Диссертация (1145039), страница 103
Текст из файла (страница 103)
// Kyklos.– 1961 - Vol.14. - Issue 1.75.Bellamy, A. Power, Rules and Argument: New Approaches to HemanitarianIntervation. / A. Bellamy. // Australian Jounal of International Affairs. - 2003. - Vol. 57, No 3.- P. 499–512.76.Bethlehem, D. The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the InternationalSystem and the Challenge to International.
/ D. Bethlehem. // The European Journal ofInternational Law. – 2014.- Vol. 25. - no. 1. - P.9-24.77.Börzel ,T.A. Networks: Reified Metaphor or Governance Panacea? / T.A. Börzel// Public Administration. - 2011. - Vol. 89. - No. 1. - P. 49–63.78.Börzel, T.A. Organizing Babylon — On the different conceptions of policynetworks / T.A. Börzel // Public Administration. - 1998. - Vol.76. - No. 2. - P.
253–273.79.Bull, H. International theory: the case for a classical approach. / H.Bull. // WorldPolitics. - V, XVIII. - April 1966.80.Buzan, B. The Inaugural Kenneth N. Waltz Annual Lecture. A World OrderWithout Superpowers: Decentred Globalism. / B. Buzan. // International Relations. – 2011. 25(3). – P. 381.‐25.Dittmer, J., Dodds, K. Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identitiesand Audiences. / J. Dittmer. // Geopolitics. - 2008.- #13(3).
- P.437-457.41982.Easton, D. An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. / D. Easton.// World Politics. – 1957. - #9.83.Fawcett, L. Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History ofRegionalism / L.Fawcett // International Affairs. - 2004.
- #80/3. - P.429-446.84.Fawn, R. “Regions” and their study: wherefrom, what for and whereto? /R.Fawn. // Review of International Studies. - 2009. - Vol. 35.85. Galtung, J.A. Structural Theory of Imperialism. / J.A. Galtung. // Journal of PeaceResearch. - 1971. - № 2.86. Haas, R. The Age of Nonpolarity. What Will Follow U.S. Dominance. / R.
Haas. //Foreign Affairs. May/June 2008.87.Hassner, P. Continuities and Change after September 11th / P. Hassner. //Contours of a «New World Order»? Bergedorf roundtable.88.Hemmer, Ch., Katzenstein P. Why Is There No NATO in Asia: CollectiveIdentity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. / Ch. Hemmer. // InternationalOrganization. – 1995. - #56.89.Hettne, B. Globalization, Regionalism and the Europeanization of Europe / B.Hettne // Politeia. - 1996. - № 3.- P. 106-112.90.Hoffmann S. Theorie et relations internationals. / S. Hoffman. // Revue fraincaisede science politique. - 1961. - Vol.
XI.91.Holmen, H. Limits to globalization / H.Holmen // European Review.Interdisciplinary journal of Academia European. - 1997.92.Hooghe, L., Marks, G. ‘Europe with the Regions’: channels of regionalrepresentation in the European Union. / L. Hooghe. // Publius: The Journal of Federalism. –1996.- no. 1. – Р. 73–91/93.Huntington, S.
The Lonely Superpower. / S. Huntington. // Foreign Affairs. -March-April 1999.94.Hurrell, A. Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. /A.Hurrel. // Review of International Studies. - 1995. - Vol. 21, - № 4.95.Langenhove, L.V. Why We Need to ‘Unpack’ Regions to Compare Them MoreEffectively.
/ L.V. Langenhove. // The International Spectator. – 2012. - Vol.47. - #1. - March.- P.16.42096.Laszlo, E. Footnotes to a History of the Future. / E. Lazlo. // Futures. - 1988. -October. - Vol. 20. - N5.97.LeDonne, J.P. The Geopolitical context of Russian Foreign policy: 1700-1917 /J.P.LeDonne // Acta Slavica iaponica. Sapporo. - 1994.
- T.12.98.Luttwak, E. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict: Grammar ofCommerce. / E. Luttwak. // National Interest. - 1990. - #20.99.Mathews , J.T. Power Shift. / J.T. Mathews. // Foreign Affairs. - 1997. -January/ February.100. Meena, K. Regions, Regionalization and BRICS. / K. Meena.
// R/evolutions:Global Trends and regional issues. – 2015. - Vol.3. - #1.101. Moravcsik, A. Preferences and Power in the EU: a Liberal IntergovernmentalistApproach. / A. Moravcsik. // Journal of Common Market Studies. - Vol.31. - #4. - 1993.102. Nye, J. S. Jr., Keohane, R. O. Globalization: What's New? What's Not? (And SoWhat?) / J.S.Jr. Nye. // Foreign Policy.
- 2000. - Spring.103. Rark, S. UN Study Adrocates Wars of Intervention. /S.Rark. // Human Events. 2000. - Vol. 56. - No 12. - P. 4–5/104. Rosamond, B. The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies:Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B.Haas. / B. Rosamond. // Journal of EuropeanPublic Policy. - Vol.12. - #2. - 2005.105. Rudolph, С. Sovereignty and Territorial Borders in a Global Age.
/ C. Rudolph.// International Studies Review. – 2005. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 1. - March.106. Sarkar , J. Debating a Post-Westphalian International Order. / J. Sarkar. //Mainstream. – 2015. - VOL LIII. - No 15. - April 4.107. Sassen, S. Globalization or Denationalization / S.Sassen // Review ofInternational Political Economy.
– 2003. -- 10 February.108. Schiff, M., Winters, L.A. Regional Integration and Development. / TheInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank and OxfordUniversity Press. - 2003. - P.1-6.109. Steel, R. Humanitarian Intervention: A Forum. / R. Steel.
// Nation. - 2003. - Vol.277, No 2. - P. 11–19.110. Vedrine, H. Le monde au tournant du siecle. / H. Vedrine. // Politique etrangere.– 1999. - №4.421111. Wendt, A. Constructing International Politics. / A.Wendt. // InternationalSecurity. - 1995. - Vol.20. - #1.P. -71-81.112. Wolfers, A. The Actors in International Politics. / A. Wolfers. //Dicrord andCollaboration / Ed. by Wolfers A.
-Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.422.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
