Диссертация (1103763), страница 15
Текст из файла (страница 15)
Mitotic Spindle Assembly and ChromosomeSegregation // Mol. Cell, - 2004, -vol. 15, no. 3, -pp. 317–327.[2]Cimini D. and Degrassi F. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections // Trends Cell Biol.,2005, -vol. 15, no. 8, -pp. 442–451[3]Bakhoum S.F. and Compton D.A.
Kinetochores and disease: keeping microtubuledynamics in check! // Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, - 2012,- vol. 24, -no. 1, -pp. 64–70[4]Alberts B. Molecular biology of the cell, Sixth edition / Alberts B. – New York, NY:Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, -2015[5]Rieder C.L and Salmon E.D. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis //Trends Cell Biol., - 1998, -vol. 8, -no.
8, -pp. 310–318[6]Meurer-Grob P., Kasparian J. and Wade R.H. Microtubule structure at improvedresolution // Biochemistry (Mosc.), - 2001, -vol. 40, -no. 27, -pp. 8000–8008[7]Chrétien D., Flyvbjerg H. and Fuller S.D. Limited flexibility of the inter-protofilamentbonds in microtubules assembled from pure tubulin // Eur. Biophys. J. EBJ, - 1998, -vol.27, -no. 5, -pp. 490–500[8]Hirose K., Fan J. and Amos L. A. Re-examination of the polarity of microtubules andsheets decorated with kinesin motor domain // J. Mol. Biol., - 1995, -vol. 251, -no.
3, -pp.329–333[9]Horio T. and Hotani H. Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubulesby dark-field microscopy // Nature, -1986, -vol. 321, -no. 6070, -pp. 605–607[10] Mitchison T. J. Localization of an exchangeable GTP binding site at the plus end ofmicrotubules // Science, -1993, -vol. 261, -no. 5124, -pp.
1044–1047[11] Hunyadi V. and Jánosi I. M. Metastability of Microtubules Induced by Competing InternalForces // Biophys. J., 2007, -vol. 92, -no. 9, -pp. 3092–3097[12] Vale R. D., Case R., Sablin E., Hart C., Fletterick R. Searching for kinesin’s mechanicalamplifier // Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
Lond. B. Biol. Sci., -200, -vol. 355, -no. 1396, -pp. 449–457[13] Desai A., Mitchison T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics // Annu. Rev. Cell Dev.Biol., -1997, -vol. 13, -pp. 83–117[14] Amos L., Klug A. Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules // J. Cell Sci., -1974,-vol. 14, -no. 3, -pp. 523–549[15] Mandelkow E.
M., Schultheiss R., Rapp R., Müller M., Mandelkow E. On the surface97lattice of microtubules: helix starts, protofilament number, seam, and handedness // J. CellBiol., -1986, -vol. 102, -no. 3, -pp. 1067–1073[16] Song Y. H., Mandelkow E. Recombinant kinesin motor domain binds to beta-tubulin anddecorates microtubules with a B surface lattice // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., -1993, vol. 90, -no. 5, -pp. 1671–1675[17] Kikkawa M., Ishikawa T., Nakata T., Wakabayashi T., Hirokawa N.
Direct visualizationof the microtubule lattice seam both in vitro and in vivo // J. Cell Biol., - 1994, -vol. 127, no. 6 (2), -pp. 1965–1971[18] McIntosh J. R., Morphew M. K., Grissom P. M., Gilbert S. P., Hoenger A. Latticestructure of cytoplasmic microtubules in a cultured Mammalian cell // J. Mol. Biol., -2009,-vol. 394, -no. 2, -pp. 177–182[19] David-Pfeuty T., Erickson H. P., Pantaloni D. Guanosinetriphosphatase activity of tubulinassociated with microtubule assembly // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., -1977, -vol. 74, no. 12, -pp. 5372–5376[20] Weisenberg R.C., Deery W.J., Dickinson P.J. Tubulin-nucleotide interactions during thepolymerization and depolymerization of microtubules // Biochemistry (Mosc.), -1976, vol. 15, -no. 19, -pp. 4248–4254[21] Spiegelman B.M., Penningroth S.M., Kirschner M.W. Turnover of tubulin and the N siteGTP in Chinese hamster ovary cells // Cell, -1977, -vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 587–600[22] Caplow M., Shanks J. Mechanism of the microtubule GTPase reaction // J.
Biol. Chem., 1990, -vol. 265, -no. 15, -pp. 8935–8941[23] Müller-Reichert T., Chrétien D., Severin F., Hyman A. Structural changes at microtubuleends accompanying GTP hydrolysis: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue ofGTP, guanylyl (alpha,beta)methylenediphosphonate // Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A., 1998, -vol. 95, -no. 7, -pp. 3661–3666[24] Wang H-W., Nogales E. Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulatesmicrotubule assembly // Nature, -2005, -vol. 435, -no. 7044, -pp. 911–915[25] Erickson H. P., O’Brien E. T. Microtubule dynamic instability and GTP hydrolysis //Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., -1992, -vol.
21, -pp. 145–166,[26] Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth // Nature, -1984, vol. 312, -no. 5991, -pp. 237–242[27] Zaytsev A.V., Grishchuk E.L. Basic mechanism for biorientation of mitotic chromosomesis provided by the kinetochore geometry and indiscriminate turnover of kinetochoremicrotubules // Mol. Biol. Cell, -2015, -vol. 26, -no.
