Диссертация (1090191), страница 77
Текст из файла (страница 77)
P. 283-287.652. Patel M.K. Plastics streams in Germany: an analysis of production, consumption and waste generation / M.K. Patel [et al] // Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 1998. V. 24. N 3-4. P. 191-215.653. Powell J.C. The evaluation of waste management options // Waste Management & Research.1996. V.
14. N 6. P. 515-526.654. Powell J. Lifecycle assessment: An overlooked opportunity // Town and Country Planning, 1998.V. 67. N 7/8. P. 244-245.655. Powell J.C., Craighill A.L. Application of LCA to recycling and waste management // Environmental Protection Bulletin. 1997. V. 48. P. 3-7.656. Powell J.C., Craighill A.L., Parfitt J.P, Turner R.K. A lifecycle assessment and economic valuation of recycling // Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
1996. V. 39. N 1. P.97-112.657. Powell J.C., Pearce D.W., Craighill A.L. Approaches to valuation in LCA impact assessment. //The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 1997. V. 2. N 1. P. 11-15.400658. Rachdawong P., Khaodhiar S., Sangiampaisalsuk N. Analysis of solid waste generation. Characteristics in Bangkok, Thailand // Journal of Environmental Research. 2000. V. 22. N 1. P. 80-92.659. Rimaityte I. Application and evaluation of forecasting methods for municipal solid waste generationin an Eastern-European city / I.
Rimaityte [et al.] // Waste Manag Res. 2012. V. 30. N 1. P. 89-98.660. Scott D. Equal opportunity, unequal results: Determinants of Household Recycling Intensity //Environment and Behavior. 1999. V. 31. N 2. P. 267-290.661. Shahabi H. Application of Artificial Neural Network in Prediction of Municipal Solid WasteGeneration (Case Study: Saqqez City in Kurdistan Province) / H. Shahabi [et al] // World Applied Sciences Journal.
2012 .V. 20 (2). P. 336-343.662. Shamshiry E., Bin Mokhtar M., Abdulai A. Comparison of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) andMultiple Regression Analysis for Predicting the Amount of Solid Waste Generation in a Touristand Tropical Area – Langkawi Island // International Conference on Biological, Civil and Environmental Engineering (BCEE-2014). March 17-18 2014. Dubai (UAE). P. 161-166.663. Shu H.Y.
Prediction for energy content of Taiwan municipal solid waste using multilayer perceptron neural networks / H.Y. Shu [et al.] // J Air Waste Mana Asso. 2006. V. 56. N 6. P. 852-858.664. Sinha-Khetrival D. Application of System Dynamics to Assess Mass Flows of Waste Electricaland Electronic Equipment (WEEE) / D. Sinha-Khetrival [et al.] // Proceedings of the International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, St.
Gallen, Switzerland, July 22–26, 2012.Edited by: M. Schwaninger. University of St.Gallen. – 10 p.665. Sircar R., Ewert F., Bohn U. Ganzheitliche Prognose von Siedlungsabfällen // Müll und Abfall.2003. V. 35. N 1. S. 7-11.666. Stanisavljević N. Material flow analysis as a basis for hazardous waste management in transitioneconomies – power company distribution case study / N. Stanisavljević [et al.] // Hazardous andIndustrial Waste Management, Crete: Technical University of Crete, 5-8 Oktobar, 2010. P.
55-56.667. Stanisavljevic N., Brunner P.H. Combination of material flow analysis and substance flow analysis: A powerful approach for decision support in waste management // Waste Manag Res. 2014.V. 32. N 8. P. 733-744.668. Stigliani W.M., Jaffe P.R., Anderberg S. Heavy metal pollution in the Rhine Basin.
EnvironSci. Technoi. 1993.V. 27. N 5. P. 786-793.669. Sukholthaman P, Chanvarasuth P. Municipal Solid Waste Management – Analysis of WasteGeneration: A Case Study of Bangkok, Thailand // Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013). 2013.
P. 1173-1180.670. Sundeen R. Explaining participation in coproduction: A study of volunteers // Social ScienceQuarterly 1988. V. 69. P. 547-568.671. Talalaj I.A., Walery M. The effect of gender and age structure on municipal waste generation inPoland // Waste Management. 2015. V. 40. P. 3–8.672. Thanh N.P., Matsui Y. Municipal Solid Waste Management in Vietnam: Status and the StrategicActions // Int. J. Environ. Res. 2011. V. 5.
N 2. P. 285-296.673. Townsend T.G. Environmental Issues and Management Strategies for Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment // Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2011. Vol. 61. N 6. P.587-610.674. Tran T.Q., Sharp A., Nakatani J., Moriguchi Y. Forecasting of the E-Waste Generation and itsFuture Trends in Vietnam. In: The 1st Environment and Natural Resources International Conference (ENRIC2014) 6–7 November, 2014. Thailand, Bangkok: The Sukosol hotel.
