Диссертация (Оптимизация хирургического лечения и реабилитации больных с переломами проксимального отдела бедренной кости (клинико-экспериментальное исследование)), страница 39
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Оптимизация хирургического лечения и реабилитации больных с переломами проксимального отдела бедренной кости (клинико-экспериментальное исследование)". PDF-файл из архива "Оптимизация хирургического лечения и реабилитации больных с переломами проксимального отдела бедренной кости (клинико-экспериментальное исследование)", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "медицина" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве РУДН. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с РУДН, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора медицинских наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 39 страницы из PDF
Chie, R.S. Yang, J.P. Liu [et al.] // Osteoporos Int. –2004. – Vol. 15, № 12. – P. 998-1002.205. Holtzer, S. Anesthesia risks / S. Holtzer, J. Marty // Rev. Prat. 2001. – Vol. 51, №8. – Р. 851-858206. Increased Risk of Major Depression in the Three Years following a Femoral NeckFracture–A National Population-Based Follow-Up Study [Electronic resource] /248Chih-Yu Chang , Wen-Liang Chen, Yi-Fan Liou [et al.] // PLoS One. – 2014.
–Vol.9.–оfModeaccess:http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089867.207. Influence of rehabilitation site on hip fracture recovery in community dwellingsubjects at 6-month follow-up / M.C. Munin, A. Begley, E.R. Skidmore, E.J.Lenze // Arch Phys. Med. Rehabil. – 2006. – Vol. 87, № 7. – P. 1004-1006.208. Intramedullary strut substitution and impaction allografting cemented revision forthe treatment of a periprosthetic fracture in a severely compromised femur / E.Tsiridis, A.A. Narvani, J.
Charity [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2007. – Vol. 22, № 2.– P. 277-282.209. Jackman, J.M. New techniques in hip fracture management] / J.M. Jackman // MoMed. – 2005. – Vol. 102, № 3. – P. 231-235.210. Jordan R. W. и др. A Comparison of Mortality following Distal Femoral Fracturesand Hip Fractures in an Elderly Population [Electronic resource] / R. W. Jordan, G.S.Chahal,M.Davies,K.Srinivas–Modeofaccess:http://www.hindawi.com/journals/aos/2014/873785/211. Keany James E., Femur Fracture [Electronic resource] / James E. Keany, DekkerMcKeever – Mode of access:http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/824856-overview212. Keating, J.F. Randomaized Comparision of reduction and fixation, BipolarHemiartroplasty and Total Hip Artroplasty Treatment of displaced intracapsularhip fractures in healthy older patients / J.F.
Keating, A.Grant, M.Masson // J. BoneJt. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 88-A, №2. – Р.249-260.213. Kishimoto, H. Surgical treatment for proximal femoral fracture in osteoporosis / H.Kishimoto // Nippon Rinsho. – 2006. – Vol. 64, № 9. – P. 1676-1680.214. Knipe Henry, Gaillard Frank Femoral Neck Fracture [Electronic resource] / HenryKnipe, Frank Gaillard – Mode of access: http://radiopaedia.org/articles/femoralneck-fracture249215. Langslet, E.Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoralneck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial / E. Langslet, F.
Frihagen, V.Opland et al. // Clin Orthop Relat Res. – 2014. – Apr; 472(4). – Р.1291-1299.216. Leczenie zlaman blizszej czesci kosci udowej przy pomocy ryglowanych pretowsrodszpikowych / J. Gagala, R. Kolodziej, J. Blacha [et al.] // Chir.
NarzadowRuchu Ortop. Pol. – 2006. – Bd. 71, № 3. – S. 211-215.217. Lobov, M. Perioperative prevention of early cognitive dysfunction in children / M.Lobov, A. Knyazev, A. Ovezov, et al. // Intensive Care Medicine. 2010; 36 (Suppl.2). – Р. 276.218. Management of young femoral neck fractures: is there a consensus? / G.P.Slobogean, S.A. Sprague, T. Scott [et al.] // Injury. – 2015.
– Vol. 46(3). – P. 43540.219. Marsland D, Mears Simon, A Review of Periprosthetic Femoral FracturesAssociated With Total Hip Arthroplasty [Electronic resource] / Daniel Marsland,SimonC.Mears–Modeofaccess:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598446/220. Melton, L.J. Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow / L.J.
