Диссертация (Трудовые споры о праве сравнительный анализ правовых норм Российской Федерации и зарубежных государств), страница 57
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Трудовые споры о праве сравнительный анализ правовых норм Российской Федерации и зарубежных государств". PDF-файл из архива "Трудовые споры о праве сравнительный анализ правовых норм Российской Федерации и зарубежных государств", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "юриспруденция" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве МГЮА. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с МГЮА, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата юридических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 57 страницы из PDF
Britain’s new statutory procedures: routes to resolution orbarriers to justice. // Comparative labor law and policy journal.2004. № 25 (4)503. Muratore L. Italy: Individual disputes at the workplace – alternativedisputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910039s/it0910039q.htm(датаобращения: 15.12.2016).504. Musukubili F. Z. Towards an efficient Namibian labour disputeresolution system: compliance with international labour standards and a comparisonwith the South African system. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for thedegree of Doctor Legum. Faculty of Law, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University,2013.505.
National labour law profile: Republic of Finland // Официальный сайтМеждународнойорганизациитруда[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.ilo.org/ifpdial/information-resources/national-labour-lawprofiles/WCMS_158896/lang--en/index.htm (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).506. National labour law profile: The Czech Republic // Официальный сайтМеждународнойорганизациитруда[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.ilo.org/ifpdial/information-resources/national-labour-lawprofiles/WCMS_158893/lang--en/index.htm (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).507.
Naumann R. Portugal: Individual disputes at the workplace – alternativedisputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910039s/pt0910039q.htm(датаобращения: 15.12.2016).508. Nel P.S., Swanepoel B.J., Kirsten M., Erasmus B.J., Tsabadi M.J. SouthAfrican Employ-ment Relations Theory and Practice (fifth edition).
Pretoria: VanSchaik Publishers. 2005.250509. Neumann D. Federal Republic of Germany. European labour courts:current issues. Ed. by W. Blenk. Geneva, 1989.510. Oblin K. Austria. Litigation and dispute resolution 2016 // InternationalComparative Legal Guides. URL: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/litigation-anddispute-resolution/litigation-and-dispute-resolution-2016/austria (дата обращения:22.02.2017).511. Osila L., Karu M.
Estonia: Individual disputes at the workplace –alternative disputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910039s/ee0910039q.htm(датаобращения: 15.12.2016).512. Pedersen M. I., Jørgensen C. Denmark: Individual disputes at theworkplace – alternative disputes resolution // European observatory of working life.URL:https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/comparativeinformation/national-contributions/denmark/denmark-individual-disputes-at-theworkplace-alternative-disputes-resolution (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).513. Peerenboom R. Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes andPrognosis.
Asian L. Rev. 1, 2009.514. Perin E. Belgium: Individual disputes at the workplace – alternativedisputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/comparativeinformation/national-contributions/belgium/belgium-individual-disputes-at-theworkplace-alternative-disputes-resolution (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).515. Pollert A. The unorganised worker: The decline in collectivism and newhurdles to individual employment rights. Industrial Law Journal, vol.
34, № 3. 2005.516. Purcell J. Law on Mediation and Labor Disputes, 2007. P. 2-3.517. Rau A.S. On integrity in private judging. // Arbitration International.Volume 14. Issue 2. 1998.518. Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2009. 5 April 2012 //[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.library.up.ac.za/law/docs/king111report.pdf(датаобращения:22.02.2017).519. Ricci R. Manually di Relazioni Sindicali. Milan: Etas Libri, 1978.520.
Rogers C. The arrival of the «Have-Nots» in international arbitration. 8Nev. L.J. 373, № 183. 2007.521. Rojot J. France // Comparative labor law journal. 1987.522. Rosch J. Institutionalizing Mediation: The Evolution of the CivilLiberties Bureau in Japan. Law and Society Review, vol. 21, № 2, 1987.523. Servais J.-M. Labour conflicts, courts and social policy. Labour law,human rights and social justice. Liber Amicorum in Honour of Prof.Dr. Ruth BenIsrael (Studies in employment and social policy set).