22, -pp. 3985–3998[28] Weaver B., Cleveland D. Does aneuploidy cause cancer? // Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., -2006.,98-vol. 18, -no. 6, -pp. 658–667[29] Zaytsev A. V., Segura-Peña D., Godzi M., Calderon A., Ballister E. R., Stamatov R.,Mayo A. M., Peterson L., Black B. E., Ataullakhanov F. I., Lampson M. A., Grishchuk E.L. Bistability of a coupled Aurora B kinase-phosphatase system in cell division // eLife, 2016., -vol.
5[30] Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Microtubule dynamics // Nature, - 1986, -vol. 324, -no. 6098,-p. 621[31] Hyman A. A., Salser S., Drechsel D. N., Unwin N., Mitchison T. J. Role of GTPhydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue,GMPCPP // Mol. Biol.
Cell, -1992, -vol. 3, -no. 10, -pp. 1155–1167[32] Walker R.A., Inoué S., Salmon E. D. // Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule endsafter ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro // J. Cell Biol., 1989, -vol. 108, -no. 3, -pp. 931–937[33] Tran P.T., Walker R.A., Salmon E.D. A metastable intermediate state of microtubuledynamic instability that differs significantly between plus and minus ends // J. Cell Biol., 1997., -vol. 138, -no. 1, -pp.
105–117[34] Молодцов М.И., Грищук Е.Л., Макинтош Д.Р., Атауллаханов Ф.И. Измерение силы,развиваемой разбирающейся микротрубочкой в ходе деполимеризации, вызваннойионами Ca // Доклады Академии Наук, -2007, -Том. 412, -№. 2, СС. 1–4, 2007.[35] Молодцов М.И., Грищук Е.Л., Макинтош Д.Р., Атауллаханов Ф.И Новый типбиомеханического движителя // Рос. хим. ж. (Ж. Рос. хим.
об-ва им. Д.И.Менделеева), -2007., -Том. LI, -№. 1, -СС. 36–44[36] Молодцов М.И. Изучение молекулярно-механических свойств микротрубочек иразвиваемых ими сил: диссертация на соискание ученой степени к. б. н.: 03.00.02 /Молодцов Максим Игоревич. – М., 2007. – 91с.[37] Grishchuk E. L., Molodtsov M. I., Ataullakhanov F. I., McIntosh J. R.
Force productionby disassembling microtubules // Nature, -2005, -vol. 438, -no. 7066, -pp. 384–388[38] Волков В.А., Атауллаханов Ф.И. Исследование молекулярного устройства,сопрягающего деполимеризацию микротрубочек с движением хромосом во времяделения клетки // Рос. физиол. ж.
им. Сеченова, -2013, -Том. 99, -№. 2, -CC. 153–162[39] Volkov V.A., Zaytsev A.V., Gudimchuk N.B., Grissom P.M., Gintsburg A.L.,Ataullakhanov F.I., McIntosh J.R., Grishchuk E.L. Long tethers provide high-forcecoupling of the Dam1 ring to shortening microtubules // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, -vol. 110, -no. 19, -pp. 7708–7713[40] Dogterom M. Measurement of the Force-Velocity Relation for Growing Microtubules //Science, -1997, -vol.
278, -no. 5339, -pp. 856–86099[41] Janson M.E., Dogterom M. A Bending Mode Analysis for Growing Microtubules:Evidence for a Velocity-Dependent Rigidity // Biophys. J., -2013, -vol. 87, -no. 4, -pp.2723–2736[42] Coombes C.E., Yamamoto A., Kenzie M.R., Odde D.J., Gardner M.K. Evolving tipstructures can explain age-dependent microtubule catastrophe // Curr. Biol. CB, -2013, vol.
23, -no. 14, -pp. 1342–1348[43] Odde D. J., Cassimeris L., Buettner H.M. Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed byprobabilistic analysis // Biophys. J., -1995, -vol. 69, -no. 3, -pp. 796–802[44] Gardner M. K., Zanic M., Gell C., Bormuth V., Howard J. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe //Cell, -2011, -vol. 147, -no. 5, -pp. 1092–1103[45] Ambrose E.J. A surface contact microscope for the study of cell movements // Nature, 1956, -vol. 178, -no. 4543, -p. 1194[46] Axelrod D. Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence //J.
Cell Biol., -1980, -vol. 89, -no. 1, -pp. 141–145[47] Olkin I., Gleser L. J., Derman C. Probability models and applications // New York:Macmillan, -1980[48] Bowne-Anderson H., Zanic M., Kauer M., Howard J. Microtubule dynamic instability: Anew model with coupled GTP hydrolysis and multistep catastrophe // BioEssays, -2013, vol. 35, -no. 5, -pp. 452–461[49] Chrétien D., Fuller S., Karsenti E.
// Structure of growing microtubule ends: twodimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates // J. Cell Biol., -1995, -vol. 129, -no.5, -pp. 1311–1328[50] Zakharov P., Gudimchuk N., Voevodin V., Tikhonravov A., Ataullakhanov F.,Grishchuk E. Molecular and Mechanical Causes of Microtubule Catastrophe and Aging //Biophys. J., -2015, -vol. 109, -no.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
