Диссертация (1145240), страница 11
Текст из файла (страница 11)
Object // The Oxford English Dictionary Second edition / Prep. by J.A.Simpson, E.S.C. Weiner. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. — Vol. X. — .640-642.388. Objective // Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology in Three Volumes / Ed.J.M. Baldwin. N. Y., London: Macmillan and CO. Limited, 1902. — . 192193.389. Objective // Encylopaedia Britanica.
Dictionary of Art and Science, in ThreeVolumes. — Edinburgh: A. Bell, C. Macfarquhar, 1771. — Vol. 3. — P. 408.390. Objective // The Oxford English Dictionary. Second edition / Prep. by J.A.Simpson, E.S.C. Weiner. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. — Vol. X. — .643.391. Objectiveness // The Oxford English Dictionary Second edition / Prep. by J.A.Simpson, E.S.C. Weiner. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
— Vol. X. — .644.392. Objectivism // Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy / Ed. S. Blackburrn. —Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. p. 267.393. Objectivism and subjectivism // The Oxford Companion to Philosophy / Ed. T.Honderich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. — P. 667.394. Objectivity and Cultural Divergence / Ed. S.C.
Brown. — Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984. — 268 p.395. Objectivity and Its Other / Ed. W. Natter, T. R. Schatzki and J. P. Jones III. —New York and London: Guilford Press, 1996. — 214 p.396. Objectivity in Law and Morals / Ed. B. Leiter.
— Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007. — 368 p.397. Objectivity // The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy / Ed. E.Craig. — London and New York, 2005. — P. 751-753.349398. Okasha, S. Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction / S. Okasha. —Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
— 160 p.399. Papineau, D. The Epistemology of Science. Introduction // The Philosophy ofScience / Ed. Papineau D. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. — C. 120.400. Peacocke, C. Objectivity / C. Peacocke // Mind. — 2009. — Vol. 118. —471. — P. 739-769.401. Pereira, J. Suarez: Between Scholasticism and Modernity / J. Pereira.
—Milwaukee: Marquette Univ. Press, 2007 — 384 p.402. Pickstone, J.V. Past and Present Knowledge in the Practices of the History ofScience // History of Science. — 1995. —33. — P. 203-224.403. Pikering, A. Objectivity and The Mandgle of Practice // RethinkingObjectivity. Ed. A. Megill. — Durham and London, 1994. — P. 109-126.404. Pinch, T., Bijker, W. Th Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or Howthe Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit EachOther // Social Studies of Science.
1984. — Vol.14. —3. — P. 399-441.405. Porter, T.M. Life Insurance, Medical Testing, and the Management ofMortality // Biographies of scientific objects / Ed. L. Daston. Chicago andLondon. — 2000. — P. 226-246.406. Porter, T.M. Objectivity as Standardization: The Rhetoric of Impersonality inMeasurement, Statistic and Cost-Benefit Analysis // Rethinking Objectivity /Ed. A. Megill.
— Durham; London. — 1994. — P. 197-238.407. Porter, T.M. Quantification and Accounting Ideal in Science / T.M. Porter //Social Studies of Science. — 1992. —22. — P. 633-651.408. Porter, T. M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science andPublic Life / T.M. Porter. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. —325 p.409. Proctor, R. Value-Free Science?: Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge / R.Proctor. — Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991. — 344 p.350410. Putnam, H. Realism with a Human Face / H. Putnam.
— Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 1990. — 347 p.411. Rationality and Relativism / Ed. M. Hollis , S. Lukes. — The MIT Press, 1982.— 320 p.412. Reality // The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy / Ed. R. Audi. —Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. — P. 677.413. Rescher, N.
Objectivity: The Obligations of Impersonal Reason / N. Rescher.— Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1997. — 264 p.414. Rheinberger, H.-J. A Reply to David Bloor «Towards a Sociology of EpistemicThings» / H. –J. Rheinberger // Perspective on Science. — 2005. —13. —P. 406-410.415. Rheinberger, H.J. Cytoplasmic Particles. The Trajectory of a Scientific Object// Biographies of Scientific Objects / Ed. L. Daston. — Chicago and London.— 2000. — P. 270-294416.
Rheinberger, H.J. Towards a History of Epistemic Things / H-J. Rheinberger.— Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997. — 326 p.417. Roberts, R.C., Wood, W.J. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in RegulativeEpistemology (Advances in Cognitive Models & Arch) / Ed.
