2011),[Электронныйресурс]URL:http://us.practicallaw.com/5-505-6503?q=&qp=&qo=&qe=.#a666693 (дата обращения 23.01.2020).106.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