Melton// Bone. – 2002. – 14 Suppl 1: S1 – Р. 8.221. Menezes, D.F. Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of alltrochanteric fractures? / D.F. Menezes, A. Gamulin, B. Noesberger // Clin. Orthop.Relat. Res. – 2005. – № 439. – P. 221–227.222. Monk, T.G.
Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery/T.G. Monk, B.C. Weldon, C.W. Garvan et al. // Anesthesiology. – 2008. –Vol.108. – Р.18-30.223. Operative delay for fracture of the hip: a two-centre prospective study / N. VonMeibom, N. Gilson, A. Dhapre [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. – 2007. – Vol. 89,№ 1. – P. 77-79.224. Osteosyntheses mini vulnerantes du femur proximal: quels enjeux pour lesfractures du sujet age / F.
Langlais, P. Burdin, M. Ropars [et al.] // Bull Acad.Natl. Med. – 2005. – Vol. l89, № 7. – P. 1399-1412.250225. Outcome following proximal femoral fracture in Northern Ireland / T.R. Beringer,J. Clarke, J.R. Elliott [et al.] // Ulster Med. J. – 2006. – Vol. 75, № 3.
– P. 200-206.226. Palm, H. Operativ behandling af hoftenaere femurfrakturer / H. Palm, M.Krasheninnikoff, S. Jacobsen // Ugeskr Laeger. – 2006. – Vol. l68, № 35. – P.2891-2896.227. Patel, S.H. Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence ofosteoporosis / S.H. Patel, K.P. Murphy // Skeletal RadioL. – 2006. – Vol. 35, № 4.– P. 202-211.228. Patients with femoral or distal forearm fracture in Germany: a prospectiveobservational study on health care situation and outcome / H.G.
Endres, B. Dasch,M. Lungenhausen [et al.] // BMC Public Health. – 2006. – Vol. 6. – P. 87.229. Patron, M.S. Proximal femoral geometry and hip fractures / M.S. Patron, R.A.Duthie, A.G. Sutherland // Acta Orthop. Belg. – 2006. – Vol. 72, № l. – P. 51-54.230. Peritrochanteric fractures treated with the Fixion expandable proximal femoralnail: technical note and report of early results / Y. Folman, N.
Ron, S. Shabat [etal.] // Arch Orthop. Trauma Surg. – 2006. – Vol. l26, № 3. – P. 211-214.231. Pingle J. Transfracture abduction osteotomy: A solution for nonunion of femoralneck fractures / J. Pingle // Indian J Orthop. – 2014. – Jan. – Vol. 48(1). – P.25-29.232. Pipino F. Bone cement and cemented fixation of implants / F.Pipino. – Zenit, 2001.– 224 p.233. Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail / J. Windolf,D.A. Hollander, M. Hakimi [et al.] // Langenbecks Arch Surg. – 2005.
– Vol. 390,№ l. – P. 59-65.234. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models / J.H.Keyak, T.S. Kaneko, J. Tehranzadeh [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2005. –№ 437. – P. 219-228.235. Preoperative characteristics identify patients with hip fractures at risk oftransfusion / M.F. Dillon, D. Collins, J. Rice [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
–2005. – № 439. – P. 201-206.251236. Prognosis of proximal femoral fracture in patients aged 90 years and older / T.Hagino, S. Maekawa, E. Sato [et al.] // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). – 2006. –Vol. 14, № 2. – P. 122-126.237. Proximal femoral fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis / K. Arai, M.Hoshino, T. Murai [et al.] // Mod. Rheumatol. – 2007. – Vol. l7, № 4. – P. 317321.238. Proximal fracture of the femur in elderly patients. The influence of surgical careand patient characteristics on post-operative mortality / F.
Geiger [et al.] //Orthopflde. – 2006. – Vol. 35, № 6. – P. 651-657.239. Randomized Trial of Hemiarthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Femoral NeckFractures: No Differences at 6 Years [Electronic resource] / Ragnhild ØydnaStøen, C.M. Lofthus, L. Nordsletten // Clin Orthop Relat Res. – 2014.
– Vol.472(1).–P.360–367.–Modeоfaccess:http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3889441.240. Rasmussen, L.S. The assessment of postoperative cognitive function / L.S.Rasmussen, K. Larsen, P. Houx et al. ISPOCD group // Acta Anaesth Scand. –2001. – № 45. – Р. 275-289.241. Recovery after hip fracture / S.I. Umarji, B.J.