R. C. Roberts, W.J. Wood. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. — 339 p.418. Rorty, R. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth / R. Rorty. — New York:Cambridge University Press, 1991. — 226 p.419. Rorty, R. Science as Solidarity // The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences / Ed. S.Nelson, A. Megill, D.N. McCloskey. — Wisconsin, 1987. — 447 p.420. Rorty, R.
Truth and Progress, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3 / R. Rorty. — NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1998. — 363 p.421. Rosa, R. Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation: Precis / R. Rosa// Analytic Philosophy. — 2013. — Vol. 54. —1. — P. 93-96.351422. Rosa, R. Descartes on Sensory Misrepresentation: the Case of Materially FalseIdeas / R. Rosa // History of Philosophy Quarterly. — 2004. — Vol. — 21.
—3. — P. 261-280.423. Rozemond, M. Descartes’s Ontology of the Eternal Truths // ContemporaryPerspectives on Early Modern Philosophy / Ed. P. Hoffman. — YaleUniversity: Broadview Press, 2008. — P. 41-63424. Scheffler, I. Science and Subjectivity / I. Scheffler. — Indianapolis: HackettPub Co Inc, 1982. — 178 p.425. Schmidt, V.H. Oversocialised Epistemology: A Critical Appraisal ofConstructivism / V.H. Schmidt // Sociology. — 2001. — Vol.35. —1.
—P.135-157.426. Science as Practice and Culture / Ed. A. Pikering. — Chicago: The Universityof Chicago press, 1992. — 474 p.427. Science Wars / Ed. A. Ross. — Duke Univ. Press, 1996. — 344 p.428. Secada, J. Cartesian Metaphisics. The Scholastic Origins of ModernPhilosophy / J. Secada.
— Cambridge, 2004. — 334 p.429. Shapin, S. Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science asSeen through the Externalism-internalism Debate / S. Shapin // History ofScience. — 1992. —30. — . 157-211.430. Shapin, S., Schaffer, S. Leviathan and the Air-Pump / S. Shapin, S. SchafferPrinceton: Princeton University Press, 1985. — 441 p.431. Shapiro, L. Objective Being and «Ofness» in Descartes / L. Shapiro //Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. — 2012.
— V. 84.2. — P.378-418.432. Sherover, Ch. Two Kinds of Transcendental Objectivity: their Differentiation /Ch. Sherover // Philosophical Topics. — 1981. —12 (2). — P. 251-278.433. Smith, K. Raffaella De Rosa. Descartes and the puzzle of sensory representation/ K.
Smith // Philosophy in Review. — 2010. — Vol. XXX. —327.5. — P. 324-352434. Solomon, J.R. Objectivity in the Making: Francis Bacon and the Politics ofInquiry / J.R. Solomon. — Baltimore, 1998. — 344 p.435. The one culture?: a Conversation about Science // Ed. J. A. Labinger, H.Collins. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. — 329 p.436. The School of Alexius Meinong // Ed. L. Albertazzi, D. Jacquette, R. Poli. —Algershot: Ashgate, 2001. — 579 p.437. The Science Wars: Debating Scientific Knowledge and Technology(Contemporary Issues) / Ed.
K. Parsons. — NY: Prometheus books, 2003. —300 p.438. Tosh, N. Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of aPresent-centered History of Science / N. Tosh // Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science. — 2003. — Part A. — 34(3). — P. 647-659.439. Travis C. Objectivity and the parochial / C. Travis.
— Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2011. — 361 p.440. Wagner, P. Entirely New Object of Consciousness, of Volition, of Thought.The coming into being and (almost) passing away of «society» as a scientificobject // Biographies of scientific objects / Ed. L. Daston. — Chicago andLondon. — 2000. — P. 132-157.441. Wells, N. J. Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suarez / N.J. Wells //Journal of the History of Philosophy. — 1984. — V. 22.
—. 1. — P. 25-50.442. Wells, N.J. Esse Cognitum and Suarez Revizited / N.J. Wells // AmericanCatholic Philosophical Quaterly. — 1993. — Vol. 67. —3. — P. 339-348.443. Wells, J. N. Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus, and Suárez / J.N.Wells // Journal of the History of Philosophy. — 1990. —28 (1). — P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
