Диссертация (1140515), страница 15
Текст из файла (страница 15)
– Vol. 246. – №. 1. – P. 125-132.80. Seeram E. Radiation dose in computed tomography //Radiologic technology. –1999. – Vol. 70. – №. 6. – P. 534-52; quiz 553-6.81. Shen Y., Hu X., Zou X. et al. Did low tube voltage CT combined with low contrastmedia burden protocols accomplish the goal of “double low” for patients? An overviewof applications in vessels and abdominal parenchymal organs over the past 5 years//International journal of clinical practice. – 2016.
– Vol. 70. – №. 9B.82. Singh S., Kalra M.K., Hsieh J. et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptivestatistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques //Radiology. –2010. – Vol. 257. – №. 2. – P. 373-383.83. Singh S., Kalra M.K., Do S. et al. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterativereconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reductionpotential in the abdomen //Journal of computer assisted tomography. – 2012. – Vol. 36.– №.
3. – P. 347-353.9884. Smith-Bindman R., Lipson J., Marcus R. et al. Radiation dose associated withcommon computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable riskof cancer //Archives of internal medicine. – 2009. – Vol. 169. – №. 22. – P. 2078-2086.85. Smith-Bindman R., Moghadassi M., Wilson N. et al.
Radiation doses inconsecutive CT examinations from five University of California Medical Centers//Radiology. – 2015. – Vol. 277. – №. 1. – P. 134-141.86. Sodickson A., Baeyens P.F., Andriole K.P. et al. Recurrent CT, cumulativeradiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults//Radiology. – 2009. – Vol. 251. – №. 1. – P. 175-184.87. Takahashi H., Okada M., Hyodo T. et al. Can low-dose CT with iterativereconstruction reduce both the radiation dose and the amount of iodine contrast mediumin a dynamic CT study of the liver? //European journal of radiology.
– 2014. – Vol. 83. –№. 4. – P. 684-691.88. Toth T. L., Bromberg N.B., Pan T.S. et al. A dose reduction x‐ray beam positioningsystem for high‐speed multislice CT scanners //Medical physics. – 2000. – Vol. 27. – №.12. – P. 2659-266889. Trivedi H. S., Moore H., Nasr S.
et al. A randomized prospective trial to assess therole of saline hydration on the development of contrast nephrotoxicity //Nephron ClinicalPractice. – 2003. – Vol. 93. – №. 1. – P. c29-c3490. Tubiana M., Feinendegen L.E., Yang C. et al. The linear no-threshold relationshipis inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data //Radiology. – 2009. – Vol.251.
– №. 1. – P. 13-22.91. Tubiana M., Aurengo A. Dose–effect relationship and estimation of thecarcinogenic effects of low doses of ionising radiation: the Joint Report of the Académiedes Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine //International Journalof Low Radiation.
– 2006. – Vol. 2. – №. 3-4. – P. 135-153.92. U.S. EPA Radiation Education Activities: Radiation Exposure P. 22-24[Электронныйресурс](https://www3.epa.gov/radtown/docs/radiation-exposureactivties.pdf, дата обращения 8 мая 2018)93. Verdun F. R., Bochud F., Gundinchet F. et al.
Quality initiatives radiation risk:what you should know to tell your patient //Radiographics. – 2008. – Vol. 28. – №. 7. –P. 1807-1816.94. Willemink M. J., Leiner T., de Jong P.A. et al. Iterative reconstruction techniquesfor computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality//European radiology.
– 2013. – Vol. 23. – №. 6. – P. 1632-1642.95. Winklehner A., Goetti R., Baumueller S. et al. Automated attenuation-based tubepotential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography: improveddose effectiveness //Investigative radiology. – 2011. – Vol. 46. – №. 12. – P. 767-773.9996. Yanaga Y., Awai K., Nakaura T. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patientsweighing 70 kg or less: initial trial of compact-bolus dynamic CT with low-dose contrastmaterial at 80 kVp //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2011.
– Vol. 196. – №. 6. –P. 1324-1331.97. Yoon M. A., Kim S.H., Lee J.M. et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstructionand Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography atvarious radiation doses //Journal of computer assisted tomography. – 2012. – Vol. 36. –№. 5. – P. 596-601.98. Yu L., Fletcher J.G., Grant K.L. et al. Automatic selection of tube potential forradiation dose reduction in vascular and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT//American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2013.
– Vol. 201. – №. 2. – P. W297-W306.99. Yu L., Li H., Fletcher J.G. et al. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiationdose reduction in CT: a general strategy //Medical physics. – 2010. – Vol. 37. – №. 1. –P. 234-243.100. Yuan R., Shuman W.P., Earls J.P. et al. Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonaryangiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: comparison with standard CTpulmonary angiography—a prospective randomized trial //Radiology.
– 2012. – Vol. 262.– №. 1. – P. 290-297.101. Zhang H., Ma Y., Lyu J. et al. Low kV and Low Concentration Contrast Agentwith Iterative Reconstruction of Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiography: APreliminary Study //Medical science monitor: international medical journal ofexperimental and clinical research. – 2017. – Vol. 23. – P. 5005..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
