Диссертация (1101287), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’.Language 82 (2), 2006, pp. 323–355.99.Cardinaletti A., Starke M. The typology of structural deficiency: a case study ofthe three classes of pronouns. In van Riemsdijk H.C. (ed.), Clitics and theLanguages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999, pp.
145–233.100. Čermák F. Today's corpus linguistics: Some open questions. International Journalof Corpus Linguistics 7:2, 2002, pp. 265–282.101. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1957.208102. Chomsky N. Explanatory Models in Linguistics. In Nagel E. et al. (eds.), Logic,Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford UniversityPress, 1962, pp.
528-550.103. Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The M. I. T.Press, 1965.104. Chung S.L. The syntax and prosody of weak pronouns in Chamorro. LinguisticInquiry, 34, 2003, pp. 547–599.105. Corbett G.G. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.106.
Corbett G.G. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language, 83(1), 2007, pp. 8–42.107. Corbett G.G., Fraser N.M. Network morphology. Journal of Lingustics, 29, 1993,pp. 113–142.108. Crysmann B. Clitics and coordination in linear structure. In Gerlach B.,Grijzenhout J. (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2000, pp. 121–159.109.
Crysmann B. Constraint-Based Coanalysis: Portuguese Cliticisation andMorphology-Syntax Interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken Dissertations inComputational Linguistics and Language Technology 15. Saarbrücken:Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität desSaarlandes, 2002.110. Dalrymple M. Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press,2001.111. Desmet T., De Baecke C., Drieghe D., Brysbaert M., Vonk W.
Relative clauseattachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencieswhen lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes21 (4), 2006, pp. 453–485.112. Dunn G. Enclitic pronoun movement and the ancient Greek sentence accent. InGlotta.
T. 67. 1989.209113. Ellis N.C., Simpson-Vlach R. Formulaic language in native speakers:Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. CorpusLinguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 61-78.114. Embick D., Noyer R.R. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32,2001, pp. 555–595.115. Embick D., Noyer R.R.
Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphologyinterface. In Ramchand G., Reiss C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of LinguisticInterfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 239–288.116. Everett D.L. Pirahã clitic doubling. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5,1987, pp. 245–276.117. Fontana J.M. Phonology and syntax in the interpretation of the Tobler-MussafiaLaw. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second PositionClitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 41–83.118. Franks S. Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journalof Slavic Linguistics, 16, 2008, pp. 91–127.119.
Gahl S. Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental andcorpus linguistic study. Aphasiology 16 (12), 2002, pp. 1173–1198.120. Gibson E., Schütze C.T. Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunctiondo not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language 40 (2), 1999,pp. 263–279.121. Gilquin G. To err is not all. What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the useof collocations by learners.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Vol. 55,No. 3, 2007, pp. 273–291.122. Gilquin G., Gries S.Th. Corpora and experimental methods: a state-of-the-artreview. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-26.123. Granger S. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations andformulae. Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications.
In Cowie A.P. (ed.).Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 145–160.210124. Gross D., Allen J.F., Traum D.R. The TRAINS91 Dialogues (TRAINS Tech.NoteNo. 92–1). Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, New York,1993.125. Hale M. Deriving Wackernagel’s Law: prosodic and syntactic factors determiningclitic placement in the language of the Rigveda. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.),Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena.
Stanford,CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 165–197.126. Halle M., Marantz A. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In HaleK., Keyser S.J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of SylvainBromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1993, pp. 111–176.127. Halpern A. On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Dissertations inLinguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1995.128. Harris A.
Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language, 76, 2000, pp. 593–616.129. Harris A. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2002.130. Hay J. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited.Language 78 (3), 2002, pp. 527–555.131. Heggie L., Ordóñez F. Clitic ordering phenomena: the path to generalizations. InHeggie L., Ordóñez F. (eds.), Clitic and Affix Combinations.
Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins, 2005.132. Hock H. Who’s on first? Toward a prosodic account of P2 clitics. In Halpern A.,Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and RelatedPhenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp.199–270.133. Jaeggli O. A. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1982.134. Johansson S. Times change, and so do corpora. In Aijmer K., Altenberg B. (eds.),English Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman; 1991, pp.
305–314.135. Kager R. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.136. Kathol A. Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.211137. Kayne R.S. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: TheMIT Press, 1975.138. Källkvist M. Lexical infelicity in English: The case of nouns and verbs.Perspectives on Lexical Acquisition in a Second Language. In Haastrup K.,Viberg A. (eds.). Lund: Lund University Press, 1998, pp.
149–174.139. Klamer M. Spelling out clitics in Kambera. Linguistics, 35, 1997, pp. 895–927.140. Klamer M. A Grammar of Kambera. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998a.141. Klamer M. Kambera intransitive argument linking. Studia Linguistica, 52, 1998b,pp. 77–111.142. Klavans J.L. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization.Language, 61, 1985, pp. 95–120.143. Kennedy G. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics.
Longman, 1998.144. Kidd E., Brandt S., Lieven E.V.M., Tomasello M. Object relatives made easy: Across-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’sprocessing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (6), 2007,pp. 860–897.145. Kucera H., Francis W.N. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-day AmericanEnglish. Providence: Brown University press, 1967.146. Lee J.F.K. Functions of need in Australian English and Hong Kong English.World Englishes, 20 (2), 2001, pp.
133–143.147. Legendre G. Clitics, Verb (Non)-Movement, and Optimality in Bulgarian.Technical Report JHU-CogSci-95-5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1996.148. Legendre G. Optimal Romanian clitics: a cross-linguistic perspective. InMotapanye V. (ed.), Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax. Oxford: ElsevierPublishers, 2000a, pp. 227–264.149. Legendre G. Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF: an Optimality-Theoreticanalysis.
In Gerlach B., Grijzenhout J. (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphologyand Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000b, pp. 219–254.212150. Legendre G. Morphological and prosodic alignment of Bulgarian clitics. InDekkers J., van der Leeuw F., van de Weijer J. (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax,Phonology, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 219–254.151.
Long D.L., De Ley L. Implicit causality and discourse focus: The interaction oftext and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory andLanguage, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2000, pp. 545–570.152. Luís A., Spencer A. A paradigm function account of ‘mesoclisis’ in EuropeanPortuguese. In Booij G., van Marle J. (eds.), A Yearbook of Morphology 2004.Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp. 177–228.153. Lyons C. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.154. Marantz A.P. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonologicalstructure. In Hammond M., Noonan M. (eds.), Theoretical Morphology. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press, 1988.155. McCarthy J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
