Ответ на вопрос №340695: Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer. In the case of Johnson v. Smith, Mr. Johnson, a resident of London, purchased a new roof from a construction company owned by Mr. Smith. After completing the installation, Mr. Johnson discovered multiple leaks during the first rainstorm and claimed that the work was poorly done. He attempted to resolve the issue directlyRead the text below and answer the question. There's only one - Ответ на вопрос №340695Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one - Ответ на вопрос №340695
2025-04-232025-04-23СтудИзба
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one - Ответ на вопрос №340695
-26%
Вопрос
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer. In the case of Johnson v. Smith, Mr. Johnson, a resident of London, purchased a new roof from a construction company owned by Mr. Smith. After completing the installation, Mr. Johnson discovered multiple leaks during the first rainstorm and claimed that the work was poorly done. He attempted to resolve the issue directly with Mr. Smith, but the company refused to fix the roof without additional payment. Consequently, Mr. Johnson filed a lawsuit against Mr. Smith in the County Court, seeking damages for the cost of repairs and associated losses. Question: What type of case is Johnson v. Smith likely to be classified as in the English courts?- A criminal case involving a violation of safety regulations
- A civil case concerning a breach of contract
- A family law case regarding child custody