Диссертация (1015837), страница 42
Текст из файла (страница 42)
2005. №5.258. Milo J. M. Retention of Title in European Business Transactions // WashburnLaw Journal. 2003. Т. 43.259. Monti G. Nejman G., Reuter W. J. The Future of Reservation of Title Clausesin the European Community. // International and Comparative Law Quarterly.1997. Vol. 46.260. Muriel A. Inside Story on a Very Exclusive Club for Lawyers. // EuropeanLawyer. 2002.
№1.261. Oakley A. Proprietary Claims and Their Priority in Insolvency // CambridgeLaw Journal and Contributors. 1995.262. Rabel E. The Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Study. Vol. 4. - Chicago :University of Michigan, 1958. Vol. 4.263. Saunders A. Walter I. Proposed UNIDROIT Convention on InternationalInterests in Mobile Equipment as Applicable to Aircraft Equipment through theAircraft Equipment Protocol: Economic Impact Assessment.
// Air and Space Law.1998.Vol. 23. № 6264. Schroth P. Financial Leasing of Equipment in the Law of the United States //The American Journal of Comparative Law. 2010. № 58.265. Shilling T. Some European Decisions on Non-possessory Security Rights inPrivate International Law // International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
1985.Vol. 34.266. Sundahl M. J. The “Cape Town Approach”: A new Method of MakingInternational Law. // Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2006. Vol. 44.220267. Thatcher A. In Flight Between Geneva and Rome: Abandoning Choice OfLaw Systems for Substantive Legal Principles In International Aircaft Finance //University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 1999.268.
Wassgren H. Rights of Financiers in Aircraft: a Finnish Perspective on the2001 Cape Town Instruments // Uniform Law Review. 2004. № 3.269. Wool J. The Case for a Commercial Orientation to the Proposed UnidroitConvention as Applied to Aircraft Equipment // Law and Policy in InternationalBusiness. 1999. №31270. Zinnecker T. The Default Provisions of Revised Article 9 of the UniformCommercial Code: Part I // Business Law. 1998-1999. Т. 54.221.