Kluwer Law International. 2001.251524. Simon A. La mediation prud'homale // Justine. 2012. Decembre. № 35.525. Singh R. Dispute resolution in Britain: contemporary trends.International journal of manpower. 1995. № 16 (9).526. Skollerholm O. Sweden. // European labour courts: current issues. Ed. byW. Blenk. Geneva, 1989.527. Soumeli E. Cyprus: Individual disputes at the workplace – alternativedisputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910039s/cy0910039q.htm(датаобращения: 15.12.2016).528.
Sourdin T. Five reasons why judges should conduct settlementconferences // Monash University Law Review. 2011, Vol 37. № 1.529. Steadman F. Handbook on alternative labour dispute resolution // Turin.International Training Centre of the ILO, 2011.530. Steadman F. Handbook on Alternative Labour Dispute Resolution. ILO,Geneva, 2005.531. Steadman F. Handbook on Alternative Labour Dispute Resolution. ILO,Geneva. 2010.532.
Strengthening the mechanisms of labour dispute prevention and amicableresolution in the Western Balkan countries and Moldova. Subregional tripartiteconference. Conference Report. Edited by Prof. Dr. Martin E. Risak and ChristianeHolter University of Vienna/University of Passau. International Labour Office, 2009.533. Sugeno K.
The birth of the Labor Tribunal system in Japan: a synthesisof labor law reform and judicial reform. Comparative labor law and policy journal.2004. № 25 (4).534. Sugino I., Murayama M. Employment problems and disputing behaviorin Japan. Japan labor review. Labor dispute resolution system. Volume 3, № 1. 2006.535. Takashi Araki. Establishment of the Labor Tribunal System: lay judgeparticipation in Japanese labor proceedings. Note 2.536. Taylor B.J., Witney F.
Labor relations law/ Englewood Cliffs, 1987.537. The Federal Labour Court // Bundesarbeitsgericht [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://www.bundesarbeitsgericht.de/englisch/englische_version.pdf(дата обращения: 15.12.2016).538. The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration scheme. Guide to the Scheme//LabourrelationsAgency[Электронныйресурс].URL:https://www.lra.org.uk/images/publications/The_Labour_Relations_Arbitration_Scheme_-_Guide_to_the_Scheme_published_version.pdf (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).539. The new model of labour dispute resolution for Ukraine //Medlingsinstitutet [Электронный ресурс].
URL: http://www.mi.se/files/PDFer/internationellt/Ukraina/new_model.pdf (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).252540. Towalski R. Poland: Individual disputes at the workplace – alternativedisputes resolution // European observatory of working life. URL:http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0910039s/pl0910039q.htm(датаобращения: 15.12.2016).541. Treu T. Conflict resolution in industrial relations. Industrial conflictresolution in market economies, 2nd ed. Ed. by T.
Hanami and R. Blanpain. Deventer,1989.542. Trollip A. T. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Butterworth, 1991.543. Van Gramberg B. Managing workplace conflict: alternative disputeresolution in Australia. The Federation Press, 2006.544. Venter R., Levy A., Conradie M., Holtzhausen M. Labour relations inSouth Africa (3rd ed). Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa. 2009545.
Verdier J.M., Cœuret A., Souriac M.-A. Droit du travail. Paris, 1999.546. Vicas T. Best practices in Austria on mediation and anti-discriminationmeasures in the world of work // Austrian Trade Union Federation (ÖGB)[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://mediacija.zsss.si/uploads/1H/uj/1Huj163vVR4X3PigM3neA/Best-Practices-in-Austria-on.ppt (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).547. Vranken. M. The role of specialist labour courts in an enviroment ofsubstantive labour law deregulation: a New Zealand case study. // Internationaljournal of comparative labour law. 1990.548.
Weiss M., Schmidt M. Labour law and industrial relations in Germany.Kluwer Law International. The Hague, London and Boston, 3rd revised editio. 2000.549. Weiss M., Simits. S., Rydzy W. The settlement of labour disputes in theFederal Republic of Germany. Industrial conflict resolution in market economies, 2nded.
Ed. by T. Hanami and R. Blanpain. Deventer, 1989.550. Weng Wen. Labor Disputes Skyrocket in Beijing. China Daily, 2009. P.25.551. Weiss M. Labour law and industrial relations in the Federal Republic ofGermany. Deventer, 1987.552. Weiss M. The interface between Constitution and labor law in Germany.Comparative labor law and policy journal.