P. 43-49.675. Tukker A. Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input–output database / A.Tukker [et al.] // Ecological Economics. 2009. V. 68. N 7. P. 1928–1937.676. Turner K. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities – Part1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis / K. Turner [etal.] // Ecological Economics.
2007. V. 62. N 1. P. 37-44.677. Vining J., Ebreo A. What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and non-recyclers. Environment and Behavior. 1990. V. 22. N 1. P. 55-73.401678. Voet van der E. Cadmium in the European community: a policy-oriented analysis / E. Voetvan der [et al.] // Wbste Manage. Res. 1994. V.
12. P. 507-526.679. Weitz K.. Life Cycle Management of Municipal Solid Waste / K. Weitz [et al.] // Int. Journal ofLife Cycle Assessment. 1999. V. 4. N 4. P. 195-201.680. Wiedmann T. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–outputanalysis / T. Wiedmann [et al.] // Ecological Economics. 2006. V.
56. N 1. P. 28-48.681. Wiedmann T. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities–Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied intrade / T. Wiedmann [et al.] // Ecological Economics. 2007. V. 61. N 1. P.
15-26.682. Wiedmann T. Development of an embedded carbon emissions indicator. Producing a time seriesof Input-Output tables and embedded carbon dioxide emissions for the UK by using a MRIO dataoptimisation system / T. Wiedmann [et al.] / Report to the UK Department for Environment,Food and Rural Affairs by Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York and Centrefor Integrated Sustainability Analysis at the University of Sydney, June 2008. – UK, London:Defra, 2008. – 86 p.683. Wiedmann T.
A carbon footprint time series of the UK–results from a multi-region input–outputmodel / T. Wiedmann [et al.] // Economic Systems Research. 2010. V. 22. N 1. P. 19-42.684. Wiedmann T. Application of Hybrid Life Cycle Approaches to Emerging Energy Technologies –The Case of Wind Power in the UK / T. Wiedmann [et al.] // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011. V.45.N 13. P. 5900–5907.685. Wiedmann T.O.
The material footprint of nations / T. Wiedmann [et al.] // Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences. 2013. V. 112. N 20. P. 6271-6276.686. Williams J., Kulik A. American's Attitudes About Recycling // The American City and County.1992. V. 107. N 8. P. 48-50.687. Xu L. Path analysis of factors influencing household solid waste generation: a case study ofXiamen Island, China / L. Xu [et al.] // Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. December 2014. P.
1-8.688. Zaman A.U. Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycleassessment method // Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2010. V. 7. N 2. P. 225-234.402ПРИЛОЖЕНИЯ403Таблица П1 – Нормы накопления ТБО для жителей городов РФ, установленные местными органами властиГородМоскваДомодедовоЗагорянскийДмитровНормы накопления ТБО, м3/год на 1 чел. (кг/год) / плотность, кг/мЗГод принятияВ благоустроенном жилом фондеВ неблагоустроенном жилом фондеРегион постановленияв индивидуальв индивидуальв многов много/ действияном (с придомоКГМном (с придомоКГМквартирномквартирномвым участком)вым участком)20081,45 (272) / 187,5 1,45 (272) / 187,5 0,46 (98) / 214,0 1,45 (272) / 187,5 1,45 (272) / 187,5 0,46 (98) / 214,0Московская20061,731,730,341,91,90,4областьМосковская1,388, в т.ч.
КГМ 1,388, в т.ч. КГМ20061,7 / 2001,7 / 200область/ 200/ 2000,093 м3/год/ м2 0,093 м3/год/ м20,106 м3/год/ м20,018 м3/год/ м20,022 м3/год/ м2Московскаяобщей площади общей площадиобщей площади 3,08 (646) в т.ч.2008общей площадиобщей площаобластьжилья (17,7)жилья (17,7)жилья (22,26)КГМ / 200-220жилья (3,6)ди жилья (4,62)/ 180-200/ 180-200/ 180-200Городское поселение Андреевка МосковскаяСолнечногорского областьм.р.МосковскаяКраснознаменскобласть20132013ДолгопрудныйМосковскаяобласть2011КоролевМосковскаяобласть2011ЗарайскКашираЛотошинскийм.р.МосковскаяобластьМосковскаяобластьМосковскаяобласть2010201020081,56841,7 (340) / 2000,4 (83) / 2102,140,24840,111 м3/год/ м20,111 м3/год/ м2общей площадиобщей площадижилья (21,09), вжилья (21,09) вт.ч.
КГМ/180т.ч. КГМ/180-2002000,1257 м3/год/ м2общей площадижилья, в т.ч. КГМ1,51 (286,9)2,41 (506,1)/ 200-2201,77 (0,092/ м2)1,51 (286,9)1,7 (340) / 2000,4 (83) / 2102,140,360,111 м3/год/ м20,111 м3/год/ м2общей площадиобщей площадижилья (21,09) вжилья (21,09) вт.ч.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
