Диссертация (1173805), страница 63
Текст из файла (страница 63)
Т. 12. № 3. С. 114-136.261150. Шепенко, Р.А. Налоговое право Китая: взимание и ответственность – М.:Волтерс Клувер, 2005. - 480 с.151. Щекин, Д.М. Баланс частных и публичных интересов и борьба с налоговымизлоупотреблениями в современной России // Закон. 2018. № 11. С 32-43.152. Щекин, Д.М. Борьба с налоговыми злоупотреблениями: новые ориентирыдля судебной практики // Судья. 2018. № 6.
С. 44-49.153. Щекин, Д.М. Налоговые последствия недействительных сделок. 2-е изд.,перераб. и доп. М.: МЦФЭР, 2004. - 189 с.154. Юзвак, М.В. Аналогия в налоговом праве: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М. 2014.- 220 с.155. Юрмашев,Р.С.Налоговоеправонарушение:теоретико-прикладныепроблемы правовой идентификации: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М., 2005. - 185 с.156. Ялбулганов, А.А.
Налогообложение природопользования: унификациязаконодательства государств - участников ЕАЭС // Публично-правовые исследования:электрон. журн. 2017. № 1. С. 46-60.Зарубежная научная и учебная литература1.Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J. Tax morale and tax evasion in Latin America //International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at Andrew Young School of PolicyStudies, Georgia State University, pp. 16-18.2.Arnold, B. A comparison of statutory general anti-avoidance rules and judicialgeneral anti-avoidance doctrines as a means of controlling tax avoidance: Which is better? (Whatwould John Tiley think?).
In J. Avery Jones, P. Harris, & D. Oliver (Eds.), ComparativePerspectives on Revenue Law: Essays in Honour of John Tiley. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 2008. pp. 17-20.3.Avi-Yonah, R. International Tax as International Law: an Analysis of theInternational Tax Regime. (Cambridge Tax Law Series). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. 2007. p. 3.4.Baker, P. Tax avoidance, tax evasion and tax mitigation (2000) GITC, p. 12[Электронный ресурс] // URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/262173949/Tax-AvoidanceTax-MitigationPhilip-Baker (дата обращения 23.01.2020).2625.Banwat, S., Mathur, V.
India. Anti-avoidance measures of general nature and scope- GAAR and other rules // Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2018, Seoul. Vol. 103a. p. 375.6.Barker, W. The Ideology of Tax Avoidance // Loyola University Chicago LawJournal, Vol. 40, 2009, pp. 229-251.7.Becker, A.A. Teoria Geral do Direito Tributário (General Theory of Tax Law),(2nd ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 1972), p. 118.8.Bianco, J.F., Tomazela Santo, R.
Brazilian Anti-Avoidance Legislation: RecentRefinements and Major Deviations from International Practice // Bulletin for InternationalTaxation, 2017 (Volume 71), № 6.9.Bird, R, Zolt, E. Technology and Taxation in Developing Countries: From Handto Mouse // National Tax Journal, 2008 (Volume 61), № 4, pp. 810-811.10.Blank, J.D., Staudt, N.C. Corporate Shams // New York University Law Review.2012. Vol. 87. № 6.
pp. 1650-1651.11.Brauner, Y. An International Tax Regime in Crystallization // Tax Law Review.2003. Volume 56. pp. 259-328.12.Brauner, Y., Pistone, P. The BRICS and the Future of International Taxation. InY. Brauner and P. Pistone, eds., BRICS and the Emergence of International Tax Coordination.IBFD: Amsterdam, 2015. p. 517.13.Cao, B.M., Li, N. China, in GAARs – A Key Element of Tax Systems in the Post-BEPS World.
Lang, M., Owens, J., Pistone, P., Rust, A., Schuch, J. & Staringer, C. (eds.).Amsterdam: IBFD Publications, 2008. p. 187.14.Broomberg, E. Tax avoidance then and now // Tax Planning Corporate andPersonal, 2007, 21. p. 1.15.Bruk, B., Dzhalchinov, D. Russia. Anti-avoidance measures of general nature andscope - GAAR and other rules // Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2018, Seoul. Vol. 103a.p. 640.16.Calich, I., Rolim, J. Tax Treaty Disputes in Brazil. In E.
Baistrocchi (Ed.), AGlobal Analysis of Tax Treaty Disputes (Cambridge Tax Law Series). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 2017. p. 884.17.Chawla, A. Tax Treaty Disputes in India. In E. Baistrocchi (Ed.), A GlobalAnalysis of Tax Treaty Disputes (Cambridge Tax Law Series). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 2017. pp. 1008-1009.26318.Chen, C.J.P., Li, Z., Su, X., Sun, Z. Rent-seeking incentives, corporate politicalconnections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence // Journal of CorporateFinance. 2011 (Volume 17), № 2, pp.
229-243.19.Christians, A. Distinguishing Tax Avoidance and Evasion: Why and How //Journal of Tax Administration, Vol 3:2, 2017, p. 10.20.Сlegg, D., Stretch, R. Income Tax in South Africa. South Africa: LexisNexis.2015. Para. 26.3.5.21.Cooper, G. Conflicts, Challenges and Choices – The Rule of Law and Anti-Avoidance Rules, in Graeme S. Cooper, ed. Tax avoidance and the rule of law (Amsterdam:IBFD Publications BV, 1997). pp. 3, 25.22.Cooper, G.