Lankester, D. Prothero [et al.] //Injury. – 2006. – Vol. 37, № 8. – P. 712-717.242. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom cementless stem with distal crosslocking screws. Early results in femora with large proximal segmental deficiencies/ N.
Sotereanos, J. Sewecke, G.J. Raukar [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2006.– Vol. 88, № 5. – P. 1079-1084.243. Risk of hip fracture after bisphosphonate discontinuation: implication for a drugholiday / J.R. Curtis [et al.] // J. Osteoporosis Int. – 2008. – Vol. 19. – P. 16131620.244. Romeo Nicholas M., Deitch John R., DiPasquale Thomas G. Femur Injuries andFractures [Electronic resource] / Nicholas M. Romeo, John R.
Deitch, Thomas G.DiPasquale. – Mode of access:overviewhttp://emedicine.medscape.com/article/90779-252245. Said, G.Z. An irreducible variant of intertrochanteric fractures: a technique foropen reduction / G.Z. Said, O. Farouk, H.G. Said // Injury. – 2005. – Vol. 36, № 7.– P. 871-874.246. Shimon V.M. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic fractured neck of femurfemoral fractures in elderly patients / V.M. Shimon, V.V.
Litvak, M.V. Shimon //Травма. – 2014. – Т. 15, № 6. – С. 114-116.247. Shortt, N.L. Mortality after low-energy fractures in patients aged at least 45 yearsold / N.L. Shortt, C.M. Robinson // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2005. – Vol. 19, № 6. – P.396-400.248. Simpson, A.H.R.W. The role of growth factors and related agents in acceleratingftacture healing / A.H.R.W. Simpson, L. Mills, B. Noble // J. Bone Jt. Surg.
–2006. – Vol. 88-B, № 6. – P. 701-705.249. Smektala, R. Trochanteric femur fractures — analysis of external quality assurancewithin a comprehensive survey / R. Smektala, H. Klaus, S. Paech // Z. Arztl.Fortbild. Qualitatssich. – 2005. – Bd. 99, № 9. – S. 537-545.250. Somashekar, В. Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Unipolar Versus BipolarHemiarthroplasty/ В. Somashekar, Sathya V. Krishna, J.N. Sridhara Murthy.
//Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. – 2013. – Vol 7. – Р. 6-11.251. Stiehl, J.B. Extended osteotomy for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hiparthroplasty / J.B. Stiehl // Am. J. Orthop. – 2006. – Vol. 35, № l. – P. 20-23.252. Stress-strain state of the proximal femur with cavity defect (focus of fibrousdysplasia) in osteosynthesis with different types of fixation devices / I.A.
Lazarev,Yu. M. Huk [et all] // Травма. – 2015. – Т. 16, № 3. – С. 62-70.253. Su E.P. Femoral neck fractures: a changing paradigm [Electronic resource] / E.P.Su, S.L. Su // Bone Joint J. – 2014. – Vol. 96-B, Suppl. A. – P. 43-7. – Mode оfaccess: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25381407.254. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength / J.H.Keyak, T.S.
Kaneko, H.B. Skinner [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2007. – №459. – P. 139-145.253255. Thein, R. Osteosynthesis of unstable intracapsular femoral neck fracture bydynamic locking plate or screw fixation: early results / R. Thein, A. Herman, P.Kedem, A. Chechik, N. Shazar // J Orthop Trauma.
– 2014. – Feb; 28(2). – Р.7076.256. Tong J. Gan. Guidelines for the management of PONV // Anesth&Analg. – 2007.Vol. 105. – P. 1615-1628.257. Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures using a cementless taperedfemoral stem / G.R. Klein, J. Parvizi, D.N. Vegari [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2006.– Vol. 21, № 8. – P. 1134-1140. 164258. Tramer N.R. Treatment of postoperative nase and vomiting // BMJ. – 2003.
– Vol.327. – P.762-763.259. Treatment of neglected femoral neck fracture / Anil K. Jain, R. Mukunth [et all] //Indian J Orthop. – 2015. – Vol. 49(1). – P. 17-27.260. Treatment of unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures using a 95 degrees angledblade plate / M.C. Yoo, Y.J. Cho, K.I. Kim [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2005. –Vol.