Диссертация (1103763), страница 17
Текст из файла (страница 17)
D. Microtubules switch occasionally into unfavorable configurationsduring elongation // J. Mol. Biol., -2000, -vol. 298, -no. 4, -pp. 663–676[99] Gillespie D. T. Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2007, -vol. 58, -pp. 35–55[100] Gillespie D. T. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolutionof coupled chemical reactions // J. Comput.
Phys., -1976, -vol. 22, -no. 4, -pp. 403–434[101] Gillespie D. T. A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation // Phys. Stat. Mech.Its Appl., -1992, -vol. 188, -no. 1–3, -pp. 404–425[102] Hill T. L., Kirschner M. W. Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filamentassembly-disassembly // Int. Rev. Cytol., -1982, -vol.
78, -pp. 1–125[103] Walker R. A., O’Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P.,Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video lightmicroscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies // J. Cell Biol., -1988, -vol. 107, -no.4, -pp. 1437–1448[104] Jánosi I.
M., Chrétien D., Flyvbjerg H. Modeling elastic properties of microtubule tips andwalls // Eur. Biophys. J. EBJ, -1998, -vol. 27, -no. 5, -pp. 501–513[105] Jánosi I. M., Chrétien D., Flyvbjerg H. Structural microtubule cap: stability, catastrophe,rescue, and third state // Biophys. J., -2002, -vol. 83, -no. 3, -pp. 1317–1330[106] Jiang L., Gao Y., Mao F., Liu Z., Lai L. Potential of mean force for protein-proteininteraction studies // Proteins, -2002, -vol. 46, -no. 2, -pp. 190–196[107] Hyman A.
A., Salser S., Drechsel D. N., Unwin N., Mitchison T. J. Role of GTPhydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue,GMPCPP // Mol. Biol. Cell, -1992, -vol. 3, -no. 10, -pp. 1155–1167104[108] Metropolis N., Ulam S. The Monte Carlo Method // J. Am. Stat. Assoc., -1949, -vol. 44, no. 247, -pp.
335–341[109] Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A. W., Rosenbluth M. N., Teller A. H., Teller E. Equation ofState Calculations by Fast Computing Machines // J. Chem. Phys., -1953, -vol. 21, -no. 6,-p. 1087[110] ЕфремовА.К.Изучениевзаимодействиякинетохоровхромосомсмикротрубочками: автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени к. ф-м.н.: 03.00.02 / Ефремов Артем Константинович. – М., 2008. – 24с.[111] Laue T., Demeler B. A postreductionist framework for protein biochemistry // Nat.
Chem.Biol.,-2011, -vol. 7, -no. 6, -pp. 331–334[112] Ermak D. L., McCammon J. A. Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions // J.Chem. Phys., -1978, -vol. 69, -no. 4, -p. 1352[113] Турченков Д. А., Бороновский С. Е., Нарциссов Р. Р. Моделирование диффузииионов в синаптической щели с использованием стохастической модели Ланжевена вприближении диэлектрического трения // Биофизика, -2013, -vol. 58, -no. 6, -pp.1013–1021[114] Турченков Д. А.
and Быстров В. С. Экспериментальные и теоретические методыизучения ионных каналов // Математическая биология и биоинформатика, -2014, vol. 9, -no. 1, -pp. 112–148[115] Balescu, Radu, Equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical mechanics // WileyInterscience publication, -1975.[116] Rotne J. Variational Treatment of Hydrodynamic Interaction in Polymers // J.
Chem.Phys.,-1969, -vol. 50, -no. 11, -p. 4831[117] Matsumoto M. Nishimura T. Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributeduniform pseudo-random number generator // ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., -1998, vol. 8, -no. 1, -pp. 3–30[118] Voevodin V. V., Zhumatiy S. A., Sobolev S.
I., Antonov A. S., Bryzgalov P. A.,Nikitenko D. A., Stefanov K. S., Voevodin V. V. Practice of ‘Lomonosov’ Supercomputer// Open Syst. J, -2012, -no. 7, -pp. 36–39[119] Arnal I. Structural Transitions at Microtubule Ends Correlate with Their DynamicProperties in Xenopus Egg Extracts // J. Cell Biol., -2000, -vol. 149, -no. 4, -pp. 767–774[120] Kononova O., Kholodov Y., Theisen K. E., Marx K.
A., Dima R. I., Ataullakhanov F. I.,Grishchuk E. L., Barsegov V. Tubulin Bond Energies and Microtubule BiomechanicsDetermined from Nanoindentation in Silico // J. Am. Chem. Soc., -2014, -vol. 136, -no. 49,-pp. 17036–17045105[121] McIntosh J. R., Grishchuk E. L., Morphew M. K., Efremov A. K., Zhudenkov K., VolkovV. A., Cheeseman I. M., Desai A., Mastronarde D. N., Ataullakhanov F. I. Fibrils ConnectMicrotubule Tips with Kinetochores: A Mechanism to Couple Tubulin Dynamics toChromosome Motion // Cell, -2008, -vol. 135, -no. 2, -pp. 322–333[122] Gildersleeve R. F., Cross A. R., Cullen K. E., Fagen A. P., Williams R.
C. Microtubulesgrow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates // J. Biol. Chem., -1992, -vol. 267, -no. 12,-pp. 7995–8006[123] Gardner M. K., Zanic M., Gell C., Bormuth V., Howard J. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe //Cell, -2011, -vol. 147, -no. 5, -pp. 1092–1103[124] Efron B., Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap // New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.[125] Varian, H. Bootstrap Tutorial // Mathematica Journal,-2005, -vol9, -no.
4, -pp. 768–775[126] Vitre B., Coquelle F. M., Heichette C., Garnier C., Chrétien D., Arnal I. // EB1 regulatesmicrotubule dynamics and tubulin sheet closure in vitro // Nat. Cell Biol., -2008, -vol. 10,-no. 4, -pp. 415–421[127] Mohan R., Katrukha E. A., Doodhi H., Smal I., Meijering E., Kapitein L. C., Steinmetz M.O., Akhmanova A. End-binding proteins sensitize microtubules to the action ofmicrotubule-targeting agents // Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., -2013, -vol. 110, -no. 22, -pp. 8900–8905.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