The Design and Structure of General Anti-Tax Avoidance Regimes //Bulletin for International Taxation, 2009, 63(1), p. 28.23.Cooper, G. The Role and Meaning of «Purpose» in Statutory GAARs // SydneyLaw School Research Paper № 16/22. March, 2016. p. 16.24.Deak, D. Legal Considerations of Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance // Society andEconomy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2004, pp.
64-66.25.De Barros Carvalho, P. Curso de Direito Tributário (Tax Law Course), (14th ed.,São Paulo, Saraiva, 2002), p. 272.26.De Broe, L. International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse, Volume 14,Doctoral Series, IBFD, Amsterdam, 2008. - 1144 p.27.De Koker, A.P., Williams, R.C. Silke on South African Income Tax. Electronic ed.Cape Town: LexisNexis Butterworths. 2015. Para. 19.37-19.39, 19.4.28.Gutierrez, M.D. Planejamento tributário: elisão e evasão fiscal (Tax planning: taxavoidance and tax evasion), (São Paulo, Quartier Latin, 2006), pp. 99-101.29.De Oliveira, R.M.
A Elisão Fiscal ante a Lei Complementar n°104, in OPlanejamento Tributário e a Lei Complementar 104 (V.O. ROCHA ed., Dialética 2001), pp. 244276.30.Desai, N., Kumar, M. The Vodafone Saga – An Analysis of the Indian SupremeCourt’s Decision // Bulletin for International Taxation, 2012 (Volume 66), № 7.31.Duff, D.G., The Supreme Court of Canada and the General Anti-Avoidance Rule:Canada Trustco and Mathew.
Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 60, № 54, 2006. pp. 5471.26432.Elliffe, C. International Tax Avoidance - The Tension between Protecting the TaxBase and Certainty of Law (March 16, 2011). Journal of Business Law, Issue 7, September 2011.pp. 647-665.33.Evans, C. Containing tax avoidance: Anti-avoidance strategies. In J. G. Head, &R. Krever (Eds.), Tax Reform in the 21st Century: A Volume in Memory of Richard Musgrave.2009. p. 559.34.Falcón, R., Tella, R. El Limitado Alcance de la Exigencia de un MotivoEconómico Distinto del Ahorro Fiscal // Quincena Fiscalб 2011, № 6, pp. 7-12.35.Ferreira, R.G.S.
Form Versus Substance: A Comparison of Brazil's Tax System tothe Tax System of the United States of America, 35 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 311 (2004).p. 329.36.Fichardt, L. A General Anti-Avoidance Rule in the UK: Sharing the spirit of theSouth African GAAR // Business Tax and Company Law Quarterly. 2013. Volume 4. Issue 2.pp. 20-25.37.Freedman, J.
Interpreting Tax Statutes: Tax Avoidance and the Intention ofParliament // The Law Quarterly Review, 2007, 123, pp. 74-75.38.Freedman, J. Designing a General Anti-Abuse Rule: striking a balance // Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 2014, 20(3), pp. 167-173.39.Gammie, M. Tax avoidance and the rule of law: A perspective from the UnitedKingdom, in G.
S. Cooper (ed), Tax avoidance and the rule of law, Amsterdam: IBFD, 1997,pp. 210-214.40.Garbarino, С. Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case ofthe Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules // Theoretical Inquiries in the Law. 2010(Volume 11), pp. 766-767.41.Green, S. Moral Ambiguity in White Collar Criminal Law // Notre Dame Journalof Law, Ethics & Public Policy, Vol. 18, 2014, pp. 501-519.42.Greco, M.A. Planejamento tributário.
São Paulo: Dialética, 2004, p. 325.43.Greco, M.A. Constitucionalidade do parágrafo único do artigo 116 do CTN, in OPlanejamento Tributário e a Lei Complementar 104 (V.O. Rocha org., Dialética 2001), pp. 181204.44.Hart, H.L.A. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, HARV. L. REV.,1958, Vol. 71, p. 593.26545.Hattingh, J. South Africa - Corporate Taxation sec. 10, Country Analyses IBFD,2012 [Электронный ресурс] // URL: http://www.ibfd.org/IBFD-Tax-Portal/ (дата обращения23.01.2020).46.Human Rights in Contemporary China. By R. Randle Edwards, Louis Henkin, andAndrew J. Nathan.
New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. - 193 p.47.Jain, T. «GAAR» and «Rule of Law»: Mutually Incompatible? // CharteredAccountant Practice Journal, Vol. 43 (August 2013), pp. 435-437.48.Johansson, Å., Bieltvedt Skeie, Ø, Sorbe, S. Anti-avoidance rules againstinternational tax planning: A classification, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No.1356,OECDPublishing,Paris2017[Электронныйресурс]//URL:https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2016)80&doc Language=En (дата обращения 23.01.2020).49.King, E.L. Tax Treaty Disputes in South Africa. In E.
Baistrocchi (Ed.), A GlobalAnalysis of Tax Treaty Disputes (Cambridge Tax Law Series). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. 2017. p. 1072.50.Krever, R. General Report: GAARs, in GAARs – A Key Element of Tax Systemsin the Post-BEPS World. Lang, M., Owens, J., Pistone, P., Rust, A., Schuch, J. & Staringer, C.(eds.). Amsterdam: IBFD Publications, 2008. p. 4.51.Kujinga, B. A comparative analysis of the efficacy of the General Anti-AvoidanceRule as a measure against impermissable income tax avoidance in South Africa. Thesissubmitted in partial fulfilment of requirement for the degree Doctor Legum (LLD) in the Facultyof Law at the University of Pretoria. 2013.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
